Top Stories Daily Listen Now
RawStory
RawStory

All posts tagged "iran"

Mockery erupts over Trump's 'confused ramblings' on rejecting war-ending deal

Critics mocked President Donald Trump's defense of rejecting Iran's ceasefire proposal, which he said would reopen a strait he claims to already control.

Trump made the remarks Saturday while speaking with reporters as he departed the White House, telling them he had turned down Tehran's latest offer because it would open the Strait of Hormuz right away.

"I'm rejecting their deal," Trump said. "They want to make a deal where they open the strait immediately...we're winning tremendously. We have total control of the Hormuz Strait...that deal would not be acceptable."

Trump argued Iran was pushing to reopen the waterway because it was "losing so badly" and had no money coming in. He claimed the U.S. had put up "the greatest blockade ever in military history," which he called "a wall of steel," and said 29 ships had come out of the strait the night before.

"They outsmarted themselves," Trump said, claiming Iran closed the strait to "cause a problem for the world" only for the U.S. to close it on them.

The explanation quickly drew ridicule online.

"The confused ramblings of a man who has no plan," wrote Matthew Boedy, a University of North Georgia professor.

Gregg Carlstrom, the Middle East correspondent for The Economist, pointed out that Trump was effectively rejecting a deal that would bring down gas prices, calling it "curious domestic messaging." He added that he suspected "this probably gives a boost to the officials in Tehran arguing in favor of escalation."

HuffPost senior White House correspondent S.V. Dáte similarly noted that Trump "is rejecting a deal that would immediately open the straits and lower oil prices."

Economist Dean Baker, co-founder of the Center for Economic and Policy Research, asked, "Since Trump has total control over the Strait, why is he letting so little oil through?"

Author and journalist Nina Burleigh dubbed the approach "Dr. Seuss diplomacy."

Trump preparing for fresh bombing offensive on Iran after the midterms: WSJ

President Trump has turned down a proposed pause in fighting with Iran and confided to aides that he anticipates striking the country again once this fall's midterm elections have concluded, the Wall Street Journal reported.

The rejected offer came out of weekend talks in Qatar, where Iranian representatives suggested a seven-day halt to hostilities that would have seen Tehran reopen a critical shipping waterway and resume nuclear discussions, contingent on Washington easing its economic squeeze on the country, including its naval presence blocking Iranian ports. Trump maintains publicly that Iran will ultimately have no choice but to accept a deal once the election passes, but sources say he harbors real doubts Tehran will cooperate and has already signaled to staff that renewed airstrikes feel like the more probable path forward.

Just how extensive any future strikes might be is still uncertain. Sources describe a president torn between wanting to preserve limited weapons stockpiles for other potential flashpoints and a pattern of threatening dramatic military action whenever talks stall, threats he's historically walked back from at the last moment.

Speaking at the United Nations General Assembly this week, Trump insisted electoral politics play no role in his Iran strategy.

"The Republican Party is running, and I'll be helping them, but I am not running. I gave absolutely no credence and will not give credence through the election when it comes to Iran," Trump said.

Behind the scenes, talks are still ongoing through go-betweens, and one U.S. official credited a successful American operation keeping oil tankers moving safely through the Strait of Hormuz, despite Iranian threats, with easing some of the pressure to rush into an agreement. Washington has made clear to both Tehran and outside negotiators that ending the naval blockade isn't happening anytime soon, calculating that continued financial pain will eventually force Iran's hand on more favorable terms.

Regional go-betweens say Iranian officials have conceded their economy is in serious trouble and put forward several possible frameworks to wind down the conflict.

Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps, effectively controlling the country since February, has pushed back on new arrangements, indicating a willingness to fight indefinitely and preferring instead to revive elements of an earlier framework from June, one built around sanctions relief, unfrozen funds, and some acknowledged Iranian involvement managing the strait once it reopened.

Trump White House branded its own official's words as 'misinformation' in court: report

The White House defended President Donald Trump's Politico ban in court by citing a story built on quotes from its own official.

According to a Wednesday article by The Washington Post, the Trump administration accused Politico of spreading "misinformation" with a report that relied on information that came from a White House official.

"The spread of misinformation, especially relating to national security, is a threat that undermines the President's ability to safeguard the national security," the White House wrote in a letter to Politico. The letter was then used by the Trump administration on Tuesday to respond to a lawsuit by CNN, MS NOW and Politico seeking to undo Trump's media ban.

The letter was one of three the government submitted to justify barring the outlets from the White House grounds. The administration revoked Politico's press passes last week. The letter accused Politico of breaking professional standards, including by relying on unnamed sources and publishing false or classified national security information.

Among Politico's six alleged offenses was a June article about the push to end the war with Iran.

"In June 2026, Politico cited a 'senior administration official...granted anonymity' said the odds of a preliminary deal to end the conflict with Iran were between 80 and 85 percent," the White House letter reads, per The Washington Post.

"Publication of sensitive security information, and misinformation about national security information, diverts White House resources and those of the national security team in particular," the letter continues.

But the official was speaking with the White House's blessing. According to an invitation and a recording reviewed by The Post, the quote came from a press call the Trump administration hosted, where reporters were told to credit a "senior administration official."

A White House aide said at the start of the call, "The contents of this call are on background, attributable to a senior administration official. By remaining on the line, you agree to those terms." The Post reported the contents of the call based on a recording.

After the aide laid out the ground rules, a senior administration official described the odds that were quoted by Politico.

"I think the second thing is we do expect to be signing this agreement over the next few days," the official said. "I can't give you an exact date. And if I were to give you a confidence that we were going to be finding this agreement, I maybe would have said 75 percent this morning. It's probably more like 80, 85 percent now, but it's not 100 percent."

The forecast held up as the United States and Iran announced an agreement days later, The Post noted. The White House did not respond to The Post's request for comment, nor did Politico.

Hegseth 'set the stage' for killing 123 kids with cuts to 'woke' Biden program: report

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth helped "set the stage" for a U.S. strike that killed at least 123 children by slashing former President Joe Biden's civilian protection teams, officials said.

The officials, who are involved in the Pentagon's internal investigation of the Feb. 28 strike on an elementary school in Minab, Iran, described their findings in a Bloomberg report published Friday. They said the investigation's report has been "all-but-complete for several months" but has not been released. The United States has not publicly accepted responsibility for the strike, Bloomberg reported.

Two Tomahawk missiles struck the Shajarah Tayyebeh Elementary School on the first day of the U.S. attack on Iran, killing more than 150 people, including at least 123 children, according to the report.

Bloomberg called it the deadliest U.S. military targeting error of the 21st century in terms of child deaths.

Teachers had moved children from the playground into a prayer room for cover after the first missile hit, according to an account Bloomberg drew from rights advocates and the watchdog group Airwars. Within minutes, a second missile struck, and part of the roof collapsed, and only a few children in the prayer room survived, the account said.

President Donald Trump's administration demanded an overwhelming air assault in the final days of February, and the officials said that order squeezed the time available to finalize targets.

That urgency, combined with gaps in information about the site, "cuts in civilian-protection personnel" and an overreliance on artificial intelligence, "set the stage for the deadly error," they told Bloomberg.

Officials involved in the probe pointed to "gaps … left after Hegseth dismantled" most of the Pentagon's civilian harm mitigation units, Bloomberg reported.

Staffing across those teams fell roughly 90% to fewer than 20 people, and the team at U.S. Central Command, which carried out the strike, shrank from 10 people to one, people with direct knowledge told Bloomberg.

No member of those teams reviewed the Minab site before the strike, the officials said, partly because of the staffing cuts and partly because of a decision to leave the group out of planning. Those reviews map civilians near a target and look for lower-risk ways to strike it, according to the report, though Bloomberg said it is unclear whether one would have raised questions about the school.

The Biden administration had built up the civilian protection efforts after an August 2021 drone strike in Kabul, Afghanistan, killed 10 civilians when U.S. forces mistook an aid worker for a threat, the outlet reported.

Hegseth announced a shift in Pentagon spending in a February 2025 video on X, saying $50 billion would be redirected toward new priorities, Agence France-Presse reported.

"We will move away from woke, Biden-era, non-lethal programs, and instead spend that money on President Trump's America First, peace through strength, priorities," Hegseth said.

The Pentagon's civilian harm mitigation plan and its Civilian Protection Center of Excellence were tagged for elimination under that push, the national security publication War on the Rocks reported the following month. Bloomberg reported that Hegseth has described his cuts to those efforts in the same terms.

In past conflicts, preparing lists of proposed targets "had taken hours for staffers to complete," according to the report.

Before the Iran attack, much of that work was "condensed into several minutes" using Maven Smart System, an artificial intelligence tool made by Palantir Technologies, people involved in the review told Bloomberg.

A Palantir spokesperson told Bloomberg there is no evidence the company's software was at fault in the Minab strike.

"America, regardless of what so-called international institutions say, is unleashing the most lethal and precise air power campaign in history," Hegseth told reporters on March 2, two days after the strike. "All on our terms with maximum authorities. No stupid rules of engagement, no nation-building quagmire, no democracy building exercise, no politically correct wars."

On Thursday, United Nations investigators said there were reasonable grounds to conclude that the Minab strike and another U.S. attack that day amounted to war crimes, Bloomberg reported.

The Pentagon declined to comment beyond saying the incident remains under investigation, and a senior administration official also cited the probe, according to the report.

"The United States does not target civilians," the official added.

Rep. Thomas Massie, a Kentucky Republican, cited the Minab strike on Tuesday when he filed eight articles of impeachment against Hegseth, accusing him of "ignoring laws that minimize civilian casualties," Truthout reported.

"By directing the Department of Defense in a manner that foreseeably dismantled the safeguards necessary to distinguish civilian objects from military objectives, Secretary Hegseth thereby effected the murder of civilians," one article says.

House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) sent members home early on Wednesday for a seven-week campaign recess before the midterm elections, CNN reported. Massie's resolution had started a clock requiring a vote within days, but the early exit pushes that vote to November.

Johnson said the early exit had nothing to do with Hegseth, according to CNN.

"It is a publicity stunt by someone who wants attention. It will immediately be tabled of course," the speaker said, referring to a procedural vote that would set the articles aside without debate. "But we probably won't do that today, we will do it when we come back."

"We should not be playing games with national security," Johnson added.

Trump dangles new midterm bribe in exchange for GOP victory: 'I'll take care of business'

In the latest batch of clips released from President Donald Trump's interview with Laura Ingraham, the president appeared to suggest he'd lose his temper and do away with all restraints against Iran if Republicans lose the midterm elections.

The remark came in the middle of a segment in which Ingraham pressed him about his trade war with Canada.

"Companies are moving into the United States, they're all leaving Canada, they're coming here," said Trump. "The Canada thing is amazing, they've been ripping us off for years."

"He's trying to wait out the midterms as well, isn't he?" asked Ingraham, referring to Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney.

"Well, I think a lot of people are," said Trump. "So Iran's, as soon as they're — by the way, the war will end right after the midterms."

"If Republicans win," said Ingraham. "But if Republicans lose in the midterms, why would the Iran war end?"

"Well, I think a lot of people think if we lose, I’ll be much more angry and I’ll just take care of business, you know? It's another way of doing it, you know. Either way they lose."

Trump has also tried to dangle the promise of $5,000 checks for every U.S. adult if Republicans retain control of Congress this fall — a promise many observers have likened to voter bribery.

Pentagon caught purging decades of classified docs after generals' warnings leak: WaPo

Anonymous insiders told The Washington Post that the Pentagon scrubbed decades of classified documents following a story about senior military officials' warnings about Iran.

In a Wednesday article, The Post revealed that the Pentagon pulled decades' worth of classified documents from a secret computer system that is commonly used by defense officials and U.S. troops. Insiders tipped The Post off following a story on Sunday about several top generals and admirals cautioning Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth about the risks of extending a war with Iran.

The documents were removed from the internal web portal on the Secret Internet Protocol Router Network (SIPRNet), according to three anonymous insiders who spoke to The Post. SIPRNet contains information that is labeled 'secret,' while top-secret information is put on other highly classified networks where fewer people have access, according to The Post.

Insiders told The Post that the documents were associated with the Secretary of Defense Orders Book (SDOB), which details the location and availability of U.S. warships, military units, weapons systems, and other resources. The SDOB also gives top generals and admirals a forum in which they can disagree with President Donald Trump and Hegseth while still carrying out their orders, The Post noted.

SDOB provides a "non-concurring" process where top generals and admirals can explain any reservations or disagreements they have with the orders or describe the detrimental effects of those orders on other military plans.

The Post noted that the SDOB became the "focus of intense discussion" after a story detailing how top generals and admirals told Hegseth that a prolonged, large-scale conflict against Iran is unsustainable. Those senior military officials also told Hegseth that operations against Iran risked weakening their ability to confront threats elsewhere.

Those warnings from senior military officials appeared in an August 14 edition of the SDOB, according to The Post.

Sean Parnell, a Pentagon spokesman, declined to discuss the removal of the classified documents with The Post, saying, "The Department of War does not publicly discuss internal operational deliberative processes," and "the success of our service members is Secretary Hegseth's top priority."

Scott Jennings reduced to stammering as he's forced to eat his Trump defense

Conservative political commentator Scott Jennings found himself stammering as an entire CNN panel turned on his argument that the Iran war is won.

During a Thursday appearance on CNN's NewsNight, Jennings tried to defend President Donald Trump's "mission accomplished" declaration. Other members of the panel, including former White House GOP staffer Sarah Matthews and pollster and Democratic political strategist Joshua Doss, argued that Iran still has nuclear ambitions and is emboldened after the war.

"Their economy is in freefall. They have hyperinflation. Their leader is a cardboard cutout," Jennings said about Iran when Doss argued that Iran is emboldened.

"They're not emboldened," Jennings said. "The economic stranglehold we have on them has not emboldened anybody."

Trump has similarly argued that Iran is weakened by the war in Iran and has repeatedly declared that Iran is losing the war. However, Trump has not been able to strike a deal with Iran that ends the hostilities.

"Then why won't they make a deal?" CNN anchor Abby Phillip asked as Jennings argued that Iran is not emboldened.

"Because they're religious fanatics who are trying to bring about the end of the world," Jennings said.

"Then you're agreeing with Josh," Phillip pointed out, making the argument that Jennings is saying Iran is emboldened enough to reject negotiations with Trump. Phillip also told Jennings he was arguing that Iran is the same despite Trump's war, suggesting it didn't accomplish anything.

Jennings responded to Phillip by shaking his head and asking, "About what?"

"Josh just said that Iran is emboldened. The regime is the same. They are now back against the wall," Phillip said. "You just confirmed that they're religious fanatics, so you're saying nothing has really changed."

Jennings responded by stammering and looking down as he tried to regroup. "Well, I mean, I-I-I have argued from the beginning it was going to be near impossible to make a deal with religious fanatics," Jennings pivoted.

Meanwhile, Matthews yelled out, "So, mission accomplished?" as Jennings tried to save face.

'What do you think he meant?' Pentagon insider fears Trump will drop a nuke

President Donald Trump's hardening stance on Iran has rattled even senior Republican officials and generals in his own Department of Defense, with one calling him "a madman who can't be trusted," according to an insider.

Veteran White House reporter Brian Karem, in a report for Raw America, identified how Trump has been weighing using nuclear weapons against Iran over the past two months.

"One unnamed Pentagon official confided to Raw America that the president’s threat that 'a whole civilization will die tonight, never to be brought back again,' which he posted to his Truth Social early last month, was seen as particularly alarming within the DoD," Karem wrote.

"After what Trump said back in July, everyone should have known this is on the table," the Pentagon official told Raw America. "What do you think he meant by that?"

The comments follow a chilling statement from former Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA). The former Trump MAGA ally claimed in a post on X Sunday that the president discussed the possibility of using nuclear weapons against Iran in recent strategy meetings and called him "pure evil."

Greene argued that Iran was "nowhere near creating a nuclear weapon," and that the U.S. military had "killed their leaders and innocent little children in a school, and Iran has controlled the Strait of Hormuz ever since and punished the region for their part in it."

"And now our government is the one actually discussing lowering the nuclear threshold in order to use nuclear weapons against Iran even though Trump claims he’s won the war like 40 times and says the U.S. controls the [Strait of Hormuz]," Greene wrote.

She described why that was so troubling.

"Trump promised no more foreign wars, but may actually be the one who delivers a nuclear holocaust that would likely drag the entire world into major conflict, economic depression, and mass human suffering we’ve never seen in our lifetimes and maybe throughout history," Greene added.

Jake Tapper rolls clip of 'pooh-poohing' Trump tailor-made for Dem attack ad

CNN anchor Jake Tapper highlighted a moment from President Donald Trump's speech on Friday that could serve as an attack ad for Democrats ahead of the midterms.

Trump said he would "never apologize" for higher gas prices even though Americans are struggling to pay for rising costs at the pump during a speech at the David S. Mack Center for Training and Intelligence in Garden City, New York. Trump touted his crackdown on crime and the ongoing Iran war at a campaign rally with Republican gubernatorial candidate and Nassau County Executive Bruce Blakeman.

Tapper commented on the president's remarks.

"So I have to say that is made for a Democratic attack ad, not all of it, not the part about Iran and the nukes, but for you to pay a little bit more for the gasoline cut to, 'you're at $4. It's OK. I'll never apologize. I did the right thing,'" Tapper said.

Matt Mowers, former senior White House adviser during Trump's first administration, argued Trump was defending his decision to launch a joint military operation with Israel against Iran.

"I think it's explaining the cost of conflict, right?" Mowers said. "What he's now doing is saying there is a reason that we are all paying more for [gas] right now. What he didn't do, and I think this was actually smart politically, is he didn't try to say, 'well, it's actually not that high.' He didn't try to pooh-pooh it. He didn't try to dismiss concerns."

Tapper pushed back.

"He said a little bit more. That's kind of a pooh-pooh," Tapper said.

Tapper added that Trump's statement might not be popular among the GOP.

"It's probably not the message that Republican candidates want the president to be saying, with only 80-something days until the midterms," Tapper said.

Strait of Hormuz to become US territory 'pretty soon': Trump

President Donald Trump said he would declare the Strait of Hormuz as a United States territory during a speech on Friday.

Trump was speaking at the David S. Mack Center for Training and Intelligence in Garden City, New York, where he was touting his crackdown on crime and campaigning at a rally with Republican gubernatorial candidate and Nassau County Executive Bruce Blakeman.

He claimed Iran was "being badly defeated."

"Pretty soon I'll be declaring the Hormuz Strait a territory of the United States," Trump said.