Top Stories Daily Listen Now
RawStory
RawStory

All posts tagged "stephen miller"

Chances of Pam Bondi going to jail grows 'exponentially daily': ex-White House reporter

An analyst Friday predicted that it's likely White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller and Attorney General Pam Bondi will spend time behind bars.

In an opinion piece for Salon, White House columnist Brian Karem described how the Trump administration has viewed President Donald Trump falling "further into delusion" and what could happen next following his "Mean Don" remarks at the World Economic Forum at Davos, Switzerland, and "word-salad monologue" at the White House press briefing room to mark his first year since his second inauguration. The change from Trump in his first administration to Trump 2.0 is noticeably different — and the people backing him could ultimately be the people he turns against.

"That Trump was more cogent and could read a room a lot better than the current version, leading one to wonder if he’s just fronting for the worst instincts of people who work for him who have far darker visions of America than even he does," Karem wrote. "Yes, I’m talking about Stephen Miller. He’s practically the deputy president right now, and every action taken by Immigration and Customs Enforcement is apparently organized, orchestrated and implemented by him. I wouldn’t be surprised if Miller was in charge of the president’s vitamin E injections."

Miller's influence has only grown, as has Vice President JD Vance's sway.

"Trump is quickly becoming irrelevant to the MAGA movement," Karem wrote. "Peter Thiel’s surrogate is warming up in the bullpen, which is a potentially worse scenario than having Trump for the next 1094 days."

What Trump has done in the past could reflect what he does in the future, including who stays or goes, and whether his inner circle will remain. Karem argued that he could turn on his closest advisers, simply because he has done it before.

"The question isn’t whether we have had enough of Donald Trump. The question is what will Donald Trump do when he finally realizes that? If what Trump did to Michael Cohen is any indication, the chances of Stephen Miller, Pam Bondi and others spending time behind bars grow exponentially daily," Karem wrote. "The president knows no loyalty. If he believes it would be better to throw his confidants under a bus, his past actions show he will do so eagerly. Maybe the Democrats, along with some Republicans, should try to convince him to flush a few."

Trump aides 'quietly whispering in his ear' as dream scenario seen in MN chaos: analysts

Stephen Miller is pushing Donald Trump to create further complications in Minneapolis, a political analyst has claimed.

Speaking on The Daily Blast, both Greg Sargent and Mother Jones columnist Mark Follman believe the president could be swayed into invoking the Insurrection Act. The law gives the president the power to deploy the US Armed Forces and National Guard in individual states. Whether Trump uses this law in Minneapolis just weeks after the ICE shooting of Renee Good is yet to be seen.

But analysts like Sargent and Follman believe Miller is orchestrating a push for Trump to use the act. Sargent said, "I think the way I would put that is that they think the supercharging of all these violent tensions and malignancies among Americans, among ethnic group against ethnic group, American against American, creates the conditions for their type of politics to take hold.

"I don’t know whether Trump really thinks it through that way, but I’m reasonably certain that Stephen Miller very much does. At bottom though, I think Miller clearly wants Trump to invoke the Insurrection Act.

"I’m not in his head, as you say, but I’m pretty sure that he is quietly whispering in Donald Trump’s ear that the time has come to invoke it. And so you can hear in Miller’s rhetoric, he uses all sorts of language that really is deeply kind of shaped around the idea of getting Trump to that place.

"And he’s trying to get Trump to invoke it, and Trump hasn’t done it yet, but it is something that Miller wants and he thinks this sort of turmoil creates the conditions for that."

Follman agreed, suggesting the Insurrection Act would do little to curb rising tensions in the area. He added, " I think that it is a very serious possibility and something that Miller and others around Trump perhaps want to see happen, really ultimately, I think, as a furtherance of maximizing his power and his control, this idea of maximizing the unitary executive theory that Trump’s in charge.

"And so using the Insurrection Act would be another expression of that predicated on, I think, this kind of rising tension and violence and chaos that we’re seeing, largely perpetrated by the operations that they’re carrying out with ICE."

'What the hell?' CNN conservative astounded by Stephen Miller's wild claims

Conservative commentator Jonah Goldberg had a sharp response Monday to White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller's unfounded claims that local and state police should "stand down" and "surrender" to ICE agents.

Goldberg was on a CNN panel responding to Miller's comments on X that alleged police in Minneapolis — where ICE agent Jonathan Ross shot and killed mother Renee Good in her car this month — have allowed protesters to do whatever they want.

"First of all, on the Stephen Miller thing, I've read the Constitution a couple of times. Nowhere in there does it say that the White House deputy chief of staff can order local law enforcement in a sovereign state to do — I almost cursed — anything, and it's all not like maybe I missed some reporting that there has been some order or request made from federal authorities," Goldberg said.

Miller, the architect of the Trump administration's aggressive immigration policy, has argued that local law enforcement hasn't cooperated with federal law enforcement — a baseless statement.

"But like the president, never mind the White House chief of staff doesn't get to tell local law enforcement officers to lay down their weapons and surrender. I don't know what the hell that means," Goldberg added.

Stephen Miller ridiculed after his 'moronic' comment seen as permission to 'beat him up'

White House deputy chief of staff for policy Stephen Miller was ridiculed over the weekend after one of his interview answers was seen as an argument in favor of beating him up.

Miller went on Fox News on Friday, where he was discussing Denmark and Trump's desire to seize Greenland.

"Denmark is a tiny country with a tiny economy and a tiny military. They cannot defend Greenland… Under every understanding of law that has existed about territorial control for 500 years, to control a territory you have to be able to defend a territory," the Trump insider said.

But that didn't sit well with observers, many of whom pointed out how antiquated the logic was.

One prominent responder was fellow Republican, Rep. Don Bacon, who chimed in, "This is 1890s thinking. He evidently doesn’t know about WW2 and the Cold War, and America’s role. Might does not make right. Right makes might."

Journalist David Phinney simply asked, "WTF is he talking about?"

Former Pentagon insider Jim Townsend said, "Miller misses the point that Greenland is defended by NATO, not just by Denmark. If Russia or China were to threaten Greenland they would have 32 nations, including the US, come to its defense."

Ex-prosecutor Ron Filipkowski added, "This guy is basically inviting China to take Taiwan. Our government is in the hands of psychotic morons."

Political commentator Alicia Smith chimed in, "Denmark is a strong NATO ally and if Greenland was attacked, NATO would defend U.S. has a military presence there not to defend for free, but because Denmark is a strong ally and agreed to allow us to have a presence in the arctic. Just a complete backwards view of the world."

Author John Fugelsang noted, "Stephen Miller gives the moral-logic argument for bigger, stronger men to beat up Stephen Miller and take his stuff."

Here's what ICE is really doing in Minneapolis — and it's not enforcing the law

This week, Mayor Jacob Frey basically took a Fox “News” host down, pointing out that Trump’s own federal prosecutors just quit their jobs rather than investigate and prosecute Renee Nicole Good’s wife for “domestic terrorism.”

Which raises the question: what is ICE really doing in Minneapolis?

Well over a decade ago, the very Anglo daughter of a friend of mine fell in love with a Hispanic fellow who owned a Mexican restaurant he’d started in her little northern midwestern town. They got married, she got pregnant, and everybody in the family was delighted. Until the feds visited the restaurant and discovered her new husband wasn’t a US citizen and had no legal permission to be here in the country.

This was during the Obama administration. The feds were unfailingly polite. They told him he had a certain amount of time to get his affairs in order but within that period of time he must leave the country, return to Mexico, and apply for asylum or a visa from there. Those were the rules.

Nobody showed up to kick in the front door of their home. Nobody from the government was wearing a mask. No swearing, no threats, no guns, no tear gas, no pepper spray, no hitting his car with theirs or beating either of them to the ground. They merely told him he had to leave and served him with the appropriate paperwork, just like they do in most other democratic countries.

At that time, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) had been a guest on my radio/TV show every Friday for about a decade, and we got his office involved, trying to intervene in their case, but the feds were emphatic: he wasn’t here legally and he had to leave. So, after a short time to organize their things and finances, the two of them got on a commercial plane and flew to Mexico, where they both live to this day.

We’ve been enforcing immigration laws since the 1920s in America, and never before have we needed an armed force with a larger budget than the FBI or the Marine Corps to pull it off. And we’ve deported a hell of a lot of people:

Syracuse University’s TRAC data attribute more than 3.1 million deportations over Barack Obama’s eight years, with a peak of over 407,000 removals in FY 2012.
By comparison, the first Trump administration (2017–2020) carried out fewer than about 932,000 deportations total, peaking at roughly 269,000 removals in 2019.
After Trump’s return to office last year, ICE reported about 290,000 removals through late 2025 and mid‑FY 2026, which is still far below Obama’s cumulative total.

In other words, Obama deported more “illegals” than Trump in any year, including last year with ICE going full force, and he did it with courtesy and the law. No masks or guns, no people being shot, no cars being chased and rammed.

As you can see, today’s ICE violence is not primarily about enforcing the immigration laws or ridding the country of undocumented persons.

Similarly, never before have we had immigration agents “investigating fraud” as a bullshit premise for terrorizing an entire community. The way they convicted Donald Trump of 34 counts of criminal felony fraud wasn’t with guys with masks and guns; it was a small army of accountants pouring through his financial records.

Never before in modern history have we had a president and vice president characterize an ethnic community in such terms as “eating your dogs and cats,” as “criminals,” as “garbage,” as an “other.”

Never before — other than the Klan in the post-Reconstruction era — have we had agents of the state deputized and authorized to use deadly force who conceal their identities and then ran amok to terrorize entire American cities.

That last point is the key to understanding what’s going on. ICE isn’t in Minneapolis, Portland, Chicago, Los Angeles, San Francisco, or any other Blue city to merely enforce our immigration laws. We already know how to do that, as we’ve been doing it successfully for 101 years and never before needed violent masked thugs to make it happen.

No, these people are in these cities for a singular purpose: to spread terror. This is Trump’s own personal Schutzstaffel (SS), a police force answerable only to him who’s principal job is to terrify communities and crush dissent.

Trump, JD Vance, and Stephen Miller have all made it clear that they believe the key to running our country isn’t via the approval of the populace, “the consent of the governed,” but, rather, is to have and use raw, naked power. Violence. Tear gas, tasers, and pepper bullets. The threat of death or imprisonment.

Back in October, Miller said Trump has “plenary authority,” meaning “authority without restrictions.” Ultimate power. Final power. The only real power in the country, at the end of the day.

A few weeks ago, he doubled down, telling CNN's Jake Tapper:

“We live in a world in which you can talk all you want about international niceties and everything else, but we live in a world, in the real world, Jake, that is governed by strength, that is governed by force, that is governed by power. These are the iron laws of the world since the beginning of time.”

John Adams referred to us a “a nation of laws, not men.” The Supreme Court building has “Equal Justice Under Law” carved into its front by the Roosevelt administration in October of 1935. Our founding documents refer to America as a nation where our politicians and police “derive their just powers from the consent of the governed.”

That’s the opposite of what’s happening right now in Minneapolis.

When demagogues and wannabe autocrats set out to seize absolute power in a nation — the way we’ve seen it done, for example, in Russia — they don’t start by rolling tanks down the street or throwing dissidents or writers like me in prison. That comes much later.

Instead, they start by telling the people who they need to fear.

For Putin, it was the Chechens. For Orbán, it was Syrian refugees. For Joe McCarthy, it was communists and socialists. And for Trump, et al, it’s brown and Black people, particularly if they were born in another country.

Once the populace is sufficiently terrified of the “other,” they’ll accept increasing levels of repression in the name of stemming the danger to themselves and their families. Armed agents of the state begin to show up in public places to “enforce law and order,” but their real goal is to terrify people into submission.

This is why Kristi Noem and Pam Bondi are refusing to investigate Renee Good’s murder and instead demanding their federal prosecutors go after her grieving wife. They want not only ICE thugs but everybody in America who may think of challenging them to know that smashing windows, dragging people out of their cars, kicking in their doors, beating them to the ground, and even killing them — all without any legal basis, without a single warrant — are what we can all expect to happen to us if we defy their power.

If ICE’s real mission was to find people in the country without authorization, they wouldn’t be going about it this way; they’d go after undocumented people the way my friend’s daughter’s husband was cornered and deported. Firmly, but politely. With paperwork instead of guns.

It’s becoming increasingly obvious to Americans that when Trump issued National Security Presidential Memorandum-7 (NSPM-7) two months ago, this is what they had in mind. That Memorandum orders the federal police agencies to go after anybody who presents the following “indicia” of potential domestic terrorism:

“[A]nti-Americanism, anti-capitalism, anti-Christianity … extremism on migration, extremism on race, extremism on gender, hostility towards those who hold traditional American views on family, hostility towards those who hold traditional American views on religion, and hostility towards those who hold traditional American views on morality.”

ICE is here to remind us of the awesome power Trump and his lickspittles have to enforce that. Question or, as with Renee Good, taunt a masked ICE thug and it’s clear you’re expressing “extremism.” Your penalty will be violence visited upon you, even death, and when you’re dead, they’ll next come after your family.

This is pure Putin, Orbán, Erdoğan, Xi, and every other tinpot dictator across the planet and throughout history.

It’s why ICE shot a young man in the face, blinding him for the rest of his life, in Santa Ana this week and the feds are refusing to give any information — including the name of the thug who shot 21-year-old Kaden Rummler — to the Santa Ana city or California state police.

It’s why goons in Minneapolis dragged a disabled woman driving to her doctor’s appointment out of her car and assaulted her.

It’s why they deploy tear gas and fire “less lethal” weapons at the slightest provocation.

Yesterday afternoon, doubling down on untouchable state power that lives well above the rule of law, DHS posted the following tweet from Reichsminister für Volksaufklärung und Propaganda Stephen Miller:

“REMINDER. ‘To all ICE officers: You have federal immunity in the conduct of your duties. Anybody who lays a hand on you or tries to stop you or tries to obstruct you is committing a felony. You have immunity to perform your duties, and no one — no city official, no state official, no illegal alien, no leftist agitator or domestic insurrectionist — can prevent you from fulfilling your legal obligations and duties. The Department of Justice has made clear that if officials cross that line into obstruction, into criminal conspiracy against the United States or against ICE officers, then they will face justice.’ @StephenM” (emphasis added)

That message — which is filled with naked lies — is very, very simple: “We have the power. We will use that power. And there’s nothing ‘the little people’ or anybody else can do to stop us. In fact, if you try to stop us, we’ll use that power against you, next.”

Trump is now openly threatening the state of Minnesota with the Insurrection Act, a law that allows a president to deploy the full force of the entire US military directly against the American people.

After a night of confrontations sparked by violent ICE raids in Minneapolis and St. Paul, Trump took to his Nazi-infested social media site to warn that if state and local officials don’t crush protests against his masked federal agents, he will step in with force.

This isn’t bluster or rhetoric. It’s a direct threat to use wartime powers inside the United States to override local government, suppress dissent, and place raw federal violence above the rule of law, something he appears to want so badly he can taste it.

That kind of threat doesn’t belong in a democracy, and it tells us exactly what this administration believes power is for.

This is nothing more or less than state-sponsored terror. And it’s damn well high time that it stop.

Sorry, JD: here's why your masked ICE goons don't have the immunity you claim

The Trump administration is trying to take the world back not just to the Dark Ages, when people were tortured to death for their beliefs, but to the Stone Age when neanderthals with the heaviest clubs held most power. Neanderthals commandeered rare earth minerals fecund hunting grounds from weaker neighbors because they could. But when they came up against more organized, ordered, and civilized Homo Sapiens, they became extinct.

Trump advisor and Neanderthal genetic marker Stephen Miller is on record lusting for the good old days when women were dragged by their hair into the cave. He told CNN during an interview that, “We live in a world, in the real world … that is governed by strength, that is governed by force, that is governed by power. These are the iron laws of the world since the beginning of time.”

He wishes. Shamefully unfamiliar with exalted human histories that produced the Magna Carta, the League of Nations, or the United Nations pact designed to prevent the next Hitler and World War III, Miller added in a later talk that “President Trump’s authority will not be questioned.”

Miller is damaged goods, a lip-snarling, Nazi-adjacent creep born into privilege. When he ran for office in high school, his stump speech claimed the right of all privileged students to litter, to trash the place, because paid staff would clean it up. That was 25 years ago, but people never really change, and Miller is now trying to help Trump re-arrange the world order.

Immunity for ICE agents?

Renee Nicole Good was murdered when one ICE agent shouted for her to “get out of the f------ car,” while another told her to move her car, which she tried to do.

Instead of investigating Good’s murderer, Jonathan Ross, for carrying a gun with PTSD, Trump’s DOJ opened an investigation into Renee Good’s wife — her political contributions, texts and social media posts, her life. MAGA videos of the murder (“Mouthy Dykes get what they Had Coming”) show Good’s wife failing to genuflect or cower in fear, instead suggesting the angry agent go get himself some lunch.

Seconds later, Ross shot Renee three times in the head as she was trying to move her car, then called her a “fucking bitch.” When Trump launched the DOJ investigation this week, six DOJ career officials, including prosecutors, quit in protest.

After Good’s murder, JD Vance engaged in a PR blitz to empower other rogue ICE agents, declaring that they have absolute immunity for murdering people.

Vance and his masked goons need some basic education on the law:

  1. ICE agents are not immune from prosecution for murder or any other crime.
  2. There is no statute of limitations for murder.
  3. Presidents can only pardon for federal crimes, not state crimes, the most serious of which is murder.

Qualified immunity — the theory

Qualified immunity is a legal doctrine created by the U.S. Supreme Court that protects immigration officers from civil liability, but not when they knowingly violate the law. Most importantly, it does not protect federal agents from prosecution under criminal laws.

In 2001, the Supreme Court set out a two-step analysis for qualified immunity:

  1. Whether “the officer’s conduct violated a constitutional right.”
  2. “Whether the right was clearly established” when he acted.

In Good’s case, the constitutional right not to be shot in the face while trying to move one’s car is clear and established.

In less clear cases, what constitutes excessive force turns on policy, practice and the facts of the case. As explained last week, deadly force cannot be used by law enforcement officers in most circumstances. The DOJ deadly force policy, similar to the DHS policy on deadly force, states that deadly force may not be used solely to prevent the escape of a fleeing suspect, and that firearms may not be discharged at a moving vehicle unless a person is threatening the officer with deadly force by means other than the vehicle, and no other means of defense appear to exist, which includes moving out of the path of the vehicle.

In Renee Good’s case, a car slowly rolling away does not pose imminent danger to anyone. Ross didn’t move out of the way, and even continued filming with his cellphone in one hand while he shot Good with the gun in the other. If he’d really “feared for his” life he’d have dropped the damned phone. Calling her a “fucking bitch” immediately after also suggests anger, rather than fear, was the motivator.

There is no statute of limitations on murder, and presidents cannot void state prosecutions

For most crimes, a limited window of time exists in which to charge and pursue a conviction, known as a statute of limitations. The driving theory is that witnesses lose fresh recollections about what happened with the passage of time, and that people — criminals, victims, and witnesses — need to get on with their lives at some point.

Statutes of limitation for state crimes vary across state lines, but in general, serious crimes have shorter limitations, and moderate crimes have medium limits (3-7 years for felonies like assault/burglary). For heinous or very serious crimes like murder, terrorism, or serious sexual offenses, most states have no statute of limitations, which allows prosecution at any time.

Complexity arises in the context of prosecuting federal officials for state crimes. A constitutional principle known as the Supremacy Clause holds that states should not be able to undermine federal policy by using targeted criminal prosecutions. Trump, Vance and Miller are trying to use the Supremacy Clause to give all federal ICE agents a get out of jail card, likely inspired by the Supreme Court ruling that Trump has immunity from prosecution for official acts.

But Trump and Co. are clearly mistaken. Even Trump’s own immunity ruling remains unsettled. Justice Sonia Sotomayor’s dissent opined that, under the majority’s grant of immunity, Trump could order Seal Team Six to assassinate his rivals with impunity, but Samuel Alito and John Roberts pushed back, suggesting that assessment was wrong.

ICE agent Jonathan Ross, who shot Renee Good three times, should, and likely will, be tried for murder. If he is not, ICE will become Trump’s paramilitary force, moving us a giant backward towards Trump/Vance/Miller’s Neanderthalic rule by club, and Good’s murder will surely become precedent for more murders to follow.

  • Sabrina Haake is a columnist and 25+ year federal trial attorney specializing in 1st and 14th A defense. Her Substack, The Haake Take, is free.

'Maggots on roadkill': JD Vance hammered as exploiting MAGA's Minnesota feeding frenzy

A former Republican strategist Tuesday mocked Vice President JD Vance as having a "dead soul," and describing him as "the ultimate code switcher, a shape-shifting wraith."

Rick Wilson, co-founder of the anti-Trump group The Lincoln Project, laid out the argument in his Substack essay that Vance's hopes for a 2028 presidential run have clouded his morality and introduced a "new, more terrifying breed: the post-identity zealot." In the wake of Renee Nicole Good's killing at the hands of an ICE agent in Minneapolis, Vance turned to blaming Good and, in the move, aimed to establish himself as MAGA's next in line.

"It was a formal move in the 2028 electoral sweepstakes, an audition not just for the MAGA base, but a supplication and a bent-knee to the most powerful man in Washington you’ve never seen under direct sunlight or a mirror: Stephen Miller," Wilson wrote.

The decision revealed Vance's ultimate political aspirations after President Donald Trump leaves office, he wrote.

"He wants the guys with the badges and the tactical gear, dragging American citizens out of their cars and sending some to the morgue, to see that he’s their guy," Wilson wrote. "It’s his application for the Bubba Praetorians to be on his side, to remind them he believes in their absolute immunity, and that he will let them keep killing Americans for sport."

"It’s a move that is simultaneously enormously dangerous and pathetically thirsty, the behavior of a beta-male bully who hopes that by holding the jacket of the guy doing the beating, he might eventually get to take the baddie to prom," Wilson wrote.

Vance's statements echoed his views — and what he hoped would appeal to his MAGA base, Wilson wrote.

"Vance understands better than Trump, and perhaps even more than Miller, that secret police organizations in authoritarian states hold a powerful veto over who gets elected, who gets to take office, and who gets to live or die; they’re the ones with guns, armored vehicles, and 'absolute immunity.' Vance sees the future, and it’s dark, authoritarian, and violent to his opponents," Wilson wrote.

"Vance was also sending a clear 2028 message to the MAGA influencer media and the MAGA political base of dictator-curious extremists, that he embraces their grotesque incentive structures: cruelty, racial animus, social division, and cheerleading a weaponized government agency devoted to suppressing the speech and rights of the people who they hate: the immigrant, the literate, the compassionate, and those devoted to exercising their rights," Wilson wrote.

This is on purpose — and it's part of his strategy, Wilson argued.

"Not by accident, Vance has also been highlighting the lies and agitporn of the MAGA influencer class who have descended on Minnesota like maggots on roadkill," Wilson wrote. "His message to them is that the circus of propaganda and division will continue, monetized with every violent attack by ICE."

'Just a pathetic little man': Stephen Miller lambasted as columnist refuses to hold back

A columnist Tuesday revealed how White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller has influenced the policies under the Trump administration — and why he wants people to fear him.

The Guardian's Arwa Mahdawi described how Miller, "the driving force behind the Trump administration’s most extreme policies," is craving immense power, but "is ultimately still just a man."

Some of President Donald Trump's aides have even reportedly begun referring to Miller as "prime minister." Behind the scenes, he has being credited with orchestrating the capture of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and has hopes to remove birthright citizenship.

Despite these moves and wielding this power, Miller is simply one person, the writer argued.

"While the ghouls hellbent on bringing authoritarianism to America, and misery to their self-declared enemies, may think of themselves as demi-gods, they are, ultimately, just mere mortals," Mahdawi wrote.

Miller, the architect of Trump's anti-immigrant policies, including the family border separations during the first Trump administration, even bonded with his wife Katie, a right-wing podcaster, about their harsh stance. And although his own family escaped persecution in Europe as Jewish refugees, something his uncle has publicly slammed Miller for, Trump's "mastermind" has continued to push for these "aggressive tactics."

And he has one goal in mind, Mahdawi argued.

"What people like Miller want most of all is for us to fear them; that’s why they’re all so obsessed with talking about strength and force and power," Mahdawi wrote. "And, yes, we should all be afraid of Miller’s brutish vision of the world. We should be worried about what Miller is doing.

"But we should also make sure to laugh at him; there is nothing thin-skinned authoritarians hate more than being laughed at. And we should never forget that, amid all the trappings of office, Stephen Miller is ultimately just a pathetic little man. One who really likes mayonnaise."

The final dig is in response to Miller's wife revealing on her podcast that her husband eats mayonnaise by the spoonful.

'Ever since hearing that podcast, I’ve had intermittent intrusive thoughts of Miller standing barefoot in the luminous light of a fridge spooning mayonnaise into his mouth, straight from the jar," Mahdawi wrote.

" ... I think the reason the mayonnaise anecdote has stuck with me is because it’s a reminder that while Miller may be in a position of extraordinary power, he is ultimately still just a man, one who likely has grease stains on his T-shirts."

Trump's evil henchmen are clones of a horrific monster who died in disgrace

At first glance, Roy Cohn, Stephen Miller and Emil Bove share an eerie resemblance, though they hail from distinct eras of American dysfunction.

Cohn was a McCarthy-era fixer and Manhattan attorney who mentored the young Donald Trump then died in disgrace. Miller is Trump’s deputy White House chief of staff, to some his “prime minister,” to all the face and voice of Trump’s tyranny. Bove is now a federal judge, but before that was Trump’s legal counsel while Trump was indicted again and again. Oh, how I long for those days.

Different résumés, yes. But the same moral rot behind the same vicious visage.

They are fraternal, tyrannical triplets. They look alike. They speak alike. They operate alike. And most importantly, they thrive for the same reason: Donald Trump, who is, in the words of South Park, “f—ing Satan,” likes demonic despotic dudes, and asks for nothing more.

The vile Cohn was Trump’s most important early influence, not because he taught him the law, but because he taught him how to abuse it, evade it, and weaponize it against anyone in the way.

Cohn’s worldview was brutally simple: never apologize, never admit error, always counterattack harder. Appeal, appeal, appeal, until justice cries “uncle.” He had a viper tongue and a monstrous leer.

To Cohn, truth was irrelevant, institutions were weapons to be bent or broken, and loyalty to scumbags mattered more than reverence for legal scholars.

Roy Cohn and Joe McCarthy Roy Cohn advises Sen. Joseph McCarthy in 1953. Picture: Los Angeles Times/Wiki Commons.

Like a fly to feces, Trump absorbed this crock of crap. In the decades since, he has surrounded himself with similar people. If Trump is the water pump, Bove and Miller are the outhouse.

Miller and Bove are near-Cohn clones, Cohn-esque pinheads with the same skull, ego, brain, and heart. Cohn preached brute force and illegality in the courtroom. Now Bove practices it while Miller reimagines it through Trump’s immigration and foreign policies, wielding cruelty as part of a 21st-century Lebensraum doctrine.

Trump selects a very specific enforcer archetype: someone who treats politics as destruction, law as an irrelevance, morality as a waste of time. These guys are willing to be hated, feared, and blamed. In fact, those traits aren’t flaws. They’re prerequisites. Miller and Bove crave insolence.

In a normal presidency, these qualities would be blasphemous, jail-inducing and worthy of impeachment. In Trump’s pigpen, they’re just mud to roll around in.

Miller’s role is not merely to craft immigration policy. It is to function as shock-and-awe made flesh. Miller says the quiet parts loud, proposes the harshest version of every policy, and luxuriates in the backlash.

Cruelty is not a byproduct. It is the point of Miller’s existence. While some men obsess over their appearance — clearly not Miller’s concern — he obsesses over wickedness. He feeds Trump’s “rule the world” fantasies and sermonizes imperialism in unblinking media appearances.

Cohn played the same ruthless role. He intimidated judges, threatened reporters, and crossed lines others would not approach. Cohn understood that power depends less on legality than on the willingness to violate norms, fast and furious, before anyone can catch up.

And then there’s Evil — sorry, Emil — Bove. He fits Trump’s corrosive mold perfectly. His value lies in being, as Trump would say, a “sleazebag” attorney. He pushed conspiracy theories disguised as legal arguments to their absolute breaking point. He taunted judges, dared courts to challenge Trump, and lied in depositions and in open court — under oath — just like his client.

Now, astonishingly, he’s a federal judge.

He is plainly, unequivocally unqualified. His entire career showcases the traits the position demands one not have: belligerence, partisanship, a staggering lack of judicial temperament.

A federal judge is supposed to be an independent arbiter, guided by restraint, humility, and respect for the rule of law. Bove laughs at such quaint notions. He is about loyalty and aggression. Always and forever. He disdains the norms that protect judicial independence. The court has adjourned on his petulance and incompetence.

These bozos thrive because they lack honor, decency, humility, or, most glaringly, truth. Loyalty tests are endless. Media outrage is constant. Legal jeopardy is routine. In this ecosystem, they become role models. Like robots, they churn out their own replacements. The insidious Karoline Leavitt, Trump’s White House press secretary, is a Miller disciple.

Cohn ended up disbarred, dying alone, loathed and disgraced. But that was the 1980s. In this Trump era, Cohn would be basking at Mar-a-Lago. Miller is a hero to his MAGA minions. He boasts 1.6 million followers on X. Think about it. So many people hang on his every post, each packed with cruelty, fabrication, and garbage.

Emil Bove Emil Bove attends Manhattan criminal court in New York. JEENAH MOON/Pool via REUTERS

And Bove? He is Trump’s representative on the federal bench — which is, of course, illegal. But who cares? Bove attends Trump rallies and events, sparking ethics complaints. Critics argue such attendance violates the code of conduct for federal judges, which bars political activity and even the appearance of impropriety, especially so soon after confirmation and despite prior ethical concerns.

A watchdog group has formally asked the Third Circuit’s chief judge to investigate and potentially discipline Bove for placing partisan loyalty above judicial neutrality. Blah, blah, blah. All this protestation matters not, because Bove’s response to all of it is a big FU.

Even the aesthetic similarities between the three matter. The severe expressions, clipped speech, and utter lack of warmth project authority without empathy. These are badges of honor bestowed by their narcissist-in-chief.

The thread, and threat, of their inhumanity proves they are not aberrations. They are continuations. Roy Cohn didn’t disappear when he died. His ethos simply evolved, metastasizing into Stephen Miller and Emil Bove.

There were once the Three Stooges, whose slapstick and bawdiness prompted laughter. Cohn, Miller and Bove are Trump’s three stooges, but they aren’t eliciting laughter. They spur terror.

When cruelty, propaganda, and law enforcement align, comedy dies and horror begins.

'By design': Stephen Miller said to be 'sending a message' with Minneapolis ICE eruption

Stephen Miller, White House deputy chief of staff behind the Trump administration's harsh immigration policies, "is the architect of a Murder Machine," according to a former GOP strategist.

The Lincoln Project co-founder Rick Wilson wrote in his Substack Thursday that after months of escalating ICE attacks in American cities, the fatal shooting of 37-year-old mother and poet Renee Nicole Good has revealed the next phase of lies from Miller and Trump's loyalists.

"You thought the abuses would stay in the detention centers. You thought the violence was reserved for those without papers," Wilson wrote. "You were wrong. This is by design."

"The transition from 'deporting criminals' to 'executing citizens in the street' isn’t a slip-up; it’s the graduation ceremony. Miller wants the blood of Americans spilled because his power flows from the fear those crimson splashes create," he added.

Wilson argued that "Miller's instant trolling of the dead and mockery of the shock and horror Americans and the citizens of Minneapolis felt, set the tone for the Big Lie of Renee Nichole Good’s murder."

Miller has signaled that power is the ultimate goal and "the MAGA playbook: kill the victim, then kill their character. If you’re dead, you’re a terrorist. If you’re grieving, you’re an 'agitator,'" Wilson wrote.

"Miller, a man who carries the same curdled racial hatreds and bureaucratic cruelty as a Heydrich or a Beria, understands one thing: Terror is the only currency that matters. The goal of shooting a poet in the face in broad daylight isn’t 'border security,'” Wilson wrote.

"It’s to send a message to every American who thinks about protesting, or observing, or even just standing on their own damn street: We can kill you, we will lie about it, and no one will stop us," Wilson explained.

ICE agents have often been placed in the field with rushed training — carrying out Miller and the Trump administration's demands — and putting Americans at further risk.

"The men manning this machine are not 'heroes.' They are increasingly undertrained amateurs of low character, eager to express their loyalty to the regime with a bullet to the head, a baton across the skull, a bloody airbag, and a woman bleeding out while they block her from receiving medical care," Wilson wrote. "They are the 'masked men' who blocked medical aid to Good, denying a dying woman the chance to breathe while they staged their 'injured officer' performance for the cameras."