All posts tagged "republican party"

'Dangerous rot' inside Trump's Republican Party just got exposed: analyst

An analyst warned of a "dangerous rot inside the modern Republican Party under [President Donald] Trump" amid rising "Nazi rhetoric" that Republicans appear unclear on how to address.

Just in the last few weeks, an alarming number of Neo-Nazi-related scandals — including the leaked Young Republicans racist, homophobic and antisemitic messages and Paul Ingrassia's messages saying he has a "Nazi streak" — are tied to the GOP and its followers, Bulwark Managing Editor Sam Stein and journalist and political commentator John Avlon discussed Thursday in a Substack interview.

Avlon has covered Neo-Nazism and written his book "Wing Nuts" about it. Stein asked him about "what Republicans should do about this — and the divide that's emerged on the right over whether to condemn it, or to do the JD Vance thing, which is there are no enemies to my right."

Stein and Avlon pointed to how Vice President JD Vance appears unable to respond to the problem, and this "strand of Neo-Nazism that we've seen that has become more problematic."

Vance this month said the following on late MAGA influencer Charlie Kirk's podcast:

"By focusing on what kids are saying in a group chat, grow up, I'm sorry. Focus on the real issues. Don't focus on what kids say in group chats," Vance said.

But the problem is that these are not kids — they're actually people over 18, in their 20s and 30s, Stein and Avlon explain.

"These are people who are old enough to know better," Avlon said.

Vance appears to be stumped on how to respond to the rhetoric.

"But the fact that JD Vance, Yale Law graduate, smart guy, embraced that no enemies to the right attitude, with regard to that Hitler loving group chat, is the problem," Avlon adds.

It's also a sign of a larger problem for Republicans.

"This is about people expressing love for, admiration with, or self-association with Hitler," Avlon said. "Much of the time... when opponents accuse their political opponents of being Nazis or being like Hitler, that means you've lost the argument. But what happens when your opponents compare themselves to Hitler? This is not a tough call. This is not within the universe of what should be a tough call."

Avlon cited the rise of Christian nationalism and militia adjacent-belief systems following the election of former President Barack Obama as playing a role in white extremism.

"You've got this percolating beneath the surface, revealed in group chats or texts that are released, shows that there is a dangerous rot inside the modern Republican Party under [President Donald] Trump," Avlon said. "It does not mean that all Trump supporters are Nazi adjacent, at all. I want to triple underline that. But one is too much. This number of stories should be alarming and should cause people to question — deeply — what animal spirits we've been tapping into. And it's part of a larger trend."

Why Did the GOP Stop Caring About Nazis? by The Bulwark

Read on Substack

Bitter GOP infighting threatens MAGA lawmaker in vital swing state

Bitter infighting among Republicans is threatening a MAGA lawmaker's seat in a vital swing state.

A group called "Republicans Against Perry" is working to unseat Trump ally Rep. Scott Perry (R-PA), who represents Pennsylvania's10th congressional district, according to a report from The Guardian. The campaign is reinvigorating its efforts from 2023, adding electronic billboards across the district starting Thursday. One reads:

"With Republicans’ razor-thin margin in the House, the seat will be one to watch closely in the midterm elections. Politics PA called Perry’s seat the most vulnerable of the 2026 congressional races they are watching," according to The Guardian.

The group is supported by WelcomePAC — a separate group focused on electing Democrats — but has not backed any potential candidates yet. However, they have indicated they could pivot to supporting a Democratic candidate.

Pennsylvania-based Republican organizer Craig Snyder is leading the campaign.

“It’s premature to make a sort of final determination,” he said. “Our reason for being is to defeat Scott Perry, and if that does not happen in the primary, then we are very, very likely to support the Democratic nominee.”

In 2023, Republicans Against Perry backed Janelle Stelson. The former local news anchor has announced she will run again after losing by only two points to Perry in 2024. Republican Karen Dalton, who is a former staff attorney in the Pennsylvania state house, will also face off against Perry in the primary.

Perry represents an area with a sizable number of government employees. One billboard launched Thursday reads:

"The government has shut down. Perry still gets paid, you don’t."

Snyder argues that Perry, who played a role in promoting the Jan. 6 fake electors scheme, represents the “ascendancy of the MAGA movement.”

“We believe we can successfully finish the job that we started in 2024,” Snyder said. “To have this mismatch between the sort of centrist, moderate, all-American aspect of the district, versus the extremism of the congressman, may be one of the most pronounced misrepresentations in the whole country.”

Dems eye shock win in red state election — as GOP frets voters 'completely checked out'

Democrats are hoping to shake up a deep red district in a special election Tuesday that promises to send a clear message on President Donald Trump's second term in office.

Debra Shigley, a Democratic attorney and mother of five, has told voters in Georgia to "send a message" to Trump and vote for her for Georgia State Senate, District 21. She's facing political outsider and Republican candidate Jason Dickerson, the Washington Post reported.

The two candidates are vying for the seat north of Atlanta, which became vacant when Trump appointed Sen. Brandon Beach, the Republican incumbent, as U.S. treasurer.

Shigley has campaigned with the head of the national Democratic Party, which hopes to add a win to the red state and add to its string of recent special election victories.

Although Republicans are expected to hold the seat, according to analysts, Democrats could narrow the margin or pull off a shocking win in a district that is "really Republican at the presidential level,” Kyle Kondik, an elections analyst for the nonpartisan site Sabato’s Crystal Ball, told The Post.

Kondik expects Shigley will “at least do better than what the presidential [margin] was.”

In the 2024 presidential election, Trump had two-thirds of the vote. During his reelection last year, Beach had 70% of the vote.

Shigley finished first in initial balloting for the special election and had 40% of the vote in the race as the only Democratic candidate. While Dickerson, who competed against six other Republicans, took the lead in his party.

While off-year elections might not predict the next major election, it is a temperature check. Democrats have seen success in recent months and some Republicans are worried, including Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Georgia) who mentioned the upcoming election and complained in a recent podcast that Republican voters “have completely checked out.”

Democrats see an opportunity to break through in a traditionally Republican state.

“We’re going to fight for every vote in Senate District 21 because the stakes couldn’t be higher,” Democratic National Committee Chairman Ken Martin said in a statement. Martin visited the Peach State to campaign with Shigley over the weekend. His goal is to keep pushing the momentum that Democrats have gained while Trump has come back to the White House.

Our parties are dying — here's why it's worse news for Dems

American political parties are in disarray. Instead of being the engines that organize and drive our politics, their roles have been supplanted by partisan social media influencers, nonprofit political groups, super PACs, and the billionaires who fund them and consultant groups they hire.

A few generations ago, it was the political parties that organized politics. In many communities, there was an organic connection between the parties and their members. The parties provided structure and access and some benefits to those who belonged to and participated in their work.

That is no longer the case for most Americans. Today, the parties have become “brands” to which voters are asked to identify, and fundraising vehicles raising money for party operations and the consultant groups who now provide the “services” message testing, voter data files, advertising, and communications.

In other words, the connection between most voters and political parties is largely limited to a loose identification with the brand and to being on lists for fundraising emails, text messages, social media posts, or robocalls asking for money or votes. While these efforts do raise some funds, the amounts pale in comparison to the hundreds of millions contributed by billionaire donors who fill the coffers of the parties and the increasingly powerful liberal or conservative “unaffiliated” interest groups and political action committees.

It has been reported that in the 2024 presidential contest, one of these liberal independent committees raised and spent almost as much as the Kamala Harris campaign (about a billion dollars) on messaging that was sometimes at cross-purposes with the campaign they were supposedly backing. Republican independent expenditure groups did much the same, with one spending a quarter of a billion dollars targeting Arab and Jewish voters with disinformation mailings and ads designed to suppress their votes. In the end, the billions spent by the campaigns and the independent groups deluged voters with messages and counter-messages, causing confusion and alienation.

Even when the parties provided funding to consultants to make personal contact with voters by hiring canvassers to go door-to-door or phone banks to call voter lists, the efforts were perfunctory and unconvincing because the canvassers or callers had no organic ties to the voters they were engaging. This is in marked contrast to decades ago, when the canvassers and callers were local elected party captains engaging their neighbors with whom they had personal ties.

This lack of organic connection with voters, the weakness of the party infrastructures, and the barrage of television, social media, and other forms of digital messaging are some of the reasons why party identification is at an all-time low, with 43% of Americans now identifying as independent, and Republicans and Democrats tied at 27% each.

The parties have also lost their role in governing their electoral operations to the billionaires and interest groups. Look at the role they played in defeating congressional Democratic incumbents in the last election or how billionaire donors are stepping over the will of Democratic voters in New York City’s upcoming mayoral race.

During the primary contest, these interests spent $30 million in advertising to smear and defeat a progressive candidate, Zohran Mamdani. Now, despite Mamdani’s decisive win as the Democratic Party candidate, the same billionaires have pooled their money to support an independent in the November election.

To date, Democratic officials haven’t criticized this move. The party has a rule stipulating that consultants who work against Democratic voter-endorsed incumbents or candidates will not be eligible for party-funded contracts. This sanction has not been applied to those groups that accepted contracts to defeat pro-Palestinian incumbent congressional Democrats, a clear demonstration of the “official” party’s weakness in the face of billionaire spending.

After Democrats lost 1,200 federal and state legislative seats during the Obama era and suffered defeats in two of the last three presidential elections, I was initially optimistic to see two New York Times headlines last week, one of which read, “Democrats Are Mulling a 2026 Campaign Pivot: ‘We Need to Rethink Things.’”

It appears that autopsies are being conducted to understand why Democrats are losing. After reading the piece, however, it became clear that some of the groups conducting the autopsies are the very independent expenditure-funded consultants that are the source of the problem. Their solution: better message testing, better use of social media and digital messaging, etc. In other words, pay us more and we’ll dig the hole deeper. No lessons learned.

What needs to happen and is still not on the agenda is for the parties to reform and reconnect with and earn the trust of voters by rebuilding their state and local infrastructures. There is a push in that direction being made in the Democratic Party by some of its newly elected leaders. Spurred on by party reformers, they have greatly increased the funds being given to state parties, reducing the amounts sent to outside consultants. But as long as the billionaire-funded groups remain the dominant players in the political process, the Democratic reformers will continue to face an uphill battle to wrest back control over elections and party affairs.

Meanwhile, the Republican side appears to be a lost cause. President Donald Trump and his cult-like MAGA movement have been able to take advantage of the weakness of their party’s organization, forcing it to submit and transforming it into a wholly owned Trump subsidiary.

Republicans who opposed Trump’s conquest have either been demeaned and silenced or drifted away to form PACs that have focused their resources on “anti-Trump” advertising campaigns, which, while celebrated by some Democrats, have had no impact on rebuilding the Republican Party.

The bottom line is that American politics has become less a battle between two competing organized political parties and more a contest between billionaire-funded entities waging virtual campaigns attempting to lure voters to endorse their “brands.” Until a significant effort is made to regulate the corrosive role of big money in politics, this will continue as will voter disaffection and alienation.

  • Dr. James J. Zogby is the author of Arab Voices (2010) and the founder and president of the Arab American Institute (AAI). Dr. Zogby has also been personally active in U.S. politics for many years; in 1984 and 1988 he served as Deputy Campaign manager and Senior Advisor to the Jesse Jackson Presidential campaign. In 2000, 2008, and 2016 he served as an advisor to the Gore, Obama, and Sanders presidential campaigns.

'Where is your outrage over Republicans?' Warren slams CNBC host to his face

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) leveled CNBC's Joe Kernen on Thursday for fear-mongering over the professed socialist who won the Democratic primary for New York City's mayoral race.

In a shocking outcome this week, 33-year-old Zohran Mamdani defeated former Gov. Andrew Cuomo to clinch the Democratic nomination.

"He's a socialist, he's a self-avowed socialist," Kernen began. "Do you think socialism is the correct path to do what you just said you want to do for working Americans? I mean, that's what he is."

Kernan called New York City "the center of the universe for capitalism."

"And Wall Street, whether you love it or hate it — I know it has a connotation in certain areas — but it's the financial engine for all the great things that happen in the U.S. in terms of the private sector, and raising money for companies, and the stock market. All these great things that provide all the jobs — that's where you get the tax money to spend on all these great things you want to spend it on. You think that's the right thing for New York City?"

Warren answered, "You don't have to push me! I believe in markets. I love markets. I think markets are fabulous — when they're honest markets. As you know, because we've had these discussions before — for example, we need markets with rules. Markets without rules are just theft.

"But what our new mayor — I hope our mayor-elect — is talking about, is how to make that economy work for families."

Warren then chastised Kernen directly.

"Where is your outrage over a Republican Party that are saying, 'We want to fund even more tax giveaways to billionaires. We want to make sure that Meta gets a check, if this bill passes, for $15 billion...while we take away healthcare from everyone else, while we drive up utility bill costs for everyone else.'

"That's not how we build a strong economy. You believe in markets? Then you should believe in participation by the employees so that they get some of the wealth that they helped create."

Watch the clip below via CNBC.

Trump's megabill could turn out to be the GOP's death knell: analysis

A new MSNBC article by former RNC chair Michael Steele claims that Senate Republicans aren't just deciding whether to add $3.8 trillion to the nation's debt by passing President Donald Trump's massive spending bill; it's also deciding on the future of the party itself and the people it claims to represent.

"Is it a party of Trump — tossing new parents, tipped workers and seniors a few crumbs while cutting the social safety net and giving very wealthy individuals a massive tax cut?" Steele asked. "Or are there enough old-school conservatives left to make the bill more economically responsible?"

Steele claimed that Trump's bill is essentially a loyalty test to see who will feed into the president's desire for total control. It would allow him to pay for his $175 billion Golden Dome missile defense system, among other expensive pursuits, while fiddling with entitlements like Medicare to pay for it -- something Trump said he'd never touch.

EXCLUSIVE: Trump accused of new grift that puts Qatari plane in shade

House Republicans have already come to heel, passing their version of the bill that bows to Trump's whims.

"This isn’t a battle over fiscal prudence. It is a battle over obedience," Steele wrote. "If they side with Trump, they’ll have to defend cutting programs like Medicaid and SNAP. They will have to answer to constituents who will feel the direct effects of their vote. We are not talking about the price of eggs anymore. We are talking about the cost of healthcare–or having access to healthcare at all. Do they think the voters won’t remember who took their safety net away?"

Steele claimed that hanging in the balance are "the remnants of traditional conservative philosophies" about spending versus "unfettered economic retribution at the hands of Trump."

Steele asked, if the Republican Party is already a shell of what it was before Trump's complete dominance, what would be its future if it no longer served the people at all?

"So far, no one seems willing to truly risk their political careers on principle," Steele wrote. "Which is why Trump remains so smug about passage of his 'Big Beautiful Bill.'"

Read the MSNBC article here.

'Bad news': White House insider predicts GOP is headed for 'impressive losses'

Author Michael Wolff, who has written "a series of blistering books" on Donald Trump, claimed that the president's instincts will "sabotage" Republicans during the 2026 midterms when they can least afford to lose their slim majority in the House, according to The Daily Beast podcast.

“Fundamentally, Donald Trump is self-destructive,” Wolff told host Joanna Coles. “All of the kinds of things he’s doing now will result in him losing—certainly losing the House of Representatives,” Wolff said.

Wolff added that he plans for the GOP losses to be "impressive," especially due to the economic uncertainty Trump has wrought with his self-imposed trade war that has received little pushback from Republicans.

EXCLUSIVE: Breastfeeding mom of US citizen sues Kristi Noem after being grabbed by ICE

"Democrats need a net gain of just three seats to retake the House, where Republicans hold the narrowest majority since the 1930s," wrote The Beast's Erkki Foster. "Their odds are strong in any circumstances—the president’s party usually loses ground in midterm elections. In the 2018 midterms, during Trump’s first term in the White House, Democrats picked up 40 seats to retake the House."

Losing the House could open Trump up to his third impeachment proceedings.

But, "the bad news for Republicans doesn’t end there," Foster wrote. Wolff predicted that "a Trump 'proxy' will be the GOP nominee in 2028, only to be brought down by Trump himself."

“That person will lose because (Trump) will undermine them because he doesn’t want them to win,” Wolff told the podcast. Instead, Trump himself wants to "maintain his grip on the Republican Party" at all costs.

And he just might get the chance; Wolff maintained that Trump's charisma makes him “more compelling than any other politician in the United States because you can’t take your eyes off of him.”

Read The Daily Beast article here.

'Did Stalin write this?' Internet torches Trump's call to 'purge' GOP of dissenting voices

Donald Trump on Saturday called for the Republican party to "purge" individuals who oppose him, leading to widespread condemnation online.

The former president over the weekend took to his own social media network, Truth Social, to slam Georgia Republicans who have opposed him since his alleged efforts to undermine the state's results in the 2020 election, which Trump lost to President Joe Biden.

"Congratulations to Georgia GOP Chair, Josh McKoon, for going after the failed former Lieutenant Governor of Georgia, who realized he could never win again, and quit his run for Office - His name is Geoff Duncan," Trump wrote. "He is a total lightweight, and went to work at a low salary for Fake News CNN. His sole function is to knock Donald J. Trump, but people don’t want to hear him, or that, and it’s one of the many reasons that CNN’s Ratings are so low (although, Jake Tapper and Dana Bash were very fair to me on the Crooked Joe Biden Debate)."

ALSO READ: We asked 10 Republican senators: ‘Is Kamala Harris Black?’ Things got weird fast.

He continued, suggesting that "Georgia should throw this 'bum' out of the Party."

"He is unelectable and not respected by anyone, other than your lightweight Governor, Brian Kemp who, if it wasn’t for me, would have never been Governor," Trump then added. "We have to purge the Party of people that go against our Candidates, and make it harder for a popular Republican President to beat the Radical Left Lunatics. Geoff Duncan is a loser who is disintegrating on his own. Congratulations to Josh McKoon for purging our Party of Misfits and people that don’t want to see us succeed!"

In a follow-up post, Trump targeted Brad Raffensperger, Georgia Secretary of State, who infamously received a call in which Trump asked him to "find" 11,000 votes.

"Brad Raffensperger has to do his job, and make sure this Election is not stolen. Brian Kemp should focus his efforts on fighting Crime, not fighting Unity and the Republican Party! His Crime Rate in Georgia is terrible, his Crime Rate in Atlanta is the worst, and his Economy is average," Trump wrote. "He should be seeking UNITY, not Retribution, especially against the man that got him the Nomination through Endorsement and, without whom, he could never have beaten Stacey Abrams. He and his wife didn’t think he could win. I said, 'I’m telling you you’re going to win.' Then he won, he was happy, and his wife said, 'Thank you Sir, we’ll never be able to make it up to you!' Now she says she won’t Endorse me, and is going to 'write in Brian Kemp’s name.' Well, I don’t want her Endorsement, and I don’t want his. They’re the ones who got Fani Willis and her boyfriend all 'jazzed up' and ready to go. He could have ended that travesty with a phone call, but he doesn’t want to end it because he’s a bad guy."

He continued:

"Think of it, I got this guy elected and he did not want to do what the State Senate wanted on Election Integrity. He works with Raffensperger, he works with Geoff Duncan—It’s all a team. I truly believe they would rather see the Republican Party lose than win!"

In response to Trump's comment about purging certain GOP officials, independent journalist Aaron Rupar asked, "Did Stalin write this?"

Writer Eric Kleefeld said, "Liquidating the Never Trumpers as a class."

Conservative Army Iraq War Veteran Peter Henlein said, "Don’t get mad at me or anyone else on the right when we call out Trump’s bulls--- because it’s August 3rd. We are 3 months from Election Day……and Trump is attacking two term Georgia Governor and ultra solid conservative Brian Kemp. Wake up. Trump hates conservatives. He wants them out the GOP."

‘She’s got balls’: Republican delegates gush over Marjorie Taylor Greene’s extremism

MILWAUKEE — Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene's (R-GA) say-anything, trash-anyone style has earned her a dedicated fanclub here at the Republican National Convention.

And while Republican attendees from across the United States can’t vote for the bombastic second-term congresswoman, they can donate to her and buy her book, which was on display Wednesday as more than 100 attendees lined up at her convention-endorsed book signing.

EXCLUSIVE: Trump ‘secretary of retribution’ won't discuss his ‘target list’ at RNC

“I love her. She's the future of this country,” Jamie Ricci of Rhode Island told Raw Story after showing the congresswoman the MAGA tattoo on his shoulder when he went through the book line. “She's got balls.”

Ricci wanted to get that MAGA tat done when he was in Washington, D.C., for then-President Donald Trump’s “Stop the Steal” rally on Jan. 6, 2021.

MAGAJamie Ricci of Rhode Island shows of his MAGA tattoo while attending a book event headlined by Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA). (Matt Laslo / Raw Story)

But, like much of that trip, things didn’t pan out as planned. He ended up not being able to get a slot in one of D.C.’s tattoo parlors before the rally he attended descended into a takeover of the U.S. Capitol, which he and his friend stopped just short of joining on Trump’s behalf.

“I said, ‘I'm not going in there. We don't belong,’ and I told him, and he's a lawyer, he's a smart guy. So God was with us, because we'd be in jail,” Ricci remembered.

As for Greene, she’s one of his contemporary political heroes, even if he recognizes she’s over the top sometimes.

“I mean, sometimes she goes a little extreme, but I don't blame any of these people for what they’ve seen on the other side, what they're doing or the way they're handling things. When she brought a hat at the State of the Union, I was like, ‘if they're breaking every rule, we can break the rules,” Ricci said. “Her ad with the targets with the guns was sick.”

Republican National Committee-appointed handlers tried to keep the media away from Greene at her public book signing.

“No interviews,” a man with an “operations” credential told reporters. “No interviews.”

But Greene, being Greene, ignored the memo and answered a couple questions.

“What’s the message of your book?” Raw Story asked.

“It’s about the policies for America First, and, basically, more about my story,” Greene replied.

While many in the line didn’t know what the book was about, they were eager to meet the bomb thrower from Northern Georgia.

“Here’s my business card. Contact me for a donation!” Shelly Garofalo, an alternate delegate from Tacoma, Wash., told the congresswoman.

ALSO READ: MTG’s stock purchase might pose potential conflict of interest: disclosure

“I love her toughness,” Garofalo told Raw Story. “It's refreshing, because there's [Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY)] on the other side, and it sounds like there's so many talking points from AOC. We need somebody to balance and say, ‘Wait a minute, if you're calling us out on this, we're calling you out on this.’”

Still, Garafalo blushes while watching MTG’s antics sometimes.

“She calls people out, like she called Dr. [Anthony] Fauci out on some stuff. And she called him ‘Mr. Fauci’ instead of ‘doctor’ — I’m like, I don’t know if I’d go to that extreme, but she’s tough,” Garofalo said. “I love her toughness. I love her strength. I love the fact that she is calling the top leadership in our government, when there's corruption, she's calling them out. So that's what I like, because the top government officials should be working for the people and they're not working for the people.”

Cecilia Calabrese, a Region 3 Director for Massechuttes for Trump, arrived 40 minutes early to be one of the first in line.

“Thank you so much congresswoman for all you do,” Calabrese told Greene.

“We need her in the Congress so badly. I was very excited to get to meet her,” Calabrese told Raw Story. “I'm from Massachusetts, so I have no one in my congressional delegation that represents me.”

South Carolina GOP candidate sues fellow Republicans for calling him 'domestic abuser'

A South Carolina state senate candidate is suing his Republican opponents after they called him a "domestic abuser."

According to court records obtained by The Post and Courier, John Gallman, who lost an election four years ago for a Horry County seat is suing state Reps. Lee Hewitt and Chris Murphy. Both lawmakers are also Republicans.

Gallman alleges that the man defamed him and inflicted "emotional distress" in April of this year.

Read Also: Few Trumpers who embrace political violence understand its endgame

On April 16, the state House adopted a resolution in Gallman's honor, recognizing Gallman for "significant contributions to developing legislation that allows children equal access to both parents after separation and divorce."

Gallman temporarily lost custody of his children during his divorce, and he began lobbying the state legislature for more equitable parting policies.

On April 17, however, state records showed about 60 House legislators asked to have their names removed as sponsors of the resolution. Among those asking that their names be removed were Hewitt and Murphy. According to the complaint, the two lawmakers told other House members that Gallman abused his ex-wife.

"The allegations about (Gallman) were defamatory and published with actual malice, as (Hewitt and Murphy) knew they were false," the complaint says. "As a result of (Hewitt and Murphy's) slander, (Gallman) was harmed and damages have been incurred, including but not limited to, actual and future damage to reputation."

"Murphy stated that 'House Leadership' instructed him to spread the information that John Gallman was a domestic abuser," the filing continues. "Defendants acted with actual malice and with the intent to destroy the reputation of John Gallman for illegitimate purposes."

The lawmakers denied the claim in a public statement from their attorneys.

"Representatives Murphy and Hewitt look forward to their day in court and have faith that the legal process will fully vindicate them and demonstrate that this litigious plaintiff's claims are completely meritless," the statement claimed.

The 2020 campaign broadcast the messy Gallman divorce all over the media, including stories that he dragged his former wife by her hair and broke her finger.

The lawsuit says that Murphy and Hewitt also claimed Gallman was mentally unstable.

Gallman was never charged and denies the allegations. He said that the defamation had made him lose business.

In a different case after the election, Gallman alleged that a news outlet failed to give "a fair and reasonably true summary of the contents of his Family Court file, or that these defendants published false and defamatory information about him with actual malice," according to the court records.

The report said the judge granted summary judgment in favor of the news outlet.

Before the case against the news outlet, Gallman attempted another defamation case, this time against the school nurse at his children's private Catholic school, and her husband.

In 2018, Gallman alleged that the nurse gave an interview to a court-appointed guardian during the divorce. According to court documents, Gallman said the nurse's husband worked for one of his competitors, which was the reason for the attacks on him. That case was stayed in November of 2019.

Read the full report here.