All posts tagged "nancy pelosi"

This tiny act could end the galling stupidity that keeps Trump in power

One of the most significant developments in what was another ear-shattering, soul-crushing week in American politics transpired quietly last Monday evening, when Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-NY) announced he was stepping down.

Nadler, 78, has been a liberal force during his three decades in Congress, and by finally throwing in the towel signaled that maybe — just MAYBE — Democrats are starting to listen to their angry constituents, who are not at all pleased by the way the party has comported itself leading up to, and after, the most consequential election in American history this past November.

“Watching the Biden thing really said something about the necessity for generational change in the party, and I think I want to respect that,” Nadler said, before grudgingly adding, that a younger replacement “can maybe do better, can maybe help us more.”

Using the word “maybe” was Nadler’s ego talking, but it was the “Watching the Biden thing …” that really interested me. I’ll have more on that in a minute, but for now, it’s instructive to listen to how news of Nadler’s departure was received in Democratic circles. Put it this way: I have not heard from ONE person of note who thought this was a bad decision.

Basically, this is what I have been hearing:

“Thank you, sir, for your many years of service. I wish more Democrats would do the same.”

To put it kindly, the Democratic Party has become a stale, useless brand. It is a party crying for a new direction, and new leadership. It needs fresh faces, and new ideas. Again: Nobody I have talked to disputes this.

One only needs see what is transpiring in Nadler’s haunts in New York City for a vivid illustration of the party’s self-destructive clash of cultures.

Up-and-comer, Zohran Mamdani, 33, handily won the New York City Democratic Mayoral Primary in July, but instead of celebrating his victory, the Democratic old guard, led by Andrew Cuomo, are fighting hard against him.

This is grotesque, it really is, but is serving to expose all that is wrong with a party that refuses to get out of its own way.

Even Democratic Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries has not been able to bring himself to endorse his fellow New Yorker, most likely because his campaign has accepted upwards of $1 million from the America Israel Public Affairs Committee (which loathes Mamdani) in just the last year alone, and because Jeffries has proven himself to be too cute by half.

Once an up-and-comer himself, Jeffries has lately fallen flat, and is out of tune with the majority of his party these days, who see him as a lurker, not a leader. Sadly, he seems to be one of the only people who doesn’t see this.

Mamdani’s stunning victory in the July primary was a repudiation of the old guard, their failed ideas, and all that old money. Mamdani has proven he can reach the voters that Democrats must have to win elections, which begs the question:

Why then are so many old guard Democrats throwing rocks at him?

The easy answer is all that damn money, but there is also something else at play here: Sheer stupidity, as well as that ego even Nadler has found so hard to shelve.

Listen to me:

If there was just ONE thing Democrats could do to enhance their chances in every election for the next 20 years it would be this: Throw out that old guard, swap out your so-called leadership, and make good and damn sure every person in America knows you’ve done it.

REPEAT: Throw out the old guard, swap out your so-called leadership, and make good and damn sure every person in America knows you’ve done it.

Nothing would signal you are listening to your terrified and angry electorate more than that. Further, it would serve notice to the growing number of Americans who don’t see a difference between our two major parties that this version of the Democratic Party isn’t serving up just more of the same old bulls--t.

Politics is a competitive, bottom-line sport. And in every sport except politics, winners are rewarded with a second chance, while losers go home. When a team wins, coaches, players and general managers are rewarded for their efforts. When a team loses, coaches, players, and general managers are sent packing.

At least this is how the perennial winners do it …

Fans of these teams expect nothing less. Why would they pour their hard-earned money into the pockets of losers? Are these fans any different than the constituents of the Democratic Party? Why should the people who do all the heavy lifting, volunteering, door-knocking, and rallying and marching until their feet hurt keep showing up if their party is just going to trot out the same old, tired-a-- losing team?

If you’ve read even a little of my stuff, you know how I feel about the revolting, racist, misogynistic, anti-American Republican Party.

That this group of bought-off goons has been able to garner the support of something called the “working-class American” is not only patently insane, but speaks to the massive failures of the Democratic Party, which has allowed for the greatest heist in American history.

How can the party that stands with unions, workers’ rights, increased minimum wage, wages overall, healthcare, childcare, social security, Medicaid and Medicare be losing the working-class voters?????

And, by the way, have you seen the latest job reports, showing Trump’s predictable and massive failures?

We’ve heard a lot about Democrats’ inability to communicate to the American public, but I’m not sure if that messaging is as much of a problem as the people who are doing it — those losing players I was talking about.

Like it or not, most Americans are sick and tired of the Cuomos and the Clintons, the Chuck Schumers and Hakeem Jeffries, the Amy Klobuchars and the Steny Hoyers, the Mark Warners and the Cory Bookers …

The list is really long, and growing.

None of these people should be in leadership any longer, and none of them will ever become president despite all their unbridled ambition, so they need to finally get that out of their hard heads.

Like it or not, they are the faces of a failed brand. I am not saying they all need to go, but they do need to learn to lead from behind, while pushing new, aspiring leaders forward.

THAT is how you truly serve your country, and thank you in advance.

It was bad enough the party lost the House, the Senate and the presidency in the most consequential elections in American history last November, but they somehow made it even worse by the way they completely and callously mishandled their beating.

It was almost as if they couldn’t wait to surrender.

It was as if they didn’t give a good goddam about the people who spent their time and treasure working their tails off to get them elected, and were now terrified about what was coming down the pike in a second, vengeful Trump dictatorial term.

A term, by the way, that should have never been allowed to happen if we had a damn Justice Department that acted with the urgency Trump’s January 6, 2021, attack on our nation most certainly demanded.

Joe Biden himself was absolutely appalling in Kamala Harris’s defeat, what with his warm welcome to America’s dictator in front of that damn fire in the White House only days after the election. I will never be able to unsee or un-hear that grotesque spectacle.

Then there was the cheery Klobuchar handling the inauguration festivities of the fascist dictator as if hosting some terrible, pinky-out cocktail party, while Schumer took it all in doing his worst impression of Chuck Schumer.

The gall of these people …

Within months, polls started reflecting Americans distaste for this out-of-touch, ineffective group. As I type this, the Democratic Party’s approval ratings are at roughly 20 percent.

Four out of five Americans don’t like what they are being served by Democrats.

It almost makes Trump’s 40 percent approvals look stellar by comparison.

But maybe Democrats are finally opening the door a crack, to let the fresh air in.

In the past few weeks I have seen hints of a different party, with different tactics, even if I am still seeing the same galling stupidity out of too many selfish dimwits like the odious, women-groping Andrew Cuomo.

Maybe Jerry Nadler’s resignation is a sign Democrats really are beginning to listen to their bosses in the field. We need more of this, people.

FAR MORE OF IT.

We need to hear from the new politicians, with new voices and ideas, who are advancing all the good Democrats have done and are doing, while forcefully standing against the most dangerous party in our nation’s history.

And we need to see them competing in our Red States as well as the Blue and Purple ones. Quit conceding turf to these fascists, who offer nothing to their voters but vitriol and death.

WE are the good guys, dammit.

WE need fighters.

These are the people who I will support. I am done getting my a-- kicked by backing the same old losing team with the same old losing players.

(D. Earl Stephens is the author of “Toxic Tales: A Caustic Collection of Donald J. Trump’s Very Important Letters” and finished up a 30-year career in journalism as the Managing Editor of Stars and Stripes. You can find all his work here.)

On Epstein, Nancy Pelosi is missing the bigger picture

The Epstein scandal is the best thing to happen to the cause of freedom and democracy in a very long time. I don’t remember the last occasion when liberals could hope to break the grip that Donald Trump has had, not only on the Republicans but on the Washington press corps. With this story, there’s finally daylight between him and his base. MAGA is facing a crisis of faith and with that, there’s hope.

Which is why I was genuinely stunned to see former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi dismiss the Epstein scandal as just another distraction.

“Whether it’s Jeffrey Epstein or Alcatraz, it’s all off the subject of what they’re doing with this budget that’s harmful to meeting the kitchen-table needs of the American people,” she said.

MSNBC’s James Downie put it well: “The public is pissed about Epstein in no small part because he was a rich guy who got away with heinous crimes, because he deliberately cultivated rich friends.

“That's an inequality story. The only way it could be closer to ‘kitchen-table issues’ is if the files were tucked in a goddamn pocketbook!”

Aside from that, Pelosi is missing the bigger picture. The Epstein scandal has grown so fast that Trump now risks forfeiting the one thing that made him invincible in the eyes of many – that made it possible for him to credibly claim that he could shoot someone and never lose a supporter. That one thing is him being the exception to the rule.

In this case, the except to the rule of Epstein.

Fact is, the president was intimately involved with the disgraced financier and child-sex trafficker. (You can read about their history in the New York Times.) But the MAGA faithful never believed it, or if they did, they didn’t believe Trump deserved the same level of scrutiny. Why?

Because the cult of MAGA is animated by a conspiracy theory, one that holds that Trump was sent by God to fulfill a prophecy, as a hero who saves America from a secret cabal of powerful (Jewish) pedophiles who traffic young girls for sex to untouchable elites. In MAGA lore, Epstein came to represent this shadowy, malevolent confederacy. The idea was that Trump would get reelected in 2024 and bring them all to justice.

So even if there was concern about old pictures and videos of Trump palling around with Epstein, Trump couldn’t be that bad, because QAnon – the conspiracy theory’s name – said that Trump was MAGA’s champion. Enemies like Bill Clinton, Barack Obama and George Soros were guilty and deserving of death, but Trump? He was the exception to that rule, the exception that would make America great again.

As long as MAGA believed in him as their savior, there was little he could do to lose their trust. He could shoot someone on Fifth Avenue. He could lead a paramilitary takeover of the US government. He could literally betray some supporters with the understanding that their sacrifice was for the greater good of saving little girls from monsters.

But then Trump made a mistake. He took MAGA’s faith for granted. He and US Attorney General Pam Bondi believed they would go wherever he told them to, even if the US Department of Justice concluded that there was no list of Epstein clients and there was no blackmail ring. They pulled back the curtain to reveal that Trump is not only a mere man, but a con man. And if MAGA believed him, well, that’s on them.

Up to that point, it really didn’t matter how much reporting there was about the actual relationship between Trump and Jeffrey Epstein, because MAGA could explain away those facts as part of the QAnon prophecy. The (Jewish) media is part of the evil conspiracy against America, so naturally they are going to try to bring its savior down. Now that Trump has triggered a crisis of faith, things are different.

You can see the difference in Trump’s reaction to the latest by the Wall Street Journal. It reported last Thursday that he gave Epstein a “bawdy” note on his 50th birthday in which he drew the outline of a naked woman.

He signed his name at the bottom as if the signature were her public hair. He included imaginary dialogue in which Trump says, “We have certain things in common, Jeffrey.”

Trump concluded with saying: “Happy birthday – and may every day be another wonderful secret.”

If you’re willing to give him the benefit of the doubt, which is what MAGA has been doing for the last decade, there’s nothing to see here. But if you’re unwilling – if, in fact, you feel betrayed by a leader who said he’d reveal the secrets of America’s enemies but instead chose to protect those secrets – this might look like what it seems to be: Two grown men joking about their fondness for sex with underage girls.

It used to be that Trump could gut it out knowing that the rightwing media apparatus was behind him all the way. They could altogether shout down legitimate mainstream reporting.

But the rightwing media apparatus – which includes men like Steven Bannon, Tim Pool, Tucker Carlson and Benny Johnson – made itself as powerful as it is by advancing Trump, in one way or another, as the leader of the cult of MAGA. In their view, he was never supposed to put himself in league with the Jewish conspiracy, yet that’s what he did, and now that he’s done so, these rightwing media personalities can’t accept it.

Therefore, Trump is in a position he has never been in. He must earn back trust from the MAGA faithful, trust that he used to safely assume was his. That’s why he ordered the attorney general to seek the release of grand jury testimony in the Jeffrey Epstein case. But in doing so, he opened space for more questions by the press corps, more demands by the rightwing media personalities, and more opportunities for his most loyal supporters to second-guess the purity of his intentions.

That’s not a distraction. That’s the whole ball game. Fortunately, many Democrats are taking advantage of it. They’re calling for the release of more documents, raising awareness of Trump’s hypocrisy and in general, they’re sewing doubt by hyping the idea that he’s hiding something. Nothing else has cracked Teflon Trump, but this might.

Pelosi ought to know better.

'Rallying cry': Pentagon may have picked wrong group to fight over ship renaming

The LGBTQ community is galvanizing to prevent Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth from renaming a U.S. Navy ship as part of the Trump administration's anti-DEI initiative.

CBS News reported Tuesday that the Pentagon was formatting a timeline to rename the USNS Harvey Milk, which honors the Navy veteran and the first openly gay politician in California's history, who was assassinated in 1978.

Other ships under consideration for renaming include the USNS Thurgood Marshall, USNS Ruth Bader Ginsburg, USNS Harriet Tubman, USNS Dolores Huerta, USNS Lucy Stone, USNS Cesar Chavez and USNS Medgar Evers.

CBS cited a Navy memo that said "the renaming of naval ships was to realign the U.S. military with Trump administration priorities of 'reestablishing the warrior culture.'"

Milk’s nephew, Stuart Milk, told the Associated Press Wednesday that he and the Harvey Milk Foundation "have reached out to the Pentagon, which confirmed there is a proposed name change on the table."

“And our hope is that the recommendation is put aside, but if it’s not, it will be a rallying cry not just for our community but for all minority communities,” Milk said.

Milk added that his uncle "always said that gay rights, and those of other marginalized communities, required constant vigilance."

“So I don’t think he’d be surprised,” Milk said, “but he’d be calling on us to remain vigilant, to stay active.”

According to the AP, "The USNS Harvey Milk was named in 2016 by then-Navy Secretary Ray Mabus, who said at the time that the John Lewis-class of oilers would be named after leaders who fought for civil and human rights."

The report said that the renaming of naval vessels is rare. "The Biden administration also changed the names of two Navy ships in 2023 as part of the effort to remove Confederate names from U.S. military installations," it read.

Democratic leaders like Speaker Emerita Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) and Gov. Gavin Newsom (D-CA) have condemned the proposed name changes.

Read the Associated Press story here.

'I feel sick': Pelosi raged against Trump in newly-uncovered J6 footage

Newly uncovered footage reviewed by Politico reveals the rage of former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) during and in the immediate aftermath of the January 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol.

This comes two years after the release of other footage that showed Pelosi frantically calling for backup as rioters breached the building to try to stop the 2020 election from being certified.

“I just feel sick about what he did to the Capitol and the country today,” said Pelosi in the new footage, taken in her SUV the day after the attack. “He’s got to pay a price for that.”

Other footage taken during the evacuation showed she initially didn't want to leave, saying, “If they stop the proceedings, they will have succeeded in stopping the validation of the presidency of the United States."

ALSO READ: Rudy Giuliani finds a new low: platforming a Nazi

In another clip, she inquired about how many times members asked, "Are we prepared?"

"We’re not prepared for the worst,” Pelosi continued. “We’re calling the National Guard, now? It should’ve been here to start out. I just don’t understand it. Why do we empower people this way by not being ready?”

This line in particular calls into question Trump's repeated false claim that he offered National Guard troops at the Capitol and Pelosi refused them. Pelosi notably has no authority over the National Guard.

Yet other footage showed Pelosi conferring with other congressional leaders, during which Sen. Dick Durbin (D-IL) speculated "How quick can Trump pardon them?"

Trump didn't pardon any Jan. 6 rioters, hundreds of whom have been convicted or taken plea agreements for their involvement in the chaos, although in recent months he has suggested he could do so if re-elected.

'Enough!' Dem strategist accuses 'backstabbing' Pelosi of shifting attention to herself

A Democratic strategist blasted former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi on Wednesday, accusing her of being a backstabber and shifting attention off Vice President Kamala Harris onto herself.

Chris Jackson took to the social media site X on Wednesday, ahead of day three of the Democratic National Convention, to air his grievances over a Washington Post report headlined "Pelosi makes no apologies at DNC for her role in Biden's ouster."

When asked if she has any regrets about her role in pushing President Joe Biden out of the race, Pelosi retorted: “Why would you ask me that question? You know, I’m a very deliberate person," according to the report.

The former House speaker said she has her "relationship with the president, and I just wanted to win this election."

"So if they’re upset, I’m sorry for them, but the country is very happy,” she told the Post on Monday ahead of Biden's speech. “I don’t know who they are, but that’s their problem.”

The Post reported that some Democrats even wore their displeasure on their sleeve — or, at least, their lapel.

They have sported a pin with Pelosi’s face that says “The Godmother," according to the Post. The pin is a reference to the iconic "Godfather" series, reportedly symbolizing that she masterminded the ouster behind the scenes — a notion Pelosi has denied.

ALSO READ: ‘Stop the Steal’ organizer hired by Trump campaign for Election 2024 endgame

The report drew Jackson's ire.

"She's completely lost it," he wrote on X. "Not only is she relentlessly stabbing our president in the back, but she's also diverting attention from Vice President Harris with this nonsense."

Fellow Democrats weighed in and appeared divided on Jackson's post, with some suggesting the media and X are "dragging this out" while others agreed with rebuking Pelosi.

Most appeared to agree they, too, were "done with her."

Why some Dems are donning 'Godfather' inspired pins at DNC — with Pelosi's face

Nancy Pelosi's role in pushing President Joe Biden out of the presidential race this year has reportedly led some Democrats to voice their displeasure — with pins.

Ahead of Biden's speech Monday night at the Democratic National Convention, the former Democratic House speaker tried to explain her reasoning in helping to usher him to step aside, saying she "took a punch for the children" on CNN.

When asked if she had any regrets about her role, she reportedly shot back at a reporter at the convention: "Why would you ask me that question? You know, I’m a very deliberate person."

Now, The Washington Post is reporting that some Democrats are wearing their displeasure on their sleeve — or, at least, their lapel.

ALSO READ: ‘Stop the Steal’ organizer hired by Trump campaign for Election 2024 endgame

They have sported a pin with Pelosi’s face that says “The Godmother," according to the Post. The pin is a reference to the iconic "Godfather" series, reportedly symbolizing that she masterminded the ouster behind the scenes — a notion Pelosi has denied.

Even so some Democrats, including some close to Biden and the Democratic National Committee, continue to be "bitterly upset with Pelosi" over her public calls for Biden to drop out, the Post reported. Some have even vowed to try to diminish her influence within the party.

“I have my relationship with the president, and I just wanted to win this election. So if they’re upset, I’m sorry for them, but the country is very happy,” Pelosi told the Post on Monday. “I don’t know who they are, but that’s their problem.”


Joe Biden gave his best to us

CHICAGO — On July 21, 2024, three weeks after his halting debate performance, Joe Biden announced his withdrawal from the 2024 presidential election and endorsed Vice President Kamala Harris as his replacement.

Last night here at the Democratic National Convention, instead of delivering an acceptance speech for his party’s nomination, Biden delivered one of his last major speeches as president of the United States.

After his daughter Ashley introduced her dad as her “best friend,” Biden walked alone to the Democratic National Committee center-stage lectern among an appreciative blue and red sea of “We Love Joe” signs. As he recounted achievements of the Biden-Harris administration, including the CHIPS Act, infrastructure investments and unmatched climate mitigation efforts, the crowd bellowed, “Thank you, Joe.”

Biden humbly reminded them to thank Kamala, too. The president said making Harris his political partner was one of the smartest things he’d ever done.

Biden’s selfless act in walking away from power

Biden’s send-off speech was a bittersweet and historically unprecedented moment, as was his decision to walk away from power. His decision has electrified the Democratic party, along with a fast-growing sector of voters who were dreading the Trump-Biden rematch.

Delivering words of encouragement and unity at the Democratic National Committee, Biden didn’t lick his wounds or air his grievances at having been pushed aside.

ALSO READ: ‘Absolutely essential’: Son of Oath Keeper Stewart Rhodes is all in for Kamala Harris

Instead, he reminded the nation that nearly four years ago, as he raised his right hand and swore his oath of office just days after the U.S. Capitol had been attacked by people who only love democracy when they win. He reminded Americans that Trump has said — again — that he won’t honor the results of the 2024 election if he loses. Again.

Emanating sincerity in his speech late Monday night, Biden said it was the honor of his life to serve as president, and that he loved the job.

But, he said in pointed reference to his decision to pass the baton to Harris and the next generation, “I love my country more.”

Before the baton is passed, reverence for the man passing it

The Democratic National Convention promises to be a joyous celebration, a reset.

Biden’s selfless act in walking away from power for the good of his country will be revered long after Biden leaves the mortal world.

But Biden also delivered notable legislative and diplomatic accomplishments as president. Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker says Biden “accomplished more in three and a half years than most presidents get done in eight.” State Rep. Elizabeth Hernandez, chair of the Illinois state Democratic Party, predicted that Biden will one day be “viewed as one of the best presidents we ever had.”

For House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who supported Biden’s decision to step down and is rumored to have pushed it, has said that Biden belongs on Mt. Rushmore. Illinois’ senior U.S. senator, Dick Durbin, who served with Biden in the Senate, said Biden made “a remarkable record as a president … (b)ut I think he’s made the right decision (to step down), and I respect him for it.”

Illinois House Speaker Emanuel Welch said the Democratic National Committee celebrates Biden because he “saved our country” when he defeated Trump in 2020.

“What this country was going through because of Donald Trump was unbelievable and Joe Biden stepped right in and turned that ship around …,” he said. “The decision he made to pass the torch to Kamala Harris is a perfect example of who he is and what he stands for and it’s all about putting country first, and that’s translating into what you’re seeing in the excitement, not just here in Illinois but all across the country.”

Thank you, President Biden

Addressing the nation about his decision to drop out of the race, Biden said, “Nothing, nothing can come in the way of saving our democracy, and that includes personal ambition.”

The contrast with Trump — who incited an insurrection to cling to power after the voters rejected him — is painfully obvious.

Despite his fervent belief that he could and should serve a second term, Biden walked away from power to save democracy from fascism. He has stressed repeatedly that America is an idea, the premise that all of us are created equally. Even if that goal has not yet been met, it still defines us.

Biden yielded to next generation. With inspiring gravitas and humility, he closed his Democratic National Committee speech with an anthem:

“The work and prayers of centuries have brought us to this day…

what shall our legacy be, what will our children say?

Let me know in my heart when my days are through,

America, America, I gave my best to you.”

For that, and for all that he has accomplished for our benefit over the past 50 years in public service, President Biden deserves our unending gratitude.

Sabrina Haake is a columnist and 25 year litigator specializing in 1st and 14th Amendment defense. Her Substack, The Haake Take, is free.

Pelosi explains to CNN her urging of Biden to drop out: I took a 'punch for the children'

Ahead of President Joe Biden's unprecedented speech Monday night at the Democratic National Convention, former Democratic House Speaker Nancy Pelosi explained her reasoning in helping push him out of the presidential race, saying she "took a punch for the children."

Biden, 81, in May awarded Pelosi, 84, the Presidential Medal of Freedom and called her the "greatest speaker of the House of Representatives in history."

But after a disastrous debate performance in June against former President Donald Trump, Pelosi pushed Biden to exit the race. According to a New York Times report last week, the two hadn't spoken since he stepped aside, and multiple reports indicated he was unhappy with her.

On Monday night, CNN anchor Jake Tapper asked Pelosi about her new book — and the fact that she hadn't spoken to the president.

ALSO READ: Harris has figured out Trump’s greatest liability

"It was four weeks and one day ago that he stepped aside. And I know that it's been very difficult for him. That's been made very clear by some of his top aides," said Tapper.

Tapper asked her about any "residual bad blood," noting that Anita Dunn said Monday that no one wants to fight Pelosi, "'at this time.'"

"Sometimes you just have to take a punch for the children," said Pelosi with a laugh, adding that she hadn't heard Dunn's comments before the question.

Anchor Dana Bash also laughed, and asked, "Who's punching right now?"

"He made the decision for the country," said Pelosi. "My concern was not about the president, it was about his campaign, as he has seen, with the exuberance, the excitement that has come forth in our country."

Watch the clip below or at this link.


In TV interview, Biden explains his election exit

President Joe Biden, in his first TV interview since withdrawing from the election, has said he acted under pressure from fellow Democrats and out of a determination to see Donald Trump beaten.

Explaining his shock exit in new detail, Biden said party colleagues standing for reelection feared he was damaging their chances as his age and mental abilities came to dominate the campaign.

Biden, 81, has kept a low profile since ending his second-term bid on July 21 after his flailing debate performance against Trump triggered a slow-burning Democrat revolt against him.

In the short TV interview, recorded in the White House last week and broadcast on Sunday, the president appeared frail but cogent, again admitting he failed in the debate but stressing that health-wise he has “no serious problem.”

“A number of my Democratic colleagues in the House and Senate thought that I was going to hurt them in the (election) races,” he explained.

“I was concerned if I stayed in the race, that would be the topic you’d be interviewing me about,” he continued.

He singled out former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, a party heavyweight whose refusal to explicitly back his campaign was seen by many as pivotal.

“You’d be interviewing me about why did Nancy Pelosi say (something)… I thought it’d be a real distraction,” Biden said.

“A critical issue for me still is — not a joke — maintaining this democracy.

“I have an obligation to the country to do what is the most important thing we can do, and that is — we must, we must, we must defeat Trump.”

Helping Harris

Biden said he was proud of his record on jobs, investment and Covid recovery — and vowed to campaign hard for Vice President Kamala Harris, who has replaced him on the ballot.

“I’m going to do whatever Kamala thinks I can do to help most,” he said.

Democrats’ hopes of winning have soared since Biden’s withdrawal, as Harris enjoys a surge in support that has left Trump and the Republicans struggling.

The outgoing president said he had expected to serve only one term when he won in 2020, but that he had been persuaded to push for a second.

“I thought of myself as being a transition president — I can’t even say how old I am. It’s hard for me to get it out of my mouth — but things got moving so quickly, it didn’t happen,” he told CBS’s Robert Costa.

As Harris holds huge rallies in swing states, Trump’s light schedule has come under scrutiny, and it was his running mate, J.D. Vance, who blitzed the Sunday morning political talk shows.

Appearing on CNN, ABC and CBS, Vance fielded questions about child care, asylum seekers and abortion.

In one testy exchange with CBS’s Margaret Brennan, Vance complained that she had asked “six questions about abortion.”

“I’m still trying to get a clear answer,” Brennan retorted.

He also claimed that Harris was the one “calling the shots” in the Biden administration.

“If she’s not calling the shots, Dana, who is?” he told CNN’s Dana Bash.

Biden in his CBS interview warned that Trump was “a genuine danger to American security.”

“Mark my words, if he wins… watch what happens,” he said. “He’s a genuine danger to American security.

“Look, we’re at an inflection point in world history… and democracy is the key.”

He added that he was “not confident at all” of a peaceful transfer of power if Trump loses a second time.

Lawmakers caught in controversy as congressional stock trading debate rages on

Members of Congress are on a summer stock shopping spree — and still violating a financial disclosure law — amid a reinvigorated movement to ban congressional stock trading.

Three members of the House of Representatives appear to have violated the Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge (STOCK) Act this week by filing required reports late — some as much as two years past a federally mandated deadline.

From Speaker Emerita Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) to Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA), more than a dozen other members of Congress continue trading stocks and securities, even in the immediate two weeks after the Ending Trading and Holdings in Congressional Stocks (ETHICS) Act passed out of the Senate Committee on Homeland Security.

The bill has yet to be voted on by either the House or Senate in order to be sent to President Joe Biden’s desk to be signed into law, but its bipartisan co-sponsors call the committee vote “strong bipartisan momentum” toward a stock trading ban.

Continuing epidemic of violations

The latest STOCK Act violators appear to be Reps. David Joyce (R-OH), Jared Moskowitz (D-FL) and Stephen Lynch (D-MA), who join a list of more than 50 members of the 118th Congress who Raw Story has found to have violated the STOCK Act.

Joyce reported on Aug. 6 a dozen stock transactions after the 45-day deadline required in the STOCK Act for disclosing most purchases, sales and exchanges of stocks, bonds, commodity futures, securities and cryptocurrencies.

Three of the transactions date back to July 2022, reported nearly two years late, and the rest are from June 2023, reported a year late. The transactions are valued between $138,012 and $495,000 total. (Lawmakers are only required by law to disclose the values of their transactions in broad ranges.)

Investments include stock in aerospace corporation Boeing, multinational investment bank Citigroup, private credit manager Golub Capital and energy company TC Energy Corporation. Some investments are part of a trust, others from a retirement account.

Moskowitz disclosed on Aug. 6 more than 60 stock transactions from an account for a dependent child. Ten of those transactions were from February 2024, reported nearly five months late.

The tardy stocks include investments in companies ranging from health insurance provider Elevance Health to personal care multinational corporation Kimberly-Clark to footwear giant Nike and manufacturing company Snap-on. The value of the 60 investments are each in the $1,001 to $15,000 range.

Lynch reported on Aug. 7 six sale transactions and one purchase for mutual funds as part of a retirement account, disclosed three weeks late. The transactions’ values ranged between $397,007 and $930,000 total.

Lynch was previously three months late reporting the sale of VMware stock as part of an individual retirement account that underwent a “forced sale” when the company was acquired.

The congressional offices for Joyce, Moskowitz and Lynch did not immediately respond to Raw Story’s request for comment.

Who is trading stocks? And who is pushing for a ban?

The ETHICS Act calls for an immediate ban on members of Congress buying stocks and would prohibit them from selling stocks 90 days after enactment. Members’ spouses and dependent children would be prohibited from trading stocks starting in March 2027, which is when the president and vice president would also be required to divest from covered investments.

Covered assets include securities, commodities, futures, options and trusts. Congressional staff members would be allowed to continue trading stocks under this bill as would legislators' non-dependent children.

“Lawmakers like me, we're kind of like umpires in a baseball game. We call balls and strikes, and you definitely don't let umpires bet on the outcome of the game, because the public needs to know the umpires are calling balls and strikes fair,” said Sen. Jon Ossoff (D-GA), a co-sponsor of the ETHICS Act, in an Aug. 7 video posted on X. “Members of Congress are making decisions every day that impact the stock market, that impact businesses and industries, and we receive confidential information on big events that are coming.”

Ossoff co-sponsored an amended version of the ETHICS Act alongside Sens. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Gary Peters (D-MI) and Josh Hawley (R-MO). The bill passed out of a Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs markup on July 24 with an eight to four vote, despite Republican senators divided on how to proceed.

The same day Georgia Republicans Greene and Rep. Buddy Carter (R-GA) disclosed stock transactions.

Greene reported six stock purchases on July 24, each valued between $1,001 and $15,000. She also disclosed the purchase of U.S. Treasury bills valued between $250,0001 and $500,000.

A little over a week later, she reported on Aug. 2 purchasing more Treasury bills, with a value between $100,001 and $250,000.

Carter reported on July 24 four partial stock sales in Ameris Bancorp, each valued between $100,001 and $250,000.

Greene and Carter’s congressional offices did not respond to emailed questions by the time of publication.

The next day, Rep. Victoria Spartz (R-IN) reported the June 28 purchase of stock in real estate investment company, Simon Property Group, as a part of her husband’s Roth IRA, valued between $50,001 and $100,000.

“These are just stocks that Congresswoman's husband had in his retirement account before she was elected to Congress,” Kristi Risk, chief of staff for Spartz, told Raw Story via email. “He was just reinvesting his dividends back into the same stock.”

Sen. Katie Britt (R-AL) reported on July 29 the sale of stock in boat dealer, OneWater Marine Inc., as part of a joint account. Value: $1,001 to $15,000. Britt’s congressional office did not respond to Raw Story’s request for comment.

Pelosi reported on July 30 two stock transactions from her husband, who is a prolific trader. When she was House Speaker, Pelosi was one of the biggest obstacles to previous stock ban bills advancing.

Pelosi’s husband, Paul Pelosi, sold 5,000 shares in Microsoft valued between $1 million and $5 million, and he purchased 10,000 shares in artificial intelligence leader Nvidia, also valued between $1 million and $5 million.

“Speaker Pelosi does not own any stocks, and she has no prior knowledge or subsequent involvement in any transactions,” said Ian Krager, a spokesperson for Pelosi, via email.

Rep. Michael Burgess (R-TX) disclosed three stock transactions on July 31, each valued up to $15,000. His spouse sold stock in Royal Bank of Canada and shipping company, United Parcel Service, and Burgess reported his own purchase of additional stock in Royal Bank of Canada.

While Rep. Dean Phillips (D-MN) does not buy and sell stocks, he did report sales of ownership interest in Outsell, Inc, a “developer of consumer engagement technologies for the automotive industry,” according to the Aug. 1 disclosure report. The sales were valued between just over $1 million and $5 million, total.

"Congressman Phillips is one of a very small number of lawmakers to have voluntary established a qualified blind trust for his finances. He has no view of or direction over his investments," Sam Anderson, communications director for Phillips, told Raw Story via email. "That long, complicated, process took significant personal effort and expense, but it’s one he believes should be rule – not the exception – in Congress."

Phillips, who ran as a Democrat for president in the 2024 race, is an original co-sponsor of the TRUST in Congress Act. The bill, authored by Reps. Abigail Spanberger (D-VA) and Chip Roy (R-TX), would require members of Congress and their families to put investment assets into blind trusts during their time in office and ban them from trading individual stocks.

Sen. Tom Carper (D-DE) reported on Aug. 2 his spouse’s sale of a UBS corporate bond valued between $15,001 and $50,000. Carper filed a timely disclosure this time but was previously late three times in reporting stock trades and U.S. Treasury bill purchases.

Rep. Dan Meuser (R-PA) reported on Aug. 3 the sale and purchase of U.S. Treasury bills. Each transaction was valued between $250,001 and $500,000.

The congressional spokespeople for Burgess, Carper and Meuser did not respond to Raw Story’s request for comment.

Peters, chairman of the Senate Homeland Security Committee and co-sponsor of the latest ETHICS Act bipartisan agreement, reported two stock sales on Aug. 5. Each trade was valued between $1,001 and $15,000 and were investments in elevator manufacturer, Otis Worldwide Corp., and heating and air conditioning corporation, Carrier.

“Sen. Peters has always been transparent about his trades and follows the requirements of the STOCK Act, which is the current law,” a Peters aide, who declined to be named, told Raw Story.

“He negotiated a bipartisan agreement to update the ETHICS Act, and led the historic passage of that bill out of committee on July 24 – the first time a Senate committee has ever voted to advance legislation that would ban stock trading for members of Congress,” the aide continued. “Sen. Peters is continuing to work to get the amended ETHICS Act passed and signed into law to establish new requirements for all members of Congress.

Rep. Laurel Lee (R-FL) reported on Aug. 5 two stock transactions involving tech giant Apple, valued between $15,001 and $50,000 each.

Rep. Rudy Yakym (R-IN) has not reported any stock transactions, but disclosed on Aug. 5 his purchase of Treasury bills valued between $15,001 and $50,000.

Yakym and Lee’s congressional spokespeople did not respond to Raw Story’s request for comment.

Rep. Lloyd Doggett (D-TX) reported on Aug. 5 a purchase of shares in soda giant Coca-Cola, valued between $1,001 and $15,001, which is “solely the automatic reinvestment of dividends on securities that my wife inherited, rather than taking the dividends in cash,” Doggett told Raw Story via email.

Doggett said he does not trade individual stocks, “nor have the holdings of these few stocks impacted my work, as indicated by my vocal advocacy demanding that large corporations and the wealthiest few pay their fair share of taxes.”

The congressman said the New York Times chose to exclude him from an investigation into congressional stock trading since he does not actively trade individual stocks.

Doggett said he supports a congressional stock trading ban, including the efforts of Oregon senator Merkley through the ETHICS Act, and “would likely support similar legislation in the House.”

Rep. Suzan DelBene (D-WA) reported on Aug. 6 two government securities transactions in Texas and New York through a joint trust, each valued between $500,001 and $1 million.

“Government securities are generally considered safe investments,” Nick Martin, a spokesperson for DelBene, told Raw Story via email. “The congresswoman supports banning members from trading stocks and is a co-sponsor of the TRUST in Congress Act (H.R. 345), which would do that.”

DelBene has a complex financial situation due to her husband’s significant investments from his time as a senior executive at Microsoft. DelBene was previously late disclosing two sales of vested Microsoft shares totaling between $1.25 million and $5.5 million, but she previously disclosed her family's s Microsoft stock investments on her annual disclosures and a 2022 periodic transaction report, providing details of a forward contract her husband enacted before being confirmed as the assistant secretary for information and technology in the Department of Veterans Affairs.

Rep. Virginia Foxx (R-NC) reported four stock purchases on Aug. 6, each valued between $1,001 and $15,000. Three stock purchases were for chemical tankers company, Ardmore Shipping Corporation, and one was in investment adviser, Ellington Financial Inc.

Sen. John Boozman (R-AR) reported on Aug. 6 five joint stock transactions, each in the $1,001 to $15,000 range. Stock transactions included investments in Alphabet, the parent company of Google, telecommunications company, Motorola Solutions, and semiconductor company, Lam Research.

Boozman previously appeared to be in violation of the STOCK Act twice with late disclosures of U.S. Treasury bond transactions. with a disclosure filed on Aug. 21, 2023, a day past the 45-day disclosure deadline.

Foxx and Boozman’s congressional offices did not respond to Raw Story’s request for comment.