All posts tagged "mike johnson"

Mike Johnson turns on GOP colleague who is 'actively working against his team'

Donald Trump wants to destroy one particular Republican lawmaker, and GOP leaders aren't going to stand in the president's way, according to CNN's new reporting.

GOP Rep. Thomas Massie has been making waves from within the Republican party, most recently in connection with his push to force the DOJ to disclose all of its files on disgraced financier and convicted child sex abuser Jeffrey Epstein. Trump has vowed to support GOP candidates who want to oppose Massie, and CNN reports that Mike Johnson won't interfere.

"Speaker Mike Johnson and his leadership team are sending their clearest signals to date that their conservative colleague will have to fend for himself as Trump’s allies prepare to dump millions into Massie’s district to purge him from the Northeastern Kentucky district he’s represented for nearly 13 years," the outlet reported on Sunday. "In interviews with CNN, five members of House GOP leadership declined to offer their backing for Massie’s reelection bid – and Johnson would not say if he’d support his colleague."

According to the report, Johnson "admonished Massie for undercutting his party’s agenda – as the libertarian-minded Republican intensifies his furious battle to force the release of the Jeffrey Epstein files and derides Trump’s signature domestic policy achievement for driving up the national debt."

The piece also quotes Johnson himself as saying, "He is actively working against his team almost daily now and seems to enjoy that role. So he is, you know, deciding his own fate." The outlet characterized the statement as "a firm message that party leaders would not intervene to protect Massie in the escalating feud with Trump."

CNN continues:

"The lack of support among House GOP leaders is a reflection of months of mounting frustration with the Kentucky Republican as he’s personally antagonized both the speaker and president in a series of fights – most recently in trying to force a vote on a bill to release the Epstein files over intense opposition from Johnson and the White House. Massie needs the support of just five other Republicans – along with all Democrats – to put the bill on the floor, but he remains two GOP signatures short."

Read the full report right here.

'Women are more brave': MTG, Mace and Boebert praised as GOP men cave in Epstein civil war

WASHINGTON — It’s becoming increasingly clear to a handful of powerful MAGA congresswomen that their fight to release more Epstein files now pits them against some of the most powerful politicians in the Republican Party.

Bring it on, they say.

“Sometimes, you just have to f—ing do what you gotta f—ing do,” Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC) told Raw Story at the Capitol. “Excuse my language.”

Before Congress’s August recess, there were 10 Republicans willing to publicly buck President Donald Trump and force his political lapdogs — Speaker Mike Johnson and other GOP leaders — to hold a vote on releasing details of the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, the financier, sex trafficker and longtime Trump friend who died in federal custody in August 2019.

“The women are more brave in the face of the White House,” Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) told Raw Story.

Massie is the lead Republican sponsor of the Epstein discharge petition, a formal mechanism that forces a vote on any measure supported by more than half the 435-person House, an effort that has made Trump and GOP leaders uneasy for months.

Their efforts to quash the move have left most Republican men neutered, but they haven’t been able to dissuade three GOP congresswomen from their demand for full disclosure — or at least as full as appropriate, given minors are involved.

‘Close to home’

Most of his victims are still alive. That doesn’t mean the judicial system and its alleged congressional enablers haven’t made them feel powerless.

“The thing that got me was these women have been fighting for 30 years for justice and still don't have it. You have people who don't want to help them, and to me, it's infuriating,” said Mace, a rape survivor herself.

“It hit close to home.”

In the ring with fellow Republicans, Mace is joined by firebrands Reps. Lauren Boebert (R-CO) and Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA). They have yet to cave.

“The truth needs to come out, and the government holds the truth,” Greene told a large crowd outside the Capitol this week, as a group of Epstein victims gathered to speak.

“All of the fault belongs to the evil people that do these things to the innocent. This is the most important fight we can wage here in Congress, is fighting for innocent people that never received justice. And the women behind me have never received justice.”

Even MTG’s Democratic critics hailed her effort.

“I thought Marjorie Taylor Greene speaking was very, very powerful in terms of a signal to other Republican congresspeople,” Rep. Ro Khanna (D-CA), co-sponsor of the discharge petition with Massie, told Raw Story.

“The tone of this was not partisan. There are partisan fights: California redistricting is a partisan fight, the president militarizing the streets [is] a partisan fight.

“This is actually an issue that can bring this country together, and, frankly, the president can get credit if he releases the files.”

Trump doesn’t want credit. Rather, he continues to reverse campaign promises to release the files, dismissing survivors as perpetuating a “hoax”.

Following the president’s demands, this week Republican leaders tried to get out in front of the issue by releasing upwards of 30,000 Epstein-related files, many of which were public already.

“I think it’s a massive win,” Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL), who had supported the push for full disclosure, told Raw Story, adding: “I've always been pushing for the documents to be housed publicly somewhere for everyone to be able to access.”

Others panned the move.

“There's a lot of redactions. Like the flight logs, I mean, we have entire pages that are blocked out and blacked out, and I don't think those are all victims,” Boebert told Raw Story.

‘I don’t buy that’

At the Capitol, Epstein survivors — or surviving family members — concurred.

“Were you able to see some of the documents that came out last night?” Raw Story asked Sky Roberts, who lost his sister, abuse victim Virginia Roberts Giuffre, to suicide earlier this year. “Just all the black on there, all the redactions?”

“The people in these files are, like, politicians,” Roberts said. “They aren’t interns. They are very wealthy and powerful people, and it shouldn't be up to the survivors to have to release that list.”

Some GOP congressmen have now distanced themselves from the discharge petition they tried to force on party leaders, to bring a vote on the House floor.

“You're not signed on to the discharge petition anymore?” Raw Story asked Rep. Tim Burchett (R-TN), the day after Epstein survivors met members of Congress. “Why not?”

“I'm afraid of what the ladies told us yesterday is that they were saying that some of them could be outed publicly,” Burchett said. “I want them to remain anonymous. They don't need to be hounded by the press or people or freaks out there.”

Raw Story asked: “What do you make of your supporters and the president’s supporters saying you’re now a part of a cover-up?”

“I don’t buy that,” Burchett said.

Tim Burchett and AOC Rep. Tim Burchett (R-TN) shares a fist-bump with Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY). REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst

Cover-up or not, Republican men have undeniably retreated.

“What do you make of the men kind of bailing on this?” Raw Story asked Massie. “Before recess, you guys had about 10 [supporters] and now it's the dudes who bailed?”

“The women are more brave in the face of the White House,” Massie said.

“And look at who the women are: They're supporters of Donald Trump: Nancy Mace, Lauren Boebert, Marjorie Taylor Greene.

“This isn't political. I know some Democrats are trying to make it political and some Republicans are trying to make it political. But our base — and even the Democrat base — are all in the same place on this.”

‘Moving pieces’

Some female Trump fans on Capitol Hill say they are giving the administration time to reverse course.

“Obviously, there's a lot of moving pieces, but we are going through them right now,” Luna said, praising the administration for its files release this week. “And there has been some stuff that was not previously up there.”

While Luna went from endorsing the discharge petition in July to removing her endorsement, she says she isn’t judging GOP colleagues on the other side of the scandal.

“Every member has a right to do what they feel is best, but I think the files have been released. So if there's more, we'll find out in the investigation,” Luna said.

“It sounded like you were saying that you could still support the discharge petition — just not now?” Raw Story asked.

“If there's stuff that hasn't been released that we need and then we're getting blocked, yeah,” Luna said. “But I'm not going to do that without … looking through all the documents myself.”

Like Trump, Luna campaigned on releasing the Epstein files. But she remains dubious of Democrats who she accuses of piling on late.

“Why now?” Luna asked. "It just seems there’s a little bit more to the story than a lot of people are saying.”

‘Burn the system to the ground’

Congress just returned from summer recess, with the federal government slated to run out of funding at the end of the month.

Still, some say there's no bigger issue than righting Epstein’s wrongs.

Nancy Mace Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC) departs in tears from a meeting with Jeffrey Epstein survivors. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst

“This might not be the biggest issue in America right now, but it is the issue everybody can agree on,” Massie said. “Honestly, I think a lot of people are going to be embarrassed on both sides of the aisle.

“Powerful political figures will be embarrassed, but that's not a reason to not do this, to avoid embarrassment for somebody.

“Again, I don't think Jeffrey Epstein was particularly partisan in his sexual malfeasance … he committed many crimes. It's basically a group of people that don't need to belong to a party, because they don't report to the law when they do.”

What’s universally agreed upon is the Epstein saga isn’t going anywhere.

Raw Story asked Mace: “Before you guys left town for August recess, there were about 10 of you supporting the discharge petition. Right now, it seems like all the men are trying to bail. Is that just the old boys club at work?”

Mace smirked.

“I hope that more will join us,” she said. “We need to burn the system to the ground and start over.

“I'll do anything to help the Epstein victims. I'll do anything I can in my power to help them.”

Only one top Dem knows how to turn the tables on Trump and his sniveling minions

The president has been working hard trying to convince Americans that crime is so bad right now that he has no choice but to send armed military to patrol major cities to restore law and order, in the process stripping citizens of rights and liberties in the name of public safety.

Unfortunately, the reaction among Democratic leaders has been mixed, to put it mildly, but I think California Governor Gavin Newsom has shown a way forward. He said that if Donald Trump truly cared about crime, he would “invest in crime suppression” in states like “Speaker Johnson’s state and district.”

Look at the murder rate in Louisiana, he said. It’s “nearly four times higher than California’s.”

The implication, of course, is that neither Trump nor the Republicans in the Congress actually care about crime. They only say they do as a smokescreen for trying to subdue, control and “own” their perceived liberal enemies residing in cities and states governed by Democrats.

And because Newsom’s allegation — that Trump and the Republicans care less about crime than they do political oppression —rang so loudly and clearly, the House speaker was asked on Fox to respond. What I want to tell you is that it was a sight to behold!

“We have crime in cities all across America and we are against that everywhere,” Johnson said. “My hometown of Shreveport has done a great job of reducing crime gradually. We’ve got to address it everywhere that it rears its ugly head, and I think every major city in the country, the residents of those cities are open to that, and anxious to have it, and we’re … the party that’s going to bring that forward.”

Amazing! Why? Because in that brief moment, the Republican leader of the United States Congress sounded just like a Democrat would sound after being attacked by a Republican.

Johnson does not counterattack. He did not say Newsom was lying (Newsom was not lying). Instead, Johnson did what his counterpart Hakeem Jeffries often does after a Republican lays into him. He retreated to a “reasonable man’s” position to show that his party is the party that really cares about crime.

How did this happen?

First, Newsom told the truth. Red-state crime surpasses blue-state crime.

Second, by telling the truth, he questioned Trump’s intentions. If crime is such an emergency in Washington and Chicago that he has to send in the military to restore public safety, why isn’t he doing that in Louisiana? Why isn’t the House speaker demanding law and order? The implied answer is they don’t really care about law and order, only whether what they say about it leads to the subjugation they desire.

But importantly, Newsom did not accept as true anything Trump and the Republicans say about crime and public safety. He did not validate any of their lies. He did not concede any ground to them. He did not say to himself, “Well, Americans really are concerned about crime and Democrats shouldn’t ignore that.” He knows Trump does not care, and did not cover up bad faith with good faith. Most of all, he did not, as historian Timothy Snyder often warns, surrender in advance.

The result?

Johnson retreated. In the face of attack, he tried making himself seem like “the adult in the room.”

“We’ve got to address [crime] everywhere that it rears its ugly head.” He did what Democrats do. That’s amazing.

Most Democrats do not have the megaphone that Newsom has. Most are not going to force Fox to ask high-level Republicans to respond to them. Even so, what Newsom is doing is replicable. Do not accept in any way the lies told by Trump and the GOP, even when, or especially when, those lies come out of the mouths of independent voters. The Republicans do not mean what they say. They do not act in good faith. Overlooking this fundamental truth inevitably makes things worse.

This is why I see potential disaster in efforts by a “new coalition” of more than 100 “new Dems” in the House to show voters they really care about immigration reform. The Washington Post reported on the group’s “bipartisan” proposal, a mix of increased “border security” and more ways for immigrants to reside legally. And while that may sound reasonable, it’s not, because it accepts as true the allegations against undocumented immigrants: that they are committing serious crimes.

They are not. Entering the US without authorization is a misdemeanor on par with reckless driving and breaching the peace. Because it’s also a civil offense, judges hear cases in immigration court, not criminal court. “Unlawful entry” doesn’t rise to a felony unless it’s been done many times over, and most immigrants, once they come, they stay.

This is not news to the Democrats, but they have ceded this ground over and over for decades in the mistaken belief that it was better to compromise with the Republicans than to fight them head on, even though the Republicans, especially after 2016, did not act in good faith.

They said the immigration issue was about “law and order.” They said it was about “border integrity.” They said it was about an important thing that mattered to everyone. It was never so. The immigration issue was always about maintaining the dominance of white people in America.

But by accepting the Republicans’ lies in “the spirit of bipartisanship,” the Democrats made the lies real. They also made themselves complicit in turning immigrants into threats so monstrous that the president was justified in creating a secret police force (ICE) that is now breaking the law and profaning the Constitution to expel “the criminal aliens.”

Worst of all perhaps is that while finding “common ground” with liars and bigots, the Democrats have not mounted an unadulterated defense of immigration. It is good, in and of itself – for our economy, our communities and our culture. We should want more immigrants to become Americans. We should make it easier for them, not harder. And we can do that by upholding the true meaning of law and order.

That immigration is an essential good is implicit in recent polling that shows the uglier Trump gets with immigrants, the less popular he gets. To me, that suggests an opportunity for the Democrats. But before they move ahead, they should follow Gavin Newsom’s example in believing bipartisanship does not require surrendering in advance.

'You could see his face turn': CNN's John Berman struck by Mike Johnson reaction

CNN's John Berman describes the reaction from House Speaker Mike Johnson when he was asked about Ghislaine Maxwell.

The Louisiana Republican appeared Friday morning on "CNN News Central," where Berman asked him about Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche interviewing the Jeffrey Epstein co-conspirator, who was subsequently transferred to a minimum-security prison camp after saying she had never witnessed President Donald Trump behaving inappropriately with women or girls of any age.

"When I asked Johnson about Ghislaine Maxwell, I read back a quote from Maxwell's interview," Berman said. "You could actually see his face turn. I mean, he really could not possibly hold her in lower regard, so he told me he discounts everything she says. But he also went on to say some interesting things about what might happen in Congress, because there is this discharge petition that could ripen in the next few weeks from Congressman [Thomas] Massie, from your home state of Kentucky, and also [Rep.] Ro Khanna from California, and what was interesting is he really was evasive on it."

"Speaker Johnson really seems to think that maybe the conditions have changed, maybe that won't be something that's followed through with with 218 signatures," Berman said. "So stand by for that, he won't give a solid answer."

The House speaker also declined to give a solid answer on the president's call for a sweeping crime bill, including billions of dollars of new funding for law enforcement in Washington, D.C., where Trump has called in the National Guard to help patrol the streets, and Berman asked why troops weren't deployed to Johnson's hometown of Shreveport, which has a much higher crime rate.

"It is interesting to hear the way Speaker Johnson does talk about that, because the only cities where President Trump has talked about sending National Guard are in states run by Democrats," Berman said. "There are high crime cities in states run by republicans like Louisiana, like Tennessee, Nashville and Memphis, have higher crime rates, but you don't hear the administration or senior Republicans talk about sending the National Guard there."

Watch below or click the link here.

- YouTube youtu.be

'Word salad': Gavin Newsom torches Mike Johnson for dodging question on crime in own state

California Gov. Gavin Newsom ripped into House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) Friday following the GOP leader’s appearance on Fox News where he failed to directly address claims that his own state’s murder rate was far higher than California’s amid his support for President Donald Trump’s federal takeover of Washington, D.C.

Johnson appeared on Fox News Friday where he was asked to respond to comments made by Newsom on Thursday, where the California governor pointed out that Johnson’s home state and district had a far-greater murder rate than California’s, suggesting the speaker of hypocrisy amid his support for Trump’s D.C. takeover, and pledge to do the same in other Democrat-run cities.

“If he is to invest in crime suppression, I hope the president would look at the facts; just consider Speaker Johnson's state and district,” Newsom said Thursday during a press conference. “The murder rate [is] nearly four-times higher than California's in Louisiana.”

Asked to respond, Johnson immediately went after Newsom’s character, and went on to speak more generally about his party’s plans to address crime more broadly.

“Gavin Newsom will do anything for attention; he can name-drop me all that he wants, he needs to go and govern his state and not be engaging in all of this,” Johnson said.

“Look, we have crime in cities all across America, and we're against that everywhere and we need to bring policies to bear. My hometown of Shreveport has done a great job of reducing crime, gradually, but we've got to address it everywhere that it rears its ugly head.”

Newsom, responding to a clip of Johnson’s comments posted on social media, derided his answer as a “word salad.”

“This is what you call a WORD SALAD,” Newsom wrote in a social media post on X Friday.

Shreveport ranked 18th on 24/7 Wall Street’s “America’s 25 Murder Capitals” list and remains among the nation’s most violent cities, with a murder rate of 21.4 per 100,000 residents, and a violent crime rate of 949 per 100,000. Newsom has criticized Johnson in the past for his continued support of Trump’s federal takeover targeting Democrat-run cities given his own state’s problems with violent crime.

Nevertheless, Johnson continued to voice his support for Trump’s federal takeover, and went as far as to suggest that residents of cities Trump has floated for additional federal takeovers, such as Chicago, would welcome the deployment of federal officers and National Guard members to patrol their city’s streets.

“I think every major city in the country, the residents of those cities are open to that, anxious to have it, and we're the party that's going to bring that forward,” Johnson said.

Watch the video below or use this link.

'I'll vote no': GOP lawmaker takes shot at Mike Johnson in new Party rebellion

As Congress nears a Sept. 30 deadline to pass a stopgap funding measure and avoid a government shutdown, one GOP lawmaker is already signaling defiance of House leadership.

That lawmaker is Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY), who has often clashed with House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) and President Donald Trump – not only over spending, but also over his push to unseal documents related to Jeffrey Epstein, which both Johnson and Trump have sought to block.

“Congress will likely pass a continuing resolution by Sept. 30, but what is a continuing resolution?” Massie wrote on X early Friday morning.

“A continuing resolution is a copy of last year’s omnibus spending bill. But since Congress passed a continuing resolution last year (FY25), this year’s continuing resolution (FY26) is a copy of the omnibus (FY24) of (former President Joe) Biden’s last year. I’ll vote no.”

Continuing resolutions have become far more frequent in recent years as partisan divides among lawmakers have deepened, making it harder for Congress to agree to regular appropriations bills that are needed to fund the government each year. Massie, among the more fiscally conservative members of Congress, has often clashed with GOP leadership over spending, which, despite the rhetoric of Republican leadership, has continued to climb every year.

Massie’s fight with Republican leadership over spending came to a head over Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which is projected to increase the federal deficit by around $3.4 trillion over ten years, per the Congressional Budget Office. Massie was among the two House Republicans that voted no on the measure, drawing scorn from the White House.

“There’s a conservative school of thought that says if we would just keep passing continuing resolutions, we’d spend the same dollars each year, so government spending would effectively go down due to inflation,” Massie continued. “The problem with that theory is (that) Congress inserted FY26 spending increases in the OBBBA.”

Massie went on to draw a line in the sand on what he’d find acceptable, detailing a proposal he made under the Biden administration that would have seen spending cut by 1%, should Congress continue to pass continuing resolutions. That proposal, he said, was “killed” by Johnson, setting the stage for what will likely be a heated battle between House Republicans ahead of the looming Sept. 30 deadline.

“It’s been falsely stated I voted for a Republican continuing resolution that passed during Biden’s administration,” Massie wrote. “Wrong. I voted for a deal, coupled with a debt ceiling increase, that said if we keep doing continuing resolutions, then the next continuing resolution cuts all spending 1% (the Massie plan). Johnson killed that deal.”

'Clearly that's his opinion': Mike Johnson swatted down by Trump admin

House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) did not receive resounding support from the Trump administration over this week's comments regarding Israel and Gaza.

During Tuesday's Pentagon news briefing, a reporter asked, "Today, Speaker Johnson was in the West Bank, which he referred to as 'Judea and Samaria,' and said that it rightfully belongs to the Jewish people. Is that official U.S. policy, and if it's not, what is U.S. policy toward the West Bank?"

Johnson visited a settlement in the occupied West Bank as part of a private visit to Israel, according to Axios. He traveled with other Republican members of the Friends of Judea and Samaria caucus in Congress, "which supports Israeli settlements and advocates for annexation of the West Bank," according to the report.

State Department spokeswoman Tammy Bruce replied, "Uh, well, I've said this about other diplomats who've spoken their minds, including Ambassador Huckabee. Certainly that's not — if there's a policy in that regard, you would hear it from me. So, I think I can say that. I'm not going to speak for him or characterize his words in any ways, but clearly that is his opinion."

The reporter then asked, "But it's not the opinion of the U.S. government?"

"Well, I'm not going to speak about opinion of the government, and if there's a status in any region of the world, certainly in the Middle East, I would wait to hear it from Secretary Rubio and President Trump."

Watch the clip below via the U.S. State Department.

'Whoa!' Accusation that Mike Johnson complicit in Epstein coverup shocks conservative

The Bulwark's Bill Kristol wrote Thursday that House Speaker Mike Johnson and House Republicans were complicit in an "Orwellian" cover-up to protect powerful people involved in the Epstein scandal.

Kristol quoted Johnson telling CNN's Jake Tapper, "I want everything to come out about the Epstein evils. . . . I’m pushing aggressively for the full release of everything that is possible, and, by the way, so is the president. We’re using every mechanism within our power to do that, and to do it as quickly as possible."

And yet, Kristol wrote, Johnson "panicked" and "recessed the House in order to avoid a floor vote on a resolution calling for the release of the files."

"This is Orwellian," Kristol wrote.

The Epstein files reportedly include the names of President Donald Trump and other powerful associates of the convicted sex trafficker who died by suicide in his Manhattan jail cell in 2019.

But try as he might to enjoy his summer recess, Kristol wrote that the Epstein scandal has followed Johnson home to Louisiana.

"Earlier this week, a state representative from Johnson’s own 4th district of Louisiana, a fellow Republican, took the extraordinary step of issuing a statement condemning Johnson," Kristol wrote.

"State Rep. Danny McCormick of Oil City pointed out that Johnson 'shut down Congress early to dodge the vote,'" adding, "It’s one thing to be silent. It’s another to actively stand in the way of truth and justice. That raises serious questions about who he’s really protecting.

"Whoa," Kristol responded to the state rep's statement.

"The Speaker’s spin notwithstanding, so far Republicans in Congress have been part of the coverup," Kristol wrote. "And the issue isn’t going away. The August recess should be interesting."

Read The Bulwark article here.

GOP chair’s Biden subpoena turned against him on CNN over Epstein silence

CNN's Kasie Hunt pressed House Ways and Means Committee chair Jason Smith (R-MO) Tuesday on using his subpoena powers to light the fuse on the Jeffrey Epstein files instead of waiting an entire month until lawmakers are back from August recess.

Smith maintained that Americans don't care about the Epstein issue enough for him to take extraordinary steps to release the information.

But Hunt didn't back away.

"There are enough members of your conference who say they care about it, that [House Speaker Mike Johnson] says, 'Hey, we gotta go home early.'" She then asked if there was "any world" in which he would use the power of the subpoena "to learn more about Epstein's finances."

"That is not a common thing that I have utilized within the Ways and Means Committee," Smith said. "But if I felt like that it was a priority for Americans, then, of course. But, like I said, this has not been something that's been a driving force."

Hunt then turned the tables on Smith, saying, "But, you did use subpoena power with Hunter Biden."

"Exactly, we have the authority to use it," Smith said. "But that is the only time that I have used it."

He then reiterated that Epstein "is not the priority of the everyday American who's working 9 to 5, just trying to put food on their table, clothes on their backs, and gasoline in their cars. That is not their focus."

Smith used the subpoena power in December 2023 to require Hunter Biden to appear for a deposition in what he called "the Biden family influence peddling scheme."

Watch the clip below via CNN.

Mike Johnson shuts down House until September to block Epstein vote: NYT

House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) said he's shutting down the House of Representatives until September to stave off a vote that could compel the Trump administration to release the files on sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein.

Johnson announced Tuesday that he would put an end to voting on Wednesday night "in what he called an effort to avoid 'political games' related to the Justice Department's handling of the files," the Times reported.

Johnson's announcement came "just after" the House Oversight Committee voted to subpoena Epstein's former partner Ghislaine Maxwell, who is currently serving a 20-year sentence for sex trafficking.

Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche announced Tuesday that he had contacted Maxwell's attorneys to set up a meeting.

Blanche posted to X Tuesday his intention to meet with Maxwell, writing, "Justice demands courage. For the first time, the Department of Justice is reaching out to Ghislaine Maxwell to ask: what do you know? At @AGPamBondi’s direction, I’ve contacted her counsel. I intend to meet with her soon. No one is above the law — and no lead is off-limits."

Democrats and rogue Republicans have been trying to force through a resolution calling for the release of Epstein-related documents.

Read The New York Times article here.