Top Stories Daily Listen Now
RawStory
RawStory

All posts tagged "jeffrey epstein"

Dramatic developments show Trump's presidency on the verge of collapse

We’ve only had one genuinely failed presidency in the modern era: Richard Nixon’s. I believe we’re on the verge of the second, and for very similar reasons. If it plays out the way I expect, the consequences could be world-changing, and will certainly alter how our politics work for decades to come.

The tipping point began in a big way when Attorney General Pam Bondi went before Congress to defend Donald Trump. When asked how many of Epstein’s co-conspirators she’d indicted, she refused to answer and instead completely lost it, going off on a bizarre rant that included:

“Donald Trump signed that law to release all of those documents. He is the most transparent president in the nation’s history. None of them asked Merrick Garland over the last four years one word about Jeffrey Epstein.

“Donald Trump — The Dow — the Dow right now is over 50,000. The S&P at almost 7,000 and the Nasdaq smashing records. Americans’ 401(k)s and retirement savings are booming. That’s what we should be talking about.”

Nobody was buying it any more than when Trump said on Wednesday of this week, “I’ve been totally exonerated. I did nothing.”

Instead, both became punch lines for comedians and have Republicans hiding to avoid being interviewed.

And on Thursday we saw the bookend of this Watergate-like tipping point, when the former Prince Andrew was arrested by the British police. They didn’t even give the royal family an advance notice, didn’t invite him to come and be questioned, but instead just showed up and took him away, then tore apart his residences looking for evidence.

Consider the analogy.

The Watergate scandal that brought Nixon down began in June 1972, but Nixon didn’t resigned until August 1974. It crossed over his re-election in November 1972, and was barely a factor, just like Epstein was only a footnote to Trump’s election in 2024. For over two years, most Americans thought Watergate was overblown.

Early reporting in the mainstream media largely dismissed the initial furor of Democrats over their headquarters’ offices being broken into as partisan huffing and puffing, because almost nobody thought Nixon himself had anything to do with the crime.

Conservative media at the time ridiculed Democrats’ concerns as political opportunism, calling the event — as Nixon himself said — “A third-rate burglary.” The legal system was largely disinterested, beyond holding the burglars themselves to account for a crime where it wasn’t clear that anything was even taken from the offices.

And the Nixon administration — and his Department of Justice and its leader, Attorney General John Mitchell — ridiculed both politicians and media folks who expressed concern that Watergate represented an actual threat to our constitutional system of government.

What changed when the tapes were finally released (analogous to the release of 3 million documents by the DOJ and Bondi’s evasive testimony) was that Americans finally realized that the president was, in fact, “a crook” and that the institutions of the federal government — particularly the DOJ — had been covering up for him.

We’re damn close to that moment now.

The recent DOJ release included reference to a report that a 13-15-year old girl reported to the FBI that Trump beat her up when she bit his penis as he forced her to perform oral sex.

This week, reporter Roger Sollenberger found that she was interviewed at least four times by the FBI and those more in-depth interviews ­(case number 3501.045) had mysteriously gone entirely missing from the documents released by Patel and Bondi.

The story made a headline on the conservative news site Drudge Report, among others; this mirrors the period immediately before Nixon resigned when rightwing sites and elected Republicans stopped publicly defending him.

Nixon fell when institutional America and the GOP stopped speaking out in his defense. It wasn’t just the break-in or the hush money he paid the burglars that broke the dam; it was when the elite consensus turned on him.

Late in the evening on Aug. 7th, 1974, three Republican leaders — Barry Goldwater, Hugh Scott, and John Rhodes — walked over to the White House and told President Nixon that the evidence against him had accumulated beyond spin, loyalty, and even partisan defense. The center of gravity had shifted, and two days later he was gone.

I’m not suggesting Trump is losing his presidency this week or next; after all, Watergate took over two years and Nixon didn’t have Fox “News” or 1,500 rightwing radio stations or Vladimir Putin and Elon Musk churning social media on his behalf. Trump has a much more powerful firewall than Nixon ever dreamed of. It may sustain him for months or even another year.

And, as president, he has a lot of tools at his disposal to keep changing the subject, which is where these revelations about Trump could become “world changing” if he comes sufficiently desperate.

A war with Iran appears to be his latest gambit. During Watergate, Nixon’s aides developed what they called a “modified limited hangout,” a strategy not of disproving the scandal but of suffocating it in the media by overwhelming the public with competing announcements, threats, events, and crises.

Nonetheless, while Americans will tolerate misconduct, abuse of office to escape accountability is an entirely different animal. And allegations of child rape are a much bigger deal than breaking into the DNC; Nixon didn’t even participate, he just gave the orders and supervised the cover-up. Trump, on the other hand, appears to be right in the middle of Epstein’s operation, perhaps even including his teen modeling agency and Miss Teen USA pageant.

It’s a cliché that “the coverup is worse than the crime,” but they keep doing it.

And now it’s metastasizing beyond Epstein.

Bondi and Patel insist the Epstein investigation is closed. Kristi Noem and Kash Patel refuse to give Minnesota police evidence in the murders of Renee Good and Alex Pretti. ICE defies over 4,400 court orders and refuses members of Congress or the press entrance to its brutal concentration camps. Trump goes after the FBI agents who uncovered Putin’s efforts to make him president in 2016. He and his family make $4 billion off his presidency in less than a year. Trump sucks up to Putin.

Trump’s level of criminality and corruption exceeds Nixon’s by orders of magnitude.

The coverups were why Nixon’s Attorney General John Mitchell went to prison, as did his Chief of Staff H.R. Haldeman, his Assistant for Domestic Affairs John Ehrlichman, his Special Counsel Charles Colson, and his White House Counsel John Dean (who’s since been a frequent guest on my radio/TV program).

That has to be waking Pam Bondi and others around Trump up at night. And it should be giving pause to every elected Republican facing the November midterms.

Every Watergate moment looks impossible right up until the hour it becomes inevitable. And when that hour arrives, it never feels sudden to those who carefully read history; only to the people who insisted, until the very end, that it could never happen here.

This shock Epstein move means huge trouble for Trump. How he'll lash out is chilling

Everyone except me seems terrified that their name is going to turn up in the Epstein Files. And to be honest, even I’m a little nervous, given that Epstein was my mother’s maiden name.

But I’m honestly not all that preoccupied by the notion that all sorts of men and even women from all walks of life were on the periphery of Jeffrey Epstein’s life, either as part of his business ventures or as attendees at one of his parties or visitors to his island.

The truth is that knowing Epstein didn’t mean taking part in his crimes. But did it indicate that you knew he was trafficking and assaulting underage girls? Almost without question. Anyone who claims otherwise is probably lying to save their ass.

The arrest on Thursday of Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor – on his 66th birthday, no less – reminds us that justice delayed isn’t always justice denied. Potential crimes committed by those close to Epstein are being taken seriously on the other side of the pond, which is something that should serve notice to Republicans engaged in the current systemic coverup here, that their time dodging accountability is running out.

So many are now caught up in the Epstein web and facing fallout. Clearly, anyone even marginally associated with the man is suffering career or personal crises, or both. Such is the toxicity of having ever interacted with the Typhoid Mary of the 21st century.

Andrew denies wrongdoing. But since it’s inarguably true that the disgraced brother of the King of England is suspected of “misconduct in public office,” and that suspicion could well lead to a prosecution and conviction, we now have our Exhibit A that not even being a royal excludes you from criminal investigation.

No one named in those scandalous files is above reproach. If esteem and power don’t protect a former prince, they can’t shield a billionaire either.

Or a president.

Donald Trump has made a lot of claims about Epstein and how he ultimately found him to be a “creep” — a term no one under the age of 75 uses anymore.

But forget about the purported falling out, or why it actually occurred. Look to the years when Trump and Epstein were joined at the hip.

In a 2017 audio interview with the journalist Michael Wolff, Epstein claimed Trump was his “closest friend for ten years.” Epstein had no reason to lie. And you don’t hide your true nature from your best pal.

Remember that Trump told New York magazine in 2002, “I’ve known Jeff for 15 years. Terrific guy. He’s a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side.”

Also, recall the birthday message artistically presented in the shape of a naked woman that Trump allegedly wrote for Epstein’s 2003 birthday album, closing with, “A pal is a wonderful thing. Happy Birthday – and may every day be another wonderful secret.” It featured Trump’s signature in the spot where a woman’s pubic hair would be.

Trump sued the Wall Street Journal for $10 billion for reporting the letter. But this is a man, let’s not forget, who openly boasted of grabbing women by the genitalia, if using a far coarser term.

All of which is to point out that the odds of Trump having been a mere innocent, looking the other way while his closest friend criminally trafficked and violated girls, seem very close to zero.

I’m not telling you anything you don’t already know. But to be real, everything this administration is doing to distract and deflect on the files just makes Trump look guiltier than anyone. He didn’t suddenly discover Epstein was a “creep.” He wasn’t appalled by the behavior of Epstein and his convicted co-conspirator, Ghislaine Maxwell.

“I was Donald’s closest friend for ten years.”

Look at that line again. If it’s true, that would mean Trump doesn’t belong in the White House but the Big House. Again, not a novel observation. But as time moves along, his being shielded from scrutiny grows clearer by the day.

The latest collection of Epstein files showed records from 2019 of the FBI interviewing a woman who alleged Trump forced himself on her after Epstein introduced them in 1984. The girl was in her early teens at the time. That document was purged from the Department of “Justice” database. Poof. Gone. It reappeared later.

Everything Trump has done of late and will do going forward must be viewed as a wag-the-dog distraction, including the threat to attack Iran. Would he really launch a war to buy time and take everyone’s eyes off of the files? Bank on it.

As we saw this week, if Trump were Prime Minister of the U.K. instead of President of the U.S., more than likely all this evidence would have triggered an arrest. The more Trump boasts that he’s been fully exonerated, as he claimed again on Thursday, the more culpable he looks.

Here is another thing the files show Epstein said about his onetime best buddy: “I have met some very bad people, none as bad as Trump. Not one decent cell in his body.”

Sounds just like the kind of guy you’d want as your closest friend.

  • Ray Richmond is a longtime journalist/author and an adjunct professor at Chapman University in Orange, CA.

Trump was just taught a 'lesson' after accidentally giving Epstein scandal new 'life': CNN

The arrest of ex-Prince Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor has highlighted a core issue the Department of Justice has yet to clarify regarding Jeffrey Epstein's files.

While all files, including email correspondence and logs, were ordered for release by the end of 2025, it is believed that millions of files are yet to be shared by the DoJ. CNN analyst Stephen Collinson believes the recent arrest of a Royal Family member will bring into question the DoJ's handling of the Epstein files.

He wrote, "The DOJ may be justified in insisting that there is insufficient evidence of wrongdoing to charge anyone with crimes over their ties to Epstein.

"This does not, however, address the core issues in the scandal. Even if prosecutions aren’t possible, what about an accounting for scores of women allegedly abused by Epstein? If there was a sex trafficking ring operating in the United States, shouldn’t the government be investigating it, if only to ensure it never happens again?

"And isn’t the country owed answers about the circle of rich and influential people who continued to associate with Epstein even after his 2008 conviction for soliciting prostitution from a minor."

Donald Trump has spoken frequently of the Epstein files and has denied any involvement in the files when asked by reporters. This tactic, Collinson believes, is having the opposite effect to what the president wants.

Though Trump may want to move the focus away from the Epstein files, every time he tries to do so, he brings it back into focus. Collinson explained, "A recurring lesson of the Epstein saga is that each effort Trump makes to close it down only seems to give it new political life.

"Some Epstein survivors hope that Thursday’s stunning developments will fuel more disclosure in the US." Collinson also contrasts the US and UK responses to investigating those named in the Epstein files.

He wrote, "In the United Kingdom, the machinery of public investigation appears to be functioning as intended. It’s harder to make that claim with confidence in the US given the politicization of a justice system that has prosecuted President Donald Trump’s opponents and a president who pardoned hundreds of people convicted of crimes linked to the January 6, 2021, riot.

"The Trump DOJ had to be forced into every act of disclosure. And the only person offered legal relief so far is Ghislaine Maxwell, who gave testimony absolving the president of wrongdoing in his dealings with her former companion — and was moved to a more lenient prison to serve her sex crimes sentence."

New Epstein arrest brings 'dramatic shift' that could start a domino effect in US: analyst

The arrest of Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor could affect the United States, according to a political commentator who believes a precedent has been set.

The ex-Prince was arrested earlier today (February 19) on suspicion of misconduct in public office. The Mirror columnist Christopher Bucktin described the arrest as an "almost surreal" moment that would have longer-term consequences for those in the US.

He wrote, "Whatever the eventual outcome, the message was unmistakable: status alone no longer guarantees insulation from criminal investigation. Of course, Andrew's arrest should not be seen as any indication of guilt, and there are no charges yet.

"He has consistently denied any wrongdoing. But the tremors have not stopped at royalty." Bucktin would pull up Attorney General Pam Bondi's comment on investigating everyone mentioned in Jeffrey Epstein's files. Bondi suggested such action could "bring down the government," and the arrest of Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor could be a shift in the tide, Bucktin believes.

He added, "It was an astonishing warning. Not that the innocent would be exonerated. Not that due process would prevail. But that full accountability might destabilise the political order itself.

"If examining credible allegations against powerful individuals, like what the UK is now doing, risks shaking institutions, then those institutions demand deeper scrutiny, not gentler handling. The rule of law cannot function on the basis that some names are simply too significant, too connected, too politically sensitive to examine.

"The Epstein affair was never merely about one disgraced financier who died in custody. It was about an ecosystem of influence - the private jets, the island retreats, the cross-party friendships and the ease with which wealth seemed to smooth every obstacle. It was about how power protects itself."

Bucktin went on to suggest the activity in the UK over the former Prince's arrest could put pressure in the US to act similarly, as their "conspicuous" silence may be breached.

He wrote, "Justice cannot stop at one imprisoned accomplice while others retreat behind legal teams and influence. It cannot flinch because the truth might prove politically explosive. And it cannot accept that the potential embarrassment of the elite outweighs the public’s right to accountability.

"A birthday arrest on suspicion of misconduct in a public office should not stand alone as a rare spectacle. It should signal something larger: that no title, no fortune, no political office is sufficient armour against the law."

MAGA TV host torches 'awful' rival right-wing network over Bannon-Epstein revelations

MAGA television host Eric Bolling had a blistering response for Newsmax after a fan called in to ask about the conservative network's reporting on Steve Bannon and his ties to Jeffrey Epstein.

A woman named Lynne from Newcastle, Pennsylvania, asked if Bolling could address Bannon's connection to the late financier and convicted child sex offender revealed in the Epstein files after she saw Newsmax reporting on the story.

"We'd like to know what's going on," she said.

Bolling had a sharp reaction to the comment and the network.

"First of all, stop watching Newsmax," Bolling said. "Your mind will melt. They censor every single voice on that network... They're pro-Ukraine. They're pro-vaccine. Stop watching Newsmax. I left there 'cause I told them 'Stop censoring my show' — they said they wouldn't. I left, on my own. They offered me a contract, I ripped it up and said, 'No, goodbye Newsmax'. Stop watching them, they're awful."

Bolling added that Bannon, President Donald Trump's former White House chief strategist during the first Trump administration, was a documentary filmmaker who had previously planned to make a film about Epstein.

He argued that Newsmax shouldn't be talking about Bannon, saying "that's not conservative, that's not protecting one of ours" over the outlet sharing Bannon's name on-air.

This ugly truth about America's rulers was unmasked in Epstein's emails

Here’s how Kentucky Republican Congressman Thomas Massie responded on ABC last weekend, to a question about the Trump regime’s handling of the Epstein files:

“This is about the Epstein class …. They’re billionaires who were friends with these people, and that’s what I’m up against in Washington, D.C. Donald Trump told us that even though he had dinner with these kinds of people, in New York City and West Palm Beach, that he would be transparent. But he’s not. He's still in with the Epstein class. This is the Epstein administration. And they’re attacking me for trying to get these files released.”

The Epstein Class. Not just the people who cavorted with Jeffrey Epstein or the subset who abused young girls. It’s an interconnected world of hugely rich, prominent, entitled, smug, powerful, self-important (mostly) men. Donald Trump is honorary chairman.

Trump is still sitting on two and a half million files that he and Pam Bondi won’t release. Why? Because they implicate Trump and even more of the Epstein class. The files that have been released so far don’t paint a pretty picture.

Trump appears 1,433 times in the Epstein files so far. His billionaire backers are also members. Elon Musk appears 1,122 times. Howard Lutnick is there. So is Trump-backer Peter Thiel (2,710 times), and Leslie Wexner (565 times). As is Steven Witkoff, now Trump’s envoy to the Middle East, and Steve Bannon, Trump’s consigliere (1,855 times).

The Epstein Class isn’t limited to Trump donors. Bill Clinton is a member (1,192 times), as is Larry Summers (5,621 times). So are LinkedIn founder Reid Hoffman (3,769 times), Prince Andrew (1,821 times), Bill Gates (6,385 times), and Steve Tisch, co-owner of the New York Giants (429 times).

If not politics, then what connects the members of the Epstein Class? It’s not just riches. Some members are not particularly wealthy, but they’re richly connected. They trade on their prominence, on whom they know and who will return their phone calls.

They exchange inside tips on stocks, on the movements of currencies, on IPOs, on new tax-avoidance mechanisms. On getting into exclusive clubs, reservations at chic restaurants, lush hotels, exotic travel.

Most members of the Epstein Class have seceded into their own small, self-contained world, disconnected from the rest of society. They fly in one other’s private jets. They entertain at one other’s guest houses and villas. Some exchange tips on how to procure certain drugs or kinky sex or valuable works of art. And, of course, how to accumulate more wealth.

Many don’t particularly believe in democracy; Peter Thiel (recall, he appears 2,710 times in the Epstein files) has said he “no longer believes that freedom and democracy are compatible.” Many are putting their fortunes into electing people who will do their bidding. Hence, they are politically dangerous.

The Epstein Class is the by-product of an economy that emerged over the last two decades, from which this new elite has siphoned off vast amounts of wealth.

It’s an economy that bears almost no resemblance to that of mid-20th-century America. The most valuable companies in this new economy have few workers because they don’t make stuff. They design it. They create ideas. They sell concepts. They move money.

The value of businesses in this new economy isn’t in factories, buildings, or machines. It’s in algorithms, operating systems, standards, brands, and vast, self-reinforcing user networks.

I remember when IBM was the nation’s most valuable company and among its largest employers, with a payroll in the 1980s of nearly 400,000. Today, Nvidia is nearly 20 times as valuable as IBM was then and five times as profitable (adjusted for inflation), but it employs just over 40,000. Nvidia, unlike the old IBM, designs but doesn’t make its products.

Over the past three years, Google parent Alphabet’s revenue has grown 43 percent while its payroll has remained flat. Amazon’s revenue has soared, but it’s eliminating jobs.

Members of the Epstein Class are compensated in shares of stock. As corporate profits have soared, the stock market has roared. As the stock market has roared, the compensation of the Epstein Class has reached the stratosphere.

Meanwhile, most Americans are trapped in an old economy where they depend on paychecks that aren’t growing and jobs in short supply. They’re one or two paychecks away from poverty. The Federal Reserve Bank of New York just reported that mortgage delinquency rates for lower-income households are surging.

Affordable housing isn’t a problem that occurs to the Epstein Class. Nor is income inequality. Nor the loss of our democracy. Nor the deleterious effects of social media on young people and children.

When Silicon Valley’s biggest tech proponent in Congress — Rep. Ro Khanna (D-CA) — recently announced his support for a tax on California billionaires, to help fill the void created by Trump’s cuts in Medicare and Medicaid (which, in turn, made way for Trump’s second huge tax cut for the rich), the Epstein Class blew a gasket.

Vinod Khosla, one of Silicon Valley’s most prominent venture capitalists, with a net worth estimated at more than $13 billion (and who’s mentioned 182 times in the Epstein files but is no friend of Trump), called Khanna a “commie comrade.”

Khosla, by the way, is best known by the public for purchasing 89 acres of California beachfront property in in 2008 for $32.5 million, then trying to block public access to the ocean with a locked gate and signs. Despite losing multiple court rulings, including a 2018 Supreme Court appeal, he carries on with the dispute.

Not classy, but, shall we say, a typical Epstein Class move.

  • Robert Reich is an emeritus professor of public policy at Berkeley and former secretary of labor. His writings can be found at https://robertreich.substack.com/. His new memoir, Coming Up Short, can be found wherever you buy books. You can also support local bookstores nationally by ordering the book at bookshop.org

‘I’d like to report a murder’: Rebel GOP lawmaker trolls JD Vance over past Epstein posts

Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) spent Tuesday morning reviving Vice President JD Vance's old comments on late financier and convicted child sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

Massie, who co-authored legislation to push the Department of Justice to release the full Epstein files, pulled up the old posts on X from Vance that revealed the vice president had different thoughts about Epstein in the past. Since the release of more than 3 million documents and materials related to Epstein, Vance has appeared to change his tune about the deceased pedophile's operation and has been criticized for staying mostly quiet on the situation.

Massie has been a frequent critic of President Donald Trump and his administration, including Attorney General Pam Bondi, and House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA). His open criticism of GOP leadership has frustrated Republican leaders who remain committed to supporting Trump.

Vance wrote in a Sept. 4, 2021, post on X:

"Remember when we learned that our wealthiest and most powerful people were connected to a guy who ran a literal child sex trafficking ring? And then that guy died mysteriously in a jail? And now we just don't talk about it."

Massie had this quippy response at 4:20 a.m. ET Tuesday: "Yeah, why is that?"

"Some of us never forgot," he added in a later post on X.

People were quick to notice the early morning posts, divulging their thoughts on the resurfaced comments from Vance.

"Hello 911, i'd like to report a murder this morning," Matt Rein, attorney and influencer and creative partnerships director for The Democrats, wrote on Threads.

"Lmao the fact that Massie wrote that at 4:20am has me dying," user Emilie Brooks wrote on Threads.

"I certainly want to know why the current administration doesn't want to talk about it or why they won't release all the files," veteran Katie Kazoo wrote on X.

"Your silence on the issue is deafening, JD," social media strategist Devin Duke wrote on X.

Three women scorned over Epstein threaten Trump’s survival

A year and a month into his second term, Donald Trump’s presidency appears to be fracturing, most immediately thanks to a self-inflicted Department of Homeland Security shutdown and a looming Supreme Court decision on his global tariffs.

Trump has also clashed with lawmakers over loyalty, with Republicans from Sen. Tim Scott (R-SC) to Sen. Roger Wicker (R-MS) calling him out over the racist Obama video Trump posted online. Then there’s the fallout from the immigration crackdown in Minnesota, which has triggered a collapse in support among the young men and Latinos who put Trump back in the White House.

Caught between adverse judicial outcomes and alienation from traditional allies — Marco Rubio’s Christian nationalist speech at the Munich Security Conference was particularly off-putting — Trump faces a mounting crisis that threatens to derail him before he can even attempt to address pie-in-the-sky promises such as lowering grocery prices and ending the war in Ukraine.

And yet the real danger may come from a trio of scorned women: Reps. Nancy Mace (R-SC) and Lauren Boebert (R-CO), and Marjorie Taylor Greene, the former congresswoman from Georgia.

They are none too pleased — frankly, they are pissed off — about how Trump and Attorney General Pam Bondi bungled the Epstein files release.

Like Trump, their former idol, they are brash, unpredictable, and unapologetic. (Well, MTG is sort of apologetic, if you believe her.) That’s what makes their rising anger over Epstein so combustible. In a party where loyalty to Trump is sacrosanct, these three firebrands broke ranks. And they didn’t just murmur dissent. They torched it.

Over the weekend, all three erupted at Bondi’s absolutely stupefying memo announcing the “end” of the Epstein files release. Their reactions were harbingers of trouble.

Mace warned: “I think we ran out of patience a long time ago, and we’re honey badgers, and so I hope that … there will be more of us that will speak out.”

Greene fumed: “All of you MAGA influencers and the rest mocking the seriousness of women who were trafficked and raped as teenagers and young women look like cult fools. Good luck trying to get women to vote for Republicans in the midterms, you insensitive clowns.”

Boebert railed: “Terrifying language in the Epstein Files I viewed yesterday … Emails about torture. Frequent talk of ‘consumption’? A restaurant called ‘The Cannibal’… These are sick, sick people.”

Last year, when Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) filed a discharge petition to force a House vote on releasing the Epstein files, the Trump administration called it a “hostile act.”

The affair was supposed to die quietly. Instead, Mace, Boebert, and Greene were among the few Republicans willing to sign on early and force the vote into daylight.

Trumpworld launched an intense pressure campaign, including private meetings urging the three to back off. They refused. In November, the House vote passed 427–1, and Trump signed the legislation.

The DOJ rollout of the files, however, has been deplorable. Deadlines have been missed and victims’ names and personal information left unredacted, while alleged Epstein co-conspirators, Les Wexner among them, have been given a shield.

On Saturday, Bondi sent a letter to Congress claiming the DOJ had fulfilled its obligations under the Epstein Files Transparency Act by releasing more than 3 million pages.

Case closed?

Not according to lawmakers. Not according to victims. And certainly not according to Mace, Boebert, and Greene. If the Epstein saga is a book, we’ve only seen the intro.

Survivors and members of Congress argue that key internal memos remain withheld and names of alleged abusers are still redacted. Bafflingly, Bondi’s memo included long-dead celebrities on a list of “politically exposed” individuals, Elvis Presley and Marilyn Monroe alongside figures disgraced by association with Epstein including former Treasury Secretary Lawrence Summers, former Paul Weiss CEO Brad Karp, and Hollywood heavyweight Casey Wasserman.

Here’s the thing: as with the rest of this mangled release and botched attempt to squash the story, inserting names like Janis Joplin, Kurt Cobain, and Pope John Paul II looked suspiciously like another smokescreen, another “look over here” moment, another distraction designed to blur relevant connections to Epstein.

Beyond the shenanigans was Bondi’s cold, crass refusal to apologize to Epstein survivors seated directly behind her in a House Judiciary Committee hearing last week.

For many, that was the final betrayal.

The three GOP women are hardly known for sisterhood politics but they are now resoundingly advancing just that.

Mace has promised to go “full-blown scorched earth,” in pursuit of accountability.

That doesn’t suggest capitulation.

Trump likes to dominate women, or so he thinks, and he likes to humiliate them too. Does “Quiet, Piggy” ring a bell? But what makes Mace, Boebert, and Greene tricky is that they are his people. They speak the language of the base. They helped build it.

And when they accuse his DOJ of hiding the truth about Epstein, it perks up the ears of MAGA conspiracy theorists.

Trump signed the release bill under enormous pressure. But the DOJ has turned a festering wound infectious. The redactions, the unredacted names, Bondi’s bonkers memo, and her refusal to apologize all feed the perception that the powerful are being protected.

Greene has positioned herself as a leading outside voice calling for the “full-blown scorched earth” approach Mace promises too. As the Epstein fiasco unfolds, Greene’s voice will only grow louder, a counterweight in MAGA, demanding answers.

These three women are set to continue reading names into the Congressional Record, demanding jail time, going to war with the DOJ, tightening the screws on Trump.

He has survived indictments, impeachments, insurrections. But surviving scorned women, allies turned insurgents, fighting for victims, may prove a more grievous challenge altogether.

Kristi Noem roasted after pilot fired over forgotten blanket: 'Can't buy another?'

Mockery abounded Friday after an unusual report revealed that Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem fired a pilot over not moving her blanket — but then needed the pilot's help to fly her home.

The Wall Street Journal described in a bombshell report the chaos and dysfunction inside the Department of Homeland Security. Several sources complained on and off the record about Noem and her top adviser and purported romantic partner Corey Lewandowski, who frequently berate senior staffers, demand polygraph tests for employees they don't trust, and routinely fire employees for dubious reasons. In one incident, Lewandowski fired a U.S. Coast Guard pilot after Noem’s blanket was left behind on a plane during a maintenance issue, according to sources familiar with the incident.

On social media, people mocked Noem over the blanket incident.

"I am confused…does Noem have a security blanket she travels with??" Former FBI special agent and lawyer Asha Rangappa wrote on Bluesky.

"The details of the Kristi Noem blanket incident are just f------ perfect," Gizmodo reporter Matt Novak wrote on Bluesky.

"The Kristi Noem blanket incident is a bizarre example of how a regime of narcissists is swinging a wrecking ball at Americans' lives in service to their own egos," former Metro editor at the Chicago Tribune Mark Jacob wrote on Bluesky.

"Noem can’t just buy another blanket?" Another user wrote on Bluesky.

"BREAKING: Kristi Noem blanket reveal," Governor Newsom Press Office wrote on X, featuring an image of President Donald Trump and late financier and sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

"DHS did not fire the officers who shot and killed Americans in cold blood. They did, however, fire an officer who accidentally left Kristi Noem's blanket on a plane," Democrats wrote on X.

'Pockets of rebellion' stalling Trump's second-term total power grab: analysis

Donald Trump's administration is facing more resistance than the president is used to, according to a political analyst who believes it is affecting Trump's plans.

The president has been pushed back by a dwindling approval rating, ICE shootings in Minneapolis, and the ongoing release of Jeffrey Epstein's files. These issues, CNN analyst Stephen Collinson believes, are only part of the problem the president faces. Trump is now facing strong pockets of resistance, which could make his time in office tricky.

Collinson wrote, "The president hasn’t repudiated his quest for total power. But he’s beginning to hit small but significant pockets of rebellion.

Every week, more people show they are less frightened of the president. That even includes some Republicans. Some of Trump’s most cherished policies and personal goals face increasing disruption from political action, the courts, individual citizens, and the inexorable gravity of electoral politics."

The analyst believes Trump has failed to throw his weight around in Minneapolis, and is now facing opposition from the courts elsewhere in the country.

"On Thursday, Trump’s border czar Tom Homan announced the end of the surge of thousands of federal officers to Minnesota," Collinson wrote. "He insisted the countrywide deportation crackdown would not relent and that the force had achieved its goals, including by making more than 4,000 arrests.

"Yet its departure and the step back from the most aggressive on-the-street tactics still represented a reversal. It followed weeks of protests and public outrage over the broad-daylight killings of two Americans, Renee Good and Alex Pretti. The politics of the purge in Minnesota are simply no longer sustainable."

Pressure on Mark Kelly also lessened when they declined to pursue Pete Hegseth's bid to punish the Arizona Democratic Party representative.

Collinsion explained, "The courts have been another reliable brake on Trump’s power grabs, even if the administration has won its share of big decisions.

"In Washington on Thursday, a judge shut down Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s bid to punish retired Navy captain and Arizona Democratic Sen. Mark Kelly for “sedition” — one of the most grievous charges that can be laid against anyone. (Hegseth said the administration would “immediately” appeal the decision.)"

This rebellious nature seen in parts of the country has, according to Collinson, instilled a pushback in the GOP too. He added, "Sometimes, a scent of rebellion can be catching.

"Six Republicans just defied their party’s leadership and voted with Democrats in the House to repeal the president’s tariffs on Canada— reflecting growing anxiety about the cost of his 19th-century-style trade policies.