Top Stories Daily Listen Now
RawStory
RawStory

All posts tagged "jd vance"

Chances of Pam Bondi going to jail grows 'exponentially daily': ex-White House reporter

An analyst Friday predicted that it's likely White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller and Attorney General Pam Bondi will spend time behind bars.

In an opinion piece for Salon, White House columnist Brian Karem described how the Trump administration has viewed President Donald Trump falling "further into delusion" and what could happen next following his "Mean Don" remarks at the World Economic Forum at Davos, Switzerland, and "word-salad monologue" at the White House press briefing room to mark his first year since his second inauguration. The change from Trump in his first administration to Trump 2.0 is noticeably different — and the people backing him could ultimately be the people he turns against.

"That Trump was more cogent and could read a room a lot better than the current version, leading one to wonder if he’s just fronting for the worst instincts of people who work for him who have far darker visions of America than even he does," Karem wrote. "Yes, I’m talking about Stephen Miller. He’s practically the deputy president right now, and every action taken by Immigration and Customs Enforcement is apparently organized, orchestrated and implemented by him. I wouldn’t be surprised if Miller was in charge of the president’s vitamin E injections."

Miller's influence has only grown, as has Vice President JD Vance's sway.

"Trump is quickly becoming irrelevant to the MAGA movement," Karem wrote. "Peter Thiel’s surrogate is warming up in the bullpen, which is a potentially worse scenario than having Trump for the next 1094 days."

What Trump has done in the past could reflect what he does in the future, including who stays or goes, and whether his inner circle will remain. Karem argued that he could turn on his closest advisers, simply because he has done it before.

"The question isn’t whether we have had enough of Donald Trump. The question is what will Donald Trump do when he finally realizes that? If what Trump did to Michael Cohen is any indication, the chances of Stephen Miller, Pam Bondi and others spending time behind bars grow exponentially daily," Karem wrote. "The president knows no loyalty. If he believes it would be better to throw his confidants under a bus, his past actions show he will do so eagerly. Maybe the Democrats, along with some Republicans, should try to convince him to flush a few."

GOP voters turn on JD Vance presidency run: 'I just don't think he can win'

Republican Party voters are unconvinced by a JD Vance presidential run and say they would turn on the vice president should he be the nominee, according to reporting.

Problems for Vance began not recently, but at the start of Donald Trump's second term as president. According to GOP voters speaking to Politico, the ties to the old establishment will hinder his chances. One voter, Sam Z, said, "I don’t think Vance can win, because I think he’s too connected to the current political establishment in Washington, which I think has a very negative approval rating right now."

"If you look at what he was about in 2018, 2019, 2020, and you look at what he’s about now, it’s very, very different… Somebody younger running in office would be awesome. So that’s the one thing I wouldn’t mind for Vance. But overall, I just don’t think [he] can win. I think he’s kind of flip-flopped on a lot of issues."

Other voters also believe Vance's ties to the current administration are a hindrance rather than a benefit for any potential presidential run in 2028.

One voter, Alexandre M, said, "I feel like it's just time for someone new, especially for the Republican Party." They went on to suggest the Epstein files is a growing issue too, "because JD Vance was also pushing that as well."

Vance was left dealing with an embarrassing moment earlier this week after suggesting the American economy is like the Titanic.

Speaking at an event in Toledo in his home state of Ohio under a banner reading, “Lower Prices, Bigger Paychecks,” Vance addressed the worsening affordability crisis by once again blaming former Democratic President Joe Biden—who left office a year ago—for the problem.

“The Democrats talk a lot about the affordability crisis in the United States of America. And yes, there is an affordability crisis—one created by Joe Biden’s policies,” Vance said. “You don’t turn the Titanic around overnight. It takes time to fix what was broken.”

GOP ex-rep calls VP answer to reporter 'deliberate and evil': 'JD Vance isn't this stupid'

JD Vance's recent comments set off "evil" alarms for one Republican who used to serve as a congressman.

The vice president kicked off the controversy with a recent answer to a reporter who asked about purportedly warrantless searches by ICE.

"Nobody is talking about doing immigration enforcement without a warrant. We're talking about different types of warrants that exist in our system," the VP said. "Typically in the immigration system, those are handled by administrative law judges. So we're talking about getting warrants from them."

But according to one Republican ex-lawmaker, Vance is actually lying.

" JD Vance isn’t this stupid, so what he’s doing here is deliberate and evil," said former congressman Justin Amash. "You don’t just need 'some kind of warrant' to enter a home. You need a warrant from the judiciary. He knows this."

Amash added, "He knows they’re breaking the law when they enter a home with an administrative warrant. He uses the phrase 'administrative law judges' to mislead. An administrative warrant comes from DHS. They are writing their own 'warrants,' which makes them no more valid under the Fourth Amendment than if a random person wrote on a piece of paper, 'I can enter your house.'"

This Trump lackey was shockingly prescient about president before wild about-face

Donald Trump “is unfit for our nation’s highest office,” JD Vance famously said.

He’s “reprehensible,” the now-vice president said before Trump’s first election, and “an idiot.”

Trump, he said way back then, may even become “America’s Hitler.”

Vance was prescient when it came to Trump.

Because the 47th U.S. president has repeatedly shown he’s unfit, most germanely for our purposes: He’s sent a paramilitary force of 3,000 masked, heavily armed agents to terrorize us. Agents have accosted Minnesotans based only on skin color, invaded people’s homes without warrants, beaten — and in two cases shot — people without giving justification for adequate cause.

The Vance who understood Trump so well a decade ago is apparently a weak man whose lust for power overrode whatever principles he had, if they were ever sincere.

He disgraced his office by calling Renee Nicole Good — who was killed this month by a federal officer — a “deranged leftist” and her actions “classic terrorism.” But in the same press conference, he admitted: “I don’t know what was in her heart or what was in her head.”

He’s ever the political chameleon.

That said, Vance is coming to Minnesota on Thursday for a “roundtable” with local leadership. We’re a welcoming people, so I hope he enjoys the brisk air.

No doubt his propaganda minister will set him up with someone who will tell him ICE is great and immigrants are terrible, but he should talk to some others.

Like ChongLy “Scott” Thao, an American who told the Associated Press masked U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents forced their way into his house and pointed guns at the family, yelling at them. They then pushed him at gunpoint out into the street wearing only his undergarments in subfreezing temperatures.

“I was shaking,” he said. “They didn’t show any warrant; they just broke down the door.”

Minnesota is home to many Hmong families who we welcomed here after the Vietnam War, when they fought for the Americans at great personal risk.

Or how about this Columbia Heights resident, Ramon Menera, another U.S. citizen who said he was detained by U.S. Border Patrol agents Jan. 14 because of his accent.

His hilarious retort, captured on video: “You have an accent, too!”

Maybe Vance should talk to Nasra Ahmed, 23, also a U.S. citizen, born and raised in St. Paul. She was arrested by ICE last week and detained for two days, enduring a racial slur and a stress-induced seizure, according to U.S. Rep. Betty McCollum. Oddly, Ahmed faces no charges.

He should also talk to Ryan Ecklund, a Woodbury realtor who was lawfully observing ICE when he was arrested and detained for 10 hours.

Finally, no doubt Vance backs the blue — except when people assault police officers as they storm the U.S. Capitol to try to keep Trump in office, in which case, pardons all around — so he should talk to Mark Bruley, the Brooklyn Park police chief.

Bruley said his own off-duty officers have been racially profiled while encountering ICE. “Every person who has had this happen to them is a person of color.”

Here’s what went down, according to Bruley:

“When (the officer) became concerned about the rhetoric and the way she was being treated, she pulled out her phone in an attempt to record the incident, the phone was knocked out of her hands, preventing her from recording it.

“The [agents] had their guns drawn during the incident and the officer became so concerned she was forced to identify herself as a Brooklyn Park police officer in hopes of slowing and de-escalating the incident.”

Second Lady Usha Vance is having a baby. Great! Vance should visit the Mischief Toy Store in St. Paul, where ICE agents — angry at the store’s public anti-ICE posture — showed up with a “notice of inspection,” forcing the store to prove its staff are permitted to work in the U.S., the Pioneer Press reported.

Vance should listen to Minnesotans who can tell him about widespread racial profiling and the routine violation of our constitutional rights, and then he should leave — and take his 3,000 masked hooligans with him.

  • J. Patrick Coolican is Editor-in-Chief of Minnesota Reformer. Previously, he was a Capitol reporter for the Minneapolis Star Tribune for five years, after a Knight-Wallace Fellowship at the University of Michigan and time at the Las Vegas Sun, Seattle Times and a few other stops along the way. He lives in St. Paul with his wife and two young children. Minnesota Reformer is part of States Newsroom, the nation’s largest state-focused nonprofit news organization.

'It's terror at this point': Explosive warning as Trump weighs nuclear option in Minnesota

WASHINGTON – As Vice President JD Vance prepared to visit Minneapolis on Thursday, a prominent Democratic congresswoman, herself a top target of Donald Trump’s racially tinged attacks, railed against federal immigration agents deploying “horrifying” and “terrifying” tactics in her home city.

“It’s occupation … it’s terror at this point,” Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) told Raw Story.

Omar was speaking at the Capitol on a day of drama around the passage of new funding for the Department of Homeland Security, which houses agencies including Immigration and Customs Enforcement, or ICE.

Agents of ICE and other DHS bodies have been running amok in Minneapolis and other parts of Minnesota as the Trump administration implements its brutal immigration agenda.

On Jan. 7, in Minneapolis, an ICE agent shot and killed 37-year-old Renee Nicole Good, a U.S. citizen and mother of three who was observing federal operations.

Trump, Vance, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, and other senior officials immediately attacked Good and praised the agent who killed her, Jonathan Ross.

Federal agencies refused co-operation with state and local investigators as fears spread that Good’s killing would be covered up, her killer not brought to justice.

Amid rising protests in Minneapolis, there has been another shooting, wounding a man in the leg, and multiple instances of protesters met with violence by federal agents.

The Trump administration has launched investigations into local Democratic leaders, including Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz and Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey.

Trump has also floated invoking the Insurrection Act, a rarely used measure that allows the president to deploy regular army troops to deal with civil unrest.

Vance was due to speak in Minnesota on Thursday evening. The administration said he would “reinforce the White House’s unwavering support for federal immigration officials,” hold a roundtable discussion with community leaders, and stage a news conference.

Raw Story asked Omar if she was worried that Vance’s visit risked “tossing gasoline on an already burning fire?”

“Minnesotans have been very level-headed in their approach,” Omar said. “They understand the stakes, and they are not taking the bait in escalating this in any kind of way that would jeopardize the safety of their neighbors.”

In another high-profile incident in Minneapolis, federal agents recently took into custody a 5-year-old boy, seeking to gain access to family members.

“It's one of the most horrifying stories to come out of Minnesota,” Omar told Raw Story. “I mean, to have this child be used in a way to coerce others to come out is really terrifying. And you know, we've heard that they took him and his father to San Antonio [in Texas] before they took them to a more permanent place.”

“Does that show that they are escalating tactics?” Raw Story asked.

“They are,” Omar said. "It's an occupation, I think is a light word to use. It's terror at this point. I think they have a desperate need to show that they are able to do something there.”

Omar was born in Somalia and emigrated to the U.S. — making her a prime target for frequent racist attacks from the right, including from Vance and Trump.

Trump has said Omar should be jailed or deported.

Right-wing invective about Somali Americans and cases of childcare benefit fraud in Minnesota have added fuel to Trump’s attacks.

Omar said: “Obviously, the Somalis are not in the crossfire of [the ICE raids] because, you know, nearly 60 percent of Somalis in Minnesota are US-born. Almost 99 percent of us are citizens. So when they couldn't find Somalis, I think they're taking their anger out on the Latino and Asian community, and it is, like I said, pure terror.”

On Thursday, the House was considering a new funding measure for the Department of Homeland Security. If it does not pass, the House will risk another government shutdown, just two months after the end of the longest such funding pause in history.

Omar said: “The alternative is finding a way to pass legislation that reins in the terror that ICE and Border Patrol is causing in our communities. They have no business being in American cities. Their mission has been to occupy, to terrorize and to intimidate communities.”

Speaking of her Minneapolis constituency, she said, “I have businesses that are reporting severe losses. It is unjustifiable to shoot an American citizen in the face, to have masked men jumping out of unmarked cars, asking American citizens for their papers.

“And this is not just happening in Minneapolis, it's happening across Minnesota, and we cannot normalize this terror that our communities are feeling, and we have to take a stand.”

Omar called the DHS funding bill “a joke” and said, “Real accountability means that they follow what the laws of this country are, and they are moving the goal post every single minute.

“They have authorized for ICE agents to go into people's homes, violating the Fourth Amendment without a judicial warrant. You can now live with federal agents that are deputized by our government constantly violating the Constitution.”

Nonetheless, most observers said the DHS funding measure would pass, with swing-state Democrats likely to support Republicans in voting for the bill.

Revealed: Vegas odds that Vances name unborn baby after Trump or Charlie Kirk

Second lady Usha Vance and Vice President JD Vance announced they were expecting their fourth child this week and gamblers are predicting what they'll name the baby — placing bets that a MAGA leader could be the possible namesake.

Bettors have indicated a likelihood that the Vances would potentially name their son after President Donald Trump or late MAGA influencer Charlie Kirk, The Daily Beast reported.

"Bettors can currently get 22/1 odds that J.D. and Usha Vance will name their unborn son 'Donald.' The odds that the couple will name their fourth child after President Donald Trump are second to the 20/1 odds that they will name the baby 'Charlie,' after slain conservative influencer Charlie Kirk," The Beast reported.

"Bettors can also get 25/1 odds on 'Christian,' 30/1 odds on 'Pete/Peter,' and 40/1 odds on 'Hill/Billy.' The Vice President and Second Lady said the baby is expected in 'late July,' but did not mention any plans for the child’s name," according to The Beast.

The couple's other children are not named after any political leaders.

The Vances have faced a number of rumors online over their marriage after Vance was seen giving an intimate hug to Kirk's wife, Erika Kirk, and Usha was photographed not wearing her wedding ring.

In the statement provided to Raw Story, a spokesperson from Usha's Vance's office said she "is a mother of three young children, who does a lot of dishes, gives lots of baths, and forgets her ring sometimes."

Usha Vance makes big announcement amid marriage questions

Second lady Usha Vance announced Tuesday that she is expecting her fourth child.

She made a joint announcement with her husband, Vice President JD Vance, on social media that they are having a son. The couple has three other children, ages 3, 5 and 8, according to The Daily Beast.

“We’re very excited to share the news that Usha is pregnant with our fourth child, a boy,” the couple said in the announcement. “Usha and the baby are doing well, and we are all looking forward to welcoming him in late July.”

“During this exciting and hectic time, we are particularly grateful for the military doctors who take excellent care of our family and for the staff members who do so much to ensure that we can serve while enjoying a wonderful life with our children," according to the announcement.

The couple married in 2014 and has faced questions rumors after the second lady appeared in public without a wedding ring, but her office offered an explanation — something the vice president has claimed they joke about.

Usha Vance's appearance in public without a wedding ring raised eyebrows among liberal influencers and strategists, who have kept an eye on JD Vance's relationship since the Catholic-convert V.P. suggested his Hindu-born wife might one day convert to Christianity. Conservatives, however, have jumped to the defense of the second lady.

In the statement provided to Raw Story, a spokesperson from Usha's Vance's office said she "is a mother of three young children, who does a lot of dishes, gives lots of baths, and forgets her ring sometimes."

'Things are looking bad for you': Internet blasts JD Vance after 'cheating' effort fails

JD Vance on Saturday lashed out against a fellow Republican, and observers were quick to point out that the vice president was apparently frustrated that his attempt at "cheating" failed.

Vance over the weekend took to X to take a swipe at Rodric Bray, a Republican member of the Indiana State Senate. Indiana Republicans stood up to Trump and refused to engage in the mid-cycle redistricting effort that Trump was aggressively pushing.

That news became relevant when Democrats did engage in redistricting activities in Virginia.

"Now, the General Assembly is moving to impose new congressional maps and force a special election in April—maps that would change Virginia’s delegation to 10 Democrats and just 1 Republican," a MAGA account wrote Saturday. "This is power for power’s sake—plain and simple. Elections should be decided in a fair fight at the ballot box, not through shady political gerrymandering. Virginians deserve better."

Vance shared that post and wrote, "I'd like to thank [Bray] for not even trying to fight back against this extraordinary Democrat abuse of power."

"Now the votes of Indiana Republicans will matter far less than the votes of Virginia Democrats. We told you it would happen, and you did nothing," Vance then added.

But users were quick to point out that it was Trump and the GOP that started the recent redistricting push.

Liberal influencer Brian Krassenstein said, "Maybe republicans shouldn’t have started this mess. Things are looking bad for you in 2028. Sad."

"At least you have your couch," he then added.

His brother Ed Krassenstein also chimed in, saying, "You are just pissed they wouldn’t cheat for you."

MS NOW's Sam Stein said, "White House launched this cycle with Texas, didn't have the ability to convince state lawmakers (in states beyond just Indiana) to follow, and is now blaming those lawmakers for Democrats retaliating."

Project Liberal's Joshua Reed Eakle weighed in, "This tweet is the political equivalent of punching a kid in the face and then crying like a huge baby and blaming everyone else when you get punched back."

Attorney James Abrenio said, "Seeing JD weigh in on this has solidified that we need 10-1 maps. The whole reason for this is to prevent Trump and JD from stealing the midterm election. All so they can continue unchecked authoritarian regime. They started this fight. We need to finish it."

Sorry, JD: here's why your masked ICE goons don't have the immunity you claim

The Trump administration is trying to take the world back not just to the Dark Ages, when people were tortured to death for their beliefs, but to the Stone Age when neanderthals with the heaviest clubs held most power. Neanderthals commandeered rare earth minerals fecund hunting grounds from weaker neighbors because they could. But when they came up against more organized, ordered, and civilized Homo Sapiens, they became extinct.

Trump advisor and Neanderthal genetic marker Stephen Miller is on record lusting for the good old days when women were dragged by their hair into the cave. He told CNN during an interview that, “We live in a world, in the real world … that is governed by strength, that is governed by force, that is governed by power. These are the iron laws of the world since the beginning of time.”

He wishes. Shamefully unfamiliar with exalted human histories that produced the Magna Carta, the League of Nations, or the United Nations pact designed to prevent the next Hitler and World War III, Miller added in a later talk that “President Trump’s authority will not be questioned.”

Miller is damaged goods, a lip-snarling, Nazi-adjacent creep born into privilege. When he ran for office in high school, his stump speech claimed the right of all privileged students to litter, to trash the place, because paid staff would clean it up. That was 25 years ago, but people never really change, and Miller is now trying to help Trump re-arrange the world order.

Immunity for ICE agents?

Renee Nicole Good was murdered when one ICE agent shouted for her to “get out of the f------ car,” while another told her to move her car, which she tried to do.

Instead of investigating Good’s murderer, Jonathan Ross, for carrying a gun with PTSD, Trump’s DOJ opened an investigation into Renee Good’s wife — her political contributions, texts and social media posts, her life. MAGA videos of the murder (“Mouthy Dykes get what they Had Coming”) show Good’s wife failing to genuflect or cower in fear, instead suggesting the angry agent go get himself some lunch.

Seconds later, Ross shot Renee three times in the head as she was trying to move her car, then called her a “fucking bitch.” When Trump launched the DOJ investigation this week, six DOJ career officials, including prosecutors, quit in protest.

After Good’s murder, JD Vance engaged in a PR blitz to empower other rogue ICE agents, declaring that they have absolute immunity for murdering people.

Vance and his masked goons need some basic education on the law:

  1. ICE agents are not immune from prosecution for murder or any other crime.
  2. There is no statute of limitations for murder.
  3. Presidents can only pardon for federal crimes, not state crimes, the most serious of which is murder.

Qualified immunity — the theory

Qualified immunity is a legal doctrine created by the U.S. Supreme Court that protects immigration officers from civil liability, but not when they knowingly violate the law. Most importantly, it does not protect federal agents from prosecution under criminal laws.

In 2001, the Supreme Court set out a two-step analysis for qualified immunity:

  1. Whether “the officer’s conduct violated a constitutional right.”
  2. “Whether the right was clearly established” when he acted.

In Good’s case, the constitutional right not to be shot in the face while trying to move one’s car is clear and established.

In less clear cases, what constitutes excessive force turns on policy, practice and the facts of the case. As explained last week, deadly force cannot be used by law enforcement officers in most circumstances. The DOJ deadly force policy, similar to the DHS policy on deadly force, states that deadly force may not be used solely to prevent the escape of a fleeing suspect, and that firearms may not be discharged at a moving vehicle unless a person is threatening the officer with deadly force by means other than the vehicle, and no other means of defense appear to exist, which includes moving out of the path of the vehicle.

In Renee Good’s case, a car slowly rolling away does not pose imminent danger to anyone. Ross didn’t move out of the way, and even continued filming with his cellphone in one hand while he shot Good with the gun in the other. If he’d really “feared for his” life he’d have dropped the damned phone. Calling her a “fucking bitch” immediately after also suggests anger, rather than fear, was the motivator.

There is no statute of limitations on murder, and presidents cannot void state prosecutions

For most crimes, a limited window of time exists in which to charge and pursue a conviction, known as a statute of limitations. The driving theory is that witnesses lose fresh recollections about what happened with the passage of time, and that people — criminals, victims, and witnesses — need to get on with their lives at some point.

Statutes of limitation for state crimes vary across state lines, but in general, serious crimes have shorter limitations, and moderate crimes have medium limits (3-7 years for felonies like assault/burglary). For heinous or very serious crimes like murder, terrorism, or serious sexual offenses, most states have no statute of limitations, which allows prosecution at any time.

Complexity arises in the context of prosecuting federal officials for state crimes. A constitutional principle known as the Supremacy Clause holds that states should not be able to undermine federal policy by using targeted criminal prosecutions. Trump, Vance and Miller are trying to use the Supremacy Clause to give all federal ICE agents a get out of jail card, likely inspired by the Supreme Court ruling that Trump has immunity from prosecution for official acts.

But Trump and Co. are clearly mistaken. Even Trump’s own immunity ruling remains unsettled. Justice Sonia Sotomayor’s dissent opined that, under the majority’s grant of immunity, Trump could order Seal Team Six to assassinate his rivals with impunity, but Samuel Alito and John Roberts pushed back, suggesting that assessment was wrong.

ICE agent Jonathan Ross, who shot Renee Good three times, should, and likely will, be tried for murder. If he is not, ICE will become Trump’s paramilitary force, moving us a giant backward towards Trump/Vance/Miller’s Neanderthalic rule by club, and Good’s murder will surely become precedent for more murders to follow.

  • Sabrina Haake is a columnist and 25+ year federal trial attorney specializing in 1st and 14th A defense. Her Substack, The Haake Take, is free.

This repulsive spectacle spoke of one man's irreversible moral rot

JD Vance famously admitted he was willing “to create stories” to attract media attention during the 2024 presidential campaign.

It was his stunning defense of knowingly spreading false, racist rumors of pet-eating Haitian immigrants in his home state of Ohio.

The lie demonized the large, legally welcomed immigrant population in Springfield to stoke anti-immigrant hostility (against a powerless community) and fuel MAGA zealotry for mass deportations.

Vance’s unconscionable deceit about Springfield Haitians brought terror and bomb threats to the southwestern town but he doubled down on the story he created to win votes and the vice-presidency.

It was, to say the least, a low point of self-serving shamelessness for the power-drunk Millennial.

But Vance went lower last week. His take on a Kent State-sized moment that shook the nation to its core was next-level Orwellian head games.

Repulsive hardly describes Vance’s performative spectacle last week justifying the public execution of an American citizen by state militia.

The horrific killing was all over social media but Vance, to borrow from George Orwell’s dystopian novel Nineteen Eighty-Four, told us to reject what we saw with our own eyes.

The vice-president insisted what we saw recorded on multiple cell phone cameras on a street in Minneapolis in broad daylight did not happen as we all saw it happen.

Those cameras caught every angle and the last-words of 37-year-old Renee Nicole Good in her maroon Honda Pilot before she steered the wheels of her car to leave an intense encounter with masked U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents.

“I’m not mad at you,” a smiling Good said to them while resting her arm on the rolled down window of her vehicle. She had just dropped her six-year-old off at school. Her dog was in the back seat. Seconds later she was dead.

One of the ICE officers, with a pulled-up neck gaiter and cell phone in one hand, whipped out a gun with the other and summarily shot her through the windshield. Then twice more through the driver’s window.

Good’s SUV careened into a parked car.

Onlookers, including a self-identified physician, who rushed to her aid were waved off by ICE officers.

It took emergency responders, apparently blocked federal law enforcement vehicles, an estimated 15 minutes to get to the lifeless woman on foot.

Almost immediately Trump and his minions blamed the victim for being shot in the face. They all but insinuated that she had it coming because she did not obey conflicting ICE commands.

They wove an official account out of whole cloth without investigation or evidence.

They exonerated the shooter they decided acted in self-defense.

They smeared the dead woman as a “domestic terrorist” who “weaponized her vehicle” to kill law enforcement officers.

They claimed she was part of a left-wing radical network bent on violence with no verification.

Trump posted that Good “violently, willfully and viciously ran over an ICE officer” who was lucky to be alive and “recovering in the hospital.”

It. Never. Happened.

The videos clearly showed a woman in a beanie cap try to drive away from a bad scene.

In a blink, we see rapid gunfire. Images of a bloody front seat. A glove compartment overflowing with stuffed animals. She had a six-year-old.

We see the ICE agent lean into the driver’s window to shoot, hear apparent audio of him call Good a profanity and watch him walk to the crash before departing the crime scene altogether.

Yet Vance, wearing his Trumpy uniform of red tie, white shirt, and blue suit, told us not to believe our lying eyes.

Good, he declared without equivocation or proof, “was trying to ram this guy with her car and he defended himself.”

Vance repeated the lie to denigrate the victim who, he was certain, “tried to run someone over” and “incite violence against ICE.” His “torrent of untruths” hit a crescendo.

“This was an attack on federal law enforcement. This was an attack on law and order. This was an attack on the American people.” Vance framed the fatal shooting of a U.S. citizen by a trigger-happy ICE agent as “a tragedy of her own making.”

It was “classic terrorism” he said, “what you see is what you get in this case” and I will tell you what you see and believe, he implied.

In Vance’s telling, the ubiquitous videos of a state-sanctioned killing — that crossed the Rubicon — revealed “a woman who aimed her car at a law enforcement officer and pressed on the accelerator,” not an unarmed neighborhood mom who did no such thing.

The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes.

Vance suggested we owe a “debt of gratitude” to the paramilitary thug who shot Good three times in the head for noncompliance.

Besides, he stipulated, (on no legal basis) the ICE agent who killed the mother of three is protected with “absolute immunity on the job.”

He excoriated the media for “prejudging this guy as if he’s a murderer” while prejudging the victim as a “deranged leftist.”

But as a true Orwellian prototype, Vance must control the narrative — regardless of how twisted or hateful.

He dehumanized Haitian immigrants in Ohio.

He disparaged a woman shot dead in Minnesota.

His knowing lies “justifying the death of Renee Good are a moral stain on the collective witness of our Catholic faith,” wrote the National Catholic Reporter.

Indeed. But Vance’s calling card is unconscionable.

  • Marilou Johanek is a veteran Ohio print and broadcast journalist who has covered state and national politics as a longtime newspaper editorial writer and columnist.