All posts tagged "henry cuellar"

Indicted member of Congress steers campaign funds to legal fees amid bribery allegations

This article originally appeared in OpenSecrets. Sign up for their weekly newsletter to receive stories like this one in your inbox.

Rep. Henry Cuellar (D-TX) has diverted over half of his 2024 campaign funds to cover legal fees as he faces charges related to allegedly accepting bribes from foreign actors in exchange for pushing policies favorable to them.

More than $784,900 of the roughly $1.5 million that Cuellar’s campaign spent in total through the end of March went to legal fees, a new OpenSecrets analysis found.

The payments represent a shift from previous cycles when Cuellar spent donor money mostly on media and other more typical campaign expenses.

In a statement denying the allegations, Cuellar claimed he “proactively sought legal advice from the House Ethics Committee, who gave [him] more than one written opinion, along with an additional opinion from a national law firm.

The bulk of the legal fees paid with Cuellar’s campaign funds went to Clifford Chance LLP, a British multinational law firm representing the congressman in the federal investigation. Cuellar’s campaign has paid the law firm about $690,000 since the start of the 2024 election cycle. No other federal political committees have reported payments to the firm.

Perkins Coie, a law firm known for providing political compliance and legal services to Democrats, received another $46,900 from Cuellar’s campaign coffers.

Cuellar’s campaign also paid $28,100 to Miller and Chevalier, a boutique D.C. firm that specializes in complicated financial cases and has represented former President Donald Trump’s onetime campaign chairman Paul Manafort, as well as several other candidates facing ethics inquiries or seeking counsel on other issues.

In February, Cuellar’s campaign started paying Mololamken LLP for legal services, racking up a $25,000 bill by March. The firm has only been paid by two other federal political committees. America First Action, a pro-Trump super PAC, paid Mololamken LLP during the 2020 election cycle and Rep. Lori Trahan (D-N.H.) paid the firm about $12,100 in March of 2020. That year, Trahan faced a House Ethics Committee inquiry into whether her campaign accepted impermissible contributions and misreported information to the FEC. The inquiry was dismissed two months later in June 2020.

Cuellar is the second high-profile Democrat in Congress to face bribery and foreign influence charges in the past year. In September, the Justice Department charged Sen. Bob Menendez (D-N.J.) and his wife after they allegedly accepted hundreds of thousands of dollars in bribes in return for promoting the interests of three New Jersey businessmen and benefitting the Egyptian government. Menendez stepped aside from serving as Senate Foreign Relations chair but pleaded not guilty. Opening arguments for the trial began May 16.

Like Cuellar, Menendez has precipitously ramped up legal spending while facing mounting legal issues. Since the start of the 2024 cycle, the Menendez campaign steered more than 70% of its campaign donor funds to lawyers. By far, the scandal-plagued senator’s top campaign expense is legal services this cycle — with over $2.5 million of the $3.6 million it has spent in total during the 2024 cycle going to legal fees.

Piecing together Cuellar’s alleged bribery scheme

Prosecutors say Cuellar and his wife, Imelda, used shell companies to launder nearly $600,000 in bribes in exchange for agreeing to “influence U.S. foreign policy in favor of Azerbaijan” and advance the interests of a Mexico City bank from at least 2014 through 2021.

The Cuellars were charged with 14 counts ranging from conspiracy to commit bribery to wire fraud, money laundering and working on behalf of a foreign government. The Cuellars made their first court appearances on May 3 and were each released on a $100,000 bond. If convicted, the Cuellars could face up to decades in prison.

The Texas Democrat’s efforts to push U.S. policy in favor of Azerbaijan ranged from delivering a speech promoting Azerbaijan’s interests on the House floor to integrating language into spending bills to bolster U.S. backing for Azerbaijan. He also helped kill legislation supporting Armenia in its decades-old conflict with Azerbaijan.

Cuellar’s connections to Azerbaijan go back to at least January 2013, the same month Cuellar was appointed to the House Appropriations Committee. It was also the month that Cuellar and his wife flew to the Eastern European country on a trip sponsored by an entity calling itself the Turquoise Council of Americans and Eurasians, according to congressional disclosure reports.

The Turquoise Council of Americans and Eurasians was run by Turkish-American businessman Kemal Oksuz, who also formed the Assembly of the Friends of Azerbaijan months after Cuellar’s trip. The Office of Congressional Ethics later found that Oksuz “used the entities interchangeably.” The indictment’s description of “Individual-1” appears to reference Oksuz.

In disclosures to Congress, Oksuz initially claimed that Cuellar’s January 2013 trip and a subsequent May 2013 congressional tour of Azerbaijan were paid for by the Turquoise Council and the Assembly of the Friends of Azerbaijan. But Oksuz later admitted that the May 2013 trip was paid for by SOCAR, the State Oil Company of Azerbaijan Republic, a national oil and gas company wholly owned by the country’s government.

Oksuz openly stated that the event’s corporate backers included SOCAR, Caspian Drilling Company and drilling fluids businesses such as M-I Swaco and Azeri M-I Drilling Fluids Ltd, as well as oil and gas companies British Petroleum, ConocoPhillips and Chevron. But he later confessed to concealing sponsors’ role in funding travel for members of Congress, which is legally required to be disclosed.

A 2015 report by the Office of Congressional Ethics found that SOCAR steered $750,000 to the nonprofits in May 2013, which was then used to fund travel to Azerbaijan for Congress members and staffers.

The May 2013 conference’s guest list included members of Congress, congressional staff, state representatives, former governors and White House officials. Oksuz estimated that the event cost roughly $1.5 million. Attendees were paid thousands of dollars in honorariums on top of “pricey gifts.”

After the Houston Chronicle found that all 10 members of Congress who participated in the trip to Baku supported pro-Azerbaijan amendments in the U.S. House, the Office of Congressional Ethics launched an investigation into the funding behind the travel.

While Cuellar did not attend the second trip, both excursions were reported as funded through the Turquoise Council of Americans and Eurasians and at least one of Cuellar’s staffers joined the second trip. The itinerary for Cuellar’s January 2013 trip also included a “briefing” at SOCAR and “dinner with SOCAR Executive Team.”

After that trip, Cuellar’s relationship with SOCAR flourished. According to the indictment unsealed on May 3, agents working on behalf of the Azerbaijani government recruited Cuellar to work with them on U.S. policy helping their country.

In July 2013, Cuellar spoke at a Washington, D.C. reception in honor of SOCAR to highlight the importance of a pipeline to deliver natural gas to Europe.

By September 2013, Cuellar had sponsored a resolution in Congress expressing support for Azerbaijan’s Southern Gas Corridor project, asserting that it was in the “U.S. national interest” to have the pipeline completed. The House Foreign Affairs Committee adopted the resolution and a portion of the pipeline began commercial operations to deliver gas from Azerbaijan to Italy in 2020.

Cuellar’s campaign also accepted money from Oksuz, including $1,000 in 2012 and $2,500 in 2015.

After Oksuz pleaded guilty to filing false statements and “orchestrating a scheme to funnel money to fund the trip,” prosecutors say payments from SOCAR to Cuellar paused.

Cuellar is also accused of accepting bribes in exchange for helping to further the political agenda of a Mexico City bank.

“Foreign Bank-1” appears to reference Banco Azteca, a subsidiary of Grupo Elektra, a retail and banking company that’s part of a corporate conglomerate led by Mexican billionaire Ricardo Salinas Pliego. In 2012, Grupo Elektra acquired U.S.-based payday lender Advance America, which matches the indictment’s description of “U.S. Affiliate-4.”

The indictment describes “U.S. Affiliate-3” as a Spanish-language media and entertainment company that appears to be TV Azteka, a subsidiary of Grupo Elektra under the umbrella of Mexican conglomerate Grupo Salinas.

In addition to fighting an anti-money laundering policy that threatened the bank’s interests, prosecutors say Cuellar tipped off its vice chairman about a proposal to pause the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau from making new regulations on the payday lending industry that could impact the company.

Similar to Cuellar’s arrangement with Azerbaijan, the Mexico City bank allegedly funneled fake consulting fees through a shell company operated by the congressman’s wife, Imelda Cuellar.

Prosecutors say “Individual-3,” whose description matches the identity of Florencio “Lencho” Rendon, served as a middleman between Cuellar and the Mexico City bank and used his consulting company to funnel money. In a plea agreement, Rendon said Cuellar ordered him to pay off a Mexican politician because he “brought the deal to the table.”

Another middleman described in the indictment is “Individual-4,” which appears to be a reference to Colin Strother, who served as Cuellar’s former chief of staff and campaign manager. Prosecutors claim that Rendon steered the monthly payments to Strother, who would then pass the money to sham consulting companies run by the congressman’s wife.

Prosecutors allege that Cuellar suggested using Strother’s consulting company as a middleman. Like Rendon, Strother also pleaded guilty and entered into a cooperation agreement, admitting to participating in a scheme to funnel funds “obtained through unlawful activity, namely bribery” to Henry Cuellar, who Strother says was the “true, intended beneficiary recipient” of the money.

Irada Akhoundova also entered into a plea agreement and admitted to helping facilitate a $60,000 payment while working for an affiliate of Azerbaijan’s state-run oil company.

All in the family

Imelda Cuellaris not the only family member with connections to the shell companies that were allegedly used to launder bribes. The indictment alleges Henry Cuellar recruited family, friends and associates to facilitate the payments.

OpenSecrets’ review of corporate records found that Henry Cuellar’s two daughters Catherine and Christine, wife Imelda and brother Martin are all listed as members, agents and owners of various limited-liability companies with little or no paper trail.

Prosecutors do not divulge the names of the entities allegedly used in the scheme to launder bribes in the indictment but describe three shell companies that match the identities of limited-liability companies incorporated in Texas.

Originally incorporated in 2012 as IRC Business Solutions Inc., IRC Business Solutions LLC was recreated as a limited liability company in 2014, matching the description of “Shell Company-1” in the indictment.

Imelda Cuellar wholly owns IRC Business Solutions, which her husband describes in personal financial disclosures on file with Congress as a “limited liability company that consults on business activities.” While Imelda Cuellar is IRC Business Solutions LLC’s sole member, it was incorporated in 2014 by Raul Vazquez, a former judge whose law office is listed as the registered office street address for the limited liability company and who has spoken highly of Henry Cuellar.

Personal financial disclosures also reveal that Imelda Cuellar has a 60% interest in Global Gold Group LLC, a limited liability company that the congressman claims “provides general consulting services.”

Incorporation records show Global Gold Group LLC was created in 2017 and its other two members are the Cuellars’ daughters, Christina and Caroline, matching the indictment’s description of “Shell Company-2.”

Obsidian Ora LLC, which operated out of the same address as Global Gold Group from 2021 to 2023 with Christine Cuellar as its sole member and agent, matches the description of “Shell Company-3.”

While three shell companies are highlighted in the indictment, the Cuellar family is also connected to other companies with little paper trail.

Ivcz Parts, Supplies, and Services LLC is described in Henry Cuellar’s financial disclosures as a limited-liability company that “sells business parts, supplies and services.” Created in 2015, the LLC is 50% owned by his wife. Ivcz Parts, Supplies, and Services LLC does not match any of the descriptions of purported sham companies in the indictment.

Henry Cuellar’s brother, Martin, is also listed as a member and registered agent of Ivcz Parts, Supplies, and Services LLC. Martin Cuellar serves as the sheriff of Webb County in Texas, where he is up for reelection this year. The primary runoff will occur on May 28 with the general election in November.

Through various contract agreements, money was funneled by SOCAR through Azerbaijani front companies.

The indictment’s description of one of SOCAR’s U.S.-based front companies “U.S. Affiliate-2” matches a now-defunct company in Katy, Texas called OLIMP USA LLC that was controlled from 2017 to 2021 by former Azerbaijani diplomat Elshan Baloghlanov.

Baloghlanov, who now serves as the Permanent Delegate of the Government of Azerbaijan to UNESCO, matches the indictment’s description of “Individual-2.” The indictment notes that “Individual-2 served as Vice Consul at the Azerbaijani Consulate in Los Angeles, reporting to Azerbaijani “Diplomat-1.”

“U.S. Company-1,” an import/export management company operated by Baloghlanov in Maryland, appears to be WCC International. Baloghlanov previously served with Suleymanov, who served as Azerbaijan’s U.S. ambassador from 2011 to 2021, and allegedly acted as Suleymanov’s middleman with Cuellar, helping to relay messages and arrange meetings.

That included an October 2017 lunch between Imelda Cuellar and SOCAR officials at a San Antonio steakhouse to negotiate their arrangement. The indictment doesn’t include the name of the steakhouse but federal campaign finance reports reveal that Cuellar’s campaign spent $103 at Ruth’s Chris in San Antonio around that time, as first reported by San Antonio Express-News.

“Diplomat-1” matches Elman Abdullayev, who served as the Consulate General of Azerbaijan in Los Angeles from 2005 to 2010. Prosecutors claim he texted Cuellar to help arrange meetings for Imelda Cuellar.

Trump threatens Biden with 'very big price' over DOJ's indictment of 'respected Democrat'

Donald Trump on Sunday threatened Joe Biden while blaming the current president for the recent indictment of a Democratic lawmaker who is accused of "participating in two schemes involving bribery, unlawful foreign influence, and money laundering."

The indictment of Henry Cuellar was recently announced by the DOJ, which said that he and his wife allegedly took approximately $600,000 in bribes from a fossil fuel company owned by the Azerbaijani government and an unnamed bank headquartered in Mexico City.

Trump then reacted to a Democrat being charged under a system he has previously said favors people from that political party over the GOP.

ALSO READ: Marjorie Taylor Greene is buying stocks again. Some picks pose a conflict of interest

"Biden just Indicted Henry Cuellar because the Respected Democrat Congressman wouldn’t play Crooked Joe’s Open Border game," Trump said without providing evidence for his claim that the Cuellars were politically targeted by the administration, particularly over border issues.

"He was for Border Control, so they said, 'Let’s use the FBI and DOJ to take him out!'" he said. "This is the way they operate."

Finally, the ex-president leveled a threat.

"They’re a bunch of D.C. Thugs, and at some point they will be paying a very big price for what they have done to our Country. CROOKED JOE BIDEN IS A THREAT TO DEMOCRACY!"

Is Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s ‘Squad’ dying?

WASHINGTON — “The Squad” — Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s (D-NY) tight knit band of progressive rabble-rousers — is still making headlines.

But lately, it’s for all the wrong reasons.

After a string of scandals, Rep. Jamaal Bowman (D-NY) and Rep. Cori Bush (D-MO) are both facing AIPAC-backed primary challengers this year. Bowman’s troubles include pleading guilty to pulling a fire alarm in the Capitol, over which House Republicans censured him. Bush, meanwhile, is under investigation by the FBI for paying her husband for security services.

Of The Squad’s two Muslim American members, one, Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN), was removed from a key foreign policy-focused committee. The other, Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-MI), was censured by the full House. Both situations involved anti-Israel comments.

Republicans, meanwhile, have placed a target — figurative and quite literal — on The Squad, sensing a grand opportunity to weaken an arch political enemy.

Squad members, however, laugh off critics who are counting them out. They instead warn that their own Democratic Party leaders better start listening to them soon, or the party risks suffering another defeat at the hands of Republicans come November.

“Is The Squad on the ropes?” Raw Story asked Bowman, the first male member of The Squad.

“S—. The ropes? F— you talkin’ about, dog?” Bowman told Raw Story through a broad, if skeptical, smile. “What you mean, ‘the ropes’? We running 1,000 miles per hour. They tryin’ to figure out how to stop us, man.

“The ropes?” Bowman again protested.

“So you feel like you are pulling the party in your direction?” Raw Story countered.

“I don’t know if we’re pullin’ no party or none of that, I know we're serving the people in our district. I know that,” Bowman said. “I know we’re showing up.”

ALSO READ: ‘I really am sincerely sorry’: Rep. Jamaal Bowman on his alarming ‘unforced error’

Opponents are also showing up, with some Squad members — particularly Bowman and Bush — drawing serious primary challenges.

That’s why Raw Story asked six of the group’s now eight members whether The Squad really is on the ropes.

“I don't think so, but I think we're always the little guy because we fight for the little guys — that's actually what a constituent told me,” Ocasio-Cortez — who first used the term “The Squad” in 2018 to describe herself and three other progressive women who came to Washington intent on overhauling politics as usual, including in the Democratic Party — told Raw Story.

“We're underdogs, because we fight for underdogs,” Ocasio-Cortez added. “And that doesn't mean we're on the ropes, but it means that we know what we fight for.”

Dem-on-Dem battles

Ocasio-Cortez's own rocket-like political rise was birthed out of a bloody Democratic primary.

Her surprise 2018 defeat of former chairman of the Democratic Caucus, then-Rep. Joe Crowley (D-NY) — the fourth most powerful House Democrat, at the time — still stings some more senior Democrats.

That’s partly why Ocasio-Cortez brushes off this year’s primaries against her fellow Squad members.

“Just by virtue of the positions that we have, I think, we expect at the very least a primary challenger for each of our re-elections, especially our first reelection,” Ocasio-Cortez said while walking through an underground tunnel to the U.S. Capitol.

Some Democrats in Congress are still upset with Ocasio-Cortez and other progressive Squad members for what they consider a betrayal: backing their more liberal primary opponents in recent elections.

ALSO READ: Marjorie Taylor Greene to federal election regulators: get bent

“They’re being primaried where in the past they primaried me, [former Reps.] Dan Lipinski, Kurt Schrader — a whole bunch of folks,” Rep. Henry Cuellar (D-TX) — the last anti-abortion Democrat left on Capitol Hill — told Raw Story. “I always said, they ought to focus the resources on the other party, but they did that so now they're getting the same.”

Lipinski — an eight-term, socially conservative Democratic lawmaker from the suburbs of Chicago — went down in 2020.

Then, in the 2022 midterms, Schrader — a seven-term Oregon centrist — lost in a primary to liberal Democrat Jamie McLeod-Skinner, who herself lost in the general election to now-Rep. Lori Chavez-DeRemer (R-OR).

Cuellar eked out two nasty primary victories back to back those years; one by a mere 300 votes.

In 2022, more than $16 million was spent on Cuellar’s seat, making it the 8th most expensive House race in the nation in the midterms, according to nonprofit research organization OpenSecrets.

“I’m not getting involved. Even though a few of them got involved with mine, I'm not gonna,” Cuellar said. “I don't do that.”

Cuellar likens these progressives and their purist positions, such as the Green New Deal they forced into the Democratic mainstream, to the demands of the GOP’s far-right, which includes Reps. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA), Lauren Boebert (R-CO) and Matt Gaetz (R-FL).

“The far-left and the far-right are the loudest. We're seeing the same thing right now with the Republican caucus,” Cuellar said. “Where they pushed us, some of the positions they took, like, the ‘defund the police, ‘say no to I.C.E.’ — you know, say no to Border Patrol — all that affected the Democratic Party.”

President Joe Biden may have been pulled further to the left by young, energetic progressive voices like those of The Squad, but Cuellar says that’s now tarnished moderate Democrats.

“It affected the Democratic Party. It affected the brand of the Democratic Party,” Cuellar said. “This is why they need to understand that, if you're going to build a big tent, you need to have progressives and you got to have moderate, conservative Democrats. That's how you do it. You add to make it bigger, you don't subtract.”

Squash the Squad?

Outside forces are trying to subtract two Squad members from the congressional rolls ahead of November.

In Missouri, Bush faces a three-way August 6 primary. A poll last month from the Republican firm Remington Research Group showed Bush down 22 points to St. Louis County Prosecuting Attorney Wesley Bell. Former state lawmaker Maria Chapelle-Nadal is also running.

Latest fundraising numbers showed Bush’s campaign had roughly half as much cash on hand as Bell.

Raw Story asked Bush if she’s worried about her campaign money.

“Oh, no. Not at all. No. When Republican ‘dark money’ funds the campaign for someone who was supposed to be a Democrat against the Democratic incumbent who was actually working in taking care of the community when their money is tied to the people that want to see national abortion bans and all this,” Bush told Raw Story. “I can't really get into it right here, but I would just say: no.”

ALSO READ: ‘Leave the drama to them:’ Mother of Lauren Boebert’s grandson speaks out

In New York, ahead of the state’s June 25 primary, Bowman is up against American Israel Public Affairs Committee-backed George Latimer, county executive of Westchester County, N.Y.

Recently, after speaking to a crowd of a few dozen youth activists gathered outside the Capitol, Bowman was fired up after telling the young voters focused on the plight of Palestinians that his campaign is “against AIPAC.”

“They're trying to hit us with metaphorical political bombs to stop us, but we're like, we're out of here, son. We’re on a whole nother level than that,” Bowman told Raw Story. “Historically,

anyone who fights for justice, what happens? People go after them.”

Bowman has endured a particularly difficult 2023-2024 congressional session.

In October, he pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor and paid a fine related to his pulling of a fire alarm in a Capitol office building.

Bowman has also faced criticism after The Daily Beast unearthed old blog posts of the former school teacher and principal that espoused 9/11 conspiracy theories, which he’s since disavowed. He blames his critics for uncovering the old posts in spite of them being deleted.

“So the power structure doesn't want voices like mine, Cori [Bush (D-MO)] and Summer [Lee (D-PA)] fighting the way we're fighting without fear, with humanity and love in our hearts. So they're going to come with, you know, bring up some s— I did 15 years ago,” Bowman said. “It’s like, what? That’s all they got? I wasn’t even in Congress. Y’all crazy. But it’s because they didn't want to focus on the work we're doing here. They’re the Wizard of Oz, man.”

Tlaib, Omar and ‘uncommitted’ movement

Last February, Republicans removed Omar from the Foreign Affairs Committee over past comments — ones she later apologized for — about Israel where she accused U.S. lawmakers of pledging their “allegiance to a foreign country.”

Then, at the end of last year, Tlaib — the lone Palestinian-American in Congress — became the 26th person ever to be censured by the House over what Republicans and 22 of her fellow Democrats deemed her anti-Israel rhetoric.

But the effort seems to have only emboldened Tlaib.

During the last quarter of 2023, Tlaib pulled in $3.7 million after House Republicans censured her.

“Rashida Tlaib outraises entire Michigan congressional field,” an Axios put it.

At a press conference outside the U.S. Capitol recently, Tlaib recounted the pleading she heard from one of her constituents with family in northern Gaza.

“The grandfather lives in my district and he’s saying to me, ‘My grandson has a fever, Rashida, how do I get him medicine? How do I save his life? We don't know what to do.’ Using starvation as a weapon of war is undeniably a war crime,” Tlaib told Raw Story in a passageway underneath the Capitol. “It is a war crime that we continue to be complicit in those decisions.”

Tlaib helped spearhead the effort to protest President Joe Biden’s support for Israel’s war in Gaza by getting Democrats to vote “uncommitted” in the state’s Feb. 27 primary.

This proved to be a wake up call to Democratic Party leaders after more than 100,000 Democrats — upward of 13 percent of Michigan Democrats — voted “uncommitted” in the primary. Biden’s campaign is treating Michigan, a genuine general election swing state, as critical to the president’s reelection prospects.

In Minnesota, about 46,000 Democratic voters — or 19 percent — protested Biden by voting “uncommitted” on Super Tuesday. In Omar’s district, 25 percent of Democrats joined the Biden protest at the ballot box.

ALSO READ: Democrats surrender huge stash of FTX crypto cash

“Of course, there needs to be a real shift. We’re saying we’re the party of the people, we have to start listening to the people,” Omar told Raw Story. “We are going to stand up to AIPAC. We’ve always stood up to them, and it's not going to be any different cycle.”

Just this week, a "Reject AIPAC" coalition of progressive political groups launched with the stated intention of boosting Squad members and other like-minded Democrats during 2024 elections.

“I think there are people who try to make it sound like we are not in a good position, but we have great fundraising numbers. We have the support and endorsement of all of the leadership. I think we're in a great place,” Omar said.

As for whether The Squad’s role has changed?

Omar says not at all.

“I think it's the same. We've always had primaries. I think we're in a unique place. I think this is probably going to be a primary cycle where we all squash, I think, our challengers in a great way,” Omar said. “No, I mean, I think our role is still the same, you know, defending democracy, fighting for the advancement of our country through policies like the Green New Deal, Homes for All, taking on big corporations.”

‘Yeah. No. We’re good.’

“So is the Squad hurting these days?” Raw Story asked Rep. Ayanna Pressley (D-MA).

“Let me just say this: We're used to being targeted. We're doing transformative work, disrupting the status quo, and we're all BIPOC. Nothing new,” Pressley told Raw Story while riding an elevator in the Capitol. “You know what we're hurting from? We're hurting from — our communities are hurting because we're here in this dysfunctional place and we're not lifting up, centering and working on the things that matter to them, like housing.”

“Yeah. No. We’re good,” Pressley said. “Focused on the people.”

While The Squad has moved the party further to left on many issues, its unofficial leader, Ocasio-Cortez says their work isn’t done yet, especially when it comes to Gaza.

“It is moving. I think we've certainly had major policy concessions on everything from climate to student loans,” Ocasio-Cortez said. “I think we do need to see some of those real policy concessions on foreign policy in Gaza, for sure.”

As for all the negative attention that The Squad is receiving — from censures to primaries — that’s the world they inhabit. Together.

“I guess I’m less fazed, because this is the way it's always been,” Ocasio-Cortez told Raw Story. “I don't know any other way.”