All posts tagged "elizabeth warren"

'Resign!' Elizabeth Warren's questioning of RFK Jr. explodes into shouting match

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) and Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy shouted at each other during a contentious hearing on Thursday.

While appearing before the Senate Finance Committee, Warren challenged the secretary about earlier claims that he would not restrict access to vaccines.

"So last November, while you are under consideration to become Secretary of Health and Human Services, Mr. Kennedy, you said, quote, if vaccines are working for somebody, I'm not going to take them away," Warren noted. "No exceptions, no ifs, or buts. You would not take away vaccines from anyone who wanted them."

"Then last week you announced that the COVID-19 vaccine is no longer approved for healthy people under the age of 65," she continued.

"It's not recommended for healthy people," Kennedy agreed.

"If you don't recommend, then the consequence of that in many states is that you can't walk into a pharmacy and get one!" Warren exclaimed. "You are effectively denying people vaccines!"

"We're not going to recommend a product for which there's no clinical data for that indication!" Kennedy shouted back. "Is that what I should be doing?"

"What you should be doing is honoring your promise that you made when you were looking to get confirmed in this job," Warren stated. "Did you hold up a big sign saying that you were lying when you said that because you are the one who said you would not take them away?"

"You want me to indicate a product for which there is no clinical data?" Kennedy complained. "Is that what you want? I'm not taking them away! Everybody can get access to them!"

"No, they can't walk into a pharmacy the way they could last month and get access to a whole vaccine," Warren insisted before pressing Kennedy about his firing of CDC official Susan Monarez.

"Do you tell the head of the CDC that if she refused to sign off on your changes to the childhood vaccine schedule, that she had to resign?" the senator asked.

"No, I told her that she had to resign because I asked her, are you a trustworthy person?" Kennedy said. "And she said no."

Warren pointed out that Monarez had publicly disputed Kennedy's claim.

"So you're saying she's lying?" she asked. "This is the same person that, less than a month earlier, you stood next to her and described her as unimpeachable."

"It looks like she didn't bend the knee, so you fired her," Warren remarked. "Look, you're putting America's babies' health at risk, American's seniors' health at risk, all Americans' health at risk, and you should resign."

Watch the video below or click here.

Elizabeth Warren confronts nominee: 'Can you say the words Trump lost that election?'

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) questioned the independence of Dr. Stephen Miran, President Donald Trump's nominee to be a member of the Federal Reserve's Board of Governors.

At a Senate Banking Committee hearing on Thursday, Warren presented Miran with what she said was an "easy question to show that you have some independence from the president."

"Did Donald Trump lose the 2020 presidential election?" she asked.

" Joe Biden was certified by the Congress," Miran replied.

"Did Donald Trump lose that election?" Warren pressed. "Can you say the words Donald Trump lost that election? Are you independent enough to say that?"

"Congress certified Joe Biden as president of the United States," the nominee repeated.

"Woo!" Warren exclaimed. "Let me ask you another question... Do you agree with President Trump that the BLS published fake numbers to manipulate the outcome of the 2024 presidential election?"

For his part, Miran criticized "the data quality from the Bureau of Labor."

"That's not the question about the data quality," Warren said. "Did, as President Trump said, the BLS publish fake numbers to manipulate the outcome of the 2024 presidential election? This is what President Trump said. Is he right?"

The senator was forced to ask the question a third time after Miran again focused on "data quality."

"Donald Trump stated that the BLS faked the job numbers before the election to try and boost Kamala's chances of victory," she explained. "Do you agree with that? Yes or no?"

"The Bureau of Labor Statistics did not take corrective action to improve the quality of steadily deteriorating data," Miran stated.

"Just two straightforward questions about your independence, and you've blown both of them," Warren remarked.

Watch the video below or click the link.

‘Clearly afraid’: Warren and Cruz trade barbs over Texas redistricting scheme

WASHINGTON — Texas Republicans are “clearly afraid” of their own voters, Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) told Raw Story after Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) compared the Lone Star State’s mid-decade redistricting effort to “gerrymandering” in Democratic strongholds like Massachusetts.

Under pressure from President Donald Trump, Gov. Greg Abbott called the Texas legislature into a special session in an effort to ram through a controversial redistricting plan designed to net as many as five extra GOP seats in next year’s midterm elections.

That’s had Democratic leaders and rank-and-file members calling foul, but Cruz told Raw Story blue state progressives are being hypocrites.

“The Democrats have long used gerrymandering to subvert democracy and expand their congressional delegation,” Texas’s junior senator said.

“For example, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts is a liberal state. There are Republicans in Massachusetts. Indeed, they've elected multiple Republican governors, and yet, of the entire Massachusetts congressional delegation, there are zero Republicans.

“They have drawn the lines in Massachusetts so that only Democrats need apply. [It’s] not surprising that the state of Texas is deciding to redraw the lines to elect more Republicans who reflect views of the vast majority of the state.”

When Raw Story presented Cruz’s argument to Sen. Warren, she laughed.

“Massachusetts is not afraid of our voters, and we don't need to engage in gerrymandering in order to elect our representatives in the state house or in Congress,” Warren said.

“Texas Republicans are clearly afraid that if the good people in Texas are given a chance to vote for who they want, that those Republicans are going to lose power.”

Polling gives President Trump and congressional Republicans reason to believe their unpopular “Big Beautiful Bill” tax cut and spending cut package and the deepening Jeffrey Epstein scandal will severely damage their electoral prospects.

The proposed Texas redistricting is a break with the customary 10-year cycle that lines up with the nation’s census, in an attempt to give the GOP an edge before any votes are cast.

“What do you think about [the Texas redistricting effort] being directed from the White House?” Raw Story asked Warren.

“It’s one more indication that Donald Trump leads the charge when it comes to undercutting democracy, for the Republicans,” the senator said.

‘Everybody's happy at the White House’

Texas Republicans are facing constant questions about the redistricting plan, leading to many representatives running from reporters or offering a dismissive “no comment.”

“I know from a bunch of you Texas members, y'all don't want this,” Raw Story pressed veteran Rep. Michael McCaul (R-TX).

McCaul smiled broadly.

“A lot of y'all are freaked out by it,” Raw Story added.

“Everybody's happy at the White House, now they're looking at an opportunity to get some seats and they talked to the state legislature, and it's their prerogative,” McCaul said.

“So that's kind of where it stands.”

“Maybe put forward policies people like and you can combat that midterm boom the other party always gets?” Raw Story suggested.

“A lot of times it's a game of numbers too. But anyway, this is actually sort of like the White House,” McCaul said. “So, that's about all I can say.”

Gerrymandering — the practice of drawing district lines to favor your own electoral prospects — is named after Elbridge Gerry, a founder, Massachusetts congressman, and U.S. vice president in 1813-14. The practice has always been part of U.S. politics, openly discussed by politicians and advisers.

“The objective is to get Republican seats,” House Budget Committee Chair Jody Arrington, another powerful Texas Republican, told Raw Story.

“But we don't get to draw the maps.”

That was a reference to state authorities set to carry out redistricting. Arrington dismissed suggestions his own seat could disappear, adding: “I think every Republican member from Texas wants to expand our number of seats if we can. I think there's a way to do it.”

Prominent Democrats are urging California governor Gavin Newsom to initiate aggressive redistricting in response to Texas, to reduce the number of Republicans from his overwhelmingly blue state.

Republicans like Arrington dismiss that as dirty politics.

“I think it would be problematic,” Arrington said, adding: “I don't think they can do what we can do because of the system for redistricting … there's not as much behind that threat than there is a realistic opportunity to have more seats in Texas.

“How many, I don't know, but there's definitely more there.”

‘How ugly’

Redistricting is easier in Texas than in California.

“Well, Texas can do what it wants but Newsom doing so would be in direct face of the voter initiative that puts [redistricting] in the hands of an independent commission which I supported as a legislator and as a private citizen back in the day,” Rep. Doug LaMalfa (R-CA) told Raw Story.

“That would have a really very bad look. And the way Newsom is bragging about how, ‘Well we got a three-to-one majority, we could just force this thing through’ … that's a bad look. The people directly said they wanted [redistricting] to be independent of politics and politicians.”

California “voters wanted [redistricting] in the hands of an independent commission,” LaMalfa added.

“I've watched personally, before I was in office, how ugly the process turned when politicians on both sides were drawing the lines in order to benefit their political vendettas and things like that.”

Asked about Texas, LaMalfa repeated that it could do what it wanted.

Another California Republican, Rep. Darrell Issa, was more cynical about the independent commission.

“They already gerrymandered my state,” Issa told Raw Story. “[Democrats] just think they can do a little better. California is already highly gerrymandered. You look at it, we [Republicans] have eight seats. And you look at the [last] election … we should have more than double that.”

“The independent commission is a farce,” Issa added, alleging “gerrymandering, clearly by a commission to create safe seats for Democrats.”

‘It’s racial’

Rep. Al Green (D-TX) is a Capitol Hill institution in himself, a fiery orator and leading figure in the Congressional Black Caucus.

He told Raw Story the Texas redistricting plan was “targeted for minority districts.”

Al Green Rep. Al Green (D-TX) is a fiery presence on Capitol Hill. REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein

“When you target people like that, you have to say what it is. This is racial gerrymandering … to eliminate minority voices in the process,” Green said.

“And there is a fear in this country of using the word ‘racial’ or ‘racism.’ There's a fear.

“We hear ‘antisemitism’ on a daily basis, and we should … but when there is this racial thing occurring, and that's what's happening in Texas, we're not hearing the voices, and that's what it is.”

Green also accused Republicans of “changing the rules in the middle of the game,” with a “mid-decade redistricting without the proper empirical evidence necessary to make judicious decisions.

“This is comparable to saying at a basketball game, ‘We're going to take out two of your players because you may outscore us in the next half,’” Green said. “So at halftime, we decide two of your five won't play. So you're gonna have to play with three, not five. We'll continue to play with five.

“We may even have six. Let's have six for our side and you have three on your side. Oh, we supposed to have 10 on the court? That's right. Okay. Well, look, we'll have seven and you have three.

“That's what this is all about, changing the numbers so that the President can maintain his authoritarian rule.”

'Abomination!' Outrage hits senators as they pass bill in razor-thin vote

After Vice President J.D. Vance cast the deciding vote to allow Donald Trump's megabill to pass the Senate Tuesday, opponents took to social media to warn the House that it was up to them to stave off impending disaster for lower-income Americans.

Call To Activism called Vance's tiebreaker, "one of the most shameful moments in American history."

"After 26 hours of fighting on the Senate floor, Republicans voted to rip health care from millions of people and let little babies go hungry. And they cheered. I'm angry. You should be too," posted Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA).

Sen. Angus king (I-ME) wrote, "Never have so many been so grievously hurt in the service of so few."

Rep. Aex Padilla (D-CA) wrote that Senate Republicans should be "ashamed" of the bill, adding, "It’s a full-scale betrayal of the American people—and they know it." Padilla vowed to keep "pushing back every step of the way," as the House gets ready to stage a final vote.

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (D) wrote that the ultimate passage of "Trump's Big Ugly Bill" would lead every community in America to "feel cuts to basic needs—all so billionaires can get another giant tax cut."

"One single GOP Senator could have stopped this abomination. Saved millions of parents from watching their child go hungry. Saved the lives destroyed when Medicaid disappears. They will all live forever with the horror of this bill," wrote Sen. Chris Murphy (D-CT).

Many fingers pointed at Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) who "caved and voted for Trump's massive bill," wrote PatriotTakes. Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) lobbied hard to win over Murkowski by promising "carve-out" benefits for her state that other states won't receive if the bill heads to the president's desk for his signature.

Punchbowl News's Brendan Pedersen wrote, "MURKOWSKI tells reporters she wants the House to send OBBB back to the Senate to continue the work. She voted for it. 'My hope is that the House is gonna look at this and recognize that we're not there yet,' Murkowski said."

Political commentator @ChidiNwatu wrote that Murkowski "must be f------ delusional or insane" to believe that could happen.

Journalist Molly Jong-Fast posted, "Disaster for rural hospitals and nursing homes," while journalist Ed Krassenstein wrote, "Hopefully @elonmusk destroys them in the next election.

'Where is your outrage over Republicans?' Warren slams CNBC host to his face

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) leveled CNBC's Joe Kernen on Thursday for fear-mongering over the professed socialist who won the Democratic primary for New York City's mayoral race.

In a shocking outcome this week, 33-year-old Zohran Mamdani defeated former Gov. Andrew Cuomo to clinch the Democratic nomination.

"He's a socialist, he's a self-avowed socialist," Kernen began. "Do you think socialism is the correct path to do what you just said you want to do for working Americans? I mean, that's what he is."

Kernan called New York City "the center of the universe for capitalism."

"And Wall Street, whether you love it or hate it — I know it has a connotation in certain areas — but it's the financial engine for all the great things that happen in the U.S. in terms of the private sector, and raising money for companies, and the stock market. All these great things that provide all the jobs — that's where you get the tax money to spend on all these great things you want to spend it on. You think that's the right thing for New York City?"

Warren answered, "You don't have to push me! I believe in markets. I love markets. I think markets are fabulous — when they're honest markets. As you know, because we've had these discussions before — for example, we need markets with rules. Markets without rules are just theft.

"But what our new mayor — I hope our mayor-elect — is talking about, is how to make that economy work for families."

Warren then chastised Kernen directly.

"Where is your outrage over a Republican Party that are saying, 'We want to fund even more tax giveaways to billionaires. We want to make sure that Meta gets a check, if this bill passes, for $15 billion...while we take away healthcare from everyone else, while we drive up utility bill costs for everyone else.'

"That's not how we build a strong economy. You believe in markets? Then you should believe in participation by the employees so that they get some of the wealth that they helped create."

Watch the clip below via CNBC.

Warren blasts Fed chair for ‘outrageous giveaway’ to banks amid market turmoil

Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell was grilled Wednesday by Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) for what she called an “outrageous giveaway” to banks amid rising costs and stagnant wages for working-class Americans.

In 2018, the Federal Reserve imposed an asset cap on Wells Fargo, capping the company’s permitted assets to a value of $1.95 trillion, after the bank engaged in a number of widespread illegal practices, including secretly opening up millions of unauthorized bank and credit card accounts for customers without their consent to meet sales targets.

Yet despite the bank continuing to engage in illegal practices in recent years and months, the Fed voted this month to lift the bank’s asset cap, something Warren warned would increase the likelihood of another recession akin to the 2008 financial crisis.

“Less than two weeks ago, the Fed Board decided to lift Wells Fargo’s asset cap; you couldn’t even wait until Wells managed to make it one whole year without being caught in a major financial scandal,” Warren said.

“In just the past six months, Wells has been caught and confessed to cheating its customers, cheating its investors, and cheating its workers, the trifecta. For the Fed to give them a gold star and tell Wells it’s okay to expand the number of customers, investors and employees that it can cheat is an outrageous giveaway to one of Wall Street’s most derelict banks.”

Warren framed her critique of the Fed’s policy under the backdrop of President Donald Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act, a sweeping budget reconciliation package that is projected to increase the national debt by $4.2 trillion over ten years, largely due to permanently extending what have been dubbed the Trump tax cuts, which are expected to primarily benefit the top 20% of earners.

“And today, you will leave this hearing and go directly to a meeting where the Fed is expected to vote to lower capital requirements for JP Morgan, Goldman Sachs, and the other too-big-to-fail banks,” she continued.

“At a time when the economic data are flashing red, these short-sighted changes will increase the likelihood that these megabanks, once again, tank the economy and then come back here and beg Congress for bailouts when their risky bets go bust. To sum up Trump’s economic agenda, it’s chaos and pain for the middle class, and even more profits for the powerful.”

Warren pressed Powell on whether Trump’s fiscal policy – extending tax breaks enjoyed primarily by the wealthiest of Americans, imposing unpredictable tariffs and cutting social services like food assistance and Medicaid – could negatively impact inflation.

“Theoretically, sure, fiscal policy can add to inflation, but again, that’s really not something we comment on, we try to stay away from fiscal policy,” Powell said.

“I understand you don’t comment on it, but I do appreciate your acknowledgement of the math here,” Warren fired back.

Watch the video below or use this link.

'Reign of corruption' revealed as Senate Dems share Musk 'dodgy dealings' list

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) has issued a new report raising questions of "corruption, ethics, and conflicts of interest" perpetuated during Elon Musk's time heading up President Donald Trump's Department of Government Efficiency, according to a preview by Rolling Stone.

The report, titled “Special Interests Over the Public Interest: Elon Musk’s 130 Days in the Trump Administration,” features a list of 130 questionable actions by Musk, his companies, and family members that culminated in a "reign of corruption," according to senior writer Tim Dickinson.

Last week, Trump announced that Musk was leaving his post as "special government employee" to focus more on his businesses, which have taken a hit since he became involved in promoting Trump's MAGA agenda.

"The Warren report is focused on Elon’s use of political power to boost his businesses, or secure special benefits — from regulatory relief to rich new contracts — that favor his fortunes and his family," Dickinson wrote.

ALSO READ: FBI silent as far-right podcaster demands Trump execution and Kash Patel torture

“Not every action listed… represents a violation of federal law,” the report said, instead arguing that “Musk has violated norms at an astonishing pace” while taking actions that are “hurting the American public.”

Rolling Stone previewed the list's 15 categories that include blatant White House promotion of Musk's Tesla electric vehicles, lucrative contracts for SpaceX and Starlink, and a concerted effort by the Trump DOJ to drop up to $2.5 billion in federal penalties against Musk's companies.

The report also claimed that Musk perpetuated an "intimidation campaign" via his X social media business, as well as "weaponizing federal power" and "influence-peddling in Congress."

The report concluded that, far from displaying transparency, "Musk himself has hidden his norms-busting activities behind a veil of secrecy...failing to make public his vast financial holdings, or what if any waivers of federal ethics requirements he may have received."

Read the Rolling Stone article here.


'Startling': Dems rally to block bill to make it easier for Trumps to 'line their pockets'

Even Democrats who once supported regulatory legislation for "stablecoins" are backing off now that the Trump family is a major player in the crypto market, according to a new report in The New York Times.

Stablecoins are "a type of cryptocurrency that maintains a price of $1"; Crypto traders like stablecoins because they don't "swing in value the way other digital currencies do, making them convenient for many types of business transactions," according to the report.

A bill backed by the crypto industry called the GENIUS Act would be "one of the first formal acts by lawmakers to create a regulatory system that could help the industry grow in the United States."

But in closed-door meetings, Senate Democrats "expressed concern that the legislation would directly benefit" the Trump family’s burgeoning crypto business, wrote reporters David Yaffe-Bellany and Eric Lipton.

ALSO READ: ‘Pain. Grief. Anger’: Families heartbroken as Trump backlash smashes adoption dreams

Although he was a "onetime crypto skeptic, Donald Trump has embraced digital currencies" and has promised "to turn the United States into the 'crypto capital of the planet.' In September, he and his sons announced they were starting World Liberty, a business that would offer its own digital currencies."

World Liberty Financial recently secured a deal with an Emirati venture fund backed by the government of Abu Dhabi to take $2 billion in deposits. The business venture would effectively funnel money "into a business led by the U.S. president’s family."

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) said in a statement that the legislation "will make it easier for the president and his family to line their own pockets. This is corruption and no senator should support it.”

Senators were also concerned about the potential for fraud and money laundering.

The Times reported that Senate Republicans need at least seven Democrats on board to move the legislation.

On Monday, both Sen. Warren (D-MA) and Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR) separately moved to ask the Office of Government Ethics "to investigate the Trump family’s growing cryptocurrency business deals, calling them 'a startling degree of foreign influence and the potential for a quid pro quo that could endanger national security," the report said.

Read the New York Times article here.

'Sheer malevolence': Analyst says Trump's first weeks 'worse than you could have imagined'

Democrats tried to work with President Donald Trump at the start of his second term, but the spirit of "sheer malevolence" by Trump and Elon Musk has made moving forward all but impossible, argued an opinion writer for MSNBC.

Journalist Paul Waldman wrote that initially, "some Democrats decided to extend a hand of bipartisanship." They included progressive Rep. Ro Khanna (D-CA) and Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) who were both spurred on by the idea of cutting government waste through Musk's Department of Government Efficiency.

Some progressives criticized Democrats for thinking they could amicably work side-by-side with the administration.

"But it turned out that even the most skeptical progressives who torched Democrats online underestimated the sheer malevolence of both Trump and Musk," Walman wrote. "In just two weeks, the billionaire duo has frozen government payments, scapegoated minorities for an air crash, purged officials deemed insufficiently loyal, seized the government's payment system and potentially shut down congressionally created agencies. Wherever you look, it's worse than you could have imagined."

ALSO READ: 'Driven to self-loathing': Inside the extremist website believed to 'groom' teen attackers

He continued, "Trump and Musk are in a hurry to destroy everything they can get their hands on...They can’t be reasoned with. And they absolutely will not stop until they lay waste to our government as we have known it. Anyone who thought otherwise ought to understand by now."

Even so, Trump has "the highest favorability rating he's ever had," with "48.9 percent of respondents viewing him favorably and 47.7 percent holding an unfavorable opinion," according to a Real Clear Politics poll.

"I'm not necessarily surprised by Trump's numbers," Andrew David, senior lecturer at Boston University, told Newsweek: "These are impressive for him personally for sure. But this is the point in his administration when he should have numbers along these lines. Considering the scope of his November victory, it would be shocking if there was a major regress in his support."

David added, "That said, while these are great numbers for Trump, they're still low by almost any measure of the presidency. In fact, the only person who started with lower numbers was...Donald Trump [in 2016]."

Read the MSNBC opinion piece here.

RFK Jr's nomination hits roadblock over financial disclosures: report

Incoming President Donald Trump's nominee for Health and Human Services Secretary, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., is still awaiting a date for his confirmation hearings following a delay over his finances.

The Washington Post reported Sunday that the Office of Government Ethics was still looking into Kennedy's financial disclosures, which he "recently amended."

"Senators traditionally wait to schedule confirmation hearings until that process is completed," The Post reported.

The report continued, "The delay has meant that Kennedy will not face the Senate until late January at the earliest. The holdup — and the prospect that Kennedy will be the lone high-profile Trump pick facing the Senate on a given day, rather than jockeying with multiple other nominees for attention — could amplify the spotlight on his record, scrutiny that has increased in recent weeks."

The delay has allowed Senators like Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) to sharpen their cases against Kennedy. Warren shared a letter with The Post that outlined about 175 pointed questions for the controversial environmental lawyer and vocal anti-vaxxer with unfounded views on autism.

Warren wrote, "Given your dangerous views on vaccine safety and public health, including your baseless opposition to vaccines, and your inconsistent statements in important policy areas like reproductive rights access, I have serious concerns regarding your ability to oversee the Department."

ALSO READ: Inside the parade of right-wing world leaders flocking to D.C. for Trump's inauguration

The group Advancing American Freedom, which is backed by former Vice President Mike Pence (R), sent a letter to senators encouraging them to ask Kennedy tough questions to determine whether he's "truly committed to restricting access to abortion medication and pursuing other goals long held by the antiabortion movement."

Kennedy, from the powerful family of Democrats, originally ran for the Democratic Party nomination for president, but switched his party affiliation to independent in 2023. When he dropped out of the race, Kennedy backed Trump who then tapped the outspoken RFK Jr. to head HHS.

Kennedy has said he's on a mission he calls MAHA: Make America Healthy Again.

Other Trump nominees, including Pete Hegseth, Pam Bondi, Marco Rubio, and Scott Bessent testified before Senate committees last week.

Kennedy is one of a handful of Trump nominees who has yet to have a hearing scheduled. Also on the list are director of national intelligence nominee Tulsi Gabbard, and FBI director nominee Kash Patel.

Read The Washington Post article here.