Top Stories Daily Listen Now
RawStory
RawStory

All posts tagged "department of homeland security"

Trump admin's 'eerie' holiday posts 'may have violated the Constitution': analysis

New Republic Associate Writer Edith Olmstead argues President Donald Trump's administration violated the Constitution while it was haunting the internet with holiday images invoking Christian nationalism.

“The Department of Homeland Security’s tasteless holiday sh——posting may have just violated the United States Constitution,” Olmstead said, citing the federal agency’s official X account publishing multiple Thursday posts that appeared to violate the Establishment Clause, which prohibits government actions that favor one religion over another.

“Rejoice America, Christ is born!” read one post.

“Merry Christmas, America. We are blessed to share a nation and a Savior,” said another.

Olmstead said the second post was likely meant to evoke nostalgia, but mostly stirred nervousness with footage of President Donald Trump spliced into clips of popular holiday movies.

“It even included a photograph of DHS Secretary Kristi Noem holding a Christmas tree in Chicago, where she launched a deadly large-scale immigration operation, to really put the eerie in cheery,” said Olmstead, adding that the Trump administration now views the separation between church and state as a suggestion.

“It’s fitting that DHS would be the source of this blatant violation, as Noem’s ethnic cleansing approach to homeland security is transparently rooted in xenophobia and Christian nationalism. And the president has continually leaned into Christian nationalist rhetoric in order to please his conservative base,” Olmstead wrote.

Similarly, critics like Rachel Laser, president and CEO of Americans United for Separation of Church and State, complain that the posts are “one more example of the Christian Nationalist rhetoric the Trump administration has disseminated since Day One in office.”

“People of all religions and none should not have to sift through proselytizing messages to access government information,” said Laser. “It’s divisive and un-American.”

Read the New Republic report at this link.

These ludicrous exchanges show how Trump lies infect voters' minds

On my Sirius XM program, I discussed the almost comical hearing this month in which a top FBI official, flanked by dog-killing Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, claimed antifa — short for anti-fascist — was the “number one terrorist” threat in the United States. Yet he couldn’t answer repeated questions from Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-MS) about where the group’s headquarters are, or how many people are actually in the group:

Michael Glasheen, operations director of the FBI’s National Security Branch, said antifa was the agency’s “primary concern” and “the most immediate violent threat that we’re facing.”

Glasheen did not answer a question from the top Democrat at the hearing, U.S. Representative Bennie Thompson, about the group’s location. When asked about the number of members, Glasheen said it was “very fluid” and that “investigations are active.”

“Sir, you wouldn’t come to this committee to say something that you can’t prove,” Thompson said to Glasheen. “I know you wouldn’t do that. But you did.”

Later, Glasheen was asked if the Proud Boys were still on the FBI’s list of domestic extremist organizations — after they were added in 2018, under Trump’s first term — but he didn’t answer, just saying, “We’re in the process right now of changing our categories for domestic terrorism.”

After I played the clips of the exchanges and commented on the ludicrousness of this — and the dangers — Steven from Los Angeles, clearly a MAGA supporter, called the program to disagree with me, claiming antifa is a terror threat he has witnessed firsthand.

Antifa of course doesn’t exist as any organized nationwide group. Some people engaging in protest call themselves ant-fascist, and often take on the name antifa — even carrying banners and other identifiers — but they mostly act independently of others who might use the term to to identify themselves.

The majority of those who call themselves antifa are opposed to violence, per the Department of Homeland Security under the Biden administration. Even if some people have called themselves antifa and have engaged in or inspired violent actions in one place or another during protests (which has happened), that doesn’t mean there’s an organized group engaged in actual organized terror plots.

But Steven didn’t get that, claiming vandalism in LA and elsewhere was “terrorism” which was coordinated by “Antifa”.

Steven: Okay, so I, um, I disagree with you, uh, living on the West Coast. Whether it’s antifa, whether you want to call it, whatever organization it is. But, I mean, they’ve ruined the streets of Los Angeles. San Francisco is a dump. Um, uh, Oregon is a dump. Uh, Seattle, Washington.

MS: Who who did this? Who ruined the streets? What did they do?

Steven: It was. Well, whatever organization you want to call it. Uh, the people that were protesting on the streets.

MS: You said antifa.

Steven: Well, that's who they're supposed to be, right?

After I pressed him on what they’re doing he said that in Portland and other places, “These people are on the streets every day. They're yelling at cars. The traffic is stopped.”

Yelling at cars? Yes, that’s what he said.

MS: Okay, Steven, that's not terrorism.

Steven: What is that? Terrorism. The stores are all closed.

MS: No, Stephen, that's not terrorism. You could tell me about vandalism. You could tell me about protests. You could even tell me about rioting, if you want, which we haven't seen.

But a terrorist and a terrorist organization are highly coordinated groups of people with plots and plans to take down the government or send a message to a group of people, and they engage in mass violence, bombings, mass shootings, kidnappings.

Why is our government spending all this money on this? You're telling me about what? Graffiti in Los Angeles?

He went on about how yelling at protests and throwing things — not explaining more — was terrorism.

But then when I brought up actual terrorism — January 6, police officers bludgeoned, the Proud Boys making threats, and the Oath Keepers, per law enforcement, stockpiling weapons at a hotel in Virginia, with a plan to bring them up the Potomac to take the Capitol — he had a very different answer.

Steven: You know what? I don't think we'll ever know the truth of that whole situation.

Oh yeah, it got a little hot from there before I ended the call! Listen in and let me know your thoughts!

  • Michelangelo Signorile writes The Signorile Report, a free and reader-supported Substack. If you’ve valued reading The Signorile Report, consider becoming a paid subscriber and supporting independent, ad-free opinion journalism.

This may be the lowest this monstrous regime can go

“Ms. Rachel, can ICE take me?”

“What about my dad? Can they take my dad away?”

“I feel so angry about how ICE is grabbing people out of my neighborhood.”

“I feel traumatized ever since ICE stole my sister.”

“I’m afraid to walk to school. I’m afraid to leave my house.”

“I want my mom back.”

These are real questions and comments I’ve heard from the kids I work with at Project Libertad in recent days, as Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) terrorizes their communities daily.

While newcomers have always faced higher rates of anxiety, depression, Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), and other mental health challenges than their US-born peers, the divide is becoming more apparent each day. These conversations with my kids represent a stark increase in fear and anxiety among immigrant children — and it’s not just an anecdotal shift. The data are clear: The Trump administration’s increasingly hostile immigration policies are irreversibly harming children.

Pediatricians Susan Kressly and Michelle Barnes warn of the lifelong impact these policies have on children’s development and health into adulthood:

Witnessing harm to others and living in constant fear is traumatic to all children in the community. These stressors disrupt brain development and have long-term negative effects on the health and well-being of impacted children. Ultimately, the cumulative effects make these communities less healthy.

Similarly, nonprofit newsroom CalMatters documents strained mental health among schoolchildren across California after a summer of widespread, aggressive ICE raids and warns of the long-term harm to children:

Experts say these raids and their aftermath may also have long-term consequences. Constant vigilance and worry puts children at greater risk of developing chronic anxiety and depression. Those who are separated from a parent face a host of social and emotional challenges.

A 2025 study in the Children and Youth Services Review showed that childhood exposure to “severe immigration enforcement” — which includes not just deportation, but also things like fear or arrest — is “significantly associated” with having anxiety as a young adult. The study’s authors call for “reforming immigration policies that unnecessarily harm members of families … and encourages social workers and allied professionals to recognize exposure to enforcement as a traumatic experience ...”

A new report in Psychiatry Online highlights the long-term, generational trauma caused by immigration enforcement and calls for the mental health community to not only improve treatment for immigrant youth and families, but also to join advocacy efforts in support of their immigrant patients.

Another recent study out of Florida from the from the National Bureau of Economic Research shows a 22 percent increase in student absences since January, a direct result of the Trump administration’s aggressive immigration enforcement there. The study blames fears of deportation and family separation for the decrease in school attendance. That same study showed a decrease in students’ test scores linked to immigration enforcement.

ICE officers and child Federal immigration officers speak to a child at a court in Manhattan. REUTERS/David 'Dee' Delgado

The trauma of mass deportation also impacts US-born children of immigrant parents, who live in constant fear of being separated from their parents. For many, that nightmare has now become a reality. CNN identified over 100 US citizen children who were left behind after a parent was deported, ranging in age from babies to teens.

The research is clear; there is no debate to be had: US immigration policy is hurting children. All that’s left to do is decide what type of society we want to be. Are we a society that cares about the well-being of children? It’s a yes or no question. There’s no “but” or “if” or “only certain children” or “they should’ve come here legally” (don’t even get me started — you can read more on that faulty argument here). We either care about human rights — or we don’t.

James Baldwin wrote in The Nation in a 1980 essay:

The children are always ours, every single one of them, all over the globe; and I am beginning to suspect that whoever is incapable of recognizing this may be incapable of morality.

His words ring truer today than ever before. If you care about children; if you say you’re “pro-life;” if you consider yourself a good or moral person: The children are ours. They are yours. And history will hold you responsible for how you did (or did not) protect them.

  • Rachel Rutter, Esq., is the founder and executive director of Project Libertad, a nonprofit providing holistic legal and social services to immigrant youth. She was named a Top 5 CNN Hero in 2024 and a 2025 WHYY Good Souls Honoree for her leadership in supporting vulnerable immigrant communities.

This chillingly un-American Trump move threatens all our freedoms

Back in September, most Americans (and the media) thought it was so over-the-top that it had to be a joke. Turns out, it wasn’t a joke and isn’t remotely funny.

In a bizarre directive that could have been written by the staff of The Onion or Putin’s secret police, National Security Presidential Memorandum-7 (NSPM-7), Donald Trump ordered the FBI, DOJ, and more than 200 federal Joint Terrorism Task Forces (coordinating FBI with local police forces across the country) to seek out and investigate any person or group who meet it’s “indica” (indicators) of potential domestic terrorism.

They include, as Ken Klippenstein first reported:

“[A]nti-Americanism, anti-capitalism, anti-Christianity … extremism on migration, extremism on race, extremism on gender, hostility towards those who hold traditional American views on family, hostility towards those who hold traditional American views on religion, and hostility towards those who hold traditional American views on morality.”
  • Have you ever spoken ill of our country or its policies, particularly under Trump?
  • Trash-talked capitalism or praised socialism on social media?
  • Publicly questioned Christianity or professed loyalty to Judaism, Islam, Hinduism, Paganism, or any other non-Christian belief system or religion?
  • Embraced the trans or more general queer community?
  • Spoken out in defense of single-parenting, gay marriage, or same-sex couples adopting children?
  • Said things or carried a sign that might hurt the feelings of masked ICE agents, Trump, or Kristi Noem?

Just imagining that any of these could trigger FBI agents knocking on our doors was so grotesque a notion that when the story first appeared four months ago, it was reported and then largely dismissed by mainstream media within the same day.

I mentioned it in an October Saturday Report and an earlier article, but, like pretty much everybody else in the media, dismissed it as virtue-signaling to the Trump base rather than an actual plan to set up a Russia-style police state here in America.

I was wrong.

Now, in a second bombshell report, Klippenstein has obtained and published a copy of Attorney General Pam Bondi’s Dec. 4 memo ordering the FBI to actually begin Russia-style investigations of people and groups who fit into the categories listed above.

Not only that, Bondi also ordered the FBI to go back as far as five years in their investigations of our social media posts, protest attendance, and other activities to find evidence of our possible adherence to these now-forbidden views.

Just being anti-fascist is, in Bondi’s eyes, apparently now a crime in America. From her memo to the FBI:

“Further, this [anti-fascist] ideology that paints legitimate government authority and traditional, conservative viewpoints as ‘fascist’ connects a recent string of political violence. Carvings on the bullet casings of Charlie Kirk’s assassin’s bullets read, ‘Hey, fascist, catch’ and ‘Bella Ciao’ — an ode to antifascist movements in Italy. … ICE agents are regularly doxed by anti-fascists, and calls to dox ICE agents appear in the same sentence of opinion pieces calling the Trump Administration fascist.”

At the same time, ICE is using a chunk of the massive budget the Big Ugly Bill gave them — larger than the budget of the FBI or any other police agency in America (or, probably, any other police agency in the world outside of China and Russia) — to buy tools they can use to spy on “anti-fascist” people who protest or oppose their actions.

In a report titled “ICE Wants to Go After Dissenters as well as Immigrants,” the Brennan Center for Justice details how the agency has acquired “a smorgasbord of spy technology: social media monitoring systems, cellphone location tracking, facial recognition, remote hacking tools, and more.”

They’ve reportedly acquired devices that spoof cellphone towers, so if you’re near them your phone will connect, thinking it’s talking to your cell carrier. Once the connection is established, ICE and/or DHS can monitor every communication to or from your phone and possibly even download all the content on your phone including emails, pictures, apps, and your browsing history.

They’re tying into nationwide networks of license-plate readers, airport facial recognition systems, and using federal surveillance drones to monitor people they consider enemies of the agency. And they’re carefully combing your social media content for posts, likes, and reposts they consider objectionable. As the Brennan Center noted:

“Homeland Security Investigations recently signed a multimillion dollar contract for a social media monitoring platform called Zignal Labs that claims to ingest and analyze more than 8 billion posts a day. The agency is also paying millions to Penlink for monitoring tools that gather information from multiple sources, including social media platforms, the dark web, and databases of location data.”

ICE is also acquiring Russian-style spy software that can remotely target your phone without your realizing it, infect it with the equivalent of an “ICE virus,” and then have your phone send them everything you do, say, hear, or see on an ongoing basis for months.

The only clue you’ll have will probably be that your battery life seems to have dropped as your phone is pumping out to ICE your data and everything the microphone in it picks up, all without your knowledge or permission.

This Putin-style sort of “search” without a legal warrant is the sort of thing that King George III’s officers did against the colonists (although back then it was reading their mail, spying on them in person, and kicking in their doors) in the 1770s that provoked our nation’s Founders to write in the Fourth Amendment to our Constitution:

“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”

It’s also a clear violation of the First Amendment’s protection of our rights to “free speech” and “peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

When Putin ended democracy in Russia, he defined the people who protested his policies as domestic terrorists and had his secret police go after them in ways that are shockingly similar to what ICE is launching and Bondi is ordering the FBI to do.

It’s chillingly un-American.

Reach out to your elected representatives (Congress’ phone is 202-224-3121) to let them know your opinion of this new aspect of Trump’s imperial reign, and pass this along to help wake up others.

If Congress and the courts refuse to give serious oversight and regulation to these agencies, we may all one day soon be facing the same neofascist brutality that killed Alexi Navalny and imprisoned (to this day) so many of his supporters.

'Leave me alone!' US citizen thought she was being kidnapped as masked feds chased her

Masked federal agents chased a 22-year-old woman in New Orleans who said she was targeted because "I'm brown," according to reports on Friday.

Security video from this week shows her telling the ICE agents to "leave me alone," The Guardian reported. She told reporters that she thought she was going to be kidnapped and ran to her front door to try and get away.

“I have no idea why they targeted me,” Jacelynn Guzman told WWL Louisiana, the outlet's reporting partner.

“That’s honestly all I can think of … It makes me scared for my family. It’s devastating," Guzman said.

Guzman said she has no criminal record.

“I was born and raised here. I’m a US citizen," she said.

A Department of Homeland Security spokesperson told the outlet in a statement Friday that Guzman matched the description of someone the agents were looking for.

ICE agents have claimed they are aiming to arrest 5,000 people throughout the next several weeks. Dozens, including many American citizens, have reportedly been detained in immigration sweeps across the city, according to the report.

'Never seen one!' James Comer makes bizarre swastika claim as agency says not hate symbol

WASHINGTON — Swastikas became the talk of Capitol Hill Thursday, to the surprise of, seemingly, everyone.

As news trickled out of a Washington Post report that the U.S. Coast Guard will no longer consider swastikas a hate symbol, Republicans were overcome with disbelief while Democrats were shocked, appalled or personally pained.

“How come you don’t tell me stuff?” Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) demanded of staffers after Raw Story showed her the report on our phone, which made her gasp in surprise.

The Coast Guard will re-classify “the Nazi-era insignia as ‘potentially divisive’ under … new guidelines,” according to the Post.

Citing documents reviewed, the Post said the new policy set to take effect on Dec. 15 “similarly downgrades the definition of nooses and the Confederate flag, though display of the latter remains banned, according to documents reviewed.”

As her surprise morphed into dread, Tlaib voiced long-held concerns about “white supremacist groups actively recruiting white supremacists to get into law enforcement.”

Other senior Democrats were similarly dismayed.

“It’s not a good thing,” former Jan. 6 Committee member Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-CA) told Raw Story. “You can’t undo history.”

The usually staid Rep. Joe Courtney (D-CT) was more vocal, maybe because he represents New London, home of the Coast Guard Academy — which he oversees on its board of visitors.

Courtney’s also a senior member of the House Armed Services Committee, where he’s the top Democrat on the Subcommittee on Seapower and Projection Forces.

“This is just a terrible message in terms of just saying, it's not hate, but potentially divisive,” Courtney told Raw Story, before pointing to a released statement.

"In 2007,” that statement said, “two hangman nooses were found at the Coast Guard Academy: one in a Black cadet's bag and another in a race relations trainer's office.

“In response, then-Commandant Thad Allen personally flew up to the Academy campus in New London to emphatically tell cadets that this hate behavior has no place in the Coast Guard.”

Speaking to Raw Story, Courtney added that the late Maryland Democratic congressman Elijah Cummings flew north with Commandant Allen, to “read the riot act.”

“Much work was done to make the Coast Guard safe and inclusive for its highly talented personnel,” Courtney’s statement continued.

“It is appalling that the Coast Guard is taking this gigantic step backwards and reclassifying nooses and swastikas as ‘potentially divisive’, as opposed to what they are: hate symbols.

“It is deeply troubling that this decision was even considered and [it] should be immediately reversed."

Courtney was far from alone.

Sen. Jacky Rosen (D-NV), a member of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, told the Post: “At a time when antisemitism is rising in the United States and around the world, relaxing policies aimed at fighting hate crimes not only sends the wrong message to the men and women of our Coast Guard, but it puts their safety at risk.”

‘Fake crap’

Democrats have voiced rising concerns about the hard-right turn of the Departments of Defense and Homeland Security under Secretaries Pete Hegseth and Kristi Noem, loyal lieutenants to Donald Trump.

The Coast Guard is part of DHS in peacetime but can transfer to the Pentagon in times of war.

The Trump administration aggressively rejected the Post report.

“This is an absolute ludicrous lie and unequivocally false,” Tricia McLaughlin, assistant DHS secretary, posted on social media.

“The Washington Post should be embarrassed it published this fake crap.“

But the Post quoted an unnamed Coast Guard official as saying they had seen the new policy wording, which they called “chilling.”

“We don’t deserve the trust of the nation if we’re unclear about the divisiveness of swastikas,” the official said, speaking anonymously “due to a fear of reprisal.”

The new policy, according to the Post, sets a 45-day limit for displays of swastikas to be reported, where previously no time limit was set.

The anonymous official was quoted as saying: “If you are at sea, and your shipmate has a swastika in their rack, and you are a Black person or Jew, and you are going to be stuck at sea with them for the next 60 days, are you going to feel safe reporting that up your chain of command?”

‘I’ve never seen one in person’

Despite widespread revulsion over the Post report, one senior Republican confronted by Raw Story seemed reluctant to take the story seriously.

Shown the report, Rep. James Comer (R-KY), chair of the powerful House Oversight Committee, offered an unusual reaction.

“Where are you on swastikas?” Raw Story asked.

“On what?” Comer said.

“Swastikas,” Raw Story said, sharing a screengrab of the Post story. “You seen this reporting?”

“I don’t know what you’re talking about,” Comer said.

Raw Story also mentioned reports of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents — like the Coast Guard, part of DHS — sporting white supremacist symbols as tattoos.

The senior Republican said he wasn’t too familiar with swastikas.

“I’ve never seen one in person,” Comer said. “Not in a tattoo. I’ve seen ‘em in movies [and] Sons of Anarchy” on TV.

New FEMA head may force agency to leave DC because he 'refuses to leave Texas': report

A top emergency official is reportedly refusing to leave Texas — and potentially could force the Federal Emergency Management Agency to move to the Lone Star State.

This could present "huge challenges" for the agency to coordinate with the Department of Homeland Security, a former FEMA official told Politico on Monday.

DHS oversees FEMA, whose top leader announced he was stepping down from the top role, and his potential replacement — Nim Kidd, head of the Texas Division of Emergency Management — could be up for the job next.

The move follows the news that David Richardson, a Kristi Noem ally who was criticized after he was publicly silent for a week following floods in Texas that killed more than 130 people, announced that he plans to resign. Department of Homeland Security officials reportedly had planned to remove the FEMA chief from the role after his six-month stint.

FEMA chief of staff Karen Evans will take on the interim position of administrator beginning Dec. 1.

A former FEMA official told The Politico that a panel appointed by President Donald Trump is planning to consider moving the agency to Texas to oblige Kidd, who apparently did not want to leave his home state, and is one of the 13 members of the review panel who remains close to the Trump administration.

“The admin wanted him, but he refused to leave Texas,” a FEMA source told the outlet.

‘Everyone is being screamed at’: Insiders say Stephen Miller irate as deportations lagging

Insiders are saying the Department of Homeland Security's ICE hiring is in "chaos" and Homeland Security Advisor Stephen Miller is reportedly angry over "lagging" deportation numbers.

A DHS source told The Daily Beast on Monday that President Donald Trump's push to "throw money around" while "panic at the top of government” has unfolded with Miller's disappointment over agents not reaching Trump's goal of 3,000 deportations per day.

“There are calls with Miller, where everyone is being screamed at,” the official told The Beast. “The targets he is setting for them are ridiculous, and it is a case of them just spending any money they can to increase the number of officers and deportations.”

Hiring within the agency has also presented other problems — agents joining before badges, system access or guns are available. Some say the money offer is luring veteran agents back and "insiders claim that the crash program has led to disorder, with some veteran agents performing minimal work for substantial pay and ballooning costs."

Former executive-level leaders from HSI and Enforcement and Removal Operations have returned to the agency, "some of them taking home north of $250,000 for office-based shiftwork, per multiple sources who spoke to the Beast," the outlet reports.

“It has just been going so fast that the process is messed up. It has been chaotic to handle. Make no mistake, it is a s--tshow right now," one HSI veteran told The Beast.

Kristi Noem, Secretary of Homeland Security, has claimed that many of the new agents would be law enforcement returnees.

However, according to several insiders, several former senior employees have returned to the federal pay scale.

"With locality pay in high-cost areas—such as parts of Texas, California, and New York—adding 35 percent or more to a basic salary, agents can earn up to $137,000 in the majority of the country. This rises to $171,268 in more expensive parts of the country, such as San Jose and San Francisco," The Beast reports.

Sources say that overtime pay has also added to the high paychecks, in addition to "ongoing federal pensions worth around $8,000–$9,000 a month, and some rehires can land well in excess of a quarter of a million annually."

This Trump lackey's ridiculous promos actually point to the fall of American law

Airport managers need to wake up fast. With only a handful of exceptions, people running airports across America are risking serious fines and being barred from government work for up to five years by broadcasting political messaging on behalf of DHS Secretary Kristi Noem.

Federal law — the Hatch Act — makes it a crime, punishable by fines and loss of current and future employment, to use government facilities or taxpayer money for partisan political purposes. Yet Noem, who has earned her national reputation as a puppy-killer and by cosplaying “tough cop” with her alleged boyfriend (they’re both married to other people), has pushed out a video to airports across the country blaming Democrats for the current shutdown.

This isn’t just a violation of federal law; it’s also a bald-faced lie.

Republicans today control the House, the Senate, the White House, and the Supreme Court. If Senate Majority Leader John Thune wanted to end the shutdown, he could do so this afternoon.

All it would take is the same maneuver Republicans have used repeatedly: a Senate rules change allowing passage of their Continuing Resolution to keep the government open, using only 50 votes plus the Vice President.

We’ve seen it before. Betsy DeVos only became Secretary of Education because Mike Pence broke a 50–50 tie in the Senate. Jeff Sessions squeaked through 52–47 as Attorney General. Rex Tillerson and Tom Price were confirmed with slim margins. And when it came to the Supreme Court, Mitch McConnell killed the filibuster to ram through Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett.

Democrats, by contrast, failed when they tried to change the rules to pass the For the People Act and John Lewis Voting Rights acts. Kyrsten Sinema and Joe Manchin sided with Republicans to preserve the filibuster, betraying the public interest.

So let’s be clear: this shutdown is not a matter of Senate procedure. Republicans have the power to end it today. They’re choosing not to because they want to strip health care from millions while protecting their $4 trillion tax cut for billionaires.

The 1939 Hatch Act, upheld by the Supreme Court in CSC v. Letter Carriers, outlaws the practice of federal officials converting government facilities into campaign machines. Its penalties are real: removal from service, debarment, suspensions, reprimands, and fines.

Some airport managers understand this, which is why several are refusing to air Noem’s message.

As of today, at least seven airports have declined to run the video at TSA checkpoints, citing policies and laws that prohibit political messaging in publicly funded facilities. Portland International Airport management informed the local ABC News affiliate:

“We believe the Hatch Act clearly prohibits using public assets for political purposes and messaging.”

The Washington Post reports that Buffalo, Charlotte, Cleveland, Los Angeles, Phoenix, Seattle, and Portland have all also said no, with at least two explicitly pointing to the Hatch Act as the reason.

By distributing this video, Noem has implicated not just herself but also airport managers nationwide, most of whom are now breaking federal law by broadcasting it. They face personal liability, including fines and disbarment from government work.

That they’ve gone along with Noem reflects how normalized lawbreaking has become in today’s Republican politics led by a 34-times-convicted felon and alleged rapist.

The lie about the shutdown itself compounds the crime. Citizens in a democracy must be able to trust their government to tell the truth about who is responsible for policy decisions and why they’re done. When those in power use public money to gaslight the public, accountability collapses. That is exactly why the Hatch Act exists.

There is precedent for enforcement of the Act even at the highest levels. The Office of Special Counsel recommended Kellyanne Conway be fired for repeated Hatch Act violations. Trump ignored it. He also ignored the law when his administration used the White House for the Republican National Convention and when he and Elon Musk went out front of it to hustle Teslas.

Republicans have apparently learned that if they break the law and face no consequences, the law effectively ceases to exist.

If Democrats are serious about defending both the rule of law and what’s left of America’s democracy, they must insist on prosecutions. That means removal from office for Noem, claims against the propagandists who produced and distributed the video, and charges against airport managers who continue broadcasting it. Anything less signals that the Hatch Act — and the rest of American law that could restrain Trump and his lickspittles — is a dead letter.

This is not a partisan point. Imagine if a Democratic administration produced a video blaming Republicans for a shutdown, then forced airports to broadcast it. Republicans would be demanding prosecutions, and rightly so. The law must apply equally or it means nothing at all.

Noem needs to stop lying. She needs to stop breaking the law. And Democrats need to stop pretending this is “politics as usual.” It is not. These are crimes designed to shift blame for a shutdown that is entirely the responsibility of the Republican Party, which could end it tomorrow with 51 votes in the Senate.

If there is no accountability now, America will slide further toward a future where propaganda is pumped through every government-owned screen and speaker. That is what has happened in Russia and Hungary, where public spaces are saturated with partisan messaging and independent voices silenced.

The Hatch Act was written to prevent that fate here. It must be enforced — with indictments, prosecutions, and disbarment — before it’s too late.

'Freaky Friday': How 'insane' Trump plan to 'bribe' kids mobilized fight

When tips started coming on Oct. 2, warning that the Trump administration was planning to offer financial incentives for unaccompanied immigrant children as young as 14 to self-deport, hundreds of immigration lawyers and advocates gathered on a call.

Their aim was to figure out how to protect vulnerable children from "Freaky Friday" — a rumored U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) mission set for Oct. 3. Named for a popular kids’ film, the operation would present children in the U.S. illegally with the option to voluntarily return to their home countries, rather than pursuing asylum or other forms of relief, even though many such children are fleeing abuse, trafficking or violence, advocates told Raw Story.

“The first time I heard it, I was like ‘This has to be a joke,’” said Ala Amoachi, an immigration attorney in East Islip, N.Y., who has represented hundreds of unaccompanied alien children (UACs).

But then she got word from the American Immigration Lawyers Association, which said information about the mission “was coming from credible sources and that they are not rumors.”

Another immigration advocate who declined to be named due to fear of retaliation said they learned about “Freaky Friday” from a government whistleblower.

On the morning of Oct. 3, Charles Kuck, an immigration attorney and adjunct Emory University law professor, posted a message on X.

“There is a darkness and evil that is taking over ICE, led by the dark lord Miller,” Kuck wrote, referencing Stephen Miller, Donald Trump’s White House deputy chief of staff.

“ICE is launching a nationwide operation today … reportedly named ‘Freaky Friday’ that will target unaccompanied children aged 14 and older of all nationalities.”

Kuck described details of the plan, from a “really reliable source.”

Unaccompanied children would receive a “threat” letter from ICE when they turned 18 if they didn’t waive their applications for relief under laws like the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act, Kuck wrote.

They would be offered $2,500 to return to their home countries. Otherwise, any family members in the U.S. would face threat of arrest, Kuck posted.

An Oct. 3 email shared with Raw Story confirmed that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) planned to offer a one-time resettlement stipend up to $2,500 to UACs aged 14 and older, in the custody of the Office of Refugee Resettlement, at the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), who wanted to self-deport.

DHS answered Kuck with an X post of its own, denying the “Freaky Friday” mission name but confirming a “voluntary” self-deportation payment.

“CHUCK KUCK IS WRONG!” the post said. (In fact, Kuck’s name is pronounced “Cook.”)

“The anti-ICE activists have made up a ridiculous term, ‘Freaky Friday,’ to instill fear and spread misinformation that drives the increased violence occurring against federal law enforcement,” the government post said.

The post also said cartels “trafficked countless unaccompanied children into the United States during the Biden Administration.”

It said DHS and HHS, whose Office of Refugee Resettlement cares for unaccompanied children without a U.S. legal guardian, were “working diligently to ensure the safety and wellbeing of those children.”

“Many of these UACs had no choice when they were dangerously smuggled into this country,” the post said.

“ICE and the Office of Refugee and Resettlement at HHS are offering a strictly voluntary option to return home to their families. This voluntary option gives UACs a choice and allows them to make an informed decision about their future. Any payment to support a return home would be provided after an immigration judge grants the request and the individual arrives in their country of origin. Access to financial support when returning home would assist should they choose that option.”

In response to a series of questions, an ICE spokesperson sent the same statement to Raw Story.

‘Threaten the lives of children’

Speaking to Raw Story, Kuck did not name the source that tipped him off to the “Freaky Friday" mission but said “there's no doubt that was the name. That is a typical DHS name under Trump.”

ICE has launched enforcement missions including Operation Midway Blitz in Chicago and Operation Tidal Wave in Florida. DHS has given immigration detention facilities alliterative names, including Alligator Alcatraz, Speedway Slammer and Cornhusker Clink.

Kuck called DHS’s response to his post “hilarious.”

“‘Chuck Kuck is wrong’ and yet in the very same tweet they admitted I was right. They didn't like the name — you know, they didn't object to Stephen Miller being called the dark lord, so that must still be true.”

Also on Oct. 3, the National Immigrant Justice Center and Illinois Coalition for Immigrant and Refugee Rights released a statement about a widely circulated email that referenced “Freaky Friday” and the program targeting unaccompanied children 14 to 18 years old but with the potential to affect children as young as 10.

“I think somebody needed to shine a spotlight on this,” Kuck said.

An ICE official said the self-deportation stipend is first being offered to 17-year-old UACs. It is currently unclear if the program will eventually extend to UACs 14 or younger.

The immigration advocate who requested anonymity said: “By the time that we got to Friday, it was like, ‘Okay, did they change their mind? Did they reverse course? Was this just like a stunt? Are they leaking this information to catch the leakers?”

‘Trauma upon trauma’

While he couldn’t attend due to travel, Kuck said the Oct. 2 call mobilizing immigration attorneys was “a reaction to a program that comes out of nowhere with no warning, that would literally potentially threaten the lives of children.”

“That's insane. That's literally what we're what we've reduced ourselves to in the immigration enforcement sphere? That’s sad.”

The immigration advocate who spoke anonymously said lawyers were “going out of their ways to officially enter into representation with the kids” in case UACs were going to be moved from care facilities run by HHS. That way, “the government wouldn't be able to say, ‘Oh, we didn't know that this kid didn't have a lawyer or something like that.’”

The advocate also said that on Labor Day weekend, in early September, the administration attempted to send more than 600 unaccompanied Guatemalan children to their home country.

“We're getting calls from the government saying, ‘Wake up the kids … they're being deported, and tell them to pack two lunches,’” the advocate said.

Within 30 minutes, government contractors showed up at shelters in Texas and Arizona, the advocate said. Children were boarded on planes and one started taxiing before a judge ordered an emergency halt at 4 a.m on the Sunday.

“That's one of the reasons why people were so alarmed and also so ready to take action [on Oct. 3],” the advocate said. “The government tried to disappear kids in the middle of the night when they thought no one was watching during a holiday weekend, and then now we hear that they're gonna call this Operation Freaky Friday and start targeting unaccompanied kids in this other way?

“It shows a pattern of this administration going after unaccompanied kids.”

UACs at U.S. government facilities are “the most vulnerable" of unaccompanied minors as they typically don’t have legal representation, Kuck said.

“Generally, if a child came across the border, it wasn't because they thought it was a really great idea,” Kuck said.

“My God, this is who we should be protecting, not offering money so they'll go back to what could potentially be a life-threatening situation in their home country.”

Amoachi pushed back on the idea that the self-deportation stipend is “voluntary.”

“They have all these special vulnerabilities,” Amoachi said. “They are minors, and even if they're not, they're vulnerable because they often experienced abuse: sexual abuse, physical abuse, psychological abuse, and they're scared. They're scared for their families. They're very traumatized right now with everything that's going on.”

Amoachi detailed “really horrifying situations” clients have faced. One 14-year-old “gave herself up to be a victim instead” when a human smuggler was going to rape her sister, she said.

Kuck said he represented a 15-year-old sex trafficking victim who was sexually abused when she arrived in the U.S.

The advocate who spoke anonymously was appalled by the idea of a child making a “life-or-death decision without a trusted adult.”

“A lot of these kids are leaving countries with high amounts of cartel violence, and so a masked man shows up at your house and says, ‘We'll give you X amount of money to carry this across the border, or join our gang,' or whatever, and they're putting you in a life or death situation, and then you come to the United States, and then there's another masked man coming to you, saying, ‘You have to make this decision right now.’ It's just trauma upon trauma.”

Amoachi said she had spoken with kindergarten-aged UACs who had seen classmates killed for not joining gangs in places like El Salvador. One 5-year-old was abandoned after his mother killed herself, having been in a forced relationship with a gang member, Amoachi said.

“What low have we reached in this country when we're going after unaccompanied minors?” Amoachi said.

‘It's just counter-humanitarian to do these things, particularly because a lot of UACs, they're coming to the U.S. usually to reunite with one or both of their parents, and they're often coming from situations where they were physically abused or psychologically abused or exposed to sexual abuse or gang violence.”

‘Done for show’

Unaccompanied, undocumented minors may qualify for Special Immigrant Juvenile Status (SIJS), a form of immigration relief for children abused, neglected or abandoned by one or both of their parents.

Two of Amoachi’s clients were deported to El Salvador this year despite pending Special Immigrant Juvenile Status cases. They suffered post-traumatic stress disorder and depression as a result of detention and deportation, Raw Story reported.

Nicole Whitaker, an immigration attorney in Towson, Md., said: “This effort is a part of a broader escalation in immigration enforcement under the current administration, signaling a shift from targeting adults with criminal records to targeting children.

“It goes against the spirit of the SIJS legislation as it was originally enacted and punishes children and families who have done the right thing by following the proper procedures and ‘waiting in line’ for legal status."

Marina Shepelsky, an immigration lawyer in Brooklyn, N.Y., came to the U.S. as an immigrant herself, fleeing the Soviet Union. She said she gets frustrated at family members “cheering” on the Trump administration.

Marina Shepelsky Marina Shepelsky during an interview with Raw Story (Screen grab)

“I find it to be almost hypocritical when people say, ‘Well, we went through the legal channels,” Shepelsky said.

“People will be so happy to go through legal channels if there were legal channels. If it was a real amnesty, millions of people would apply, and they would pay a $100,000 penalty. They would find the money, believe me.

“I think it's very cruel, this enforcement the way it’s done. I think that it's just a lot of it is done for show, as a deterrent to people, and I think it's unfair.”

Amoachi said children are generally inclined to comply with people in authority, which could compel them to accept a self-deportation offer.

UACs might also be tempted to take the $2,500 self-deportation stipend if there’s “implication that their family members could face repercussions,” meaning some children would be “willing to sacrifice themselves for their families," Amoachi said.

This summer DHS launched a voluntary departure program through the U.S. Customs and Border Protection Home App, offering subsidized travel and a $1,000 “exit bonus.”

“None of this is accidental,” Kuck said. “They want to literally deport everybody, so they do the easy ones first.”

Shepelsky mainly represents Ukrainian refugees fleeing the war with Russia. Given her clients are usually white, “they are treated differently,” she said, “but I wouldn't say they're treated much, much better than others.”

“This is so inhumane and so not aligned with what all of us have always thought was the purpose of the immigration system.

“Now, instead of protecting them, especially kids, we are trying to buy them, bribe them, scare them, bully them, really, into leaving.”