All posts tagged "dan crenshaw"

'Stop this': Texas GOP lawmaker roasted for 'cheesy' concealed carry holster infomercial

Rep. Dan Crenshaw (R-TX) posted a lengthy infomercial diatribe on X Friday evening, promoting "Endex Fitness" brand concealed carry holsters for guns.

This follows some other controversial product plugs by Republican lawmakers, including Gov. Kristi Noem (R-SD) promoting a Texas dental practice that fixed her teeth — which actually led to her facing a false advertising lawsuit.

"No better way to celebrate Independence Day than stylishly exercising your 2nd Amendment rights," wrote Crenshaw, accompanying the post with a video demonstrating the holster. "So many brands try to sell you 'sleek' holsters and belt systems for 'concealed' carry. But there’s nothing sleek about an extra inch of plastic or leather or metal clips, plus the belt. Our design keeps it simple with an improved belly band elastic holster that integrates into the pants perfectly. Or you can use the holster by itself. It’s removable."

ALSO READ: Rep. Byron Donalds, his gigantic Jim Crow myth and a forgotten fact about Black voters

Crenshaw went on to disclaim, "No, I don’t make a dime off of this ... The profits for this clothing line go almost entirely to funding US House races around the country and growing the Republican majority," and urged supporters to "Get it soon. This is our first drop and we didn’t produce all that much. Enjoy!"

Crenshaw's post didn't go down on social media the way he might have been hoping.

"What is with this trend of elected Republicans doing these product infomercials?" wrote anti-Trump conservative activist Heath Mayo. "Like, how do they sit there and think: 'Yeah, this is a good idea.' What are we doing here? I’m begging you guys — stop this, please."

"AND it acts as a girdle, which you seem to need," wrote former congressional candidate Pat Bryan.

"We're not a serious political party," wrote the account @robertjalberts.

"No, it's cheesy," wrote the account @bikesalsa.

"What are you doing, bro?" wrote the account @IsntChrisL. "The Congress pipeline already allows you to get rich with insider trading and then continue the corruption with a lobbying gig once your voters finally boot you. You're screwing up the whole system and doing infomercials while you're still in office." Crenshaw, ironically, has been accused of insider trading himself by Fox News anchor Jesse Watters, and didn't respond to it gracefully.

Watch the video below or at the link.

Exclusive: Rep. Ilhan Omar questions Alito’s patriotism

WASHINGTON — Democrats are asking who’s the treasonous one now that pictures have surfaced of an upside American flag flying at the home of Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito.

Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) — the Somali-born congresswoman who some Republicans have called “treasonous” and accused of being “a foreign agent” — is in disbelief that the GOP is defending Alito after his wife allegedly disrespected the American flag.

The upside-down flag that flew at the Alitos’ home in Virginia in the days after the attack on the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, was a well-known symbol of Donald Trump’s “stop the steal” effort to overturn the results of the 2020 election. A separate “Appeal to Heaven” flag — a banner carried by some January 6 rioters — flew at the Alitos’ vacation home in New Jersey less than two weeks after the riot, the Associated Press reported.

ALSO READ: What Trump's weird WWE Hall of Fame speech tells us about his presidential debate strategy

“It sounds insane. It sounds un-American,” Omar told Raw Story while walking through the basement of the U.S. Capitol on Wednesday.

While there’s disagreement within the Democratic Party over whether to hold hearings into this latest Supreme Court scandal, there’s broad agreement in the party that this latest incident is a new low for the nation’s high court.

On the GOP side, Alito has his defenders, but many Republicans — a party that’s tried to ban flag burning in recent decades — don’t want to wade into this controversy.

At the very least, there’s broad agreement the Supreme Court has astounded a Congress that itself is known for astounding even the most seasoned political observers.

Hypocrisy watch

Omar doesn’t use “un-American” lightly. That allegation has personally stung her

— she was born in Somalia before migrating to refugee camps and eventually landing in Minneapolis — as she’s endured sustained attacks questioning her patriotism from many on the right.

In February 2023, Republicans booted Omar — one of just three Muslims in Congress — from the House Foreign Affairs Committee. Then, at the start of this year, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) introduced a censure resolution against Omar.

“I wish I had the votes to expel and deport her,” MTG tweeted on X in February.


While the GOP did censure Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) — another Muslim member — Greene’s effort to shame Omar never got a floor vote. But earlier this month, Rep. Don Bacon (R-NE) introduced a new censure resolution against Omar.

Omar is wondering where these Republicans are now that Alito, a fellow conservative, is accused of disrespecting the flag in which they drape themselves.

The U.S. Flag Codea largely symbolic and unenforced law — states that the “flag should never be displayed with the union down, except as a signal of dire distress in instances of extreme danger to life or property.” Trump himself has advocated criminalizing flag burning.

“It shows that the flag is just a prop for them and not something that they honor,” Omar said. “You can’t make this s— up. These people really are a special breed.”

“Does this show, like, that MAGA is now the GOP and the court is now MAGA-ish?” Raw Story asked.

“Yeah. That’s been clear,” Omar said. “In the last six, seven years it’s been evident.”

Evident or not, Democrats’ hands are tied — at least in the House of Representatives, where the party is locked in the minority.

Dems divided

This is an election year, and the Supreme Court was already on the ballot after conservative justices overturned Roe v. Wade. But Democrats are now vowing to triple down on their calls to try and restrain the Supreme Court.

“This is one of the reasons why we really need a code of ethics for Supreme Court justices,” Rep. Maxwell Frost (D-FL) told Raw Story. “And he does need to, I believe, recuse himself from a litany of cases.”

Frost is generally supportive of a legislative response some of his Democratic colleagues are crafting to this Alito flag incident, but he goes a step further than others.

ALSO READ: NFL drafts Capitol Hill staffers for lobbying retreat

“It’s bizarre. Some may say, treasonous. I would say that,” Frost said.

“Treasonous” is a step too far for many of his colleagues — in part because many Democrats are still in disbelief over this flag incident.

“It's pretty pathetic, actually,” Rep Dan Kildee (D-MI) told Raw Story. “In an era where it's hard to find things that are not outrageous, they figured out a way to outdo it. It’s pretty bad.”

While Alito blames his wife, Kildee says that’s a flimsy defense.

“He can try to hide behind his wife all he wants, but it's pretty weak,” Kildee said. “The idea that he can express that view and then be a fair judge in cases that involve that particular question, that’s pretty hard to imagine.”

Earlier this session, the Senate Judiciary Committee passed a measure that would saddle Supreme Court justices with a concrete code of ethics. Republicans opposed it, and it squeaked out of the committee on a strictly party line vote., 11-10.

Some Senate Democrats are now calling for hearings into this latest Alito scandal, but so far the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Sen. Dick Durbin (D-IL), has nixed the idea. He is, however, calling on the justice to voluntarily bow out of cases about presidential powers and allegations of misconduct surrounding the 2020 election.

“He should recuse in cases — in Article II cases,” Durbin told Raw Story while heading to the Senate floor to vote Wednesday.

In the House, 45 Democrats agree. They penned a letter Tuesday calling on Alito to recuse himself from all Jan. 6-related cases. While the Democratic Party is itching to put up some restraints on the Roberts Court, the GOP wields the gavels in the House.

Controversy is ‘crap’ — to at least one Republican

On cue, Republicans disagree about whether Alito is in the wrong — especially over calls for one of their conservative compatriots to recuse himself from some of the biggest, most controversial cases ever to come before the court.

“That's just asinine,” Rep. Andy Biggs (R-AZ) told Raw Story of Democrat’s calls for Alito to recuse himself from Jan. 6 cases going forward.

“It’s crap,” Biggs said. “It’s stupid. It is really dumb.”

Andy Biggs Rep. Andy Biggs (R-AZ). (Facebook)

Other Republicans won’t go that far. In fact, many don’t even want to touch this controversy with a 10-foot flag pole.

“Not sure what’s the motivator of it, but I guess it’s something between the two of them,” Sen. Mike Braun (R-IN) told Raw Story of the associate justice and his wife. “It’s probably inviting scrutiny. Beyond that, I don’t really weigh in on stuff like that when I don’t know much about it. I just know that it happened.”

“‘Inviting’ or ‘welcoming’ scrutiny?” Raw Story asked.

ALSO READ: 'A fantasy of manhood': Are frat boys the new Proud Boys?

“However you want to phrase it,” Braun — who, after recently winning Indiana’s Republican gubernatorial primary, is likely the next governor of his state — said through a chuckle.

The issue of an upside down flag isn’t something many veteran Republicans want to weigh in on.

“What are your thoughts when you see an American flag flying upside down?” Raw Story asked Rep. Dan Crenshaw (R-TX), who famously and heroically lost his right eye on his third tour to Afghanistan as a Navy SEAL.

“What was the context here?” Crenshaw asked Raw Story.

“Justice Alito, his wife did it. But I was just asking more broadly. Like, is that offensive to you aside from that?”

“I really don’t have a comment. I don’t know,” Crenshaw said. “I got no comment. I have no idea why.”

Democrats are filling that void, including with laughter.

“Well, my first thought is, everybody has neighbor troubles from time to time,” Rep. Richard Neal (D-MA) joked to Raw Story.

“They're just like us!” Raw Story quipped back.

“Yeah,” Neal said as his laughter waned and his face became serious. “But secondly, it seems to me to be petulant.”

Alito is no Clarence Thomas?

Petulant or not, some Democrats are urging their colleagues to stay focused, in part, because the freedom of speech extends to justices and their spouses.

In fact, some Democrats say this episode is doing their job for them.

“It doesn’t surprise me about any of those folks. It’s a shame,” Rep. Bill Pascrell (D-NJ) told Raw Story. “It doesn't bother me at all what they’re doing, because it only shows how they really are. Better than words. That makes them part of the MAGA group.”

Pascrell says he’s more concerned about Justice Clarence Thomas taking lavish gifts from billionaire donors, including exclusive, all expense paid vacations on private yachts to accepting free tuition payments for his nephew’s schooling, as ProPublica reported last spring.

Clarence ThomasSupreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas (Photo by Olivier Douliery for AFP)

“The other guy that’s taken his off the top, that guy should recuse himself,” Pascrell said. “He's just taking tremendous amounts of donations from the MAGA types. I don’t think you can say that about Alito.”

“And that's more worrying — the taking of the money, because there are strings attached?” Raw Story inquired.

“Absolutely,” Pascrell replied. “Yes. Exactly.”

“But they say there's no strings?”

“There's never any strings,” Pascrell told Raw Story through a laugh. “That's what they said in New Jersey.”

Marjorie Taylor Greene is buying stocks again. Some picks pose a conflict of interest

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) is back playing the stock market after an extended absence — and she just purchased stock in two companies whose business dealings potentially conflict with her congressional committee assignments.

In a public filing released today and reviewed by Raw Story, Greene reported buying up to $15,000 Qualcomm, a federal defense contractor. Greene serves on the Homeland Security Committee and the Subcommittee on Border Security and Enforcement.

RELATED ARTICLE: Lawmakers, law breakers: 42 members of Congress have violated a conflicts-of-interest law

She also reported an investment of up to $15,000 in technology giant Microsoft. Greene serves on the Government Oversight and Accountability Committee and the Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Information Technology, and Government Innovation.

Greene also reported buying up to $15,000 each in Home Depot, Goldman Sachs, Hershey, Berkshire Hathaway and Tractor Supply Company stock. She also purchased up to $500,000 worth of U.S. Treasury bills — short-term investments that mature between four and 52 weeks.

Greene’s office did not immediately answer Raw Story’s request for comment.

Family stocks that Greene disclosed made an 18.6 percent return on stocks in 2023, as estimated by Unusual Whales. That was above average and in the middle of members of Congress who traded stocks. Asked on Fox News about the trades, she said an account for her son must have made the trades, a claim widely mocked on social media.

ALSO READ: 16 worthless things Trump will give you for your money

Notably, Greene’s new investments do not include Trump Media & Technology Group, whose stock has tanked since it came on the market.

In October 2021, Greene became the first member of Congress to personally invest in Digital World Acquisition Corp, which in March merged with Trump Media to form the publicly traded Trump Media & Technology Group, which trades on the NASDAQ market under the ticker symbol “DJT” for “Donald John Trump.”

In 2021, Greene reported that she and her then-husband Perry Greene purchased between $15,001 and $50,000 worth of Digital World Acquisition Corp.

ALSO READ: Biden campaign surrenders tainted crypto cash

Greene has not reported that she sold the stock. She was divorced in December 2022. It appears the Digital World Acquisition Corp. shares — along with the shares of many other stocks — went to her ex-husband.

Greene’s husband frequently bought stocks in companies that openly supported social efforts that the congresswoman opposed, such as the Black Lives Matter movement and LTBTQ+ rights, Business Insider reported.

Greene had personally stopped trading stocks since 2023, according to financial disclosures filed with Congress.

Unusual Whales, which tracks the stock trades of members of Congress, warned in a 2023 report that stock trading by members of Congress poses risks: “It is important to remember that many of these stocks these members are trading are also legislated by their very committees. In no surprise, these conflicts do not stop members from trading those very stocks, like members of the Armed Services trading war stocks, and others.”

Unusual Whales noted in the report how Rep. Dan Crenshaw (R-TX) reacted when asked about his highly successful trades in 2021.

“His exact words were that without trading, ‘You have no way to better yourself’ as a congressperson,’” the report said.

Raw Story has reported that 42 members of Congress — Greene is not among them — have violated the Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge Act of 2012 during the current congressional session because they’ve improperly disclosed personal financial trades.

Bipartisan efforts to ban stock trading among members of Congress have so far proved unsuccessful.


'Tucker lying for attention': GOP lawmaker feuds with ex-Fox News host

Conservative media host Tucker Carlson was under fire on Friday after he attacked a Republican lawmaker for voting in favor of a bill that would encourage TikTok to divest from its Chinese ownership.

Rep. Dan Crenshaw (R-TX) voted in support of the bill, after which Carlson said, "This is Rep. Dan Crenshaw as he walks out of the Capitol after voting to give Joe Biden the power to shut down news sites that dare to challenge him." Crenshaw evaluated the evidence instead of making any announcement in public.

"Crenshaw tells reporter Liam Cosgrove that U.S. intel agencies don’t meddle in domestic news coverage, when of course he knows that’s untrue. Watch his face as he says it. Liar," Carlson said after the vote.

ALSO READ: House Republican giggles over Hitler praise — and admits he never listens to Trump

In response to the attack, Crenshaw said the former news host was "lying for attention, as usual."

"Maybe since he lost his production assistants at Fox News he can no longer do basic research or read short legislation," according to the lawmaker. "Nothing in the TikTok bill gives anyone any authority to shut down news agencies. Tucker is mad about a bill that simply stops the CCP from stealing the data of tens of millions Americans and using TikTok to push their propaganda."

Crenshaw also clarified that, by his count, "90% of conservatives in the House voted for this bill."

"None of this is surprising, since Tucker never misses an opportunity to defend America’s enemies, and of course garner some clickbait on his Chinese TikTok account," according to the post from the lawmaker.

Trump has opposed the bill but has in the past spoken against the use of the app.

Five more Republican lawmakers surrender FTX money to U.S. Marshals Service

Money keeps pouring into the U.S. Marshals Service from federal political campaigns and committees who received funds from FTX, the now-defunct cryptocurrency company, according to a Raw Story analysis of federal campaign records.

Another five political campaigns sent $15,500 in campaign cash to the government agency best known for hunting down suspected criminals, adding to at least $160,000 collected from 30 federal political candidates and party committees, as Raw Story first reported.

The five new campaigns that gave up the money are fundraising entities for Rep. Marc Molinaro (R-NY), Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-NY), Rep. Lori Chavez-DeRemer (R-OR), Rep. Bob Latta (R-OH) and Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick (R-PA).

Stefanik is chairwoman of the House Republican Conference, the GOP’s fourth most powerful position in the U.S. House of Representatives.

RELATED ARTICLE: Why big-time politicians are surrendering gobs of campaign cash to an unlikely source

These mass “disgorgements” to the U.S. Marshals — an extraordinary development with almost no precedent in politics — stem from the Department of Justice urging politicians to return contributions made by FTX executives, including Sam Bankman-Fried, the company’s former CEO. Bankman-Fried faces 13 charges in federal court, including fraud, breaking campaign finance laws and violating the Foreign Corrupt Business Practices Act with an alleged $40 million bribe to Chinese authorities.

“Based on our office's investigation, we have cause to believe these donations represent the proceeds of Bankman-Fried's crimes and accordingly are forfeitable under applicable provisions of the federal asset forfeiture statutes,” said a letter sent by the Department of Justice to a member of Congress’ campaign committee, which in turn shared its contents with Raw Story.

The letter continued, “It is the intent of this office to request any funds forfeited be made available to compensate the victims of Bankman-Fried's crimes pursuant to the Department of Justice's restoration and/or remission regulations."

These letters seem to indicate the DOJ taking a harder stance on campaigns taking money from suspected criminals — and could be considered an “aggressive practice,” said Kevin O’Brien, a partner at Ford O’Brien Landy LLP and former assistant U.S. Attorney for the Department of Justice.

“Forced forfeiture is a very onerous process. It's not fun, and I think that might have something to do with why they're so eager to send the money back,” O’Brien said. “Investors pretty much lost their shirt, and so the government has an obligation to collect what it can from other sources, including people who are required under the law to forfeit the proceeds of a crime.”

As for sending the money to the U.S. Marshals, O’Brien called it “unusual” and “weird.” He wasn’t sure why the funds were directed to the U.S. Marshals but theorized it could be a bureaucratic decision. The Marshals could be taking the funds as a part of its Asset Forfeiture Program, which allows the USMS to manage and sell assets seized and forfeited by the DOJ, according to the U.S. Marshals website.

“The Molinaro campaign sent the contribution it received from an FTX Executive to a U.S. Marshals recovery fund. It will benefit those defrauded by FTX,” said Dave Catalfamo, an adviser to the Molinaro campaign.

Four of the five new disgorgements came from FTX executive, Ryan Salame, a frequent political donor, according to Raw Story’s analysis of FEC records.

Salame’s house was searched by the FBI on April 27, but he has not been charged with a crime.

“Since news broke, I have waited on guidance from the bankruptcy court on what to do with the funds I received connected to FTX. Having received said guidance, I have tendered the funds to the court. It is up to the court to decide what to do with the money,” Rep. Morgan Griffiths (R-VA), who previously returned $2,900 in FTX-related contributions, said in a statement.

Among the political contributions that federal political committees have sent the U.S. Marshals to date, according to federal records:

Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee — $36,500

Republican National Committee — $25,000

Former Republican Sen. Ben Sasse — $5,800

Rep. Mike Simpson (R-ID) — $5,800

Former Rep. Lee Zeldin (R-NY) Campaign Fund — $5,800

Sen. Maggie Hassan (D-NH) — $5,800

Sen. John Boozman (R-AR) — $5,800

Rep. Ruben Gallego (D-AZ) — $5,800

Rep. Marc Molinaro (R-NY) — $2,900

Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-NY) — $2,900

Rep. Bob Latta (R-OH) — $2,900

Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick (R-PA) — $2,900

Rep. Eli Crane (R-AZ) — $2,900

Rep. Larry Bucshon (R-IN) — $2,900

Rep. Chuck Edwards (R-NC) — $2,900

Rep. Alex Mooney (R-WV) — $2,900

Rep. Julia Letlow (R-LA) — $2,900

Rep. Greg Casar (D-TX) — $2,900

Rep. Salud Carbajal (D-CA) — $2,900

Rep. Jeff Duncan (R-SC) — $2,900

Rep. Dan Crenshaw (R-TX) — $2,900

Rep. Morgan Griffith (R-VA) — $2,900

Rep. Maxwell Alejandro Frost (D-FL) — $2,900

Rep. Bill Johnson (R-OH) — $2,900

Rep. John Moolenaar (R-MI) — $2,900

Rep. Joyce Beatty (D-OH) — $2,900

Rep. Kay Granger (R-TX) — $2,900

Sen. Tim Scott (R-SC) Presidential Exploratory Committee — $2,900

Rep. Gary Palmer (R-AL) — $2,900

Rep. Buddy Carter (R-GA) — $2,900

Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart (R-FL) — $2,900

Rep. Kathy Castor (D-FL) — $2,900

Rep. Sean Casten (D-IL) — $2,700

Athena PAC (Democratic Rep. Kathy Castor of Florida) — $2,500

Axne PAC (Democratic Rep. Cynthia Axne of Iowa) — $1,618

Rep. Lori Chavez-DeRemer (R-OR) — $1,000

Why big-time politicians are surrendering gobs of campaign cash to an unlikely source

More than 30 federal political candidates and party committees have together surrendered at least $160,000 worth of donor dollars to the U.S. Marshals Service in recent weeks, according to a Raw Story analysis of federal campaign records.

It’s an all-but-unprecedented relinquishing of precious campaign cash to a government agency best known for hunting down suspected criminals, and even veteran election officials say they’ve never seen anything quite like it in U.S. politics.

But this isn’t any routine situation: Most of these “disgorgements” stem from contributions made by executives of bankrupt cryptocurrency exchange FTX, including former CEO Sam Bankman-Fried, Raw Story’s analysis indicates. And the Department of Justice is urging campaigns to give the money up.

“Based on our office's investigation, we have cause to believe these donations represent the proceeds of Bankman-Fried's crimes and accordingly are forfeitable under applicable provisions of the federal asset forfeiture statutes,” said a letter sent by the Department of Justice to a member of Congress’ campaign committee, which in turn shared its contents with Raw Story.

The letter continued, “It is the intent of this office to request any funds forfeited be made available to compensate the victims of Bankman-Fried's crimes pursuant to the Department of Justice's restoration and/or remission regulations."

Bankman-Fried faces 13 charges in federal court, including fraud, breaking campaign finance laws and violating the Foreign Corrupt Business Practices Act with an alleged $40 million bribe to Chinese authorities. The FBI on Thursday reportedly searched the home of FTX executive Ryan Salame, a frequent political donor. Salame has not been charged with a crime.

The largest amount sent to the U.S. Marshals came from the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, which received $36,500 from Nishad Singh, FTX’s former director of engineering, who pleaded guilty in February to six conspiracy charges. The DSCC did not respond to Raw Story’s request for comment.

The Republican National Committee received $25,000 from Salame, according to the FEC filing. The RNC declined to comment.

RELATED ARTICLE: Beto O’Rourke returned $1 million check from FTX’s Sam Bankman-Fried

Raw Story’s review of the FEC filings indicated that of the political committees to unload money to the Marshals Service, Salame contributed to 15, Bankman-Fried to six and Singh to five.

It is highly unusual for the Marshals Service to involve itself in electoral politics generally, and it almost never collects money from political campaigns. Federal Election Commission records show it’s happened once during the past decade prior to the flurry of disgorgements during recent weeks. The Marshals Service does, however, list “seizing assets gained by illegal means and providing for the custody, management, and disposal of forfeited assets” among its responsibilities.

Campaigns typically send unwanted donor cash — particularly money from contributors who find themselves in legal jeopardy or public disrepute — to the U.S. Treasury, which generally absorbs it into the nation’s general fund.

Sending money to the Marshals Service is “a way for these political committees to resolve the situation, and then whatever they do with Sam Bankman-Fried, that's a whole other issue,” said Michael Toner, a partner at Wiley Rein and former Republican FEC chairman who served on the commission from 2002 to 2007. “It may be that the authorities have preferred the disgorgements go to the U.S. Marshals Service because obviously that's an arm of the federal government, and it would accomplish the same purpose as a disgorgement" to the U.S. Treasury.

“It appears this is related to the FTX case, and all inquiries are being referred to the USAO in the Southern District of New York,” Dave Oney, a spokesman for the Marshals Service, told Raw Story via email.

The Department of Justice and the U.S. Attorney's Office in the Southern District of New York did not respond to Raw Story’s requests for comment.

Emphasizing that she was speculating, Ann Ravel, a Democrat and former FEC chairwoman who served from 2013 to 2017, said, “I've never seen anything like this, and maybe they think because they can't rely on [campaign] people doing what they're supposed to do, that they need more active campaign finance enforcers.”

Raw Story contacted each political committee that disgorged money to the Marshals Service between January, when the phenomenon first began, and late March, when most disgorgements took place. Most committees did not respond to messages.

But the campaign of Rep. Dan Crenshaw (R-TX) indicated that Crenshaw didn’t need a push to return the $2,900 Salame contributed to Crenshaw for Congress on Oct. 10, 2022.

“Obviously the campaign didn’t know at the time that FTX was engaged in criminal activity,” said Sue Walden, Crenshaw for Congress’ political director, in a statement to Raw Story. “We were happy to oblige the Justice Department’s request.”

Among the political contributions that federal political committees have sent the U.S. Marshals:

Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee — $36,500

Republican National Committee — $25,000

Former Republican Sen. Ben Sasse — $5,800

Rep. Mike Simpson (R-ID) — $5,800

Former Rep. Lee Zeldin (R-NY) Campaign Fund — $5,800

Sen. Maggie Hassan (D-NH) — $5,800

Sen. John Boozman (R-AR) — $5,800

Rep. Ruben Gallego (D-AZ) — $5,800

Rep. Eli Crane (R-AZ) — $2,900

Rep. Larry Bucshon (R-IN) — $2,900

Rep. Chuck Edwards (R-NC) — $2,900

Rep. Alex Mooney (R-WV) — $2,900

Rep. Julia Letlow (R-LA) — $2,900

Rep. Greg Casar (D-TX) — $2,900

Rep. Salud Carbajal (D-CA) — $2,900

Rep. Jeff Duncan (R-SC) — $2,900

Rep. Dan Crenshaw (R-TX) — $2,900

Rep. Morgan Griffith (R-VA) — $2,900

Rep. Maxwell Alejandro Frost (D-FL) — $2,900

Rep. Bill Johnson (R-OH) — $2,900

Rep. John Moolenaar (R-MI) — $2,900

Rep. Joyce Beatty (D-OH) — $2,900

Rep. Kay Granger (R-TX) — $2,900

Sen. Tim Scott (R-SC) Presidential Exploratory Committee — $2,900

Rep. Gary Palmer (R-AL) — $2,900

Rep. Buddy Carter (R-GA) — $2,900

Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart (R-FL) — $2,900

Rep. Kathy Castor (D-FL) — $2,900

Rep. Sean Casten (D-IL) — $2,700

Athena Pac (Democratic Rep. Kathy Castor of Florida) — $2,500

Axne PAC (Democratic Rep. Cynthia Axne of Iowa) — $1,618