All posts tagged "anna paulina luna"

Fed chief Jerome Powell accused of criminally lying under oath: report

MAGA Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL) has referred Fed Chairman Jerome Powell to the Department of Justice on two criminal counts of lying under oath, according to Fox News Digital.

The outlet first reported Luna's accusations after obtaining her letter to the DOJ. It reads, in part,

"On June 25, 2025, Chairman Powell provided testimony under oath before the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs regarding the renovation of the Federal Reserve’s Eccles Building. In his statements, he made several materially false claims," Luna's letter said.

Luna went on to accuse Powell of "lying about lavish amenities at the Federal Reserve's Eccles Building and misrepresenting its state of maintenance," according to the report.

President Donald Trump has floated the idea of firing Powell over fraud allegations regarding the building project. Trump has been upset with Powell, his own appointee, for failing to lower interest rates according to his instruction.

According to Fox News Digital, "Trade outlet Mortgage Professional reported that Powell denied all accusations of perjury and has directed a formal watchdog probe into renovation project costs of the Eccles Building."

Read the Fox News Digital Report here.

‘Not worried, no, no, no, no, nope': GOP squirms as Trump-Epstein scandal spirals

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump’s handling of the Jeffrey Epstein scandal is making many of his Republican allies on Capitol Hill squirm — but that doesn’t mean they’re backing down.

After dismissing his own MAGA base as “stupid people,” “weaklings,” “foolish” and “PAST supporters,” the president has changed his tune a tad. But for many members of Congress in both parties, merely allowing Attorney General Pam Bondi to release the Jeffrey Epstein grand jury testimony is not good enough.

While the testimony would be welcome, members of Congress continue to demand the release of the full Epstein records, including the infamous client list that Bondi previously said was “on my desk" — and now denies exists.

“The grand jury release is a first step,” Rep. Ro Khanna (D-CA) told Raw Story at the Capitol.

“It's not going to have the information about all the other potential men who were involved, and that has to be a release of the witness memos, the release of the broader evidentiary file.”

If releasing the grand jury testimony was meant to placate Trump's critics, it’s already failed.

Republican rage

Republicans still seem to be struggling through the denial stage of collective grief after President Trump — who many referred to as “Daddy” throughout the 2024 election — spent the week lashing out at supporters and policymakers alike.

“My PAST supporters have bought into this “b—---,” hook, line, and sinker,” Trump posted on Truth Social.

“They haven’t learned their lesson, and probably never will, even after being conned by the Lunatic Left for 8 long years.

“Let these weaklings continue forward and do the Democrats[‘] work, don’t even think about talking of our incredible and unprecedented success, because I don’t want their support anymore!”

After years of Trump stoking Epstein conspiracies, political watchers were left scratching their heads as the president did an about face, contradicting his campaign trail vows of transparency, justice, even revenge.

Rep. Troy Nehls (R-TX) is one of the president’s most devoted congressional allies, whether rocking gold Trump sneakers or not.

Raw Story asked him: “So wait, you don't think there's a change in tune from Trump on Epstein?”

“Why are we talking about Epstein?” Nehls said, walking down the Capitol steps.

“Because her committee,” Raw Story said, pointing to Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL), Chair of the Task Force on the Declassification of Secrets. “The Task Force on Secrets is charged with investigating it.”

“Then let them do their investigation,” Nehls said.

“But they say that's harder because the DOJ under Bondi isn't releasing the information they need,” Raw Story said.

“I don't think that’s what the boss said. The boss said, ‘If there's stuff out there to release, release it,’” Nehls said. “I don't think the boss is being an obstructionist. We've got to talk about the wins we have and not get distracted over Epstein.”

“But Epstein was a promise to the base that you guys were going to uncover this pedophile ring,” Raw Story pressed. “You're not worried that the base is going to come looking for revenge?”

“So much great stuff to talk about other than that,” Nehls said.

“Sounds like wagging the dog?” Raw Story asked.

“Sounds like it's just — let's move on,” Nehls said. “Let's just move on.”

But many Republicans, like those on the Secrets Task Force, do not want to move on. They are demanding documents, answers and candor — none of which the Trump administration has been willing to provide without a fight.

“Do you guys plan on following the president's lead and dropping your Epstein investigation?” Raw Story asked Luna.

“No,” the congresswoman said.

Luna’s Secrets Task Force is new. House Republican leaders erected it, in part, to show the party’s base Republicans are taking on the so-called “Deep State,” investigating conspiracies from JFK’s assassination to whether 9-11 was an inside job.

Top of the stack of historical conspiracies party leaders saddled the task force with is Jeffrey Epstein and his alleged list of partners in crime. But you wouldn’t necessarily know that from talking to the chair.

“You can see all my comments publicly,” Luna told Raw Story. “You're going to see more of that, and that's all I’m going to say on that.”

“But what'd you make of this President saying ‘stupid people?'”

“Just look at my comments,” Luna said.

“I've read your comments,” Raw Story's reporter said, “but the President said y'all are ‘stupid’ for looking into it.”

“He didn't say ‘y'all are stupid.’ There's a lot of context there,” Luna said. “You'll see soon.”

Congressional Republicans aren’t used to presidential tongue lashings, which may be why many have tuned out what Trump actually said.

‘This is stupid’

“What’d you make of President Trump calling many in the base dumb for being curious about this Epstein stuff?” Raw Story asked Sen. Markwayne Mullin (R-OK).

“I didn't hear that,” Mullin said. “I don't think he called them dumb.”

“He said, ‘stupid people,’” Raw Story said, reading the president’s exact quote.

“He was using it in the context of being caught up in this instead of focusing on what we've accomplished,” Mullin said. “Instead of focusing on what we've accomplished, we're allowing this one issue to divide us. I think he was referring to, ‘this is stupid.’”

"It was a hoax. It's all been a big hoax. It's perpetrated by the Democrats and some stupid Republicans,” Trump told reporters at the White House Wednesday. “And foolish Republicans fall into the net.”

Dumbfounded, members of the press asked for clarification on whether the president was parting ways with some of his most ardent supporters — whether inside or outside of Congress. Trump tripled down.

"Yeah I lost a lot of faith in certain people because they got duped by Democrats," the president told the cameras.

‘We're going to have transparency’

It’s hard for Democrats to fathom, but no Republicans on Capitol Hill are looking for a political divorce from Trump. He is today’s Republican Party.

“What do you make of President Trump accusing y'all interested in Epstein of being ‘stupid people’?” Raw Story asked Rep. Ralph Norman (R-SC), a veteran of the far-right House Freedom Caucus.

“Look, President Trump has done more for this country, and I like his style. I like him, you know, regardless,” Norman said. “I'm not going to criticize him for one thing.”

“But you're not going to lay down on your calls to investigate Epstein?”

“We're going to have transparency,” Norman promised.

Like Norman, a growing number of the party’s rank-and-file find themselves on the opposite side of the Epstein scandal from the president. Awkward.

"I'm for full transparency on this. I'll be supporting releasing files," Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC) told Raw Story.

Nancy Mace Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC) at the U.S. Capitol. REUTERS/Craig Hudson/File Photo

"Obviously, I want to protect kids and no one wants to see child porn, but this is about right and wrong and it's ensuring we have trust in the process. I've worked with a lot of victims over the years."

"And you're not worried at all that there is stuff in these files on President Trump?" Raw Story asked the Secrets Task Force member.

"No, I'm not worried at all," Mace said. "No, not worried. No, no, no, no. Nope, no he's not a pedophile. That's ridiculous."

Mace and other Republicans demanding the release of the Epstein files are now more aligned with their Democratic counterparts than they are with their MAGA master. Before this week, Democrats were suspicious, but many are now convinced Trump is hiding something damning.

“It’s Trump showing true colors,” said Rep. Pat Ryan (D-NY). “He's a liar. He manipulates people,”

“Are you pretty convinced Trump’s on the list?” Raw Story asked.

“I think so,” Ryan told Raw Story. “It's the only explanation.”

When Trump tried to bury the investigation, he seems to have accidentally made Epstein the talk of the town. And that’s not a good thing.

'Internal rebellion'

It’s surely a new day in Trump’s Washington — ordinarily, Republicans just don’t cross him, in large part because those who have, have been primaried or pushed out of the party.

Despite GOP efforts to change the law, Trump is constitutionally barred from running for a third term. That makes him a lame duck, even as his allies on Capitol Hill need the very voters he’s alienating. Democrats are trying to exploit this newly forming fissure.

“The Epstein issue is a real issue in this space, and they don't want rich, powerful people protected,” Rep. Khanna told Raw Story. “It's the first time he's facing an internal rebellion on his own base.”

Strange new — if potentially temporary — alliances have begun to form. Khanna’s teaming up with libertarian-leaning Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) to try and force both President Trump and Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) to release the Epstein files.

Massie’s been effective, according to Khanna, who says they’ve gotten roughly eight MAGA-tinged Republicans to sign their discharge petition — a rare procedural tool that enables otherwise powerless rank-and-file lawmakers to overrule the Speaker if they can garner support from more than half of their colleagues.

Speaker Johnson’s been doing the president’s bidding — abandoning most oversight of the executive branch, surrendering the power of the purse — but the discharge petition could cut him, other GOP leaders and Trump out of the equation altogether.

This latest GOP brawl is only energizing Democrats who’ve struggled to find their collective groove since Trump re-entered the Oval Office in January. Democrats sense GOP leaders are on their heels, which was on display all week as Johnson failed to muster enough GOP votes to even advance broadly bipartisan crypto bills.

According to Khanna, those disruptions were tied to the discharge petition. He says he has the votes to overrule the speaker, which is why GOP leaders are maneuvering behind the scenes.

“They're trying to avoid that, and then they're hoping that the momentum is lost during the August recess,” Khanna said. “But this issue is not going away. Are Republicans in the Trump administration protecting pedophiles? They're protecting the rich and powerful, and they're giving them impunity.”

Congressional Republicans reject the notion of some White House coverup. Rather, they say, Trump just wants to move on past his old buddy, Jeffrey Epstein.

"He just wants to be done," Mace said of the president.

There is broad bipartisan agreement on one thing — no one on Capitol Hill thinks the Epstein saga will end anytime soon.

In fact, many of the president’s Republican allies on the Secrets Task Force are vowing to keep the investigation alive until they get answers for their revved-up base.

"It's not going away,” Mace told Raw Story. “Look what's happening right now in Washington — we can't hold a hearing without it coming up, because Democrats understand the political wedge that it is.”

MAGA Republicans take unlikely stance in rebellion against House bill: columnist

MAGA Republicans led by Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) took a surprising turn as they denounced a House bill meant to protect Trump ally Benjamin Netanyahu's Israel from boycotts.

The bipartisan bill, HR 867, "would have amended the Anti-Boycott Act of 2018 by criminalizing compliance with boycotts called for by international government organizations, such as the United Nations — with potential penalties including prison time," according to a new article on MSNBC.com.

"A vote on the bill had been set for Monday, but it was canceled by House GOP leadership after Greene and other MAGA Republicans — including Rep. Anna Paulina Luna and former Rep. Matt Gaetz, both of Florida — denounced it," wrote MSNBC opinion writer Ja'han Jones.

ALSO READ: ‘Pain. Grief. Anger’: Families heartbroken as Trump backlash smashes adoption dreams

Greene posted to X her reason for opposing the bill: "It is my job to defend American’s rights to buy or boycott whomever they choose without the government harshly fining them or imprisoning them."

Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) wrote that he agreed with Greene and would also vote 'no' on the bill.

After word came down that the bill was being pulled from consideration, Massie wrote, "Apparently HR 867 has been pulled from the schedule for this week. Thank you for your vocal opposition on this platform. It was a ridiculous bill that our leadership should have never scheduled for a vote."

Jones cited a recent Pew Research survey that found "53% of Americans hold negative views of Israel — up from 42% about three years ago," before the Hamas attack of Oct. 7, 2023 and Israel's retaliation that has decimated Gaza.

In addition, Americans' opinion of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu also remains low at 32%, according to the survey conducted in March.

Jones concluded, "With that broadening discontent in mind, along with uncertainty over its passage, it’s easy to understand why the House bill was pulled."

Read the MSNBC article here.

'Conservatives just embarrassed Mike Johnson': MAGA lawmaker lauded after GOP 'mutiny'

In a major defeat for House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA), Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL) led the effort to advance remote voting for members of Congress who are new parents.

Nine Republicans joined all House Democrats to advance the measure that would allow the new parents to designate a colleague to vote for them for 12 weeks after they or their spouse welcome a new child.

The measure was introduced by Rep. Brittany Pettersen (D-CO) in January and gained bipartisan support. The fight against Johnson's attempts to undermine the measure caused Luna to leave the conservative House Freedom Caucus, whose members backed Johnson.

Johnson and other Republicans have called proxy voting unconstitutional and rife for abuse.

Political writer @Monaheart1229 posted to social media, "Johnson's attempt to block MAGA House Rep Anna Paulina Luna's DP giving proxy voting rights to new parents has FAILED 206-222 Nine MAGA 'no' votes Luna: 'Never bet against the Luna.” House Dem Rep Brittany Pettersen’s message to Johnson: “Don’t f--- with moms.”

ALSO READ: 'The Hard Reset': Here's how the U.S. is exporting terrorism around the world

Reporter Melanie Zanona wrote, "An effort by GOP leadership to kill @realannapaulina’s proxy voting push for new parents just failed on the House floor. Remote voting will still need to come to the floor & pass, but this is a big win for Luna — & big defeat for Speaker Johnson. 8 Rs sided w/ Luna.

"Luna, no liberal squish, did a brave thing by trying to enact a simple pro-family policy in a bipartisan manner. Mike Johnson tried to punish her for it and failed," wrote The Bulwark's Joe Perticone.

Columnist Eric Michael Garcia posted, "Goodness gracious! EIGHT Republicans opposing this rule that would have killed Anna Paulina Luna's discharge petition! Mike Johnson is facing a mutiny!" Garcia added, "Conservatives just embarrassed Mike Johnson on a level I haven't seen since the McCarthy days. Johnson USED proxy voting regularly during the 117th Congress, but he needed to keep Chip Roy happy so he sided with her instead of Luna and got a jailbreak."

Congressional correspondent Julie Tsirkin called it a "HUGE win for @realannapaulina… who moments before the vote expressed her disappointment with House GOP leadership’s efforts to kill her proxy voting push for new parents 8 Republicans joined Luna in defeating Speaker Johnson."

And PatriotTakes wrote, "Anna Paulina Luna attacks Speaker Mike Johnson’s hypocrisy over proxy voting," along with photo evidence of Johnson having voted by proxy as late as 2022.

Luna posted before the vote, "Here are some documents showing [Johnson] voting by proxy in the 117th Congress, as late as December 2022. He argues it's 'unconstitutional' but has done it several times! Since the case is being made to the public via press, I'm doing the same."

Anti-abortion Florida congresswoman dumps husband’s stem cell stock amid gov lawsuit

The husband of staunch anti-abortion Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL) sold up to $15,000 of stock in a biotechnology company that uses human embryonic stem cells for medical treatments — at the same time she and her husband are suing the government over the use of stem cells in developing COVID-19 vaccines, according to a Raw Story analysis of federal financial records.

Luna reported the Jan. 2 sale of stock in Lineage Cell Therapeutics, valued between $1,001 and $15,000, according to a Jan. 29 financial disclosure report.

In June, Raw Story first reported on her husband’s ownership of the stock in the California-based company that uses “specialized, terminally-differentiated human cells,” to treat traumatic injuries, degenerative diseases and cancers, according to its website.

RELATED ARTICLE: Revealed: Anti-abortion Rep.'s husband invests in company that uses embryonic stem cells

Concurrently, Luna and her husband, Andrew Gamberzky, are alleging in a lawsuit that the government violated their religious beliefs by requiring military members to get COVID-19 vaccines, some of which were developed using fetal cell lines.

Luna’s congressional office did not respond to Raw Story’s request for comment.

Luna spokeswoman Edie Heipel previously told Raw Story that Luna’s anti-abortion stances are “blatantly clear" and that the congresswoman “has no and has never had affiliation" with Lineage Cell Therapeutics "to include owning stock." Heipel did not respond to several follow-up questions, including why Luna's husband purchased Lineage Cell Therapeutics stock, what she thinks of her husband's stock holding and whether he planned to sell it.

“Hypocrisy is the name of the game for Anna Paulina Luna,” said Lauryn Fanguen, a spokesperson for the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, in response to Raw Story’s investigation last month. Time and time again she says one thing and does another, lining her own pockets along the way. It’s hardly shocking how quickly Luna’s supposed deeply-held moral beliefs fall away when there’s a profit to be made.”

The lawsuit against the government

Luna and Gamberzky are suing the National Guard Bureau, Department of Defense, U.S. Air Force and Oregon Department of Military. They allege “significant financial injury” upon Gamberzky’s resignation from the Oregon Air National Guard over his objection to getting the COVID-19 vaccine “based on his sincerely held religious beliefs,” the lawsuit said.

“Plaintiff is unable to receive any of the COVID-19 vaccines due to what they believe and understand is a connection between these vaccines and their testing, development, or production using fetal cell lines,” Raw Story reported from the lawsuit.

RELATED ARTICLE: Florida congresswoman sued the Pentagon over stem cells. One problem: her husband's stocks

The lawsuit continued: “Plaintiffs hold the sincere religious belief that they must not take anything into their bodies that God has forbidden or that would alter their body functions, such as by inducing the production of a spike protein in a manner not designed by God.”

According to UCLA Health, “The COVID-19 vaccines do not contain aborted fetal cells. However, Johnson & Johnson did use fetal cell lines — not fetal tissue — when developing and producing their vaccine, while Pfizer and Moderna used fetal cell lines to test their vaccines and make sure that they work.”

The National Academy of Sciences states that “cell lines are established by culturing fetal cells in such a way that they continue growing and multiplying in laboratory dishes.”

Luna’s pro-life and anti-stem cell stance

Luna called the use of stem cells for research “morally wrong” and “no better than the Nazis” in terms of human testing, Raw Story reported.

Back in 2019, Luna wrote on Facebook that pro-choice and “pro-woman arguments” are “b-------,” and “abortion was never intended for women’s rights,” but rather “born in eugenics.”

Since taking office in 2023, Luna has co-sponsored numerous bills seeking to limit abortion rights, and she showed what she called “horrific” images of “late-term abortion” at a House Committee on Oversight and Reform hearing in March.

Florida congresswoman sued the Pentagon over stem cells. One problem: her husband's stocks

Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL) and her husband are suing the federal government, alleging COVID vaccine requirements in the military violated their religious beliefs because the therapy was developed using embryonic stem cells.

But Luna’s husband, Andrew Gamberzky, who resigned from the Air National Guard over the issue, also invests in a company that uses human embryonic stem cells to treat disabilities, according to Luna’s most recent congressional financial disclosure.

Gamberzky owns between $1,001 and $15,000 of stock in Lineage Cell Therapeutics. The California-based company says it intends to “pioneer a new branch of medicine based on transplanting specific cell types to patients with serious medical conditions,” such as paralysis.

That, according to corporate filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, includes the use of embryonic stem cells derived from human embryos — a practice that many conservatives consider morally fraught, if not reprehensible, amid an age-old debate over the definition of personhood and when life truly begins.

RELATED ARTICLE: Revealed: Anti-abortion Rep.'s husband invests in company that uses embryonic stem cells

The lawsuit, which includes the Department of Defense and the U.S. Air Force as defendants, seeks monetary damages for “significant financial injury … including loss of healthcare, spousal benefits, and survivor benefits as provided for by the military.”

“Plaintiff is unable to receive any of the COVID-19 vaccines due to what they believe and understand is a connection between these vaccines and their testing, development, or production using fetal cell lines,” the lawsuit says.

“Plaintiffs hold the sincere religious belief that they must not take anything into their bodies that God has forbidden or that would alter their body functions, such as by inducing the production of a spike protein in a manner not designed by God.”

Luna’s office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Earlier this year — before Luna and Gamberzky filed the lawsuit — Raw Story first reported on Gamberzky’s ownership of Lineage Cell Therapeutics stock in the context of Luna’s staunch anti-abotion position.

At the time, Luna congressional press aide Darren Dershem acknowledged Raw Story’s several requests for comment, but Luna’s office did not otherwise respond to messages and emailed questions.

ALSO READ: Republican congresswoman used Russian fighter jet images in salute to U.S. Air Force

Luna spokeswoman Edie Heipel subsequently said in an email to Raw Story that "Rep. Luna’s positions on this issue are blatantly clear" and that "she has no and has never had affiliation" with Lineage Cell Therapeutics "to include owning stock".

Heipel did not respond to several follow-up questions, including why Luna's husband purchased Lineage Cell Therapeutics stock, what she thinks of her husband's stock holding and whether he plans to sell it.

Congressional financial disclosures, which require members of Congress to detail stock trades made by themselves, their spouses and dependent children, offer no indication that Gamberzky sold his Lineage Cell Therapeutics.

Lineage Cell Therapeutics did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Earlier this year, the company declined to answer questions about its technology, use of embryonic stem cells or investments in the company by government officials.

“The company is not able to contribute to your report on the personal financial investments of federal government officials,” spokesman Nic Johnson wrote in an email.

‘No better than the Nazis’

Luna herself has previously questioned the use of certain human stem cells in medical research.

"A lot of times doctors and scientists will argue, well, 'we need stem cells.' Well, you don't have to have necessarily fetal stem cells,” Luna said during an interview in 2021 with One America News. “There's other stem cells that they can use. Then they can clone and harvest. So I feel like that whole argument in itself is really disturbing, because at the end of the day, you know, where are they getting this tissue?

"It's not OK. It's morally wrong,” Luna continued, citing the sale of pre-birth tissues for research purposes. “It's not done in the name of science. And frankly, if you're going to do human testing, that makes us no better than the Nazis."

In a March 9 filing with the SEC covering company activity in 2022, Lineage Cell Therapeutics briefly addressed embryonic stem cells.

"Government-imposed bans or restrictions on the use of embryos or hES cells in research and development in the United States and abroad could generally constrain stem cell research, thereby limiting the market and demand for our products," the company stated.

‘Pro-choice & pro-woman arguments are b-------’

The investment in Lineage Cell Therapeutics represents the only stock shares that Luna or Gamberzky own, according to Luna’s most recent financial disclosure, which she filed with U.S. House officials on Aug. 2, 2023.

Gamberzky appears to have purchased the stock sometime between late September 2021 and late August 2022, as an earlier disclosure filed by Luna in 2021 did not list a Lineage Cell Therapeutics stock holding. The 2022 filing did list the investment. No specific date is given for the purchase.

Lineage Cell Therapeutics says it uses stem cells to “replace or support cells that are dysfunctional or absent due to degenerative disease or traumatic injury, or administered as a means of helping the body mount an effective immune response to cancer.”

Then and now, Luna, a freshman who won Florida’s 13th Congressional District seat in 2022, routinely decries abortion and argues that human life is sacred from its earliest stages.

She has cheered the Supreme Court’s Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision, which overturned Roe v. Wade and ended a federal right to abortion. And during her brief congressional tenure, she's already co-sponsored several House bills that aim to reduce abortions or restrict and regulate abortion rights, including H.R. 862 — the "Dismemberment Abortion Ban Act of 2023" — H.R. 7 — the "No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion and Abortion Insurance Full Disclosure Act of 2023" and H.R. 4345, which seeks to "protect the dignity of fetal remains".

“My mother chose #life. My husband was adopted. There are so many stories like ours,” Luna wrote in a May 2022 Facebook post in explaining her opposition to abortion. “It’s time we look at what the science says about life. If a single cell organism is considered life on another planet, what about a multi-cellular being in a womb?”

In 2019, Luna wrote: “Abortion was never intended for women’s rights. It was intended to rid the 'supreme' race of less valued bloodlines. Abortion was born in eugenics. All those pro-choice & pro-woman arguments are b-------.”

More recently, in March, Luna pilloried Washington, D.C., city officials during a dramatic House Oversight Committee hearing. She accused them of ignoring “horrific” abortions of fetuses that she said were fully or near-fully developed and aborted by a doctor who should lose his medical license. She said the fetuses were children and named them: Christopher, Harriet, Phoenix, Holly and Angel.

Behind Luna in the Capitol hearing room as she spoke: large posters of their dead bodies.

Stem cell therapy, in general, offers great promise for people stricken with a variety of maladies.

But the use of embryonic stem cells, specifically, has for years caused doctors, scientists, bioethicists and the religious to debate whether the potential for life-improving stem cell treatments outweighs what some consider an immutable wrong — regardless of whether human embryos used would have ever been implanted or viable.

Human embryonic stem cells used for therapeutic purposes primarily come from early embryos known as blastocysts that “were created by in vitro fertilization (IVF) for assisted reproduction but were no longer needed,” according to the International Society for Stem Cell Research, a nonprofit organization that counts 4,500 scientists, educators, ethicists and business leaders among its ranks.

The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, for one, questions their use, stating: “The Church favors ethically acceptable stem cell research. It opposes destroying some human lives now, on the pretext that this may possibly help other lives in the future. We must respect life at all times, especially when our goal is to save lives.”

‘Floridians can count on Anna Paulina Luna’

Anti-abortion organizations have lauded Luna, an endorsee of former President Donald Trump who last year spearheaded the censure of Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA), for such advocacy.

“Floridians can count on Anna Paulina Luna to champion life-affirming policies that protect moms and babies from the horror of abortion, and we are proud to endorse her for Congress,” Marilyn Musgrave, Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America’s vice president of government affairs, wrote last year when her organization endorsed Luna. “Anna Paulina was raised by a single mother and knows firsthand the compassion and vital services the pro-life movement offers mothers in need. She stands in stark contrast to Democrats who push for abortion on demand up to birth, even cruel late-term abortions, paid for with tax dollars – an agenda Floridians overwhelmingly reject.”

Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America did not immediately respond to questions about Luna’s husband’s investment in Lineage Cell Therapeutics.

Annual personal financial disclosures, which are mandatory for all members of Congress, detail the assets, investments, financial trades, debts, royalties and outside sources of income for lawmakers and their spouses. Congress requires these filings to in part defend against conflicts of interest and enhance government transparency.

Lawmakers are also required to disclose any individual stock or cryptocurrency trade within 45 days of making them, although dozens of members of Congress have failed to comply with this law, leading to some to introduce outright bans on members of Congress making such trades.

Federal records also indicate that on June 1, the U.S. House Committee on Ethics granted Luna’s request in May for a gift waiver associated with the birth of her first child, who was born in August.

The waiver allows Luna to forego publicly disclosing gifts related to the birth.

GOP congressman — a retired Navy SEAL — uses foreign warship photo in salute to U.S. Navy

Rep. Ryan Zinke (R-MT), whose political identity is closely associated with his background as a Navy SEAL, recently extended birthday wishes to the U.S. Navy on social media — using what appears to be an image of an Indonesian warship.

In a birthday message on X, formerly known as Twitter, a transparent silhouette of the word “NAVY” was overlaid on the ship.

A Raw Story analysis indicates that the image is a stock photo from the graphic design website Canva.

In the graphic, the numbers “3” and “5” are visible on the ship as is an anti-aircraft radar tower. These and other elements of the photo seem to match a Canva image of a ship with the number “358,” an anti-aircraft radar tower and an Indonesian flag.

The ship is identified as IDN Warship 358 at vesselfinder.com.

POLL: Should Trump be allowed to run for office?

Zinke posted the graphic on Oct. 13 without comment. It remained online as of Tuesday morning.

Lyle Goldstein, who spent 20 years on the faculty of the U.S. Naval War College and currently serves as a visiting professor of international and public affairs at Brown University, concurred with Raw Story’s assessment of the image.


“I think you are correct,” he said. “I'm not aware of any (U.S. Navy) ship class of that type. It looks to be a light frigate or corvette. In that category, we've developed the Littoral Combat Ship (LCS), which looks very different.”

Multiple messages left with Zinke’s office were not returned.

Zinke, who previously served a turbulent two years as secretary of the Interior under President Donald Trump, is the latest member of Congress who have used depictions of foreign military vehicles or symbols in an effort to honor a branch of the U.S. military.

RELATED ARTICLE: GOP Rep. Anna Paulina Luna deletes social media posts featuring Russian fighter jets

Most recently, the office of Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL) deleted two of the congresswoman’s social media posts after Raw Story reported that the airplane silhouettes used in her happy birthday message to the U.S. Air Force — she’s an Air Force veteran — were actually Russian fighter jets.

“This post was published without approval from me as the comms director, via a junior staffer,” Edie Heipel, Luna’s communications director, said in an email. “Rep. Luna is a US Air Force veteran who worked in airfield management and her husband is a Bronze Star/Purple Heart Combat Controller. To suggest she doesn’t know the difference between American and Russian fighter jets is asinine.”

GOP Rep. Anna Paulina Luna deletes social media posts featuring Russian fighter jets

The office of Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL) deleted two of the congresswoman’s social media posts after Raw Story reported that the airplane silhouettes used in her happy birthday message to the U.S. Air Force were actually Russian fighter jets.

“Happy Birthday United States Air Force! As an Air Force Veteran myself, I’m especially thankful for everything I learned while serving in this incredible branch of our Armed Forces,” Luna, an influencer on Instagram before being elected to Congress last year, wrote on her posts.

RELATED ARTICLE: Republican congresswoman used Russian fighter jet images in salute to U.S. Air Force

Rob Young, historian for the National Air and Space Intelligence Center at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base near Dayton, Ohio, and a retired Air Force lieutenant colonel, said the jets were a model developed in the old Soviet Union that evolved over the years and are still in use.

An image of a Sept. 18, 2023, Instagram post — now deleted — from Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL). Instagram

“As I examine them, the silhouettes look most like MiG-29s,” Young said.

Multiple messages from Raw Story to Luna’s office before publication were not returned.

Late Tuesday night, Edie Heipel, Luna’s communications director, sent a response via email.

“This post was published without approval from me as the comms director, via a junior staffer,” Heipel wrote. “Rep. Luna is a US Air Force veteran who worked in airfield management and her husband is a Bronze Star/Purple Heart Combat Controller. To suggest she doesn’t know the difference between American and Russian fighter jets is asinine.”

The posts had been online since Sept. 18.

Republican congresswoman used Russian fighter jet images in salute to U.S. Air Force

Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL), who uses her status as a veteran of the U.S. Air Force to boost a hard-right, MAGA-fueled political career, wanted to wish her military branch a happy birthday.

So last week on X, formerly Twitter, and also on Instagram, Luna posted a celebratory graphic with the Air Force logo and a political logo for herself, superimposed over six silhouettes of fighter jets.

“Happy Birthday United States Air Force! As an Air Force Veteran myself, I’m especially thankful for everything I learned while serving in this incredible branch of our Armed Forces,” Luna, an influencer on Instagram before being elected to Congress last year, wrote on her post.

The problem?

The jets aren’t American.

They appear to be Russian.

“As I examine them, the silhouettes look most like MiG-29s,” said Rob Young, historian for the National Air and Space Intelligence Center at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base near Dayton, Ohio, and a retired Air Force lieutenant colonel.

Indeed, the fighter jet images that Luna used are noticeably different than those of common U.S. fighter jets past and present, such as the F-14 Tomcat, F-15 Eagle, F-16 Fighting Falcon, F/A-18 Super Hornet, F-22 Raptor and F-35 Lightning.


Multiple messages from Raw Story to Luna’s office before publication were not returned. The posts had been online since Sept. 18.

UPDATE, Sept. 27: Luna has deleted the Russian fighter jet posts from her X and Instagram accounts.

Late Tuesday night, Edie Heipel, Luna’s communications director, sent a response via email.

“This post was published without approval from me as the comms director, via a junior staffer,” she wrote. “Rep. Luna is a US Air Force veteran who worked in airfield management and her husband is a Bronze Star/Purple Heart Combat Controller. To suggest she doesn’t know the difference between American and Russian fighter jets is asinine.”

The Mikoyan MiG-29, which first became operational in 1984, was a singular achievement for Soviet military aviation that evolved into an ever more deadly weapon of warfare. After the collapse of the Soviet Union, the Russian military made them a centerpiece of their fighter complement, and the jets spread worldwide — to the point where the United States purchased some in an effort to keep them away from bad actors.

POLL: Should Trump be allowed to run for office?

Ukraine also inherited some MiG-29s and has used them in the war against Russia.

Despite being an Air Force veteran, Luna has confused types of fighter jets before. In May, after meeting with representatives of Ukraine’s parliament in Poland, she said they “demanded F-35s.” They were asking for F-16s, which they eventually obtained, with pilots being trained by Americans.

A fellow Republican — 2022 U.S. Senate candidate Joe O'Dea of Colorado — similarly released a television ad last year that featured Russian fighter jets while promising to "support the police and military" of the United States, Roll Call reported.

ALSO READ: Revealed: Anti-abortion Rep.'s husband invests in company that uses embryonic stem cells

Luna has said U.S. involvement in the Russia-Ukraine war could “potentially start WWIII” and, in a post last week on X, she wrote, “NO MORE FUNDING FOR UKRAINE.”

As an enlisted servicemember, Luna worked as an airfield management specialist in the Air Force. She changed her name from Anna Paulina Mayerhofer to Anna Paulina Luna in 2019, at age 29, according to the Washington Post.

Former President Donald Trump endorsed Luna’s run for Congress from a district that includes Clearwater, Fla. Other far-right lawmakers, including Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA), campaigned for her.

In Congress, Luna led the GOP’s successful effort to censure Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA), in a vote along party lines, over his role in investigating Trump. But Luna had to remove language that would have imposed a multimillion-dollar fine because some of her colleagues thought it was unconstitutional.

Luna gave birth Aug. 26 and, despite an infection and fever, vowed earlier this month to fly to Washington, D.C., to vote “no” on a short-term spending bill written by a leadership coalition of House Republicans to avert a government shutdown.

“If I’m needed, I’m coming,” she said.

Revealed: Anti-abortion Rep.'s husband invests in company that uses embryonic stem cells

Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL), one of Congress’ most outspoken abortion rights opponents, disclosed that her husband invests in a company that utilizes human embryonic stem cells to treat disabilities, a Raw Story review of congressional financial documents.

The congressional financial disclosures indicate that Andrew Gamberzky, Luna’s husband, holds a stock investment worth between $1,001 and $15,000 in Lineage Cell Therapeutics.

The California-based company says it intends to “pioneer a new branch of medicine based on transplanting specific cell types to patients with serious medical conditions,” such as paralysis, using proprietary technology and therapies.

That, according to corporate filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, includes the use of embryonic stem cells derived from human embryos — a practice that many conservatives consider morally fraught, if not reprehensible, amid an age-old debate over the definition of personhood and when life truly begins.

Luna herself has previously questioned the use of certain human stem cells in medical research.

"A lot of times doctors and scientists will argue, well, 'we need stem cells.' Well, you don't have to have necessarily fetal stem cells,” Luna said during an interview in 2021 with One America News. “There's other stem cells that they can use. Then they can clone and harvest. So I feel like that whole argument in itself is really disturbing, because at the end of the day, you know, where are they getting this tissue?

"It's not OK. It's morally wrong,” Luna continued, citing the sale of pre-birth tissues for research purposes. “It's not done in the name of science. And frankly, if you're going to do human testing, that makes us no better than the Nazis."

In a phone call Monday, Luna congressional press aide Darren Dershem acknowledged Raw Story’s several requests for comment, but Luna’s office did not otherwise respond to messages and emailed questions.

The day after publication of this article, Luna spokeswoman Edie Heipel said in an email to Raw Story that "Rep Luna’s positions on this issue are blatantly clear" and that "she has no and has never had affiliation" with Lineage Cell Therapeutics "to include owning stock".

Heipel did not respond to several follow-up questions, including why Luna's husband purchased Lineage Cell Therapeutics stock, what she thinks of her husband's stock holding and whether he plans to sell it.

Lineage Cell Therapeutics declined to answer questions about its technology, use of embryonic stem cells or investments in the company by government officials.

“The company is not able to contribute to your report on the personal financial investments of federal government officials,” spokesman Nic Johnson wrote in an email.

In a March 9 filing with the SEC covering company activity in 2022, Lineage Cell Therapeutics briefly addressed embryonic stem cells.

"Government-imposed bans or restrictions on the use of embryos or hES cells in research and development in the United States and abroad could generally constrain stem cell research, thereby limiting the market and demand for our products," the company stated.

‘Pro-choice & pro-woman arguments are b-------’

Stem cell therapy, in general, offers great promise for people stricken with a variety of maladies.

But the use of embryonic stem cells, specifically, has for years caused doctors, scientists, bioethicists and the religious to debate whether the potential for life-improving stem cell treatments outweighs what some consider an immutable wrong — regardless of whether human embryos used would have ever been implanted or viable.

Human embryonic stem cells used for therapeutic purposes primarily come from early embryos known as blastocysts that “were created by in vitro fertilization (IVF) for assisted reproduction but were no longer needed,” according to the International Society for Stem Cell Research, a nonprofit organization that counts 4,500 scientists, educators, ethicists and business leaders among its ranks.

The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, for one, questions their use, stating: “The Church favors ethically acceptable stem cell research. It opposes destroying some human lives now, on the pretext that this may possibly help other lives in the future. We must respect life at all times, especially when our goal is to save lives.”

The investment in Lineage Cell Therapeutics represents the only stock shares that Luna or Gamberzky own, according to Luna’s most recent financial disclosure, which she filed with U.S. House officials on Aug. 29, 2022.

ALSO READ: ‘Monuments to me’: How politicians use donors’ leftover 'zombie' cash to buy themselves legacies

Gamberzky appears to have purchased the stock sometime between late September 2021 and late August 2022, as an earlier disclosure filed by Luna in 2021 did not list a Lineage Cell Therapeutics stock holding. No specific date is given for the purchase.

During the past two years, Lineage Cell Therapeutics' share price has ranged from just above $1 to just below $3, with shares in recent days mostly trading in the $1.35 to $1.50 range.

Lineage Cell Therapeutics says it uses stem cells to “replace or support cells that are dysfunctional or absent due to degenerative disease or traumatic injury, or administered as a means of helping the body mount an effective immune response to cancer.”

Then and now, Luna, a freshman who won Florida’s 13th Congressional District seat in November, routinely decries abortion and argues that human life is sacred from its earliest stages.

She has cheered the Supreme Court’s Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision, which overturned Roe v. Wade and ended a federal right to abortion. And during her brief congressional tenure, she's already co-sponsored several House bills that aim to reduce abortions or restrict and regulate abortion rights, including H.R. 862 — the "Dismemberment Abortion Ban Act of 2023" — H.R. 7 — the "No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion and Abortion Insurance Full Disclosure Act of 2023" and H.R. 4345, which seeks to "protect the dignity of fetal remains".

“My mother chose #life. My husband was adopted. There are so many stories like ours,” Luna wrote in a May 2022 Facebook post in explaining her opposition to abortion. “It’s time we look at what the science says about life. If a single cell organism is considered life on another planet, what about a multi-cellular being in a womb?”

In 2019, Luna wrote: “Abortion was never intended for women’s rights. It was intended to rid the 'supreme' race of less valued bloodlines. Abortion was born in eugenics. All those pro-choice & pro-woman arguments are b-------.”

More recently, in March, Luna pilloried Washington, D.C., city officials during a dramatic House Oversight Committee hearing. She accused them of ignoring “horrific” abortions of fetuses that she said were fully or near-fully developed and aborted by a doctor who should lose his medical license. She said the fetuses were children and named them: Christopher, Harriet, Phoenix, Holly and Angel.

Behind Luna in the Capitol hearing room as she spoke: large posters of their dead bodies.

‘Floridians can count on Anna Paulina Luna’

Anti-abortion organizations have lauded Luna, an endorsee of former President Donald Trump who recently spearheaded the censure of Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA), for such advocacy.

“Floridians can count on Anna Paulina Luna to champion life-affirming policies that protect moms and babies from the horror of abortion, and we are proud to endorse her for Congress,” Marilyn Musgrave, Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America’s vice president of government affairs, wrote last year when her organization endorsed Luna. “Anna Paulina was raised by a single mother and knows firsthand the compassion and vital services the pro-life movement offers mothers in need. She stands in stark contrast to Democrats who push for abortion on demand up to birth, even cruel late-term abortions, paid for with tax dollars – an agenda Floridians overwhelmingly reject.”

Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America did not respond to questions about Luna’s husband’s investment in Lineage Cell Therapeutics.

Annual personal financial disclosures, which are mandatory for all members of Congress, detail the assets, investments, financial trades, debts, royalties and outside sources of income for lawmakers and their spouses. Congress requires these filings to in part defend against conflicts of interest and enhance government transparency.

ALSO READ: Pelosi reports tech stock purchases worth up to $1.5M amid 'crisis of confidence and trust' in Congress

Lawmakers are also required to disclose any individual stock or cryptocurrency trade within 45 days of making them, although dozens of members of Congress have failed to comply with this law, leading to some to introduce outright bans on members of Congress making such trades.

Luna is slated to file her next annual personal financial statement on Aug. 13 after requesting a 90-day filing extension on May 15.

Federal records also indicate that on June 1, the U.S. House Committee on Ethics granted Luna’s request in May for a gift waiver associated with the birth of her first child, who is due later this year. The waiver allows Luna to forego publicly disclosing gifts related to the birth.

Editor's note, July 1, 2023: This article has been updated to include a post-publication comment from Luna's congressional spokesperson.