Trump gives garbled word salad when asked why ICE agent not arrested: 'What knows means'

Trump gives garbled word salad when asked why ICE agent not arrested: 'What knows means'
U.S. President Donald Trump speaks with members of the media aboard Air Force One en route from Florida to Joint Base Andrews, Maryland, U.S., January 11, 2026. REUTERS/Nathan Howard

The ICE agent who shot and killed Renee Nicole Good in Minnesota is apparently protected from the law, President Donald Trump's administration has suggested. Trump, however, seems to have no idea what that means.

When asked Sunday after Vice President JD Vance's comment that the agent could not be prosecuted, Trump rattled out a nonsensical word salad that left reporters on Air Force One baffled, the Daily Beast reported.

Good, a 37-year-old Minnesota mother of three, was shot in the face by an ICE agent on Wednesday while attempting to drive away from an ICE protest. Vance responded by incorrectly claiming ICE officers enjoy "absolute immunity."

When a reporter asked what that meant, Trump responded: "Everyone's seen it. A woman who's very violent. She's a, you know, very radical person. Very sad what happened. Her friend was very radical."

When pressed again to define absolute immunity, Trump offered an even more garbled answer: "Well, I'm going to let the people define it. But immunity, you know what immunity, what knows means as well as I do."

Bodycam footage reveals that Good sat calmly behind the steering wheel, telling the ICE agent who would shoot her minutes later: "That's fine, dude, I'm not mad at you." ICE agents surrounded her SUV while Good's wife, Rebecca, filmed from outside. When ordered to exit her vehicle, Good attempted to drive away. An officer fired three shots into her head, shouting a vile slur as the vehicle traveled several feet before crashing into parked cars.

Trump and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem claim Good was attempting to run over agents. Noem accused her of "domestic terrorism."

Video evidence demonstrated Good's tires were turned away from the officer.

Vice President JD Vance, a Yale Law School graduate, said the officer was "doing his job" and therefore protected by federal immunity. Legal experts have rejected this claim, noting that the Supreme Court granted absolute immunity only to the president for official acts, but that does not extend to other federal officials.

When asked whether deadly force was necessary, Trump deflected: "It was highly disrespectful of law enforcement. The woman and her friend were highly disrespectful of law enforcement. You saw that they were harassing them, were following for days and for hours. And I think frankly they're professional agitators."

This statement contrasts with Trump's pardon of over 1,500 defendants who attacked police officers during the January 6 Capitol riots.

According to Good's ex-husband, the couple had just dropped off their 6-year-old son at school when they encountered protesters disrupting an ICE raid and decided to stop and observe.

When the reporter attempted to ask whether disrespect justified killing a U.S. citizen, Trump interrupted: "I'd like to find out—and we are going to find out—who's paying for it."

The administration has repeatedly claimed that protesters are funded by mysterious radical organizations, despite the FBI's apparent inability to identify these groups.

Good's death has prompted nationwide protests, with thousands gathering at hundreds of anti-ICE rallies across the country.

For customer support contact support@rawstory.com. Report typos and corrections to corrections@rawstory.com.

It’s an odd political phenomenon that a sitting president often loses the next midterm elections after taking office, instantly creating potential gridlock in the next Congress instead of moving the country forward. The 2026 midterms were no different, except it was a much bigger victory than anyone could have predicted, with a full congressional flip.

The American people delivered a referendum on Trumpism, overwhelmingly voting for affordability over every other issue. But we also voted for accountability and change, and now all of my social media feeds are full of liberal voters demanding to see both.

But not just for Trump and his cronies.

People want a change in Democratic leadership in both the House and the Senate. Trump has made a tremendous mess for Democrats to clean up, and they now have the chance to start in January 2027 instead of having to wait until January 2029. But the current leadership doesn’t strike fear in the hearts of MAGA, and that’s a huge problem for the Democrats.

Rep. Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) has been under extra scrutiny for taking AIPAC donations and for his recent secret meetings with “his friend” Jared Kushner, who’s no friend to any Democrats. Jeffries has also played down the calls for Trump’s third impeachment, claiming that “the American people don’t want us to get even; they want us to get things done on their behalf.”

WRONG, sir. VERY WRONG. We’ve been living under the blight of Trump’s criminality for far too long, and we want justice.

Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) is also incredibly unpopular with voters (he’s currently polling at a historically low 13%), and the demands for his replacement are far louder than the ones to remove Jeffries. Schumer has been weak on Israel and has also accepted millions from AIPAC, which is why many of the new incoming Democratic Senators have already stated they won’t support him for Senate Majority Leader.

In an aisle-crossing interview on Fox News last Thursday, South Carolina’s first Democratic female Senator-elect, Dr. Annie Andrews, told Bret Baier that the party needs new leadership. When asked whether she would support Schumer, she replied, “I still very much believe it’s time for generational change on both sides of the aisle.”

Abdul El-Sayed, the senator-elect from Michigan, has repeatedly declined to support Schumer and reiterated his stance on CNN that he wanted to “consider other options.”

Other incoming Democrats who have also declined to support Schumer include James Talarico (TX), Adam Hamilton (KS), Juliana Stratton (IL), Chris Pappas (NH), Peggy Flanagan (MN), and Troy Jackson (ME).

Personally, I think it’s beyond time to put women in both of those leadership roles. Nancy Pelosi is the first and only woman to have served as the speaker of the House. My choice for the next speaker is Rep. Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY), who represents the younger and more progressive arm of the Democratic Party and triggers MAGA big time.

However, Rep. AOC has said she doesn’t want the gig and is supporting Jeffries. But I’m still advocating for a woman in that role. At least we have a Democratic woman looking to take over as House Majority Leader: Rep. Katherine Clark of Massachusetts, the current House Minority Whip, who should have plenty of support and be able to easily take over that position in January.

Over in the Senate, it’s unconscionable that it’s 2026 and there’s never been a female Majority Leader. There are currently 16 Democratic women in the Senate; although we’re losing Sen. Amy Klobuchar to the governorship of Minnesota, we’re gaining Peggy Flanagan in her seat, as well as Dr. Andrews in Lindsey Graham’s former seat when she’s sworn in. While I’d be happy to see any of the more experienced women as Senate Majority Leader, my favorite is Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), who’s been triggering Trump and MAGA forever, indicated by their terrible and racist nickname for her. One of Trump’s biggest tells is that he mostly bullies those he perceives as threats in his attempts to minimize them, so once you understand that, it’s easy to figure out who belongs in more prominent roles.

At 77, Warren is a centrist who also pulls in progressives. She brings decades of experience in holding Republicans accountable, and her work on the Senate Banking Committee is just part of the proof.

As of press time, neither Schumer nor Jeffries are being challenged, something I brought up to my Senator, Ron Wyden (D-OR), who held an invite-only Blazers watch party on Friday night in Portland that also acted as a “mini-Town Hall” for the assembled guests. When “Sen. Chutzpah” opened the floor to questions, he called on me first. I brought up the overwhelming demands for Schumer to be replaced, and Wyden replied that he would support “any efforts to make BOLD MOVES” in the Senate. He obviously couldn’t come right out and say so, but I think he would support a challenge, especially from a woman.

Congressional Democrats would be wise to pay attention to the voice of the people, which was on full display at a huge protest in New York’s Times Square on Saturday that drew thousands, including the infamous Naked Cowboy.

I could hand Democrats a laundry list of things to take care of after they literally get our House (and Senate) in order, and I will in future columns. But before the new Congress can be sworn in, Democrats need to finally take my advice and hire a Democratic Press Secretary to hold daily briefings. After Trump’s premature announcement on Saturday that the UFC’s Dana White has been offered the job as White House Press Secretary, MAGA went nuts, immediately embracing the idea.

Turns out, it was probably Defense Department advisor Dana White who was suggested to Trump.

That certainly would make for some great opening line material on the first day on the job, as Democrats need to wrench the narrative back from the lies coming from the White House.

THANKS FOR SUBSCRIBING! ALL ADS REMOVED!

Republicans' hold on one swing state's government now comes down to a single legislative race, and their lead keeps slipping.

North Carolina state Sen. Danny Britt, a Republican, held a 228-vote edge over Democratic challenger Catina Hamm as of Wednesday afternoon, The Washington Post reported. That 0.4-percentage-point margin sits inside the range that allows for a recount, and the contest is the last one still uncalled in the state Senate.

Britt's cushion has narrowed over the course of the week as election officials have worked through provisional ballots.

The outcome will decide whether Democrats seize complete control of North Carolina's government in what the Post described as a "stunning sweep." Should Britt lose, the state Senate would be split evenly between the two parties, leaving a Democratic lieutenant governor to break ties. Democrats already won control of the state House after flipping more than 20 seats in the midterms.

A flip would also change the landscape for Democratic Gov. Josh Stein, who has been boxed in by a legislature Republicans have controlled for 15 years. The razor-thin race caps off a brutal cycle for the GOP in North Carolina, which the Post counted among the party's worst showings there. Republicans lost the state's U.S. Senate contest by a staggering 20 percentage points and dropped five U.S. House seats, with two more still potentially in play.

The clock is now ticking. North Carolina counties face a Friday deadline to certify their results, and local candidates who lost their races by less than a percentage point have until Tuesday to ask for a recount.

Neither Hamm nor state Democrats have said publicly whether they plan to pursue one, according to the Post.

Britt, for his part, brushed off the threat of a recount. He told WRAL on Tuesday that he felt "confident that a recount changes nothing."

A single aerial photo of the White House grounds has critics demanding the next president undo Trump's pet project.

Rep. James Clyburn (D-SC), a longtime member of the House Democratic leadership, shared the image Wednesday, showing President Donald Trump's half-built ballroom stretching out beside the executive mansion as cranes loom over its exposed frame.

"I hope everyone takes a good hard look at this picture," Clyburn said. "Trump's under-construction ballroom is now bigger than the rest of the White House. Much bigger."

In the photo, the ballroom's boxy, unfinished shell sprawls across a footprint that appears to dwarf the historic residence next to it, with the familiar South Portico looking small by comparison.

Clyburn's post quickly set off a wave of reactions from Trump critics, several of whom called for the structure to come down once Trump leaves office.

Norman Ornstein, a political scientist and emeritus scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, urged anyone eyeing the presidency to commit to razing it on day one.

"I want every putative 2028 candidate to pledge that on January 20, 2029 he or she will sign an executive order to tear down this monstrosity," Ornstein said.

Michael A. Cohen, a political columnist and author, aimed his demand squarely at the opposing party's field of hopefuls.

"Every Democrat running for the White House in 2028 needs to pledge to tear down this ferkakta monstrosity upon taking office," Cohen argued.

Shannon Watts, founder of the gun safety group Moms Demand Action, offered a blunter verdict.

"Tear this s— down," she responded.

Susan Glasser, a staff writer at The New Yorker, kept her reaction brief as she shared Clyburn's image with her own followers.

"Truly amazing," Glasser remarked.

The demands put a fresh spotlight on what Trump's eventual successor might do with the project, as Ornstein and Cohen both cast a teardown pledge as a test for anyone hoping to win the White House.

{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}