<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Did Fox News out a source to protect a Republican Senator?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rawstory.com/blog/2009/06/did-fox-news-out-a-source-to-protect-a-republican-senator/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rawstory.com/blog/2009/06/did-fox-news-out-a-source-to-protect-a-republican-senator/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 18:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: bassman</title>
		<link>http://rawstory.com/blog/2009/06/did-fox-news-out-a-source-to-protect-a-republican-senator/comment-page-1/#comment-13223</link>
		<dc:creator>bassman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 20:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rawstory.com/blog/?p=3480#comment-13223</guid>
		<description>This guy went to the Fox(Faux GOP Propaganda) News Network with his story and didn't think these weasels and vermin would protect their own bought and paid for schill Senator Ensign. Does he have a tatoo on his forehead that says "Schmuck" on it? Oh, and it sure seemed OK to pimp  his wife off while he was getting a nice paycheck and his wife's salary had doubled. Typical Reich-wing Republican.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This guy went to the Fox(Faux GOP Propaganda) News Network with his story and didn't think these weasels and vermin would protect their own bought and paid for schill Senator Ensign. Does he have a tatoo on his forehead that says "Schmuck" on it? Oh, and it sure seemed OK to pimp  his wife off while he was getting a nice paycheck and his wife's salary had doubled. Typical Reich-wing Republican.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: disappointed voter</title>
		<link>http://rawstory.com/blog/2009/06/did-fox-news-out-a-source-to-protect-a-republican-senator/comment-page-1/#comment-12777</link>
		<dc:creator>disappointed voter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 21:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rawstory.com/blog/?p=3480#comment-12777</guid>
		<description>He took the tip to Fox New?? What a fool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He took the tip to Fox New?? What a fool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Did Fox News out a source to protect a Republican Senator? &#124; The Ruthless Truth blog</title>
		<link>http://rawstory.com/blog/2009/06/did-fox-news-out-a-source-to-protect-a-republican-senator/comment-page-1/#comment-12734</link>
		<dc:creator>Did Fox News out a source to protect a Republican Senator? &#124; The Ruthless Truth blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 17:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rawstory.com/blog/?p=3480#comment-12734</guid>
		<description>[...] source in question is Doug Hampton, who along with his wife previously worked for Senator John Ensign. Hampton allegedly sent a letter [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] source in question is Doug Hampton, who along with his wife previously worked for Senator John Ensign. Hampton allegedly sent a letter [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimbo</title>
		<link>http://rawstory.com/blog/2009/06/did-fox-news-out-a-source-to-protect-a-republican-senator/comment-page-1/#comment-12726</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 15:57:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rawstory.com/blog/?p=3480#comment-12726</guid>
		<description>Hysterical.

"OMG! After years of active participation in our corrupt system I am now being victimized myself! I know, I'll rat the system out to our official propaganda organization - they'll expose this behavior and return me to my place as oppressor rather than oppressed!"

I don't know  which is funnier: that Hampton is a mewing lackey that doesn't understand his place in the pecking order or Fox New's ham-handed attempts at coverup and slander.

Seriously, isn't it illegal for the US government to collude with Fox News to deceive the American people? Shouldn't it be illegal for the Republican Party to own a "news" outlet that isn't clearly labeled as a partisan organization?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hysterical.</p>
<p>"OMG! After years of active participation in our corrupt system I am now being victimized myself! I know, I'll rat the system out to our official propaganda organization - they'll expose this behavior and return me to my place as oppressor rather than oppressed!"</p>
<p>I don't know  which is funnier: that Hampton is a mewing lackey that doesn't understand his place in the pecking order or Fox New's ham-handed attempts at coverup and slander.</p>
<p>Seriously, isn't it illegal for the US government to collude with Fox News to deceive the American people? Shouldn't it be illegal for the Republican Party to own a "news" outlet that isn't clearly labeled as a partisan organization?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dennycrane</title>
		<link>http://rawstory.com/blog/2009/06/did-fox-news-out-a-source-to-protect-a-republican-senator/comment-page-1/#comment-12725</link>
		<dc:creator>dennycrane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 15:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rawstory.com/blog/?p=3480#comment-12725</guid>
		<description>Send a rock solid story to FAUX NEWS, at the same time send a copy to a "real" NEWS source.Sit back and see the fireworks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Send a rock solid story to FAUX NEWS, at the same time send a copy to a "real" NEWS source.Sit back and see the fireworks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Applesauce &#187; Random stuff to get you riled on a Saturday</title>
		<link>http://rawstory.com/blog/2009/06/did-fox-news-out-a-source-to-protect-a-republican-senator/comment-page-1/#comment-12717</link>
		<dc:creator>Applesauce &#187; Random stuff to get you riled on a Saturday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 14:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rawstory.com/blog/?p=3480#comment-12717</guid>
		<description>[...] Fox News OUT A SOURCE in an effort to protect Republican Sen. John Ensign? Oh, and did Ensign&#8217;s sexual [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Fox News OUT A SOURCE in an effort to protect Republican Sen. John Ensign? Oh, and did Ensign&#8217;s sexual [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: latichever</title>
		<link>http://rawstory.com/blog/2009/06/did-fox-news-out-a-source-to-protect-a-republican-senator/comment-page-1/#comment-12703</link>
		<dc:creator>latichever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 12:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rawstory.com/blog/?p=3480#comment-12703</guid>
		<description>On June 15, 2009, Foxnews published this story:

"Sources Say 'Extortion' Threat Was Behind GOP Senator's Admission of Affair With Staff Member"

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/06/16/gop-senator-admits-extramarital-affair-campaign-staffer/

This was after Hampton's letter was written, and before the Sun disclosed it. 

In other words, if Fox did receive the letter they deliberately contradicted it publicly, i.e.,  lied.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On June 15, 2009, Foxnews published this story:</p>
<p>"Sources Say 'Extortion' Threat Was Behind GOP Senator's Admission of Affair With Staff Member"</p>
<p><a href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/06/16/gop-senator-admits-extramarital-affair-campaign-staffer/" rel="nofollow">http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/06/16/gop-senator-admits-extramarital-affair-campaign-staffer/</a></p>
<p>This was after Hampton's letter was written, and before the Sun disclosed it. </p>
<p>In other words, if Fox did receive the letter they deliberately contradicted it publicly, i.e.,  lied.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
