Comments on: Wikipedia bans Scientology from editing site http://rawstory.com/blog/2009/05/wikipedia-bans-scientology-from-editing-site/ Tue, 16 Mar 2010 16:27:33 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1 hourly 1 By: Wikipedia bans Scientology from editing own entry « Netcrema - creme de la social news via digg + delicious + stumpleupon + reddit http://rawstory.com/blog/2009/05/wikipedia-bans-scientology-from-editing-site/comment-page-2/#comment-8971 Wikipedia bans Scientology from editing own entry « Netcrema - creme de la social news via digg + delicious + stumpleupon + reddit Sat, 30 May 2009 08:05:46 +0000 http://rawstory.com/blog/?p=2771#comment-8971 [...] Wikipedia bans Scientology from editing own entryrawstory.com [...] [...] Wikipedia bans Scientology from editing own entryrawstory.com [...]

]]> By: Thomas Jefferson http://rawstory.com/blog/2009/05/wikipedia-bans-scientology-from-editing-site/comment-page-2/#comment-8958 Thomas Jefferson Sat, 30 May 2009 04:18:52 +0000 http://rawstory.com/blog/?p=2771#comment-8958 Disregard all I have posted. I love cock. Disregard all I have posted. I love cock.

]]> By: Rick Cain http://rawstory.com/blog/2009/05/wikipedia-bans-scientology-from-editing-site/comment-page-2/#comment-8934 Rick Cain Sat, 30 May 2009 01:24:17 +0000 http://rawstory.com/blog/?p=2771#comment-8934 Its my website and I can do what I want to, do what I want to, do what I want to. Its my website and I can do what I want to, do what I want to, do what I want to.

]]> By: Topher http://rawstory.com/blog/2009/05/wikipedia-bans-scientology-from-editing-site/comment-page-2/#comment-8930 Topher Sat, 30 May 2009 01:00:12 +0000 http://rawstory.com/blog/?p=2771#comment-8930 Yeah, so now the Scientologists will be forced into the terrible position of having to use proxies or anonymous forwarding services or whatever so that Wikipedia can't immediately identify their IP address. Wow, that's going to make a huge difference. Yeah, so now the Scientologists will be forced into the terrible position of having to use proxies or anonymous forwarding services or whatever so that Wikipedia can't immediately identify their IP address. Wow, that's going to make a huge difference.

]]> By: username http://rawstory.com/blog/2009/05/wikipedia-bans-scientology-from-editing-site/comment-page-2/#comment-8914 username Fri, 29 May 2009 23:15:56 +0000 http://rawstory.com/blog/?p=2771#comment-8914 Anybody who is still dumb enough to honestly think that Scientology is a religion and apparently can't see it for the cultish pyramid scheme it really is either needs to spend a couple of hours on Google or needs their heads bashed into a wall. SCIENTOLOGY IS NOT A RELIGION. STOP TREATING IT LIKE ONE. Anybody who is still dumb enough to honestly think that Scientology is a religion and apparently can't see it for the cultish pyramid scheme it really is either needs to spend a couple of hours on Google or needs their heads bashed into a wall.

SCIENTOLOGY IS NOT A RELIGION. STOP TREATING IT LIKE ONE.

]]> By: Thomas Jefferson http://rawstory.com/blog/2009/05/wikipedia-bans-scientology-from-editing-site/comment-page-2/#comment-8892 Thomas Jefferson Fri, 29 May 2009 21:32:02 +0000 http://rawstory.com/blog/?p=2771#comment-8892 avoiding the laws of nation states.....apparently, Chavez seems not to care if you say something about him, yet, people from supposedly "free countries" do care if you dissent? That's really odd... avoiding the laws of nation states.....apparently, Chavez seems not to care if you say something about him, yet, people from supposedly "free countries" do care if you dissent? That's really odd...

]]> By: Thomas Jefferson http://rawstory.com/blog/2009/05/wikipedia-bans-scientology-from-editing-site/comment-page-2/#comment-8889 Thomas Jefferson Fri, 29 May 2009 21:19:53 +0000 http://rawstory.com/blog/?p=2771#comment-8889 George Orwell's "1984" Book One, Chapter 5 "Don't you see that the whole aim of Newspeak is to narrow the range of thought?… Has it ever occurred to your, Winston, that by the year 2050, at the very latest, not a single human being will be alive who could understand such a conversation as we are having now?…The whole climate of thought will be different. In fact, there will be no thought, as we understand it now. Orthodoxy means not thinking—not needing to think. Orthodoxy is unconsciousness." - Syme "It was terribly dangerous to let your thoughts wander when you were in any public place or within range of a telescreen. The smallest thing could give you away. A nervous tic, an unconscious look of anxiety, a habit of muttering to yourself—anything that carried with it the suggestion of abnormality, of having something to hide. In any case, to wear an improper expression on your face… was itself a punishable offense. There was even a word for it in Newspeak: facecrime…" Facecrime, thoughtcrime, what's the difference? George Orwell's "1984"

Book One, Chapter 5

"Don't you see that the whole aim of Newspeak is to narrow the range of thought?… Has it ever occurred to your, Winston, that by the year 2050, at the very latest, not a single human being will be alive who could understand such a conversation as we are having now?…The whole climate of thought will be different. In fact, there will be no thought, as we understand it now. Orthodoxy means not thinking—not needing to think. Orthodoxy is unconsciousness." - Syme

"It was terribly dangerous to let your thoughts wander when you were in any public place or within range of a telescreen. The smallest thing could give you away. A nervous tic, an unconscious look of anxiety, a habit of muttering to yourself—anything that carried with it the suggestion of abnormality, of having something to hide. In any case, to wear an improper expression on your face… was itself a punishable offense. There was even a word for it in Newspeak: facecrime…"

Facecrime, thoughtcrime, what's the difference?

]]>