<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Right-wing military writer: We may have to kill war journalists</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rawstory.com/blog/2009/05/right-wing-military-writer-we-may-have-to-kill-war-journalists/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rawstory.com/blog/2009/05/right-wing-military-writer-we-may-have-to-kill-war-journalists/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 00:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Winger to Taliban holding U.S. troop: kill him &#124; The Reid Report</title>
		<link>http://rawstory.com/blog/2009/05/right-wing-military-writer-we-may-have-to-kill-war-journalists/comment-page-2/#comment-18169</link>
		<dc:creator>Winger to Taliban holding U.S. troop: kill him &#124; The Reid Report</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 18:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rawstory.com/blog/?p=2667#comment-18169</guid>
		<description>[...] of justice.&#8221;  And in another instance in May of this year, Peters also called for &#8220;military attacks on the partisan media.&#8221;Ralph just wants to see some executions.  Doesn&#8217;t matter who.  Soldier, terrorist, just [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of justice.&#8221;  And in another instance in May of this year, Peters also called for &#8220;military attacks on the partisan media.&#8221;Ralph just wants to see some executions.  Doesn&#8217;t matter who.  Soldier, terrorist, just [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The America 20xy News Service &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Fox analyst: Taliban should kill US soldier if he deserted</title>
		<link>http://rawstory.com/blog/2009/05/right-wing-military-writer-we-may-have-to-kill-war-journalists/comment-page-2/#comment-18026</link>
		<dc:creator>The America 20xy News Service &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Fox analyst: Taliban should kill US soldier if he deserted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 22:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rawstory.com/blog/?p=2667#comment-18026</guid>
		<description>[...] this year, Peters stirred controversy when he suggested that “future wars may require censorship, news blackouts and, ultimately, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this year, Peters stirred controversy when he suggested that “future wars may require censorship, news blackouts and, ultimately, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fox analyst: Taliban should kill US soldier if he deserted : Federal Jack</title>
		<link>http://rawstory.com/blog/2009/05/right-wing-military-writer-we-may-have-to-kill-war-journalists/comment-page-2/#comment-18008</link>
		<dc:creator>Fox analyst: Taliban should kill US soldier if he deserted : Federal Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 20:18:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rawstory.com/blog/?p=2667#comment-18008</guid>
		<description>[...] this year, Peters stirred controversy when he suggested that “future wars may require censorship, news blackouts and, ultimately, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this year, Peters stirred controversy when he suggested that “future wars may require censorship, news blackouts and, ultimately, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Right-wing warblogger advocates shooting journalists &#171; ACCUMULATING PERIPHERALS</title>
		<link>http://rawstory.com/blog/2009/05/right-wing-military-writer-we-may-have-to-kill-war-journalists/comment-page-2/#comment-14235</link>
		<dc:creator>Right-wing warblogger advocates shooting journalists &#171; ACCUMULATING PERIPHERALS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 17:58:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rawstory.com/blog/?p=2667#comment-14235</guid>
		<description>[...] have led to the deaths of American soldiers and have severely harmed the US&#8217;s cause abroad, I would never advocate that the US military kill Ralph Peters.  Leave a Comment   No Comments Yet so far  Leave a comment   RSS feed for comments on this post. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] have led to the deaths of American soldiers and have severely harmed the US&#8217;s cause abroad, I would never advocate that the US military kill Ralph Peters.  Leave a Comment   No Comments Yet so far  Leave a comment   RSS feed for comments on this post. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: War Is Boring</title>
		<link>http://rawstory.com/blog/2009/05/right-wing-military-writer-we-may-have-to-kill-war-journalists/comment-page-2/#comment-9363</link>
		<dc:creator>War Is Boring</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 21:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rawstory.com/blog/?p=2667#comment-9363</guid>
		<description>[...] New York Post and Fox News journalist Ralph Peters is advocating that the U.S. military kill unsympathetic journalists. This just four months after Joe the Plumber, in his role as a Pajamas Media war reporter, said [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] New York Post and Fox News journalist Ralph Peters is advocating that the U.S. military kill unsympathetic journalists. This just four months after Joe the Plumber, in his role as a Pajamas Media war reporter, said [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Hummel</title>
		<link>http://rawstory.com/blog/2009/05/right-wing-military-writer-we-may-have-to-kill-war-journalists/comment-page-2/#comment-8521</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Hummel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 12:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rawstory.com/blog/?p=2667#comment-8521</guid>
		<description>Actually, come to think of it, the Crackpot Cabal of NeoConMen certainly SHOULD "have a soapbox" --- so that what such folks are thinking can actually get out  into the "light of day" where it can be examined and much of it explicitly REFUTED. What is REALLY important is NOT the rhetoric of the "lead" article --- but rather the attitudes and philosophy of the RESPONDENTS that needs to be addressed. I am moved, in particular, to register my reactions to the series of posts by Bob Dobbs above (whom I take to be representative of a fairly substantial faction among "We the People"). In response to the "line of thinking" on which he touches, it is appropriate to assert some (generally fairly obvious) counterarguments.

The reasons "liberals are so obsessed with appeasing people who want to kill them" is that they do not LIKE having been ENDANGERED by the "initiatives" undertaken by "NeoCons" in "promoting" a world view that GOADS people halfway 'round the world into murderous (even suicidal) vengeance! SOME of us, at least, think OUTSIDE "the box" --- and have come to realize the UNDERLYING motivation of the whole obscenity that "we" have actually "cultivated"!

We CONNECT THE DOTS --- and come to recognize the fundamental FAILURE of "our" past MISguided (or maybe more like MISBEGOTTEN!) MIS"leadership" (both “political” and also “corporate”!) to fulfill their ACTUAL obligations to the membership of this society (and others) --- which WOULD have been to OPTIMIZE BOTH THE CHARACTER AND THE QUALITY OF "OUR" PRODUCTS, rather than to merely MAXIMIZE ”THEIR” MONEY!

Actually, a VERY LARGE PART of the blame REALLY even rests on the heads of all those ORDINARY folks who long SPONSORED and BANKROLLED the likes of a Saddam  Hussein  --- by buying so much of what he "had to sell", and then brainlessly burned it up as a mere fuel to power “our” automobiles! ---  and who (or whose kids and grandkids) have subsequently been lured off into fighting a dirty little "OIL war" over in Iraq, making "us" lots of enemies both there and the world over, and in some cases even coming back dead or permanently damaged themselves, or who may have LOST LOVED ONES or friends therein!! Surely that is an UGLY, HATEFUL reality to which to have to face up. But would it somehow be any "better" for people to now just meekly try to erect a "psychological defensive barrier of DENIAL"??! Would not THAT actually merely COMPOUND the REAL fraud that has been foisted off on all the REALLY aggrieved victims??!

With respect to those who have "bought into the bullbleep" and still CLING to MILITARISM as the supposed "answer" to the whole problem (Dobbs, for instance, at least REPRESENTS himself to have "combat experience", suggested to have been in  Vietnam, and I see no reason not to take him at his word), it can all become a way of  life. Somehow many such folks never quite come to recognize that "THEIR" war was NOT the wonderful "cause" to which they gave a measure of devotion ---  and many of them ACTUALLY, GENUINELY BELIEVE that there could have been no more intelligent alternative to what they have embraced. These people need to be guided back in out of the cold.

Vietnam, it should  be noted (by EVERYBODY!) is now finally (forty long hard years later) now largely HEALED and relatively PROSPEROUS. And the people there DID THAT FOR THEMSELVES, without (and indeed rather IN SPITE OF) any "help from "US". (And no, there was NOT any cascade of "dominoes" that came "tumbling down" in the aftermath!)

So too, hopefully, the three different ethnic groups who comprise the artifically-cobbled-together (initially by Winston Churchill) nation of "Iraq" will ALSO recover, in time (whether they remain "bound together" or --- as I for one think perhaps more likely --- go their separate ways; in any case it really doesn't matter).

The only question is whether THIS nation will actually continue to prosper,  in the aftermath of having now SQUANDERED so much of its resources (particularly its OWN Providential Endowment of PETROLEUM. Fully 70% of that endowment --- and specifically the "cheap, easy" stuff --- as is now KNOWN (originally by Hubbert-inspired statistical methods now fleshed  out by satellite mapping and sonic-imaging mapping of underground structures) TO BE ALL USED UP.

This country now needs to get busy developing the TECHNOLOGICAL ALTERNATIVES to its abject, addictive dependency on OTHER PEOPLES' OIL --- instead of trying to "engineer" wars by which to "control" (and ultimately expropriate) reserves elsewhere. Those alternatives HAVE been devised, investigated, and many even "piloted" going back the last 30-35 years now alteady. It is now time to get SERIOUS about IMPLEMENTING them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, come to think of it, the Crackpot Cabal of NeoConMen certainly SHOULD "have a soapbox" --- so that what such folks are thinking can actually get out  into the "light of day" where it can be examined and much of it explicitly REFUTED. What is REALLY important is NOT the rhetoric of the "lead" article --- but rather the attitudes and philosophy of the RESPONDENTS that needs to be addressed. I am moved, in particular, to register my reactions to the series of posts by Bob Dobbs above (whom I take to be representative of a fairly substantial faction among "We the People"). In response to the "line of thinking" on which he touches, it is appropriate to assert some (generally fairly obvious) counterarguments.</p>
<p>The reasons "liberals are so obsessed with appeasing people who want to kill them" is that they do not LIKE having been ENDANGERED by the "initiatives" undertaken by "NeoCons" in "promoting" a world view that GOADS people halfway 'round the world into murderous (even suicidal) vengeance! SOME of us, at least, think OUTSIDE "the box" --- and have come to realize the UNDERLYING motivation of the whole obscenity that "we" have actually "cultivated"!</p>
<p>We CONNECT THE DOTS --- and come to recognize the fundamental FAILURE of "our" past MISguided (or maybe more like MISBEGOTTEN!) MIS"leadership" (both “political” and also “corporate”!) to fulfill their ACTUAL obligations to the membership of this society (and others) --- which WOULD have been to OPTIMIZE BOTH THE CHARACTER AND THE QUALITY OF "OUR" PRODUCTS, rather than to merely MAXIMIZE ”THEIR” MONEY!</p>
<p>Actually, a VERY LARGE PART of the blame REALLY even rests on the heads of all those ORDINARY folks who long SPONSORED and BANKROLLED the likes of a Saddam  Hussein  --- by buying so much of what he "had to sell", and then brainlessly burned it up as a mere fuel to power “our” automobiles! ---  and who (or whose kids and grandkids) have subsequently been lured off into fighting a dirty little "OIL war" over in Iraq, making "us" lots of enemies both there and the world over, and in some cases even coming back dead or permanently damaged themselves, or who may have LOST LOVED ONES or friends therein!! Surely that is an UGLY, HATEFUL reality to which to have to face up. But would it somehow be any "better" for people to now just meekly try to erect a "psychological defensive barrier of DENIAL"??! Would not THAT actually merely COMPOUND the REAL fraud that has been foisted off on all the REALLY aggrieved victims??!</p>
<p>With respect to those who have "bought into the bullbleep" and still CLING to MILITARISM as the supposed "answer" to the whole problem (Dobbs, for instance, at least REPRESENTS himself to have "combat experience", suggested to have been in  Vietnam, and I see no reason not to take him at his word), it can all become a way of  life. Somehow many such folks never quite come to recognize that "THEIR" war was NOT the wonderful "cause" to which they gave a measure of devotion ---  and many of them ACTUALLY, GENUINELY BELIEVE that there could have been no more intelligent alternative to what they have embraced. These people need to be guided back in out of the cold.</p>
<p>Vietnam, it should  be noted (by EVERYBODY!) is now finally (forty long hard years later) now largely HEALED and relatively PROSPEROUS. And the people there DID THAT FOR THEMSELVES, without (and indeed rather IN SPITE OF) any "help from "US". (And no, there was NOT any cascade of "dominoes" that came "tumbling down" in the aftermath!)</p>
<p>So too, hopefully, the three different ethnic groups who comprise the artifically-cobbled-together (initially by Winston Churchill) nation of "Iraq" will ALSO recover, in time (whether they remain "bound together" or --- as I for one think perhaps more likely --- go their separate ways; in any case it really doesn't matter).</p>
<p>The only question is whether THIS nation will actually continue to prosper,  in the aftermath of having now SQUANDERED so much of its resources (particularly its OWN Providential Endowment of PETROLEUM. Fully 70% of that endowment --- and specifically the "cheap, easy" stuff --- as is now KNOWN (originally by Hubbert-inspired statistical methods now fleshed  out by satellite mapping and sonic-imaging mapping of underground structures) TO BE ALL USED UP.</p>
<p>This country now needs to get busy developing the TECHNOLOGICAL ALTERNATIVES to its abject, addictive dependency on OTHER PEOPLES' OIL --- instead of trying to "engineer" wars by which to "control" (and ultimately expropriate) reserves elsewhere. Those alternatives HAVE been devised, investigated, and many even "piloted" going back the last 30-35 years now alteady. It is now time to get SERIOUS about IMPLEMENTING them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Hummel</title>
		<link>http://rawstory.com/blog/2009/05/right-wing-military-writer-we-may-have-to-kill-war-journalists/comment-page-2/#comment-8512</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Hummel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 10:54:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rawstory.com/blog/?p=2667#comment-8512</guid>
		<description>Actually, somebody should inform this A$$HOLE that quite a few of them WERE killed during the course of the Iraq debacle. The last count I saw (~12/8/08) was about 148.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, somebody should inform this A$$HOLE that quite a few of them WERE killed during the course of the Iraq debacle. The last count I saw (~12/8/08) was about 148.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
