Supreme Court rejects Virginia GOP's last-ditch attempt to block fair legislative elections

On Monday, the Supreme Court handed down their decision in Virginia House of Delegates v. Bethune-Hill, shutting down the Virginia GOP's last ditch effort to rig the upcoming state legislative election taking place this November.


In 5-4 decision, the justices held that the House of Delegates has no standing to appeal the decision made by the lower court. The vote broke along unusual lines, with Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg writing for a majority with Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, Clarence Thomas, and Neil Gorsuch, and Justice Samuel Alito writing a dissent joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Stephen Breyer and Brett Kavanaugh.

The case stemmed from a challenge to the GOP-drawn House of Delegates legislative map in Virginia, which residents challenged as an unconstitutional racial gerrymander. 12 of the 100 districts contained a voting base that was more than 55 percent African-American, raising concerns that lawmakers deliberately crammed as many black voters into as few districts as possible so they could not have as many representatives as their presence in the population.

A district court previously ruled all 12 of the districts unconstitutional, but the Supreme Court in 2017 approved one of them and told the lower court to use a different standard to review the other 11. The district court once again found the remaining 11 unconstitutional, and ordered a new map to be drawn. Democratic state Attorney General Mark Herring refused to defend the GOP's gerrymander, leading the legislature to hire its own lawyers — which the Supreme Court today ruled was not allowed.

The decision was not altogether surprising, as the new state legislative map is already in place and primaries have already been held. The Supreme Court typically does not intervene in elections halfway through the process, so it is likely the justices would have issued their opinion sooner if they had wanted to rule in favor of the GOP.

The ruling is a huge victory for Virginia Democrats, who will now be competing with a fair map that will have considerably more competitive districts. Democrats only need to swing two seats in the state Senate and House of Delegates to win control of either chamber. Winning both would give them their only legislature in a Southern state, and leave the Minnesota Senate as the only GOP-controlled legislative chamber in a state President Donald Trump lost.

The Supreme Court is scheduled to decide three more major voting rights cases this term: Rucho v. Common Cause, which concerns a Republican partisan gerrymander in North Carolina, Lamone v Benisek, which concerns a Democratic partisan gerrymander in Maryland, and Department of Commerce v. New York, which will decide whether the Trump administration can interrogate people about citizenship while conducting the 2020 Census.

For customer support contact support@rawstory.com. Report typos and corrections to corrections@rawstory.com.

Ohio Democratic congressional candidate Brian Poindexter's past arrests were revealed by a new report by a conservative outlet.

Poindexter, a Cleveland city councilman and former union organizer, was arrested in 1998 on suspicion of swallowing a rock of crack cocaine during a traffic stop and in 2013 for allegedly slapping a stranger at a Cleveland Indians game, according to police records obtained by the Washington Free Beacon.

The Democratic candidate is challenging Republican Rep. Max Miller of Ohio, who already faces accusations of assaulting his ex-wife, including allegations that he threw scalding water on her and threatened her with a gun.

According to the 1998 police report, officers pulled over Poindexter, then 18, near a Cleveland intersection known for drug activity.

Poindexter allegedly took small objects from his coat and swallowed them, and a scuffle ensued as an officer tried to retrieve them, and police ultimately recovered what they described as a rock of suspected crack cocaine. Poindexter was arrested on a drug abuse charge, but it's unclear whether he was prosecuted. The police department did not respond to a request for comment.

A Poindexter campaign spokesman denied the drug allegation, telling the Free Beacon: "Any implication that Brian has used hard drugs is false."

Fifteen years later, on Aug. 10, 2013, Poindexter, then 34, was arrested for assault and removed from an Indians game after allegedly slapping a stranger, a separate police report shows.

The alleged victim, Bob Rzepka, told the Free Beacon the fight began after he watched Poindexter swallow a hot dog whole and approached to compliment him.

"I said, ‘Hey man, if I buy you a hot dog, will you shove that f---ing thing down your throat like you did, and can I get a video of it, because people will never believe me,’" Rzepka told the Free Beacon.

But he said Poindexter, who appeared to be heavily intoxicated, took offense at the praise.

"He's like, ‘Hey, were you trying to insinuate something?’" Rzepka said. "I go, ‘No, man. I just think it’s crazy that you just shoved that freaking hot dog down your throat without even taking a bite of it, and then he just — wham — just smacked me right across the f---ing face."

Nearby officers removed Poindexter from the stadium, but Rzepka declined to press charges.

Rzepka, who lives in the district, said he was surprised to learn Poindexter is now running for Congress. "The guy who slapped me at a baseball game is running for Congress?" he said. "I wouldn't want him representing me."

THANKS FOR SUBSCRIBING! ALL ADS REMOVED!

President Donald Trump was reportedly shocked to learn how deeply Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth had cut the Army’s leadership, prompting The Jim Acosta Show to wonder whether one of Trump’s closest aides had kept the bad news from him.

The jab came after Army Secretary Dan Driscoll announced his resignation following months of friction with Hegseth, and after he recently took his concerns directly to Trump, according to The Atlantic.

“Trump was surprised when Driscoll told him how many generals and other top officers had been fired, pushed out, or passed over for promotion under Hegseth,” one person familiar with their White House conversation told the outlet.

The revelation led The Jim Acosta Show’s Morning Memo to mock Trump for apparently being unaware of what was happening inside his own administration.

“I guess the Human Printer left those pages out of his daily Happy Time briefing,” morning newsletter writer Tommy Christopher joked Tuesday.

The “human printer” is a nickname colleagues have given Trump aide Natalie Harp for her tendency to supply the president with favorable printouts of media coverage from a portable printer she is known to carry, according to reports.

Driscoll resigned Monday after warning Trump that the Army could not make the changes it needed after losing so many experienced leaders, The Atlantic reported. Trump “expressed concern about the deep cuts,” the magazine added.

Hegseth has not publicly responded to Driscoll’s departure.

Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. suffered a courtroom embarrassment on Tuesday after a federal judge accused his department of littering a legal filing with AI-generated falsehoods.

According to The Washington Post, U.S. District Judge Christopher Cooper criticized the Department of Health and Human Services for citing nonexistent scientific evidence — potentially AI-generated — "to support sweeping changes to federal teen pregnancy prevention programs."

The Trump administration had argued that congressionally appropriated funds for such programs should avoid encouraging teen sexual activity and be steered only toward abstinence and "body literacy" programming, after HHS cut tens of millions in grants.

In an opinion granting a preliminary injunction as the underlying lawsuit continues, Cooper called the changes "likely arbitrary and capricious" and found the government had failed to provide adequate evidence for its policy.

"He wrote that grant solicitations for the program '(remarkably) reference public health studies that appear either not to exist or not to support the propositions for which they are cited — a hallmark of AI-generated citations,"" the Post is reporting, adding that, of the seven cited articles, two appeared to be "entirely made up and three others did not exist in the journals they were attributed to."

This is not the first time Kennedy has faced humiliation over AI-generated falsehoods.

Last year, The Washington Post revealed that citations in the White House's sweeping "MAHA Report" had also been AI-generated, producing garbled references and invented studies.

The Post notes the ruling "stems from a July lawsuit" brought by two Minnesota counties, Washington state, a sex education advocacy nonprofit, and Planned Parenthood of the Heartland, which serves Iowa, Nebraska and nearby states.

{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}