Supreme Court rejects Virginia GOP's last-ditch attempt to block fair legislative elections

On Monday, the Supreme Court handed down their decision in Virginia House of Delegates v. Bethune-Hill, shutting down the Virginia GOP's last ditch effort to rig the upcoming state legislative election taking place this November.


In 5-4 decision, the justices held that the House of Delegates has no standing to appeal the decision made by the lower court. The vote broke along unusual lines, with Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg writing for a majority with Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, Clarence Thomas, and Neil Gorsuch, and Justice Samuel Alito writing a dissent joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Stephen Breyer and Brett Kavanaugh.

The case stemmed from a challenge to the GOP-drawn House of Delegates legislative map in Virginia, which residents challenged as an unconstitutional racial gerrymander. 12 of the 100 districts contained a voting base that was more than 55 percent African-American, raising concerns that lawmakers deliberately crammed as many black voters into as few districts as possible so they could not have as many representatives as their presence in the population.

A district court previously ruled all 12 of the districts unconstitutional, but the Supreme Court in 2017 approved one of them and told the lower court to use a different standard to review the other 11. The district court once again found the remaining 11 unconstitutional, and ordered a new map to be drawn. Democratic state Attorney General Mark Herring refused to defend the GOP's gerrymander, leading the legislature to hire its own lawyers — which the Supreme Court today ruled was not allowed.

The decision was not altogether surprising, as the new state legislative map is already in place and primaries have already been held. The Supreme Court typically does not intervene in elections halfway through the process, so it is likely the justices would have issued their opinion sooner if they had wanted to rule in favor of the GOP.

The ruling is a huge victory for Virginia Democrats, who will now be competing with a fair map that will have considerably more competitive districts. Democrats only need to swing two seats in the state Senate and House of Delegates to win control of either chamber. Winning both would give them their only legislature in a Southern state, and leave the Minnesota Senate as the only GOP-controlled legislative chamber in a state President Donald Trump lost.

The Supreme Court is scheduled to decide three more major voting rights cases this term: Rucho v. Common Cause, which concerns a Republican partisan gerrymander in North Carolina, Lamone v Benisek, which concerns a Democratic partisan gerrymander in Maryland, and Department of Commerce v. New York, which will decide whether the Trump administration can interrogate people about citizenship while conducting the 2020 Census.

For customer support contact support@rawstory.com. Report typos and corrections to corrections@rawstory.com.

Republican infighting broke out Saturday as Democrats presented a unified front celebrating a bipartisan bill that President Donald Trump allowed to pass at midnight by refusing to either veto or sign it.

The ROAD to Housing Act, described by CNN as a "sweeping" bipartisan bill to tackle housing affordability, spurred cheers of joy from Democrats and a scattered, sometimes hostile, response from Republicans.

"NOT GOOD ENOUGH!" conservative pundit Ann Coulter scolded Trump on Friday. "You need to veto it before midnight, Mr. President!!! The housing bill furthers the destruction of working and middle class neighborhoods by expanding Section 8 housing, moving ghettos into formerly safe towns."

The law caps the number of single-family homes big investors can buy, allows developers to skip an environmental review for properties between two previously reviewed buildings and creates a grant program communities can use to develop preapproved housing designs, according to NPR.

On Saturday, Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) responded to Coulter and tried to justify Trump's actions by arguing he'd outmaneuvered Senate Majority Leader John Thune and House Majority Leader Mike Johnson.

"Only 32 of us voted against the Housing bill in the House," Massie said. "But had Trump vetoed it, I can assure you that Thune & Johnson would not have rallied votes to override his veto and the bill would have died. By not vetoing it, Trump took ownership of the bill."

This notion received an indirect rebuttal from Fox News correspondent Chad Pergram, who pointed to bills' 358-32 win in the House and its 85-5 victory in the Senate.

"It takes two-thirds to override a veto in both chambers," he said. "Thus, the House and Senate both had supermajorities capable of overriding the President’s veto to convert this bill into law."

Pergram also acknowledged such action was rare.

Sen. Tim Scott (R-NC) did not name Trump in his response, but he did throw support behind the bill the president refused to sign.

"The American Dream is a little more within reach for families across this country," he said. "The 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act became law last night and will help more Americans plant roots, build stability, and pass opportunity to the next generation."

Meanwhile Democrats both celebrated the bill's passage and slammed Trump for failing to support it in a bid to pressure Congress to pass his SAVE America Act voter ID bill.

Among those to celebrate was Rep. Jonathan L. Jackson (D-IL).

"At midnight, the bipartisan ROAD to Housing Act became law—despite President Trump holding the bill hostage and refusing to sign it," Jackson wrote. "Families in IL-01 can't afford political games when housing costs are soaring, but President Trump would rather see Americans on the street than at the ballot box."

Mike Nellis, former Kamala Harris campaign advisor, professed himself confused by Trump's tactics.

"Again, it’s bafflingly stupid that Donald Trump let a housing bill become law without signing it, ensuring he gets no credit for it," said Nellis. "It’s literally the only thing they’ve done on affordability, and he managed to completely disown it."

Political consultant Saikat Chakrabarti, a progressive Democrat, chastised Trump as ineffective.

"The President of the United States just refused to sign a housing bill in 'protest,' and the bill became law anyway," he said. "Don’t think I’ve ever seen a weaker or more pathetic move. The most powerful person in America is playing the role of activist."

"President Trump chose politics over this effort to lower housing costs," added Sen. Maggie Hassan (D-NH), "but I'm glad that this bipartisan bill is now law."

Even White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt praised the bill in June, before Trump announced he would not sign it.

"President Trump promised to lower housing costs, and he is delivering, making it easier for every family to achieve the American Dream of homeownership, she wrote. "Tomorrow’s historic bill signing is another promise made, promise kept."

THANKS FOR SUBSCRIBING! ALL ADS REMOVED!

Vice President JD Vance's allies say he accidentally stumbled into a strategy to leave himself unscathed by the conflict in Iran, but Trump insiders argue he's just kidding himself, Politico reported Saturday.

Aides and allies of Vance told Politico that he's hoping his early skepticism of starting a conflict with Iran and his public doubts that Iran could be counted on to make peace will be "his saving grace" if hostilities drag on.

"It wasn't necessarily strategic from him, but it did have the side effect of putting him in a good place politically," an anonymous GOP operative allied with Vance told Politico. "From a purely political perspective, all that really mattered was him being seen as attempting to bring the war to an end, while at the same time remaining loyal and aligned with the president."

Vance is closely linked to the Iran peace talks, Politico noted. He was in the middle of peace talks that led to a memorandum of understanding to end hostilities between the U.S. and Iran, but the MOU has since fallen apart, Politico noted.

"How can you blame this on him?" a Vance ally told Politico, referring to the continued conflict with Iran. "Failing at trying for peace, I don't think gets you a penalty from rational people. In other words, the non-war crowd is not going to fault him for trying to end the war."

However, a former Trump official cast doubt on the idea that Vance comes out unscathed, saying, "This MOU is likely a loser, and it's his," and that Vance "is very, very much the person with the most to lose."

Another former Trump official agreed Vance's team is too hopeful, saying, "Dude, you just got handed a s— sandwich. You can't cover up the taste too much."

FBI director Kash Patel, recently summoned to the White House after an angry Senate Republican demand he explain his luxury lifestyle, faces a looming threat next week from within the Trump administration, MS NOW analysts argued Saturday morning.

MS NOW reporter Jackie Alemany — among the first to reveal the White House's frustration with the embattled FBI director — noted one source told her the pending confirmation of acting Attorney Todd Blanche could spell trouble.

"He isn't going anywhere right now," Alemany said. "That could potentially change after Todd Blanche's confirmation."

MS NOW legal analyst Kristy Greenberg, a former New York federal prosecutor, agreed, basing her opinion on past experiences working alongside Blanche.

The former prosecutor admitted a begrudging respect for Blanche's professionalism even if she could not approve of the work he's done for President Donald Trump.

"He actually knows how to do the job, said Greenberg. "I don't agree with how he has done the job, but he knows how to do the job ... Kash Patel has no idea what he's doing. He's too busy on his jet skis."

The White House has denied Alemany's report that it is "frustrated with Kash Patel" — over antics that included a vulgar tweet directed at MS NOW — with a comment from communications director Steven Cheung.

"There has been no frustration over his tweet this morning," wrote Cheung. "I reposted his tweet. Other White House officials reposted his tweet. Him calling MSNOW (expletive) is an accurate description of their (expletive) reporting."

But Alemany suggested Saturday that the White House continues to support Patel publicly because of the scandal-laden FBI director's continued loyalty to Trump.

"He is acting on the president's major, main priority, the most animating force of this administration, which is investigating and relitigating the 2020 election," said Alemany. "That being said, it seems like he, Patel, is butting up against some more pushback here."

And he'll face more pushback from Blanche, Alemany predicted in her response to Greenberg's comment that Patel was "frankly acting like a buffoon."

Replied Alemany, "I'm not sure Todd Blanche is happy."

{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}