President Donald Trump is a desperate man. With the midterms on the horizon and his approval ratings under water, he doesn’t want to talk about affordability. Nor does he want to talk about his war with Iran. And he certainly doesn’t want to talk about Jeffrey Epstein.

What does he want to talk about? Communists.

Over the last two weeks, Trump has ratcheted up his overheated rhetoric in response to democratic socialists’ victories in primary elections in Colorado, New York, Washington, DC, and elsewhere.During a speech to Christian conservatives at a Faith and Freedom Coalition convention in Washington on June 26, he called democratic socialists “animals” and said, “We have to stop this horrible threat of cancer that’s permeating our country called communism.” He went on to say that the “godless” communists in the Democratic Party pose a particular risk for Christians. “They will close your churches in this country,” he warned. “They will kill your people. And that’s what they’re about.”

It’s not as if Trump and his fellow Republicans haven’t hurled the communist epithet before, but over the past six months they have upped the ante.

Heading into the 250th birthday celebration on the National Mall, Trump continued his tirade. Speaking at Mount Rushmore on July 3, he not only besmirched Democrats, but immigrants as well. “There is now a resurgence of the communist menace in our land, including from newcomers to our country who embrace ideas totally opposed to our way of life and our great success,” he said. “...You can be a communist or you can be a patriot. You cannot be both.” He made no secret that he is trying to salvage Republican candidates’ chances in November. “America will never be a communist country,” he said. “We can only lose the midterms if we allow ourselves to lose the midterms if we are foolish, stupid, and unwise.”

Trump was only slightly more restrained on July 4 at the National Mall. After introducing a handful of World War II veterans and lauding them for their heroism, Trump ahistorically declared: “Our warriors did not fight communism on battlefields across the world, only to have that menace rear its ugly head right back here in America. We’re not going to let it happen.” (In fact, American troops, along with troops from Great Britain and communist Soviet Union, defeated fascism in World War II.)

The GOP’s Red-Baiting Tradition

It’s not as if Trump and his fellow Republicans haven’t hurled the communist epithet before, but over the past six months they have upped the ante. According to a recent Washington Post analysis of statements, social media posts, and podcasts, from January to June, they applied the word “communist” or “communism” to Democrats an average of 626 times per week, 43% more than during the same time frame in 2025.

Right-wing pundits have entered the fray, too. Megan McArdle, a self-described “right-leaning libertarian” columnist at The Washington Post, recently wrote that democratic socialist victories represent “a heady moment for the left, because socialism’s tainted brand has recovered from the vivid failures of the Soviet Union.”

Likewise, historian Arthur Herman, writing for Fox News, disingenuously equated democratic socialists’ policy agenda with that of the Soviet Union in a July 3 column. “In June, Marxist radicals calling themselves democratic socialists swept the New York City primaries...” he wrote. “...Communist-style socialism has brought poverty, mass starvation, and subsistence misery to tens of millions worldwide.”

Such attacks are nothing new. Republicans denounced Franklin Roosevelt’s New Deal as “socialism” and even “communism.” In 1961, then General Electric spokesman Ronald Reagan warned that government health insurance would lead to socialism. Over the following decades, however, Republicans largely abandoned that mantra in favor of attacks on “big government” and the welfare state.

Trump is a throwback to an earlier time. In his 2020 State of the Union address, Trump attacked socialism, claiming it “destroys nations.” Like Reagan before him, he specifically denounced a “Medicare for All” proposal endorsed by Sens. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), and 130 other members of Congress at the time, calling it a “socialist takeover of our healthcare system.”

During the last election, Trump often called Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris a “Marxist,” tying her to her father’s economic perspective on markets and inequality. More recently, he labeled New York Mayor Zohran Mamdani, a democratic socialist, a “communist,” and dubbed Janeese Lewis George, a democratic socialist who won last month’s Washington, DC, Democratic mayoral primary, a “Communist adherent.”

Democratic socialists in the Democratic Party are not communists. If they are a member of any organization, it likely would be the Democratic Socialists of America, which does not function as a party. Communist organizations still exist in the United States, but they are politically marginal and have no representation in Congress or in any state legislature.

Americans Support Democratic Socialist Policies

Likewise, democratic socialism is not synonymous with Soviet communism, which fell apart 35 years ago. The countries that democratic socialists in America hold up as models can be found in Western Europe. They are multiparty democracies with market economies, strong unions, and robust social safety programs that include universal healthcare. Their economic models are nothing like the one-party command economy of the Soviet Union and, as I pointed out in detail in a December 2025 essay, they do a much better job of ensuring their citizens live long, healthy, and prosperous lives than the United States does.

While only about 17% of Americans have a favorable view of democratic socialist politicians, their policies are quite popular. For example:

• According to a new Economist-YouGov poll, 52% of Americans support eliminating private health insurance companies and replacing them with a national health plan. Only 30% oppose the idea.
• Public support for a higher federal minimum wage has remained strong for years. A 2021 Pew survey found that 62% of Americans supported raising the federal minimum wage to $15 an hour, while a 2019 Pew survey found support at 67%.
• A February Pew survey found that 69% of Americans favor requiring employers to provide paid family leave. Even 59% of Republicans support it.
• Finally, 63% of Americans favor raising taxes on large corporations, according to a March 2025 Pew poll, and 58% favor raising taxes on households earning more than $400,000 annually.

Perhaps what is holding democratic socialists back is how they identify themselves. The term “socialist” just may have too much baggage. After all, many Americans still associate the word with the Soviet Union, whose official name was the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, even though it was a communist dictatorship.

New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a democratic socialist, told The Washington Post earlier this week that political labels should not be an issue. “What matters is the legislation, your proposals, the ideas before us,” she said. “How a person identifies in their economic view of the world is less important to people than if we’re making their groceries more affordable.”

Maybe. But Trump and the GOP are betting that calling Democrats “communists” will matter to enough voters to overshadow their concerns about the cost of food, gasoline, housing and healthcare. November will reveal whether that Cold War strategy still works.

Republican infighting broke out Saturday as Democrats presented a unified front celebrating a bipartisan bill that President Donald Trump allowed to pass at midnight by refusing to either veto or sign it.

The ROAD to Housing Act, described by CNN as a "sweeping" bipartisan bill to tackle housing affordability, spurred cheers of joy from Democrats and a scattered, sometimes hostile, response from Republicans.

"NOT GOOD ENOUGH!" conservative pundit Ann Coulter scolded Trump on Friday. "You need to veto it before midnight, Mr. President!!! The housing bill furthers the destruction of working and middle class neighborhoods by expanding Section 8 housing, moving ghettos into formerly safe towns."

The law caps the number of single-family homes big investors can buy, allows developers to skip an environmental review for properties between two previously reviewed buildings and creates a grant program communities can use to develop preapproved housing designs, according to NPR.

On Saturday, Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) responded to Coulter and tried to justify Trump's actions by arguing he'd outmaneuvered Senate Majority Leader John Thune and House Majority Leader Mike Johnson.

"Only 32 of us voted against the Housing bill in the House," Massie said. "But had Trump vetoed it, I can assure you that Thune & Johnson would not have rallied votes to override his veto and the bill would have died. By not vetoing it, Trump took ownership of the bill."

This notion received an indirect rebuttal from Fox News correspondent Chad Pergram, who pointed to bills' 358-32 win in the House and its 85-5 victory in the Senate.

"It takes two-thirds to override a veto in both chambers," he said. "Thus, the House and Senate both had supermajorities capable of overriding the President’s veto to convert this bill into law."

Pergram also acknowledged such action was rare.

Sen. Tim Scott (R-NC) did not name Trump in his response, but he did throw support behind the bill the president refused to sign.

"The American Dream is a little more within reach for families across this country," he said. "The 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act became law last night and will help more Americans plant roots, build stability, and pass opportunity to the next generation."

Meanwhile Democrats both celebrated the bill's passage and slammed Trump for failing to support it in a bid to pressure Congress to pass his SAVE America Act voter ID bill.

Among those to celebrate was Rep. Jonathan L. Jackson (D-IL).

"At midnight, the bipartisan ROAD to Housing Act became law—despite President Trump holding the bill hostage and refusing to sign it," Jackson wrote. "Families in IL-01 can't afford political games when housing costs are soaring, but President Trump would rather see Americans on the street than at the ballot box."

Mike Nellis, former Kamala Harris campaign advisor, professed himself confused by Trump's tactics.

"Again, it’s bafflingly stupid that Donald Trump let a housing bill become law without signing it, ensuring he gets no credit for it," said Nellis. "It’s literally the only thing they’ve done on affordability, and he managed to completely disown it."

Political consultant Saikat Chakrabarti, a progressive Democrat, chastised Trump as ineffective.

"The President of the United States just refused to sign a housing bill in 'protest,' and the bill became law anyway," he said. "Don’t think I’ve ever seen a weaker or more pathetic move. The most powerful person in America is playing the role of activist."

"President Trump chose politics over this effort to lower housing costs," added Sen. Maggie Hassan (D-NH), "but I'm glad that this bipartisan bill is now law."

Even White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt praised the bill in June, before Trump announced he would not sign it.

"President Trump promised to lower housing costs, and he is delivering, making it easier for every family to achieve the American Dream of homeownership, she wrote. "Tomorrow’s historic bill signing is another promise made, promise kept."