Study links soda, pancreatic cancer

By Reuters
Monday, February 8th, 2010 -- 10:18 am
Share on Facebook Stumble This!

coke can Study links soda, pancreatic cancerWASHINGTON (Reuters) - People who drink two or more sweetened soft drinks a week have a much higher risk of pancreatic cancer, an unusual but deadly cancer, researchers reported on Monday.

People who drank mostly fruit juice instead of sodas did not have the same risk, the study of 60,000 people in Singapore found.

Sugar may be to blame but people who drink sweetened sodas regularly often have other poor health habits, said Mark Pereira of the University of Minnesota, who led the study.

"The high levels of sugar in soft drinks may be increasing the level of insulin in the body, which we think contributes to pancreatic cancer cell growth," Pereira said in a statement.

Insulin, which helps the body metabolize sugar, is made in the pancreas.

Story continues below...

Writing in the journal Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, Pereira and colleagues said they followed 60,524 men and women in the Singapore Chinese Health Study for 14 years.

Over that time, 140 of the volunteers developed pancreatic cancer. Those who drank two or more soft drinks a week had an 87 percent higher risk of being among those who got pancreatic cancer.

Pereira said he believed the findings would apply elsewhere.

"Singapore is a wealthy country with excellent healthcare. Favorite pastimes are eating and shopping, so the findings should apply to other western countries," he said.

But Susan Mayne of the Yale Cancer Center at Yale University in Connecticut was cautious.

"Although this study found a risk, the finding was based on a relatively small number of cases and it remains unclear whether it is a causal association or not," said Mayne, who serves on the board of the journal, which is published by the American Association for Cancer Research.

"Soft drink consumption in Singapore was associated with several other adverse health behaviors such as smoking and red meat intake, which we can't accurately control for."

Other studies have linked pancreatic cancer to red meat, especially burned or charred meat.

Pancreatic cancer is one of the deadliest forms of cancer, with 230,000 cases globally. In the United States, 37,680 people are diagnosed with pancreatic cancer in a year and 34,290 die of it.

The American Cancer Society says the five-year survival rate for pancreatic cancer patients is about 5 percent.

Some researchers believe high sugar intake may fuel some forms of cancer, although the evidence has been contradictory. Tumor cells use more glucose than other cells.

One 12-ounce (355 ml) can of non-diet soda contains about 130 calories, almost all of them from sugar.

Share this article:
  • Print
  • email
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Story comments are below...

  • well, Study links sugary soda to pancreas cancer. Drinking just two or more sweetened soft drinks a week increases risk!
  • Pancreatic Cancer badly affects the pancreas. The symptoms of pancreatic cancer differ from person to person. The early symptoms include nausea, weight loss, jaundice, vomiting etc. There are many treatments available but diagnosis is the main part. For more details refer http://www.cancery.com/pancreatic-cancer-sympto...
  • M. Culleton
    Is the risk of developing pancreative cancer the same if one only drinks "diet/non-cafeine" soda pop?
  • M. Culleton
    Is the risk of developing pancreative cancer the same when one consumes a "diet" and "non-cafeine" soda pop?
  • It is a good thing they gave the actual numbers, so people don't overreact. I wonder if they asked them what they were drinking IN the sodas, were the soda drinkers heavier alcohol users? I also find it more than coincidental that this study came out the same week Congress voted on the soda tax. I think it was a bit strategic on the part of the food police and the power-elite who want to grab even more of our money!
  • slipknot
    If these findings were in fact true, "a 'much' higher risk", we wouldn't have 308 million people in this country today. Sure, soft drinks are unhealthy and shouldn't be used in place of water and the more healthy, 100% fruit juices available. But 37,680 cases in the U.S. is .0122% of the population or one out of every 8200 people per year. Gimme a break!
    Why don't they do a study as to why we have so many goddamned people on this earth and how long it'll be before we run out of resources?
    Maybe we should all drink a case per week.
    Idiots!
  • Btw, RAW, that headline on the frontpage is WRONG! The problem isn't "fizzy"soda, the problem is sweet soda!
  • "Tumor cells use more glucose than other cells."
    And soft drinks like Cola are sweetened with 'high FRUCTOSE corn syrup'! So, obviously, something is at odds here. Looks like scientists aren't even sure what kind of sugar leads to cancer. Sloppy work.
  • the truth is
    its the aspartame stupid.

    watch sweet misery.
  • And in countries other than the US, the cyclamat, too! About 5% of people metabolize this to a poison. So, this is a big gamble with your health - are you one of the 95% or of the 5%? I'm SHOCKED to see that this shit is allowed in Germany. No more Coke Zero for me.
  • james
    besides this you should also never drink coke or pop or bottled water, etc from a plasstic container or an aluminum containder due to all of the cancerous chemicals that leak from the plastic into the drink or food. mexican coke or german or most european cokes and pepsi colas use real sugar instead of the poisonous high fructus corn syrup and they are available in glass instead of only in aluminum or plastic as in usa or canada. coke in the usa could increase sales just by using real sugar and mass producing glass bottles as the predominant container; but they believe that the people are too stupid to be aware of the difference---but more and more the people are waking up.
  • "they are available in glass instead of only in aluminum or plastic"
    Sadly, not any longer, here in Germany. Only some small bottles for automats are still made of glass. Even the returnable bottles are made of PET (Polyethylenterephthalat) nowadays...
  • theoracle
    140 people out of 60,524 people studied over 14 years got pancreatic cancer? And of the 140 who got pancreatic cancer, 87 percent drank two or more soft drinks a week?

    This is one of those "studies" that makes a person scratch their head. Why? Because of the remaining 60,384 people in this study (over 14 years) who didn't get pancreatic cancer, how many of these people drank two or more soft drinks a week, and didn't develop pancreatic cancer????

    Until I see this data, I must presume that someone with an anti-soft drink agenda conducted this study, similar to so many other "studies" spun to reach a preset conclusion.
  • Wildcat
    Sugar? They don't use sugar in pop anymore -- it's all high-fructose corn syrup! If you want sugar in your fizzy drinks, you either have to live someplace where it's cheaper to use than HFCS, or seek out independent, off-label brands that specialize in sugar, or wait for the Big Bottlers to put the stuff out as a special promotion...

    Until and unless a clarification is released that says it one way or the other, I'm going to have to assume they tested the dominant HCFS-only stuff and are just calling it "sugar"...
  • Exactly! The way this is reported doesn't make any sense. If it's glucose which fuels tumors, what do sodas with their high fructose content have to do with this? And, btw, nowadays food companies put a high level of sugar, and increasingly HFCS, into juice as well. So, why should this be any better? If the juice drinkers have a lower risk, isn't it more likely that the higher input of vitamins plays a role?

    Imho this is just another study that finds an interesting statistical anomaly, but then jumps at a conclusion, without proving any causal relationship, and while disregarding the hundreds of other factors that may play a role. Hey, it may be that cancer makes people drink more soda, or that there ae genetic reasons that make the patients both a higher risk group for tumors while at the same time resulting in them having a sweet tooth, or something. Or that juice drinkers have a more healthy lifestyle, and it's their consumption of, say, spinach, that safeguards them from cancer!

    Really, this kind of crappy scientific sensationalism that relies only on a selective reading of statistics is totally unhelpful and may seriously backfire. Just like that hype about low fat diaries in the 70s, which now has been shown to be based on a false reading of statistics, where the much more probable factor behind obesity (once again, too much sugar, and especially fructose) had simply been disregarded. Simply ignore all the brouhaha, eat healthy, traditional, food, and wait some decades until the scientists finally know what they're talking about!
  • Phil E. Drifter
    This is great because my sister, who is fat and always has been, drinks Pepsi One religiously, thinking it will help her lose weight. However, she's still fat and doesn't realize the only way you lose weight is by doing cardio and sweating and burning the fat stores off your body; any reduction in calorie intake will only be offset by your metabolism adapting to keep as much weight as possible.

    Compare your body to a car. if you're overweight, you're carrying far too many gallons of fuel, all the excess weight is fuel you need to burn off, by sweating it off.
  • What kind of Pepsi? The classic stuff with lots of HFCS, or the zero calories soda? And then, those industrially produced sugar substitutes may have side effects as well, and in twenty years or so scientists may vent that this causes cancer. Who knows?

    However, at least the 70s hype of low fat diats is seriously questioned nowadays. Pls see this excellent lecture about the problems with that onesided view, from the University of California, "Sugar: The bitter truth". It's not too difficult to understand, and presented in an entertaining way:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dBnniua6-oM
  • Mr Fuji
    It could be the water. Singapore is one of the few Countries with drinkable recycled sewage water.
  • Don't get fooled into believing that the water in the US is any better! Totally depends on where your water comes from. That recycled water may even be superior to the stuff coming out of your tap.
  • Whoodo
    Citing 140 cases out of 60,000 over 14 years as important, makes it seem that the researchers are grasping for statistical significance (easily obtained with very high N) and confusing it with literal significance or substantial effects. The theory - too much sugar->pancreas->too much insulin->pancreatic damage - fits, but "modern" societies do a lot more "sugar" tricks in their process foods than just soda and, as mentioned, heavy soda-suckers probably have other dietary insufficiencies to boot. Pass me another Coke.
  • hamburgervol
    Try Canada Dry Lemon Lime sparkling water in a can. Zero sugar, HFCS, and it's not diet. If you want to add a little sweetener, mix with cranberry or your favorite juice.
  • hankpa
    diet sodas (along with gum, whey protein drinks etc etch) have a combination of Acesulfame potassium and 'splenda'. this combination actually made my body 'act' like i had diabetes. i got dizzy, i got the sweats and couldn't see in one eye and had 'spots and swirls' in the other
    ! i had to drink tons of water and i got better.

    i did some research and COMPLETELY got rid of these two chemicals (and HFCS) from my diet (very very very tough to do as you know). know what?

    I HAVE HAD NOOOOO weird reactions anymore. and i've lost weight to boot.

    the FDA care nothing about you people. do some research.
  • vvv63vvv
    i dont recommend lingering for decades in an old age home to anyone due to good health, it's far too expensive, tedious and burdensome

    drink up, light up, enjoy and go
  • hankpa
    diet sodas (along with gum, whey protein drinks etc etch) have a combination of Acesulfame potassium and 'splenda'. this combination actually made my body 'act' like i had diabetes. i got dizzy, i got the sweats and couldn't see in one eye and had 'spots and swirls' in the other
    ! i had to drink tons of water and i got better.

    i did some research and COMPLETELY got rid of these two chemicals (and HFCS) from my diet (very very very tough to do as you know). know what?

    I HAVE HAD NOOOOO weird reactions anymore. and i've lost weight to boot.

    the FDA care nothing about you people. do some research.
  • hankpa
    diet sodas (along with gum, whey protein drinks etc etch) have a combination of Acesulfame potassium and 'splenda'. this combination actually made my body 'act' like i had diabetes. i got dizzy, i got the sweats and couldn't see in one eye and had 'spots and swirls' in the other
    ! i had to drink tons of water and i got better.

    i did some research and COMPLETELY got rid of these two chemicals (and HFCS) from my diet (very very very tough to do as you know). know what?

    I HAVE HAD NOOOOO weird reactions anymore. and i've lost weight to boot.

    the FDA care nothing about you people. do some research.
  • jimbeaux
    Good for you Hankpa !
  • eldurado
    Posting the same thing three times sort of diffuses your point! Personally your symptoms sound more like a nervous disorder or possible minor stroke, brought on anxiety. Water is good for what ails ya, though!
  • echo
    I NEED some clarification here. When they say "sugar" do they mean High Fructose Corn Syrup?
  • I also forgot to mention all the other products with the HFCS shit in them.
  • All of them from SUGAR? - Journalism FAIL
    Look up HFCS ! Get back to us with the truth.
  • beltman713
    I was gonna say, where the hell can you find soda with sugar in it these days?
  • uupinko998
    No way dude, is there anything thats good that doesnt cause cancer??

    Jess
    www.private-surfing.be.tc
  • michelle
    my grampa drank soda all his life,he is 78 yrs old and he's a very healthy man,
    i think things happen for a reason,people die every day,my aunt was 36, and very healthy woman
    But in a coures of three years she died from stomach cancer,and the doctors said it might have been because she ate too much spicy food,we'll never know what caused her cancer,but you might have heard that all of us have a little cancer inside of us thats just waiting to be awakend....
  • C. Ramba
    Excellent duckspeak, gents! Get your facts straight, quackers! Its the high fructose corn syrup in the soft drinks that causes the problems. Not that artificial sweeteners are any better. Look up "aspartame dangers" on Google and you'll get hundreds of thousands of hits. Talk about thinking outside the box, you couldn't think your way out of a wet paper bag!
  • dennycrane
    Good, at least it isn't gin and tonic.
  • Boson Bison
    NEW STUDY::::: flouride helps the dental work in my small intestine. Studies show that people get paid more for studies which confirm ideas held by population. New psychological study shows that psychologists have less respect for the scientific method than the guy that reads your power meter. Studies show men like tits. New study confirms that people used in studies get all kinds of illness and die and suffer, and the people doing the study don't give a shit. A Blue-Ribbon Commiission formed to study the ethics and value systems of high-level research universities has come to the conclusion that people who use people like guinea pigs in studies have a lower sense of empathy than people who do not use people like guinea pigs in studies. Studies have shown that most people generally trust people who do studies on them, due to their demeanor, dress, and position. Studies have shown that people used in double-blind studies develop paranoia and irrational fears of health care professionals.
  • NadePaulKuciGravMcKi
    High-fructose corn syrup?!
  • leontrotsky
    HFCS is indeed horribly overlooked by MSM articles such as this. The fact that it's a GMO is no doubt largely to blame, let alone the massive pesticides/herbicides/fertilizers involved in our mega-subsidi$ed factoryfarm shytstem which the Dems are fully in bed with.. which now threatens the viabilility of humanity via widescale soil devastation.

    http://www.seedsofdeception.com/Public/GeneticR...


    As for the FRESCA person.. aka "diet" soda.. I for one learned long ago on truly listener-sponsored radio (KPFA) show http://YourOwnHealthAndFitness.org
    that Aspartame, counter-intuitively, in fact makes you fat. Take it from an MD:

    http://www.mercola.com/article/aspartame/danger...


    Fluoride in processed foods is a huge deal, IMO.. sometimes I'll be away from my infrastructure and unable to cook my own beans, then crack open a can and it tastes like nothing but chlorine-- tap water! We and Canada are alone in this madness of fluoridation-- I think it's illegal to dump it in your backyard but the industry has found our bodies as their legit dumping ground.. (can you believe the power of The Establishment to condition parents to drink this Kool-Aid.. literally, selling "Nursery Water" with the poison purposefully added??! Luckily, class-action lawsuits are now getting underway..)

    http://www.fluoridealert.org/govt-statements.htm


    As for the HAMBURGER HELPER story.. definitely.. I'm in a college town and these kids are constantly spreading sickness caused by being diet/sleep ignoramuses. Specifically, MONOSODIUM GLUTAMATE is rediculously under-regulated, as is allowed to be labelled as "natural flavor" or "spices" so we cant even do our capitalist duty and shop against it! Pure lobbyist evil. I see it on the big cans that go into restaurant food (PIZZA!) and then there's the 20 lb. bags of pure MSG I see empty behind the Asian restaurants.. it's a meat tenderizer (tenderizes your brain cells!) slash flavor enhancer.. aka addictive. So they profit directly from piling it on.

    As for the sweet tooth generally-- living in hippy vegetarian co-housing decades ago taught me to lose this idiotic addiction.. one is way happier from doing so-- vegetables are what you crave and directly feel the vitamin nourishment as your eating-time satisfaction, as opposed to the empty sugar-burn high.. listen to the KPFA show above for repeated lecturing on sugar's direct effect in contributing to cancer growth etc.
  • MYMY
    "Although this study found a risk, the finding was based on a relatively small number of cases and it remains unclear whether it is a causal association or not,"--says the Yalie... Why are American universities in the pocket of corporations?

    Over 60,000 people followed over 14 years, and they think that's a relatively small number?? As I recall our guys studied 400 Puerto Rican women for a few years to determine birth control pills were 'safe'...
  • Hmmph
    I think even with people who drink soda in extreme moderation, 2 a week is pretty low. Anyone below that probably is just very disciplined and healthy in other aspects of their lives, unleashing a spurt of confounding variables. I have no doubt people who guzzle soda are unhealthier overall, but I think it is mostly a symptom, not a direct cause.
  • Exactly! People who drink less than two soft drinks a week prolly have a quite different, and more healthy lifestyle. And then, there may be dozens, if not hundreds of factors that may prevenent them from getting cancer. I'm totally flabbergasted by the negligence with which those "scientists" jump at a single conclusion without taking others explanations into account.

    Hell, it my even be the got the causal relationship wrong, and that by a weird coincidence people who have a genetical disposition for tumors also have higher appetite for sugars, who knows? From only looking at the statistics, this can't be determined at all. And scientists should stop hyping every small finding they made, and only alarm the public when they have real evidence, not only lousy guesswork.
  • rad
    I'll just wait till next week when this study is contradicted by some other study. still drinking my coke everyday.
  • crankshaft
    High Fructose Corm Syrup has been show to be contaminated with mercury. Aspartame, Ace-K, Sucralose, et. al are also very harmful to health. Read about Donald Rumsfeld getting Aspartame approved inspite of studies showing a link to brain cancer when he was CEO of GD Searle! It's clear we're being poisoned with GMO food, fluoride in the water (the EPA asked for this to be stopped), chemtrail spraying, etc.
  • yanktank61
    Gee soft drinks (and fast food related to soft drinks) contribute to pancreatic cancer?? Sure thing. Plus we should remember that if you are obese (from eating too much sugar and processed foods) there is an increase in diabetes, cancer, high blood pressure, bad teethe......

    I have a young roommate who eats/drinks/sleeps the pop lifestyle and his diet will surely shorten his life. He drinks as much coke as he can....eats hamberger helper (at best), heats microwaveable dinners in the oven? The smell of plastic in the morning smells like.....cancer. But nothing you can tell him or others like him will make a difference. Ever try telling a (an unthinkinly) rebellious young person to not indulge in some sort of self-destructive behavior? Once the health problems start it is already too late. Avoiding soft drinks, fast food, smoking are all preventative behaviors that have predictable consequences.

    Then again I think my roommate could survive oxygen deprevation and I would not notice any difference in his behavior.
  • "The smell of plastic in the morning smells like.....cancer."
    Hehehe, good one!
    But really, heating plastic in the oven? Totally nuts!
  • yanktank61
    Yes he heats plastic in the oven at 350 degrees and I am going to talk to him about that. Though I am not fond of the practice in a microwave it is preferable to using the oven. The poor boy is clueless and his summary behavior has horrible long-term consequences. He is only 25 (and acts like he is 17). Poor thing is not too bright...
  • jimbeaux
  • thx1138
    .
    WORLD'S FATTEST NATION THANKS AGRIBUSINESS SUBSIDIES: HIGH-FRUCTOSE CORN SYRUP

    -- Corporate Farming Perfects Art Of Scamming U.S. Citizenry To Pay For Their Own Poisoning --

    -- Luckily, Some Sick Citizens Can Pay Through Nose To Corporate Health Care For Lousy Treatment --
    .
  • leontrotsky
    THX1138 .. great name because it was Lucas' best movie, and all should see it! I want to respond to your cryptic statement,
    "Luckily, Some Sick Citizens Can Pay Through Nose To Corporate Health Care For Lousy Treatment"...
    more to the point, a certain Sick-O megacorporate Political Party is pushing for a codification of the for-profit system in a way that will put
    uniformed men with guns in a position to force those of us WHO TAKE CARE OF OURSELVES to pay for obese, crazy people's super-overpriced diabetes and experimental mind drugs. Let it know that this is completely untenable, as these doctors have:
    Physicians for a National Health Plan http://pnhp.org/news
  • leontrotsky
    THX1138 .. great name because it was Lucas' best movie, and all should see it! I want to respond to your cryptic statement,
    "Luckily, Some Sick Citizens Can Pay Through Nose To Corporate Health Care For Lousy Treatment"...
    more to the point, a certain Sick-O megacorporate Political Party is pushing for a codification of the for-profit system in a way that will put
    uniformed men with guns in a position to force those of us who take care of ourselves to pay for obese, crazy people's super-overpriced diabetes and experimental mind drugs. Let it know that this is completely untenable, as these doctors have:
    Physicians for a National Health Plan http://pnhp.org/news
  • Jersey boy
    My dad did not drink soda at all. His sugar intake was minimal. his HFCS intake was what he could get by with. He died of PC. This is hogwash.
  • unsaneviews
    Jersey Boy. Life is far more complicated that it seems you want to admit. That your father died of this disease (I am so sorry about that) says absolutely nothing important about this study. For something to increase there has to be a baseline rate, and your father was a very unlucky case. My mom's best friend died of a form of lung cancer associated with asbestos without ever having significant exposure. It happens. It is not at all accurate to think about things as having absolute causes in most cases, but a plethora of synergistic forces, from genetics, environment, stress, diet, etc. Most "cancers" we get are readily managed by the bodies immune system. That's right. We all get "cancer" all the time, and the body clears it out. The ones that kill or harm us are the ones that we do not manage to control. Reality is far more complicated than calling a controlled study hogwash.
  • rhetoricus
    Some people who don't smoke die of lung cancer. Doesn't mean that smoking doesn't increase the chance that you will die of lung cancer.
  • dano J
    Don't expect the US govt to point out the obvious. The US govt has been bought out by the CEOS and big pharma. Not even the CC is going to warn you about anything that might cut into the profits of their clients instead they can't shout enough how 'dangerous' product are -products that are cheap and have been tested by human subjects not for decades but through centuries.

    hundreds of thousands die of drug over-dose and drug interaction in the US-the rest of the world -especially third world countries there aren't even proper reulations to control the sale and consumption of these drugs.


    People like Susan Mayne (of the Yale Cancer Center at Yale University) are there not to warn us of whats not good for us. They are they to lull any doubt about these dangerous products, playing on the traditional trust that the public have for these instittutions.

    Take my advice and revert to herbal cures-especially for minor illnesses. Every culture hs its treasure of herbal cures-though most cultures have lost touch with these. Also the internet has a wealth of advice on natural cures and also the dangers of processes and synthethic foods.

    my favorite is earthclinic.com where people have posted their personel testimonies so one has an idea of what a particular threatment might entail.

    SAY NO TO PEPSI, SAY NO TO COKE> SAY NO TO ALL THINGS ARTIFICIAL.
  • Zatarain's root beer concentrate and raw sugar! Now that's a drink!
  • Scott550
    Well, it's not the same thing at all as the natural, healthy fructose in honey and fruit. "High-fructose corn syrup" is a highly refined, artificial product. It is created through an intricate process that transforms cornstarch into a thick, clear liquid. White sugar and "high-fructose corn syrup" are not the same. Industry advocates for corn growers say that they are the same. But nutritional science studies say that there is a big difference between the two. "High-fructose corn syrup" is, in fact, worse than sugar.

    Research has shown that "high-fructose corn syrup" goes directly to the liver, releasing enzymes that instruct the body to then store fat. This elevates triglyceride (fat in blood) levels and elevate cholesterol levels. Also, it does not stimulate insulin production, which usually creates a sense of being full. Therefore, people may eat more than they should. Indications also are that the important chromium levels are lowered by this sweetener which may then contribute to type 2 diabetes.
  • sunshine
    Sugar isn't the problem - High fructose corn syrup is.
  • Satan
    Mexican pop uses real sugar. Their Coke is made with real sugar. Jarritos is good too.
  • tarlipps
    Still 130 calories and all from sugar but it's real good.
  • freshwater
    in regards to weight gain, they're the same. i lived in asia for many years. drinkable tap water is nonexistent. i found myself drinking soft drinks instead of buying bottled water. in 6 months my weight went up 20%. after a couple years i returned back home. i got back in good shape and lost the weight. but i sort of went nuts eating all the sweet items i loved as a kid and couldn't find overseas. after so many years of no good ice-cream, candy, chocolate, pies, cakes, more soda... my weight went back up and my health became very very bad. i actually thought i was beginning down the road to death. body pain, constant diarrhoea, head aches, fatigue... then i thought about totally changing my diet to fresh foods. as much organic as i could find. i still eat meat. in two month i lost 20% of my weight. i felt good. i was also playing racket ball. i did miss some kind of sweet drink though. i started drinking 100% fresh squeezed OJ. sometimes costco also had Odwalla 100% strawberry/lemonade. my weight went back up 20%. after a year i quick the juice, only water, and i lost 20% weight.

    it's the sugar that makes me gain weight. (along with the oils and other usual suspects). for the part of "bad health" i can't determine if it was the HFCS in the ice-cream, cakes, soda... that brought that on. but it sure seems like research teams could quickly figure that out by serving a test group only organic sweets. maybe "they" don't want us to know? it might slow down the cash flow from patients to doctors to HMOs to some bad democrats to republicans to defense contractors to terrorists to archer daniels midland.

    i've just stumbled on this conclusion. it seems to me scientists, doctors, university research teams, corporate research teams would know this?
  • jimbeaux
    Actually there is no difference between refined sugar & HFCS ( almost like the tv ad says) - the only thing they don't say - is that they're actually both bad for you.

    http://www.sugarshockblog.com/2009/09/sugar-the...
  • shaunsnapp
    Yes, that is false. HFCS is extremely well documented as being worse for you than sugar, which is already bad for you. The only people who contest this now are the HFCS manufacturers. All they can say is "its healthy in moderation." Which less is better than more, but its not healthy at all full stop.
  • The ads say HFCS is not NUTRITIONALLY different from sugar, which is true. But, it is CHEMICALLY different from sugar and affects our bodies differently, that is what is trying to be obscured by this HFCS campaign.
  • False! Refined sugar consists of both glucose and fructose. HFCS is more fructose. And that may be the problem, since the body can't cope with tht stuff in the same way as glucose. For instance, recepetors react on glucose with reducing the appetite. So, your body knows that you have taken calories in! But no reaction to fructose. You can have more and more of this shit without getting a feedback. And, of course, food producers love it when you eat and drink more, thus they prefer HFCS! More about this in this excellent lecture on "Sugar: The bitter truth":
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dBnniua6-oM
  • JakeW83
    Actually, you are retarded for swallowing that shit.
  • rhetoricus
    This is not true, but it's what the sellers of HFCS try to convince people of. In soda, it has been found that by using HFCS instead of pure sugar it can make the soda 10 times richer in harmful carbonyl compounds. Carbonyl compounds are elevated in people with diabetes and are blamed for causing diabetic complications such as foot ulcers and eye and nerve damage. Foods with increased fructose produce significantly higher fasting plasma triacylglycerol values than did the glucose diet in men. Plasma triacylglycerols are a risk factor for cardiovascular disease.

    According to an article in SF Gate, “The body processes the fructose in high fructose corn syrup differently than it does old-fashioned cane or beet sugar, which in turn alters the way metabolic-regulating hormones function. It also forces the liver to kick more fat out into the bloodstream.”

    So it's not that sugar is good, it's that HFCS is worse.
  • easterling
    Interestingly HFCS is never mentioned in this article? I know that Coke in Mexico has cane sugar. I do not know if Coke or other soft drinks in Singapore contain HFCS or cane sugar? A Mexican Coke containing cane sugar costs $1.50 a bottle at a local grocery store. One would think that an article citing a study 14 years in length would contain a bit more information?
  • Baldrick
    Black Cherry Fresca! No calories, no sugar, great taste.
  • piltdown
    And loaded with aspartame.

    No thanks.
  • DownriverDem
    Isn't Fresca a diet drink? Diet drinks cause cancer too. I would be very concerned about diet pop. I never touch the stuff because it tastes so bad. Anything that tastes that bad can't be good for you.
  • Baldrick
    How is Fresca a diet drink? It doesn't taste watery like Diet Coke/Pepsi. The regular and flavored varieties have never had sugar, does that make it a diet drink? Is water a diet drink?
  • DownriverDem
    Isn't Fresca considered a diet drink? Is it artifically sweetened? This has nothing to do with water. I'm asking you.
  • S in PA
    I am old and can remember the 70s. As I recall, Fresca was marketed as a diet drink back then.

    Also, FWIW, HFCS = Monsanto and Aspartame = Monsanto. Evil and dangerous.
  • DownriverDem
    That's what I remember too. That guy better check the label for additives.
  • matticusfinch
    no more soda for me!
  • RF
    There is no sugar in any of the soda on the MArket... If there were, I might have an occasional soft drink, but the days of sugar as an ingredient in soda ar elong gone- The replacement ingredient is the culprit-
  • Nunya
    Jolt has always had sugar. "Twice the caffeine, all the sugar" was their logo. It has been re-introduced as of the early 2000s, but I dont know the exact composition & too lazy to look it up.
  • toneii
    Dr. Pepper and Mt. Dew have a new "retro" cane sugar version in the pop machine at Publix. It even uses the 60's label style. It tastes better to me, but I only drink on special occasion, so I only tried one.
  • Phil E. Drifter
    Incorrect and how ignorant of you to just make a blanket statement like that, 'there is no sugar in any soda on the market,' as if you'd investigated every brand on earth to make that claim.

    Pepsi Throwback uses sugar instead of HFCS. And they reproduce their old bottle style with it.And they brazenly advertise right on the label: make with real sugar!

    http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/younga...
  • philbrittain
    BINGO! You beat me to it. Since they put HFCS in soda, in the mid 80s, Diabetes have increased at a rate of over 400%. Coincidence? If think not. Of course the government has a different take. They back PepsiCo, etc. when they say that metabolically HFCS and cane sugar are the same. They say it even tastes the same. That is total and complete BULLSHIT. You can tell from drinking the Pepsi Throwbacks and passover cokes. Also, I don't get digestive issues from drinking Pepsi Throwback as I do the regular stuff.

    Then again, since corporations and the US Government say they are the same it has to be something else because they are only looking out for my well-being. Right?!
blog comments powered by Disqus