Study: Third hand smoke also bad for you

By Agence France-Presse
Tuesday, February 9th, 2010 -- 12:27 pm

WASHINGTON (AFP) – You know smoking is bad for you. You know inhaling someone else's smoke is bad for you. Now a US study says third-hand smoke -- tobacco residue clinging to surfaces -- is also bad for you.

When a cigarette burns, nicotine is released in the form of a vapor that collects and condenses on indoor surfaces such as walls, carpeting, drapes and furniture, where it can linger for months, said the study, which was published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS).

"Our study shows that when this residual nicotine reacts with ambient nitrous acid it forms carcinogenic tobacco-specific nitrosamines, or TSNAs," said Hugo Destaillats, a corresponding author of the study.

"TSNAs are among the most broadly acting and potent carcinogens present in unburned tobacco and tobacco smoke," he said.

The most likely human exposure to TSNAs is through either inhalation of dust or the contact of skin with carpet or clothes -- making third-hand smoke particularly dangerous to infants and toddlers.

Story continues below...

Opening a window or turning on a fan to air out a room while a cigarette burns does not eliminate the hazard of third-hand smoke. Smoking outdoors doesn't help much either.

"Smoking outside is better than smoking indoors but nicotine residues will stick to a smoker's skin and clothing," said Lara Gundel, a co-author of the study.

"Those residues follow a smoker back inside and get spread everywhere. The biggest risk is to young children," she said.
"Dermal uptake of the nicotine through a child's skin is likely to occur when the smoker returns and if nitrous acid is in the air, which it usually is, then TSNAs will be formed."

Substantial levels of TSNAs were also found in the truck of a heavy smoker, the study says, adding that most vehicle engines emit some nitrous acid that can infiltrate the passenger compartment of a vehicle.

Researchers from the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory led the study, which they say is the first to quantify the reactions of third-hand smoke with nitrous acid.

Share this article:
  • Print
  • email
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

  • I mixed a rum and coke, and had a smoke too. Probably cost me about $5 but what the hell. If they ban smoking it will become just another illecit drug, and we have all seen how well they stop the distribution and sale of those!!
  • Gray
    Let's follow the money instead of the smoke: It's the "Tobacco-Related Disease Research Program" which funds this study. And not only this one, but the research of lots of scientists at Berkeley, among them Gundel, is paid for by this source:
    http://www.trdrp.org/fundedresearch/GrantSearch...

    Hmm, imho this is something that should be noted in those news reports, don't you think? Well, and why was TRDRP created? "The Legislature asked the University of California to establish and administer a research program to facilitate the elimination of smoking in California"!
    http://www.trdrp.org/programinfo/Mission.asp

    Uhuh, so a program whose purpose is to get rid of smoking, funds studies which consequently find that all things nicotine are harmful? What a surprise!!! And only nitpicking people would conclude that such an approach, where the desired result is known before research even started, isn't totally in sync with scientific ethics...
  • Gray
    Just to emphasize aa critical point: The sheer amount of studies (dozens!) and the costs ($700,000 only for this one) show that obviously lots of scientists at Berkeley work EXCLUSIVELY for the anti-smoking pogram TRDRP. And still, they state in their papers they have "no conflicts of interest". Yeah, sure. Just like the guy who delivers your pizza has no conflict of interest, too. It's his job. But he knows he will be fired if he refuses to bring pizza, but lasagne instead.
  • WilyArmadilla
    You know....if everything in the world was as freakin' deadly as these Chicken Little's make it out to be, not one of us would have made it out of childhood as anything other than a desease- riddled shell. Nor would our parents, who grew up in a time when smoking was as common as the cold!

    Sure, maybe it isn't GOOD for you, but it isn't gonna kill you either. These people, and folks like them, are just trying to gin up their results to justify their grant funding.
  • If toys from China contained the amount of toxins the furniture and carpet in smokers' apartments do, there would be a huge outrcy. Yet there is nothing done to protect children from their smoking parents. There isn't even any kind of regulation for smoking in cars when kids are present that I am aware of.
    For some reason, whenever a new study shows a new facet of the madness of smoking, smokers call it "shit".
  • theoracle
    Oh, and death is a pre-existing condition we all have at birth.
  • theoracle
    Just living is hazardous to one's health.
  • tino
    why don't they study the effects of working in a kitchen where fast food is made, man working fast food made my lungs hurt bad, and anybody that works faste food comes home stinking like the crap from the kitchen, that stuff can't be healthy to work around, that leaves a thick film of something on everything, you can feel in on cloths its like the grease on bacon, just imagine what breathing it does to ones lungs, these employees need health insurance bad as I'm sure they're minimum wage + cents doesn't cover the health checkups they probably all need

    for now they're just wasting time worrying about 3rd hand smoke, next thing you know they'll waste money and intellectual resources to study whether you get cancer by masturbating to pictures of people who smoke cigarettes... effing dumb
  • Ron
    I can't wait for the fourth-hand, fifth-hand and sixth-hand smoke declarations. Next they will declare smokers "serial murders" or "genocidal maniacs"! ANYTHING to appease anti-vitaminB3ers.
  • Nick
    You could live your whole life in a sterile room, filled with pure oxygen, eating organic food, exercising for hours, and you're still going to die. We are mortal creatures, cells decay and we die. Nothing you do or don't do will ever change that.
  • thepoliticalcat
    Note that they haven't said just how severe the effects are. Are they looking at people who smoke a pack a day? Or one cigarette a day? It's well-known that the processed meats contain very high levels of nitrosamines. Are those MORE dangerous than third-hand cigarette smoke? Or less? Eating corned beef and cabbage with a little bread or potatoes should pack a nice nitrosamine wallop. Why don't we hear more warnings about that? Or would the Irish find that annoying? I don't blame the scientists for the finding, by the way. I blame the science-ignorant media. I'll bet the actual study shows some infinitesimally tiny increase in risk, and the reporters, having failed math, and especially statistics, are just fearmongering, as usual. Feckin' eejits.
  • Gray
    Where are any statements about the level of dangerr here? How many really get health prroblems? 1 in 100000? 1 in a million? That scientists are able to show a potential hazard under laboratory conditions still does't make it real.
  • Over The Target
    constant geoengineering for 3 years (plane spraying) has no bad health effects?

    STFU and stop spraying the skies !
  • MedfordTim
    What a load of shit!
  • Kevin
    Wait until they confirm that it's the chemicals in all our plastic objects that are causing autism. Then they can accuse someone else of killing their children for a change.
  • JoshJ89
    This article really makes me want a cigarette..but I'm out. Good to know i can just inhale from my drapes.
  • kajaja420
    So are my bathroom walls covered with third hand residual shit? First there's the matter, then there's the smell, then the particles. Am I consuming this third hand shit that's on my walls and most likely tooth brush? And yes, my point is cigarette's are perfectly healthy and logical if that's the point you thought I was trying to make.
  • gypski
    Give me a fucking break. Our political state is more a danger to people then fucking 3rd hand smoke. Quit your fucking nanny bullshit and move on in life. Humans will do human things and its nobody else's business. And, its even been proven that of all smokers, only 25% contract cancer. If everybody quit smoking the government would have to tax you for breathing clean air.
  • howiebledsoe
    EVERYTHING is bad for you. get over it.
  • N.lyndsteele
    It's amazing there is anyone over the age of 25 left in this country. Let alone France or other countries where they don't babysit to the Grave.
  • Gray
    Yup, it's really becoming ridiculous. I wonder how mankind did manage to survive for so long. If we believe all the hype of those scientists, and add up all the alleged risks, I'm sure we'll find that one in every ten people will die every year because of one health hazard or another. Makes me wonder why we're not all dead yet.
  • Will
    Shut up!
blog comments powered by Disqus