USGS claims Venezuela sits on Earth’s largest oil reserves

By Stephen C. Webster
Saturday, January 23rd, 2010 -- 1:30 pm
Share on Facebook Stumble This!

hugochavezupclose USGS claims Venezuela sits on Earths largest oil reservesVenezuela may have just become the center of an energy-starved world.

The Orinoco Belt, situated squarely underneath the South American nation, may hold some 513 billion barrels of crude oil, according to a new report by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS).

That's twice the size of Saudi Arabia's oil reserves, placing Venezuela firmly atop the list of oil-rich nations.

The timing of the USGS announcement is striking. On Jan. 28, international firms will take part in an auction for contracts to drill in the Orinoco Belt. The deadline for auction registration was Jan 18, according to industry publication Petroleum World. Results will be announced on Feb. 10.

However, the USGS did not make an estimate of how much oil is actually recoverable. The Orinoco Belt's reserves are typically thick and tar-like, with some patches difficult to reach with current drilling technology.

Story continues below...

"The initial opening of the Orinoco oil belt resulted in a major production boost in the region, but ended in legal controversy, when state-owned Petroleos de Venezuela S.A. took over control of the projects in 2007 under a new hydrocarbons law," a Dow Jones release noted. "ExxonMobil and ConocoPhillips left, starting arbitration proceedings against the country. Chevron, Total and other international companies stayed."

"Knowing the potential for extractable resources from this tremendous oil accumulation, and others like it, is critical to our understanding of the global petroleum potential and informing policy and decision makers," said USGS Energy Resources Program Coordinator Brenda Pierce, in an advisory. "Accumulations like this one were previously very difficult to produce, but advances in technology and new understandings in geology allow us to assess how much is now technically recoverable."

The primary beneficiary of Venezuelan oil is the United States, which consumed 19.5 million barrels of domestic and imported crude per day in 2008, according to the USGS.

Venezuelan socialist leader Hugo Chavez, a longtime antagonist to U.S. political leaders, recently approved construction of a massive oil refinery as a joint venture between state-run Petróleos de Venezuela and China's state-run CNPC. The project, projected to cost some $6 billion USD, would ensure a steady flow to as much as 10 percent of China's oil imports, according to Reuters. China consumed 7.9 million barrels of crude oil per day in 2008, according to the USGS.

The announcement is likely to cause waves in Venezuela's political circles, where oil diplomacy has been a key to the country's global outreach. That the estimate comes from a U.S. firm is also likely to sharpen President Chavez's rhetoric, which has in recent months repeatedly decried U.S. military presence in neighboring Colombia.

As recently as November, 2009, Chavez warned Venezuelans to "prepare for war" with the United States and Colombia, arguing that rapidly expanding defense spending was prudent in the face of such a perceived threat. The U.S. State Department claimed its agreement, settled in August, allows U.S. soldiers to operate drone aircraft from Colombian military bases as a way of prosecuting the drug war.

Shortly after the announcement, Colombia said it would suspend all gas exports to Venezuela. In response, Chavez froze all diplomatic ties with the country.

Ecuador, Bolivia, Brazil and Argentina have also objected to Washington's plan to use Colombian military bases, calling the US military deployment suspiciously large.

Share this article:
  • Print
  • email
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Story comments are below...

  • Armando
    Dont talk about something you dont know stupids... Venezuela had a constitution before chavez! He is a criminal

    Im a venezuela. so dont talk about something you dond know
  • musicramis
    It's great that we have alot of people who are aware of what's REALLY happening in the world, like the gentlemen that are ex-military and know firsthand about the corruption that exists in the military as far as them being used for purposes other that the intended. Big business unfortunately calls the shots and misuse our brave brothers and sisters in arms to guard thier wallets at the expense of the Armed Forces. Thanks to the gentelmen who are brave enough to come forward and expose this. Hopefully others will read and understand the injustice that our Armed Forces is facing.
  • You know what this means? Venezuela has a US-led invasion in its future, all to fight "terrorism" or "drugs" of course. Venezuela has the gall to actually claim its oil as its own and that oil revenue should remain largely in-country to benefit the people of Venezuela. That simply cannot be tolerated by Wall Street and it's pets in DC,
  • yaright
    Watch your back, Hugo.
  • Possum
    Check out this article that can be found on David Icke Website (davidicke.com) under latest headlines:

    Saturday, 23 January 2010
    Now, why is the US government pouring troops into Haiti to take over the country at the expense of humanitarian aid? Er ...
    Haiti is full of oil say scientists
    "The Central Plateau, including the region of Thomond, the plain of the cul-de-sac and the bay of Port-au-Prince are filled with oil, he said, adding that Haiti's oil reserves are larger than those of Venezuela. An Olympic pool compared to a glass of water that is the comparison to show the importance of oil Haitian compared to those of Venezuela, "he explains. Venezuela is one of the world's largest producers of oil."

    USGS American smokescreen? Hmmmmmm
  • Possum
    Check out this article that can be found on David Icke Website (davidicke.com) under latest headlines:

    Saturday, 23 January 2010
    Now, why is the US government pouring troops into Haiti to take over the country at the expense of humanitarian aid? Er ...
    Haiti is full of oil say scientists
    "The Central Plateau, including the region of Thomond, the plain of the cul-de-sac and the bay of Port-au-Prince are filled with oil, he said, adding that Haiti's oil reserves are larger than those of Venezuela. An Olympic pool compared to a glass of water that is the comparison to show the importance of oil Haitian compared to those of Venezuela, "he explains. Venezuela is one of the world's largest producers of oil."

    USGS American smokescreen? Hmmmmmm
  • MemphisBill
    Clearly we must liberate Venezuela from the evil dictator Hugo Chavez. He is a communist, a socialist, a supporter of terrorism, a hider of weapons of mass destruction and he has no fashion sense. Nothing to do with the oil, nothing at all.
  • mmeflutterbye
    No country that has rich resources is safe from predator countries. Guess who the biggest predator is... Aw com'on you can guess.
  • ziply
    Yep. Won't be long until we trump up some reason to go to war with Venezuela, or support a proxy. How the h*ll did OUR OIL get under VENEZUELA'S DIRT anyway????
  • Mr. Neutron
    The only reason stories about the extremely heavy oil of Venezuela's Orinoco Belt, or the oil sands of Canada's Alberta's Athabasca are being brought up these days,

    is because of Peak Oil.

    They are trying to pacify the ignorant public into thinking there is "plenty of oil" right before the sh!t hits the fan. The difference between pumping crude oil, and *processing* heavy tar or sticky sand is the difference between turning on your faucet and walking 5 miles to pump water into a bucket.

    One lets you get on with life as usual - the other one is like a kick in the teeth.

    Welcome to Peak Oil.
    There's plenty of oil - please standby while we try to get it to you fast enough...
  • Mr Neutron,

    The few dollars per barrel of extra processing expense will be noticed much less at the gas pump than the extra cost of our current 10% ethanol mandate.

    Heavy oil's biggest worry is actually the abundance of light oil:

    http://alethonewsa.wordpress.com/2009/10/01/eas...

    "Peak oil" was nothing more than fearmongering.
  • Mr. Neutron
    You miss the point entirely -
    it's not a question of the oil becoming a 'bit more expensive'.

    It's a question of supply keeping up with demand - which it won't be able to, because processing those "huge reserves" of heavy tar, oil sands, or the 'shale oil' of the American West, take too damn long.
    Get it ?
    They don't *pump* the stuff, like they do for conventional crude - they *process* it.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Athabasca_Oil_Sand...
    The oil sands of Canada produce about 1.5 million barrels/day of syncrude. They *hope* to get that up to 5 mb/d by 2028.
    Meanwhile, ONE conventional crude well, Cantarell in Mexico, dropped from 2.1 mb/d in 2003, to 0.5 mb/d last year. A DROP of 1.6 mb/d in 6 years.

    Production rates - that's the whole game.
    Peak Oil - when the global production rates can only go down...
  • The only factor that impedes more rapid development of heavy oil infrastructure is the abundance of light oil.

    Honestly, do you really think that humanity is incapable of refining petroleum???
  • Mr. Neutron
    If light oil is so "abundant", why are they bothering with oil sands in Canada, heavy tar in Venezuela, and shale rock in the U.S. West ?

    And the "refining" begins only after the crude oil is delivered. The ability to *deliver* that synthetic crude is the issue here - that is the time bottleneck. Do I really think it will be hard for people to speed up the processing of this low quality stuff ? Yes I do - read the links I gave.

    In fact, read up for a few years, and come back when you graduate high school.
  • Savantster
    This guy is fairly detached .. he uses 1/2 assed logic on one side to prop up a failed idea, then uses 1/2 assed logic on the other side to tear down other ideas. Bitching about ethanol in gas, which helps but costs money, then says the more expensive way of doing things isn't important because we have the technology, and that's all that matters.. So, using the technology to improve fuel combustion at a little cost is bad, but massive costs to get the usable oil out of stuff, no big deal? .... and all to avoid the underlying problem, we need to eventually get off oil, and sooner is better than later.
  • lschupp
    We should be making nice with Huge Chavez, encouraging him to be a democratic socialist like some of the Scandinavian countries. Fighting with him, following the hostility of George Bush, who, at least rhetorically and may be more, supported a coup against Chavez, who, unlike Bush, had received a majority of the popular vote and was thus a legitimately elected president. It may be too late; it may be that Chavez lacks the character to be democratic. But it is worth a try. He has supported the poor in his country and has attempted to help the poor in this country with home heating oil. Trying for better relations is better than angering an oil power close to home who, at least, is not a right-wing dictator like our other past best friends in the area, men who "disappeared" their democratic critics--men like Pinochet in Chile, the right-wing generals and tyrants we embraced throughout the area, throughout the 80s and the 2000-2008 period.
  • wiseturtle
    NOW you know why they have been fucking with him these past 5 years!!!
  • John Drake
    And…all China has to do is stop buying our federal debt, dump their FRN's, and the guv'mint will be up shit's creek…but I forgot, they are already there! But we can always outsource our killing machine with Xe (aka Blackwater and the rest of the hoodlums) and the CIA can pump billions into a blue/green/yellow/orange/you-pick-the-color Revolution and topple Hugo "once and for all"…Then the IMF can swoop in with loans tied to dismantling their economy and social resources and crash the local curency, cause hyperinflation/deflation/whatever, and we'll be back to owning another banana republic (created by our own little greedy hands). Sounds like Obama will be the "even better War-time President" they all lust after to dupe the hoople-heads of the Murikan public into sending sons and daughters off to visit foreign lands, see exotic sites, and kill locals by the score.
  • Atilla
    Notice also, that now that with the threat to oil prices by the renewable energy sources starting to come on line the petrocriminals are finding new huge sources of oil previously unknown to the average citizen.(Imagine that!) Wind and solar needs to be heavily subsidized or as soon as the renewable energy industry goes in the tank the price of oil will rise to strangle our economy again, for the third time in my lifetime. Farking criminals!!
  • The biggest rip off is forcing you to subsidize uneconomic corporate energy like the present nuclear, wind and solar industries.

    The real "farking" criminals are the shills that pushed the phony scarcity "peak oil" meme.
  • Savantster
    Oil is heavily subsidized as well.. billions in tax breaks, and $700 billion for our Military to continue one more year of securing oil fields and pipe lines in the Middle East.

    I suspect you deny global climate change as well. You and the rest of the shit flinging monkeys should go back into the trees and eat maggots. You're not suited to an advanced, civilized, _enlightened_ society. You seem driven by personal gain, greed, and willful ignorance; worst of all, you're content to let other human beings suffer and die slow miserable death so you can have more luxuries that do nothing to fundamentally help you live your life.
  • Mr. Neutron
    Peak Oil is about production rates, Einstein.

    "513 billion barrels" of heavy tar doesn't mean squat if they can only produce it at 2 or 3 million barrels per day 20 years from now.
    Same goes for the oil sands of Canada, and the hydrocarbon lakes of Titan, moon of Saturn. It doesn't help that "we know they're there".

    These media "feel good" stories never mention the 'flip side' of oil production - the huge megafields that have been pumped for 50 or 60 years and are declining at 6% or 7% per year. All new oil production has to make up for lost production at existing fields, *plus* cover any demanded growth. The media always forgets to mention *that* part of the story - they concentrate on new finds, as if that production is added to a *constant* base of production.
  • Mr Neutron,

    The few dollars per barrel of extra processing expense will be noticed much less at the gas pump than the extra cost of our current 10% ethanol mandate.

    Heavy oil's biggest worry is actually the abundance of light oil:

    http://alethonewsa.wordpress.com/2009/10/01/eas...
  • Savantster
    ethanol additives help the fuel burn more completely and reduce pollution. But, who cares, right? it costs you some pennies and you don't like it. Fuck everyone else and their clean air, right?
  • Sonnetta
    I just have to say, after reading all your comments here, I have never been so proud of the U.S. military veterans as I have been today. Thank you, all of you, for confirming what I have come to know, and 'Not' what is being fed to us through corporate media. "Terrorism" = OIL> Greed> War x Big $ Business= "Terrorism"
  • Syed
    Next EARTH QUAKE will be in Venezuella.
  • atlantis
    Venezuela sits on the world`s largest oil reserves.
    And what business is that of the United States?
  • angrymamma
    this explains why Bush tried to kill off Chavez. you can be sure Chavez is way ahead of the US on this topic.
  • thx1138a
    .
    U.S. INTEL SERVICES DISCOVER VENEZUELAN CONNECTION TO AL-QAEDA, WMDs, 9/11

    -- USGS Renames Country's Largest Seaport, "Gulf of Venezuela", To "Gulf of Tonkin" --

    -- CNN Reports Chavez Behind Advanced IED Attacks On U.S. Forces Occupying Nearby Haiti --
    .
  • This Disqus comment wasn't working yesterday.
    I did 13 years active duty in the USMC and Navy. We helped protect the rich and for the Kuwati royals to keep their wealth. I knew it was a load of b.s. when I was in and spoke out on it but I did my time and got out with an honorable. I come home to a damn police state on the domestic front.

    "They" have been after Chavez ever since the CIA's coup attempt failed. I would expect to see some sort of staged terror attack set up by the black ops on American soil or USA inc., interests and blamed on Chavez to set up a pre-emptive strike.
  • mikjall
    Hooray for all of you American servicemen who have seen through all of the bullshit and are willing to say so, following in the footsteps of U.S. Marine Major General Smedley Darlington Butler (1881-1940), two-time winner of the Congressional Medal of Honor (once for service in Haiti), author of "War is a Racket" (1935), which I recommend that everyone read in a free hour, and the man who said, in a 1933 speech:
    "I spent 33 years and four months in active military service and during that period I spent most of my time as a high class muscle man for Big Business, for Wall Street and the bankers. In short, I was a racketeer, a gangster for capitalism. I helped make Mexico and especially Tampico safe for American oil interests in 1914. I helped make Haiti and Cuba a decent place for the National City Bank boys to collect revenues in. I helped in the raping of half a dozen Central American republics for the benefit of Wall Street. I helped purify Nicaragua for the International Banking House of Brown Brothers in 1902-1912. I brought light to the Dominican Republic for the American sugar interests in 1916. I helped make Honduras right for the American fruit companies in 1903. In China in 1927 I helped see to it that Standard Oil went on its way unmolested. Looking back on it, I might have given Al Capone a few hints. The best he could do was to operate his racket in three districts. I operated on three continents."
    Too bad the Marine recruiters don't hand that out in the high school parking lots!
  • Narvi
    Expect an Earthquake in Venezuela and U.S. push to war in Venezuela.
  • icenine
    Cheney can't sleep at night now, knowing that there's the biggest oil reserve in the world and he was too busy starting wars in the Middle East to try to steal it. Well, it's never too late for him and I'm sure its now on the to-do list. Imagine if we had had leaders half as smart as the Chinese we could have had a huge refinery built down there and $50/barrel oil. Instead we tried to overthrow Chavez in a CIA coup. Look at the difference between Venezuela and Saudi Arabia. Chavez has helped the 90% of his country that were dirt poor have land reform and better lives. He is popular with his people. And then there's the harsh dictatorship of the Saudi's where they don't seem to give a rat's ass about their poor population and are not nearly as well liked. And yet, we kiss the Saudi's ass and try to kill Chavez.
  • I'm curious why no one has brought up the fact that this may be a typical OPEC style scam that allows Venezuela to sell more oil(OPEC limits each member nation to only sell x% reserves per Y) than they have. This is a classic scam by member nations to sell more oil than their fair share.

    I'm not saying this is the case, i'm just curious to see that it hasn't been brought up.
  • Savantster
    Because it was the United States Geological Survey, not OPEC.. why would the U.S. help Chavez?
  • Rodolfo
    I am Venezuelan and is a real shame that we are sitting in such a rich soil and most of the people is poor. Chavez is the worst criminal dictator ever in the Latin American history, he has given all this money to buy votes all over latin america and idiot goverments to support the kiling of the Venezuela's democracy.
    All his people are now very rich , his family and closest friends, he has destroyed the future of new generations with his stupid comunist ideas.
    Chavez must be stop no matter which way, it will be a great favor for the Venezuelans and the world.
  • Savantster
    http://www.rethinkvenezuela.com/downloads/ceprp...

    guess if it wasn't "instant", you missed it?
  • mikjall
    Rodolfo, you may have good reason to dislike Chavez; there are certainly legitimate criticisms of his régime. And, like all of us, you are entitled to your opinion. However, your statement that "Chavez is the worst criminal dictator ever in the Latin American history" (if you actually believe it) betrays an astonishing ignorance of Latin American history, unbecoming of a Venezuelan. And Chavez can only be described as a "dictator" under the current political conventions for using language in such a way that nothing means anything any more (e.g. calling Obama a "Socialist"). It is strange that Chavez gets regularly called a "dictator", "strongman", "kingpin", whereas you never see that said of Silvio Berlusconi in Italy, to whom the description "criminal dictator" applies much more justifiably than to Hugo Chavez (although even for Berlusconi it's a misnomer). So far, the CIA has not staged a coup against Berlusconi, or attempted to destabilize the Italian government (any more than they acted against Maximiliano Hernández Martínez or Augusto Pinochet). So, Rodolfo, I suggest that you go back to high school and learn something about history, politics and propaganda. Then, perhaps, Venezuela could be proud of you, whatever your opinions and predilictions.
  • malikk
    how was it before chavez was ELECTED president ,i am sure there was' nt any poverty before he was president of venezuela right,
    i bet their was'nt any corruption either it was just great place to live
  • thelonegunman
    i see the US doing regime change very soon... but of course, it will be about removing a 'dangerous dictator,' and not at all about the oil...
  • howiebledsoe
    Looks like our good friends in the FARC are gonna have to start sacrificing some of their boys soon, I smell a terrorism plot somewhere down Venezuela way....
    Of course, If China and Russia decide to get friendly with Chavez, things will get even nastier, luckily we just got a hold of a new stronghold, the former republic of Haiti, now called "New Puerto Rico." Just think, when we have all of Afganistan´s opium and oil, and all of Venezuela´s cocain and oil, the world is our toxic oyster!!!!
  • widollar
    All global problems for the last thirty years involves the fight by the CIA for domination of countries who have OIL, period!
  • Simple answers are usually deceptions.
  • Savantster
    Occam's Razor disagrees with you.
  • seen2much
    One of the things I got on my resume is a few years in the oil patch as a MWD, wireline surveyor. I also did gyroscopic MWD in arctic drilling and whipstock orientation. Drilling ops are a lot like firing a torpedo, they require guidance, I provided that guidance.

    One of the most obvious things I noticed, was that as time went by, the wells got deeper and deeper. The deeper you go, the hotter it gets, and the temps and depths in 1996 was pushing the limits of human technology. It didn't take a genius to figure out that we are in SERIOUS trouble.

    Oil means nothing to anybody in the ground, it can't be used until you get it on the surface. We are used to being able to easily get at the oil, and peak oil has nothing to do with known oil in the ground, and everything to do with how much oil we can extract FOR A REASONABLE PRICE!!

    You only THINK you know how important oil is to you. Without hydrocarbons, our condition is comparable to the bronze age. Actually much worse considering more than 90% of the population would perish if we lost 50% or more of our current production ability. Your food, your medicine, EVERY SINGLE ASPECT OF MODERN LIVING, all gone if the waterfalls of oil we use just slow down..

    We are YEARS away from replacing our deadly dependence on hydrocarbons, and DANGEROUSLY far behind on our research of this critical issue. It goes FAR beyond windmills and bio diesel. It means living a life VERY FEW of us are even CAPABLE of, much less WILLING to live.

    But, it really doesn't matter. All of us will be forced into the necessary changes very soon. Those who cannot adapt will die. Even if we massively deploy every ounce of brainpower and labor into windmills and bio fuel, we would only save about 20 to 30% more of the population than would have died if we did nothing.

    Recycling soda bottles and car pooling isn't going to cut it. We would all have to live within the carbon footprint of the Mongolian nomads to spare us what is coming.

    Some SERIOUS hurt is about to befall our species, all because of our stupidity.

    Baa! BAAA! Little sheeple, have you any meat to pay the wolves?
  • Savantster
    "We are YEARS away from replacing our deadly dependence on hydrocarbons, and DANGEROUSLY far behind on our research of this critical issue. It goes FAR beyond windmills and bio diesel. It means living a life VERY FEW of us are even CAPABLE of, much less WILLING to live."

    No, we can employ resources we have NOW to start recovering alternate energy supplies.. geo-thermal, tidal, solar, wind, biomass, etc. etc. It won't fully replace fossil fuels, but we could dramatically reduce our need of them as fuel (and as noted, we still need hydrocarbons for everything else in a modern world). Our biggest problem is _energy_, and we don't put resources into gathering energy, we put resources into producing baubles and toys.

    "Even if we massively deploy every ounce of brainpower and labor into windmills and bio fuel,"

    it isn't about knowing what sources to try and get, it's not about the brain power. It's about the will. People who own mountains with coal aren't going to let people know we can have sustainable, clean energy if we just divert _other_ resources to making the collection systems. It's always been about the energy.. recycling is a must (keep those resources available for use), but it takes too much _energy_ compared to making things disposable and making them new each time.

    And if we put $100 billion into pure research for alternative energy sources (instead of say, Goldman Sachs profit portfolio), we'd surely find "new and better ways" to do thing. There simply isn't a _will_.

    "Some SERIOUS hurt is about to befall our species, all because of our stupidity."

    On this, we're 100% agreed.

    Head over to www.thevenusproject.com and take a gander. This is all about will, ignorance, greed, and the few holding us all back so they can continue to own everything.. liberate the resources and use them intelligently up front and we could _all_ have decent lives. You just have to define "decent", and it surely doesn't include gold toilets to shit in while millions starve to death.
  • hneftafl
    Chavez is not fucked. The U.S. is fucked. China, Russia, India, Brazil, The EU...these are the major players of the 21st century. They will decide what is done with Venezuelan oil. The U.S., with its wrecked economy and demoralized populace, will be forced to sit and watch as the world is carved up and consumed by others. At its height, the U.S. would have had Chavez overthrown years ago and his oil halfway depleted by now. The fact that this hasn't happened yet is evidence the U.S. is descendant.
  • INVADE INVADE INVADE
    THEY HAVE OIL INVADE THEM.. Venezuela IS NOW FULL OF TERRORIST
  • "an energy-starved world"

    Really???

    It would seem quite the opposite is true.

    Proven reserves just keep increasing.

    New technologies are exploding not just in production of heavy oil but deep water as well. Fracking has proven to more than double recoverable reserves.
  • Cussin' Jack
    "Proven reserves" doesn't mean "economically and technologically recoverable reserves". It just means it's in the ground. As seen2much says, "... peak oil has nothing to do with known oil in the ground, and everything to do with how much oil we can extract FOR A REASONABLE PRICE!" The financial crisis alone has destroyed billions of dollars in capital that could have been used for extraction and technology research. And big deal if we can get it out of the ground if it eventually costs $20/gal to put in our cars or heat our homes?

    It's PowerDown time people.
  • "Cussin",

    Of course recoverable reserves have increased dramatically. With the advances in extraction technology, previously developed and quantified fields simply have more economically recoverable oil in them. No exploration required. BTW, the cost of extraction just keeps going DOWN.

    Get with it. "Peak oil" is deader than a door nail.

    Jack, you can shut out your lights and sit in the dark if you like, but one wonders why you feel the need to tell others to do so.
  • Savantster
    Because using those fuels is killing the planet. If we don't either a) turn off the lights, or b) find new energy sources, you'll be happily dancing in the glow of dozens of inefficient bulbs up until the time you die from toxic exposure or the planet burns around you.

    If reserves are so plentiful and extraction costs cheaper, why is oil going UP so much?
  • Savanster,

    That's just your religion. Carbon is a natural basic element, it can't "kill the planet". However the "alternative energy" nuclear power just might poison the earth for thousands of generations.

    BTW, oil prices rose because Zionist interests attacked Iraq and disrupted a major supplier. It took a few years for the industry to develop other oil fields to replace the lost production. Market manipulators stepped in a made a killing with the help of "peak oil" alarmists such as yourself.
  • Savantster
    Yes, science is my religion. Facts dictate my reality, and I respond to facts, not hopes and wishes.

    While increasing carbon in the atmosphere won't "kill the planet", it most certainly can make it "uninhabitable" for humans and many current living species of animals. And I agree, nuclear is a bad idea.
  • A Name
    It will not be wise to burn all the oil (and coal, and natural gas) that can be found.
  • Phil E. Drifter
    Yup, the 'war on (some) drugs was the foot in the door to let the US government become the terrorist/police state it is and is fast-becoming.
  • donofcali
    Use that oil $ to stock up on SAMs, Hugo, a whole shitload of those. And make sure to pick up lots of the latest Russian jamming and EMP equipment.
  • MothMan
    Chavez, your fucked ...
  • dickerson3870
    RE: 'USGS claims Venezuela sits on Earth’s largest oil reserves"
    NOTE: "Obama authorizes covert economic war against Venezuela", Wayne Marsden Report, 01/18/10 (The veracity of such is left to the readers to decide) : (excerpts) WMR's intelligence sources have reported that the Obama administration has authorized an economic war against Venezuela in order to destabilize the government of President Hugo Chavez. After a successful coup against Chavez ally, President Manuel Zelaya of Honduras, and the very thin 51-49 percent electorial win by Chile's billionaire right-winger Sebastian Pinera on January 17, a buoyed Obama White House has given a green light for political operatives in Venezuela, many of whom operate under the cover of non-governmental organizations (NGOs), to set the stage for massive street demonstrations to protest Chavez's devaluation of the bolivar, Venezuela's currency...
    ...The Obama administration's assault is two-fold: economic and political. Pressure is being applied against the gasoline chain Citgo, which is owned by the Venezuelan state oil company, PDVSA, and Venezuelan investment favorability ratings. Politically, the U.S. is overtly and covertly funneling money to anti-Chavez groups through the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), and groups affiliated with George Soros.
    There is also a small military component to Obama's strategy of undermining Chavez. U.S., P-3 Orion overflights of Venezuelan airspace from bases in Aruba and Curacao are designed to intimidate Chavez and activate Venezuelan radar and command, control, communications, and intelligence (C3I) systems to gather electronic and signals intelligence data that would be used by the United States to jam Venezuelan military networks in the event of a U.S.-inspired urprising against Chavez by U.S. loyalists embedded in the Venezuelan military, police, PDVSA, and media. The U.S. is also stoking cross-border incursions into Venezuela by Colombian paramilitaries to gauge Venezuela's border defenses...
    ...It is estimated that some 25 percent of Venezuelans are likely Fifth Columnists who would take part in a revolt against Chavez. Many are based in the Venezuelan oil-producing state of Zulia and the capital of Maracaibo, where successive U.S. ambassadors in Caracas have stoked secessionist embers and where the CIA and U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency have concentrated much of their efforts....
    SOURCE (FOR SUBSCRIBERS) - http://www.waynemadsenreport.com/articles/20100...
    FREE CONTENT - http://www.waynemadsenreport.com/
  • utterly — and tragically, credible

    Chavez is a fox, though, and a soldier, and Russia and China could play a decisive role.

    The question is, what can we do to undermine this rotten business?
  • anything a breathing citizen tries now will be termed 'treasonous' and punishable if it undermines, subverts, or causes financial losses to your corporate betters - the new supercitizens!
  • Alfred the Saxon fought a losing battle against the Vikings for twenty years, fighting, losing, and fleeing to the forest to live in abject misery, only to come back and fight again, and lose again, until finally he drove them out of Wessex, and ultimately out of all England — a line his sons hewed to for ten generations, until Aethelred the Unready.

    There is always hope, as long as the spirit lives in a few hearts. That's why the Pashtuns of the Hindu Kush can never be beaten, suffer though they may. The duty of Pachtunwali is something they never surrender.
  • Savantster
    You're making the same mistake our entire civilized world is making (re: energy, resources, global pollution, et. al.).. Back then, you COULD run off into the woods and recoup. Where are you going to run today? "They" have helicopters with heat sensing equipment, they have tanks and air-deliverable toxins.. they have way many more ways to find you and destroy you than ever before in history. There is NO PLACE TO RUN TO..

    The same applies to people "roaming off into the wilderness and making a life for themselves". Those days are gone, the frontier is gone, there is no where left to go and just stake a claim, everything is now owned and if you want to live your life, you are beholden to those that came before (and/or their families, anyway).. you must beg them for land to grow food, you must beg them for land to build a house on, you must be endentured and work for them, building up their empires, before you're granted any means to try and live your life.

    Hourglass1 is right, of course. Today, our freedom of speech for people is curtailed while it's expanded for pieces of paper controlled by the top 1%. Stick your head up in THIS day and age, and it will get cleaved off. If they can drop Presidents in plain sight in the broad day light, the averge citizen stands no chance of ever making a serious impact. Your peers are too stupid, too lazy, too apathetic for you to ever be effectual at toppling the Imperialists now.

    No.. either full on civil war will happen in America, or she'll over step her bounds, get too cocky, and several other world powers will smack her (killing your neighbors and turning your neighborhood into a wasteland in the process). The ruling elite are running multi-nationals, and are from all over the globe. The don't care what happens in Detroit, they don't have to see it and it doesn't effect their bottom lines.
  • support chavez against USA by getting a citgo gas card. Thank god for Chavez.
  • I have a Citgo station across the street from my work — I haven't bought a drop elsewhere for years (well, except in emergencies, maybe a gallon or two).

    Yes, he is a bulwark against the Evil Empire. May whatever gods there be protect him.

    By the way, I have his UN speech in two languages (parallel tabulated) with the audio clip at my (former) website here.
  • Coming soon to a newspaper near you...

    BREAKING: Venezuela believed to be developing weapons of mass destruction
  • overdoneputaforkinit
    Israel is not in South America so that makes the WMDs threat harder to sell. Also those countries are Catholic, not Muslim. Also there is land all the way from South America to the USA. We don't have thousands of miles of oceans to protect us and let us ignore the consequences of the wars we start. Selling a war of choice to Americans in their own backyard and against people of similar religion will be very hard to do.

    I'm sure the organized crime branch of government CIA will be hard at work and persistent for 100 years looking for some plausible black operations to submit to the military industrial complex for approval.
  • lorn
    Good point. That is why Colombia is being armed to start and fight the proxy war, a policy started by Bush and continued by war President Obama.
    Massive new US bases are under construction in Colombia.
    http://directaction.org.au/issue16/obama_increa...
  • Savantster
    ah, yes.. but the war on drugs is raging down there. Saving billy from some dirty S.A. drug will get mommy and poppy sheeple riled plenty. couple of cute white teen girls from decent families OD and it's all over FOX, and Chavez is pretty well fucked.
  • <tsk!>
  • Sanger
    It wont be long before Chavez is sponsoring 'Terror' and we invade his ass. We have such a transparent and obvious foreign policy!

    Peak Oil, anyone?
  • Prattvictory
    Why did we send 12,000 troops to occupy Haiti?

    Practice
  • and position
  • DougI
    Don't worry, Chavez is safe until another Republican President is elected.
  • Cussin' Jack
    Doug -- Don't be fooled into thinking Barack Obama isn't hawkish. Look at his Senate voting record on Iraq and Afghanistan. And now he's expanding Bush's Afghan war. This guy is no dove and he has no backbone whatsoever as proven by his abysmal failure to stand up to the corporate moneyed interests of Wall Street. This was not the "Change" you voted for (me, I voted 3rd party because I could see through the Dem/Repub bullshit).

    Obama will start this. And as history as our guide, all it takes to get the American Sheeple behind him is some false-flag Gulf of Tonkin or U.S.S. Maine incident.

    May God have mercy on us all.
  • Where is the difference between rep and dem scum in the senat
    and the white house? There Is No difference!
    There are just the rivalling pack of corrupt thugs.
  • Phil E. Drifter
    You people don't get it. It doesn't matter who gets elected president (or senator or representative) because entire droves of people are appointed, and they're the ones in charge. Illegal drug money runs the world economy and that's why the Federal government is fighting tooth and nail to keep drugs illegal; it provides them with money for covert operations. Have you noticed th $880Billion Congress just voted to have the Fed Reserve (a private institution that literally prints money up for pennies on the dollar and then) loans it back to the US federal government AT INTEREST; the US government then passes the debt on to bankers, and citizens. The US will always be in debt to the Federal Reserve because the Federal Reserve controls the money. That's why you pay yearly property taxes, and that's why you pay income taxes, and this is exactly what Jefferson spoke against: drowning the public in perpetual debt.
  • Prattvictory
    Tell that to the Hondurans.

    Bill Clinton and Barack Obama won't let Aristide back in the hemisphere much less Haiti.
  • I hate to say it, but I am in good company with Ray McGovern, John Perkins, Russ Baker, and many other lights, that Obama isn't a free agent, but as JFK found out, the Pentagon is a ruthless opponent of a president who crosses certain lines. Yes, he has constitutional power, but as Mao said, "Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun."
  • malikk
    you mean the CIA

    Though he was responsible for creating it, President Harry S. Truman had begun to see the insidious power of the CIA. In a column that appeared in the Washington Post on December 21, 1963, he expressed his grave doubts about this sinister agency:

    “For some time I have been disturbed by the way the CIA has been diverted from its original assignment. It has become an operational and at times a policy-making arm of the government...
    “I never had any thought that when I set up the CIA that it would be injected into peacetime cloak-and- dagger operations. Some of the complications and embarrassment that I think we have experienced are in part attributable to the fact that this quiet intelligence arm of the President has been so removed from its intended role that it is being interpreted as a symbol of sinister and mysterious foreign intrigue and a subject for Cold War enemy propaganda.”
blog comments powered by Disqus