Exclusive: Kucinich shreds Democrats for betraying the promise of change

By Sahil Kapur
Thursday, January 21st, 2010 -- 9:45 am
Share on Facebook Stumble This!

kucinich1 Exclusive: Kucinich shreds Democrats for betraying the promise of changeSlams health bill 'madness'

WASHINGTON -- Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) on Wednesday said the Massachusetts election was a "wake up call" for Democrats and that his party had better change course or it could suffer devastating losses come November.

"People elected Democrats in 2008 to change the country's direction," he told Raw Story in a nearly hour-long interview.

"And the same entrenched interests that George Bush could not shake, this current White House is having great difficulty in shaking. One could suggest they might be more entrenched than ever."

Kucinich staunchly defended liberalism but alleged that Democrats are not behaving like liberals.

Story continues below...

"There's nothing liberal about the bailouts. There's nothing liberal about standing by and watching banks use public money to get their executive bonuses. There's nothing liberal about giving insurance companies carte blanche to charge anything they want for health care... Since when did that become liberal?"

"There's nothing liberal about letting coal and oil write climate change legislation," he added. "Are you kidding me?"

The 13-year congressman lamented the lack of change in economic policies, tying it to the major problems Democrats are facing.

"The minute the president appointed Tim Geithner and Larry Summers to key policy positions, and the minute that [Ben] Bernanke was named to head the Fed again, we're looking at people who participated in the decline of the economy," he said. "This group has done us a disservice."

"Every area of the economy is still about taking wealth from the great mass of people and putting it into the hands of a few. If you don't have a economic democracy, you don't have a political democracy."

"We have to be more defined as being on the side of the people and not on the side of interest groups that are so entrenched," said Kucinich, who is widely regarded as a champion on progressive issues.

Dems 'jumped in bed with insurance companies'

Kucinich said he's deeply disillusioned with what health reform has become, suggesting Democrats should "slow down" and "take a step back."

"Health care became too complex and too riddled with concessions to insurance companies and pharmaceutical companies," he said. "It's really time to take a new direction and that direction has to be back to the American people."

One idea Democrats are floating is to pass the Senate bill through the House, which would then allow the President to sign it into law.

healthcaremoney Exclusive: Kucinich shreds Democrats for betraying the promise of change"I don't think that's going to happen," he said. "The senate bill is so totally flawed that I don't think it can get the votes in the House to pass. I certainly wouldn't vote for it."

"It hits very sharply at people who gave wage concessions to get health care benefits," he said, citing the excise tax on health care benefits. "We're going to ask Americans to take a wage cut? Why?"

"We lost the initiative the minute that our party jumped into bed with the insurance companies. And soon they were looking at increasing taxes as a way of subsidizing insurance companies. It's just madness."

"We're redistributing the wealth of the nation upwards by giving the insurance companies 30 million new customers, $50 billion a year more in revenue."

A number of progressives and Democrats disagree with Kucinich's conclusion, and say despite its flaws the health care bill is at least an important step toward expanding coverage and reducing costs.

"Well, which direction are we building in?" Kucinich responded. "If we give insurance companies a monopoly on health care, if we put no controls on premiums, if we give them antitrust exemptions... Is this the direction we build in to protect health care for people, or to protect insurance companies?"

He said part of America's distrust for the bill is the special deals the leadership cut with certain Senators, citing Sen. Ben Nelson's exemption for Medicaid expenses in Nebraska.

"People know when things get to that point, it's time to stay stop. Stop what you're doing. Don't make another move. Slow it down. That's the message from Massachusetts."

Kucinich voiced his long-held view that the best way to address health care is to achieve a "Medicare-for-all system." He said Democrats shouldn't abandon health reform, but need to signal they realize it's been mishandled.

Rips Obama admin on economy, giving Wall Street 'immunity'

wallst Exclusive: Kucinich shreds Democrats for betraying the promise of changeKucinich said the Massachusetts election was also a referendum on the Obama administration's "inadequate" response to the economic crisis.

"We ought to focus on creating 15 million jobs, and if we do that, we'll regain the confidence of the American people on domestic issues," he said.

"With people losing their jobs, losing their homes, their investments, their savings, retirement security, losing opportunities for their children to go to college, we have to focus on economic issues."

The congressman from Ohio claimed these problems have arisen because the system is skewed against the interests of the people, and that Obama's economic team isn't helping to solve them.

He said the Obama administration was giving Wall Street banks "immunity and too big to fail protection," saying they "even pride themselves on that."

"People understand the precarious nature of the economy, and that's what they're responding to in Massachusetts."

"We're really at a moment here, a moment of pivot. We need to regain the confidence of the American people by rallying them on the economic issues. But if not, Massachusetts will just be a harbinger of what's to come."

Special interests 'more entrenched than ever'

Kucinich lamented Democrats' growing camaraderie with big moneyed interests, claiming it's hurting the party.

"You ask the banks to reform banking?" he said. "Put the insurance companies to reform insurance. Call in nuclear to reform energy policies? Are you kidding me?"

"These problems, lest we forget, did not start with Barack Obama," Kucinich said. "It was George Bush drove the economy over the cliff with a trillion dollar tax cut and a war based on lies, and an expanding trade deficit."

"And we can't do that by playing patty-cake with Wall Street, by caving into the demands of big banks, by playing footsie with insurance companies and by jumping in bed with the pharmaceutical industry.

"Americans are really skittish about the economy, and they have every right to be," he said. "This isn't a left-right argument; this isn't a liberal-conservative argument. This is about down or up."

"We have a really deep recession, and the only way to bring it back up is to have a massive jobs program," he said. "I don't see any evidence" that Obama's economic team is standing behind that.

"We have to listen to what the message is from Massachusetts. We better listen carefully."

Beyond left and right

pelosireid Exclusive: Kucinich shreds Democrats for betraying the promise of changeIn what may come as a surprise to some of his supporters, Kucinich declined to blame Republicans for what he believes have been economic policies gone awry.

"We have to be looking at ourselves," he claimed. "We have to be looking at what we need to do to govern... It's really simple: the people don't like what we're doing."

"Democrats have to look at our own responsibilities, not the Republicans' responsibilities," he said. "If we want to give the mantle of leadership to Republicans, they're the minority, they're willing to take it."

Kucinich said the Democratic strategy, as unveiled in a leaked internal memo obtained by Talking Points Memo's Brian Beutler, of urging Republicans to take more responsibility was "wrong."

"This isn't about the Republicans, this is about the Democrats."

"There's been a serious mislabeling of politics in America, where there's an attempt to confuse people about who stands for what, and in that it's the triumph of special interests."

'Still time to recover'

Kucinich said that despite the Democrats' turn in the wrong direction, they can still win back the people's trust.

"I'm not one who believes the sky is falling," he said. "We just need to listen to what people are saying. The people of Massachusetts sent the message that they're not willing to be taken for granted."

"Democrats need to take a more aggressive stance," Kucinich posited. "The only time I've ever voted against my party is when I thought we could do better, and be stronger."

"We can only keep our majority if this wake-up call is used in a constructive way, and we have our eyes open."

"We just had an alarm go off in Massachusetts, and we better wake up. Because if we shut the clock off and go back to sleep, when we wake up in November we could end up in the minority."

Despite his harrowing words, Kucinich said he "remains optimistic" that Democrats can "turn things around."

"We still have enough time to recover. A political eternity exists between now and November. Plenty of time. But we have to really reset the pointer of our political direction."

Health bill 'madness...party jumped in bed with insurance companies'

WASHINGTON -- Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) on Wednesday said Republican Scott Brown's victory in Massachusetts election was a "wake-up call" for Democrats and that his party had better change course or it could suffer devastating losses come November.

"Democrats should take a deep breath and slow things down with respect to the health care legislation," Kucinich told Raw Story in a nearly hour-long interview.

"Health care became too complex and too riddled with concessions to insurance companies and pharmaceutical companies. It's really time to take a new direction and that direction has to be back to the American people," he said.

One idea Democrats are floating is to pass the Senate health reform bill through the House, which would then allow the President to sign it into law.

"I don't think that's going to happen," he said. "The senate bill is so totally flawed that I don't think it can get the votes in the House to pass. I certainly wouldn't vote for it."

"It hits very sharply at people who gave wage concessions to get health care benefits," he said, citing the excise tax on health care benefits. "We're going to ask Americans to take a wage cut? Why?"

"We lost the initiative the minute that our party jumped into bed with the insurance companies. And soon they were looking at increasing taxes as a way of subsidizing insurance companies. It's just madness."

"We're redistributing the wealth of the nation upwards by giving the insurance companies 30 million new customers, $50 billion a year more in revenue."

A number of progressives and Democrats disagree with Kucinich's conclusion, and say despite its flaws the health care bill is at least an important step toward expanding coverage and reducing costs.

"Well, which direction are we building in?" Kucinich responded. "If we give insurance companies a monopoly on health care, if we put no controls on premiums, if we give them antitrust exemptions."

"Is this the direction we build in to protect health care for people? Or is this the direction we build in to protect insurance companies? It's the wrong direction. Somebody's got to blow the whistle and say we're running the wrong way."

He said part of America's distrust for this bill is the special deals cut with certain Senators, citing Sen. Ben Nelson's deal exempting Nebraska from Medicaid expenses for years.

"People know when things get to that point, it's time to stay stop. Stop what you're doing. Don't make another move. Slow it down. That's the message from Massachusetts."

Kucinich voiced his long-held view that the best way to address health care is to achieve a "Medicare-for-all system."

Rips Obama admin on economy, giving Wall Street 'immunity'

Kucinich said the Massachusetts election was also a referendum on the Obama administration's "inadequate" response to the economic crisis.

"We ought to focus on creating 15 million jobs, and if we do that, we'll regain the confidence of the American people on domestic issues."

"With people losing their jobs, losing their homes, their investments, their savings, retirement security, losing opportunities for their children to go to college, we have to focus on economic issues."

"We should aim at lifting everyone up. But you can't do that as long as you have a for-profit system. So within the confines of the for-profit system, all we have are bad choices. And every choice hurts costs consumers and taxpayers."

"The minute he appointed Tim Geithner and Larry Summers to key policy positions, and the minute that Bernanke was named to head the Fed again, we're looking at people who participated in the decline of the economy," Kucinich said. "This group has done the president a disservice."

He said the Obama administration was giving Wall Street banks "immunity and too big to fail protection," saying they "pride themselves on that."

"People understand the precarious nature of the economy, and that's what they're responding to in Massachusetts."

"Every area of the economy is about taking wealth from the great mass of people and putting it into the hands of a few," Kucinich said. "If you don't have a economic democracy, you don't have a political democracy."

"If we address the practical economic aspirations of people, come November of 2010 the American people will give us an opportunity to continue to lead the nation. But if not, Massachusetts will just be a harbinger of what's to come."

Special interests 'more entrenched than ever'

"You ask the banks to reform banking? Put the insurance companies to reform insurance. Call in nuclear to reform energy policies? Are you kidding me?"

"These problems, lest we forget, did not start with Barack Obama," Kucinich said. "It was George Bush drove the economy over the cliff with a trillion dollar tax cut and a war based on lies, and an expanding trade deficit."

"People elected Democrats in 2008 to change the direction. And the same entrenched interests that George Bush could not shake, this current White House is having great difficulty in shaking. One could suggest the might be more entrenched than ever."

"We're really at a moment here, a moment of pivot. We need to regain the confidence of the American people by rallying them on the economic issues."

"And we can't do that by playing paddycake with Wall Street, by caving into the demands of big banks, by playing footsie with insurance companies and by jumping in bed with the pharmaceutical industry.

"Americans are really skittish about the economy, and they have every right to be," he said. "This isn't a left-right argument; this isn't a liberal-conservative argument. This is about down or up."

"We have a really deep recession, and the only way to bring it back up is to have a massive jobs program," he said. "I don't see any evidence" that Obama's economic team is standing behind that.

"We have to listen to what the message is from Massachusetts. We better listen carefully."

While Kucinich didn't defend Democrats, he said the liberal ideology is not to blame.

"There's nothing liberal about the bailouts. There's nothing liberal about standing by and watching banks use public money to get their executive bonuses. There's nothing liberal about giving insurance companies carte blanche to charge anything they want for health care... Since when did that become liberal?"

"There's been a serious mislabeling of politics in America, where there's an attempt to confuse people about who stands for what, and in that it's the triumph of special interests."

Share this article:
  • Print
  • email
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Story comments are below...

  • Holly
    The rest of our government needs to take a cue from Dennis K. When will they all get real? Maybe when they have to be just as broke as the rest of us.
  • elizadavid
    "The senate bill is so totally flawed that I don't think it can get the votes in the House to pass. I certainly wouldn't vote for it."

    "It hits very sharply at people who gave wage concessions to get health care benefits," he said, citing the excise tax on health care benefits. "We're going to ask Americans to take a wage cut? Why?"

    "We lost the initiative the minute that our party jumped into bed with the insurance companies. And soon they were looking at increasing taxes as a way of subsidizing insurance companies. It's just madness."

    cheap r4i
  • Rockfordrusty
    Whoa. I hope folks will pay more attention to what Kucinich is saying and think less about bizarre presidential politics. I can never forget Rep. K pointing out that none of us needs health insurance, but all of us need heath care. Back Dennis on issues, and we can save the Democratic Party. I haven't given up on Obama, but I think he should have a long conversation with Kucinich, particularly about war and healthcare.
  • DDAZ
    When Kucinich said that the Massachusetts election was also a referendum on the Obama administration's "inadequate" response to the economic crisis, he hit the nail on the head. If democrats aren't going to take into account the wants and needs of the PEOPLE who elected them to office, then they deserve to lose seats in Congress and even President Obama deserves to lose the in the next election. I'm not too keen on the Republican Party running things in Washington, but given the choice between a democrat who acts like a republican and a republican it might as well be the R-Party passing legislation there.
  • Beverly Merchan
    I have always admired Dennis Kucinich for his honest and sincere approach to foreign and domestic policies that affect all Americans. I recall during the presidential debates where Mr. Kucinich was the only candidate who admitted voting againdt key senate bills from bankruptcy reform to the iraq war, where the other Democratic candidates haphazardly tried to make an argument as to why they voted to support legislation that adversely affected the American people. In fact, their votes were in line with the corporate lobbyist who continue to exert their influence despite President Obama's promise to change the way Washington does business.
    I have long believed that Democrats, with few exceptions like Mr. Kucinich, are nothing more that moderate republicans and this is now clearly evident by the way they have conducted the health care debate and are trying to give the American people a watered down piece of legislation that does nothing but make insurance and pharmaceutical industries billions of unearned profits. Since Ronald Reagan Republicans and spineless moderate republicans (Democrats) have attacked and undermined the social safety network for America's poor and working poor by demeaninig social welfare programs that help provide a minimal existence. However, they have no qualms in blindly handing out billions in corporate welfare to immoral corporations who more than ever are robbing the American blind and providing themselves with shameful bonuses so they can continue their opulent way of life and embody Veblens "Leisure Class".
    It's time for American's to wake up and stop voting against their own political and economic interest. Politicians like Mr. Kucinich are rare and truly represent what is good about America.
  • Tim
    I wanted Kucinich all along. It was pretty clear from the first debate that he wasn't bought out. The moderators tried to make him look like a kook.
  • liberalbias
    Interesting that this article uses the same kind of unflattering photo of Pelosi that the "Anti-Card-Check" ad uses......the latter of course is right wing propaganda because it's a totally fabricated ruse to kill this bill and actually take power AWAY FROM UNION MEMBERS!!!!
  • Owl Rancher
    To throw around the lable "Libitarian" is all good and well if everyone starts at a zero sum position.But being the supply side policies of the last 28 years and wage to cost of living inequalites have stripped the middle class and poors ability to purchase, thus keeping us in the lack of demand cpnsumer driven economy the WEALTHY will still dominate everyone else
    even on a libertarian run government.We Still Lose..
  • bee
    what a little panty-waste of a so called "man"
    Who is filling your pockets...
    "Traitor"
    Disgusting!
  • Barry
    I truly hope that Congressman Kucinich's mind-set seeps into the thick-skulled, so called, leaders of this land. The future doesn't look so bright, ther aren't enough Dennis Kucinichs' in our government!
  • GrandmaSpirit
    Seems to me we have have been sold out time and again, who do they think they are, spending our hard earned money year after year, doesn't matter if they are blue or red, they all lie, and spend our money in ways most Americans who foot the bill would never approve upon. Personally I think all issues based upon spending our money, should be voted on by ALL Americans... They love the ball passing, they know when they go to far, they can toss the ball back stamped "change" to the red or blue team. Yet they BOTH sell us out. The system is Broken and not in our favor...
  • GrandmaSpirit
    I voted for Kucinich, and always thought the best two, together would be him and Ron Paul Wow talk about Integrity. I thought Obama wouldn't sell us out, he better wake up, we might as well say Obama has a George W Bush Virus. Because nothings changed in policies.
    Sure Bush was the worst of all Presidents, even most Republicans get that. I question Obama sense of REALITY. Oh by the way...of course they didn't allow him to debate, they would rather have those that have empty promises and men who whore around, neither of which Kucinich would ever do.
  • Ben Webster
    Kucinich is making a lot of common sense, but nobody listens to common sense anymore; especially those in the "political party" in Washington D. C.
  • templeofthedog
    Bail outs to banks and Wall Street, secret deals with the pharmaceutical companies and the health insurance industry, tax cuts for the very wealthy, no accountability on the billions of dollars lost or stolen in Iraq or Afghanistan, $2.3 trillion unaccounted for at the Pentagon, no bid contracts to crony Corporations who are stealing from the tax payer and performing shoddy work, send our country into needless war for the greed of Corporate interests AND now the Supreme Court rules 5-4 to allow Corporations to funnel even more money into politics.

    Say good bye to the United States Of America and say hello to the United Corporations Of America.
  • Earl
    Kucinich is 100% correct! Wake up Dems.
  • Earl
    Kucinich is 100% correct!
  • joealbiani
    This is one of the very few people of integrity in a system totally bought and paid for by insurance, big banks and drug interests. The health care "reform" is a justa big bonanza for insurance companies. When the domocrats wouldn't even allow Kucinich to be part of the debate in Arizona, Obama, Edwards and Clinton didn't say a word in protest. The media said nothing. It was clear at that point as to who runs this country and why we are in the mess we are in.
  • Mick
    As a NE Ohioan who remembers Kucinich as mayor of Cleveland when it was given the flattering monicker "Mistake on the Lake", I cannot believe I'd ever see the day where I respected anything that came out of this guys mouth.

    Interesting times...
  • Paul
    Kucinich is right, and he's wrong.
    He's right that we need to stop having a "Sugar Daddy" government, who passes out money to whoever screams the loudest. It isn't their money to give. Get out of the way and let the market take care of itself. Concentrate on "promoting the general welfare" by creating an environment which is a business and job incubator, not one that taxes and penalizes success.
    He's wrong in that "liberal" is a good thing. (And other's are wong that "conservative" is a good thing.) FREEDOM is the right thing. Let's get back to small, unintrusive and unobtrusive government.
  • tadj
    I agree with not voting on the health care to me if it is voted in it was done just so the admin. could say they passed health care reform. This bill doesn't reform it is a joke.
  • johnadams
    Where was his outrage a year ago or even a month ago? How was Obama managing to get his vote? The dems are trying to spin in another direction just long enough to keep their seats in 2010, and then it's off to the races with their progressive, socialist, marxist agenda...again. Our system of government was meant to have checks and balances, and it's time we restored them.
  • templeofthedog
    Where was your outrage when Bush and the republicans were marching our country into fascism? Those who fall for this 'socialism' b.s. are so ignorant and are just knowingly or unknowingly doing the bidding for the corporations. Fools! I'll take a dose of socialism over fascism any day.
  • HopeforAmerica
    Kucinich has always been a straight shooter, and I've always liked him. I think the Dems were side swiped by the Blue Dogs who often acted like Republicans instead of Democrats! Therefore, I blame a lot of this of Blue Dogs and Leiberman. Progressives and the president had a clear agenda which was hijacted by the Blue Dogs and Leiberman.
    And the Dems allowed Joe (#@^*#) Leiberman to strike the Anti Trust mandate for insurers. Grrr! Get rid of Leiberman! There's NO Competition without the AntiTrust legislation... and WHY should insurance companies have an exemption when all other industries are bound by anti-trust laws!? That means insurance companies can actually FIX Prices amongst themselves keeping prices high for everyone including medicare, businesses and consumers.
    I think we need a Movement to push our the Senate and House to Strike Down the Anti-Trust Excemption for Insuance Companies!! Without that or a public option, there is NO Competition amongst insurers. This crap about buying across state lines is just that.... crap! Many larger insurers Own many other companies in Other States.... that's NOT Competition!!

    And on another note... I like the consumer protections in my state against insurers... that would go away because insurance companies would only have to abide by the laws of which THEY are based. Therefore, the insurers are going to base themselves in the state(s) which have the Least Consumer Protections!!
  • mworrall
    21% medicare cuts in March will put my largely medicare/medicaid practice out of business next couple of years. My practice Overhead is 68%, reform brings new costs, you do the math. We need reform to reduce the costs involved in the provision of medical care.

    Why does a doctor need 2-3 billing people to get authorizations and collect from insurance companies?

    Why does 20% of my practice cost involve documentation to remain compliant with government regulation? (Yes, prison terms wait for those who don't comply, inaddition to fines and loss of the possibility to practice --- not for poor care, just poor documentation.)

    Why do I have to order extra tests all the time to protect myself from malpractice lawyers?

    Why is malpractice $100K/yr? --- must see a lot of patients to earn $100K.

    Why, as my payments from insurance companies haven't increased in 10 years, do insurance premiums go up?

    Why can't I get individual health insurance for my family for less than 100K/yy due to a pre-existing condition?

    These questions need to be addressed.... but each party has its paymasters who will make sure answers to these questions are never given... even as doctors quit their practices..patients lose their ... and medicare continues to sink financially (currently subsidized at over 50% out of the general fund ---- largely from deficit spending.)
  • ron7777
    damn the man who looks so funny will never win but he sure told it like it is . maybe his wife could run with her looks and his brain whata dynamic candidate.i thought the wifes pix was about some scandal i am looking up more pics of her grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr.
  • Joe Orange
    Dennis is one of the few ,if not the only politician who consistantly tells the truth and is really on the side of the people. He was against the bank bailouts and lambasted the AIG debacle. He doesn't believe in 'too big to fail'. He took on the big powers, utilities and banks, in Cleveland in the 70's and was proven correct 30 years later. For his stance he was voted out in a recall election and the big banks forced the city into bankruptcy. It's always about money! Dennis didn't need money, he lived in his car, and he's a better person and leader for it.
  • HopeforAmerica
    I also like Widen from Oregon and Bernie Sanders from Vermont, These guys came up with some great amendments and were shot down. We need to get rid of Leiberman... his wife is a Big Exec for an.. you guessed it.... an Insurance Company!! No wonder he wanted the Democrats to Drop their Anti Trust legislation which would guard have guarded public and the gov't from the insurance companies price Fixing! Damn Lieberman!
  • genevieve
    I agree with the senator I am a lifelong democrat and dont like where our party and country is heading Our leaders are becoming money hungry greedy people and the blue collar hard working people are suffering I am a eighty two year old woman and fear for my six childrens future thank you for listening
  • Gareth
    Thank you Dennis, and thank you rawstory. As a lifelong Democrat, I think Dennis needs take America in the direction WE want, not the Corporate States and not the Non-Profit Industrial Complex, and not the two party fake-out on America. We need a Hail Mary. I'm sure not voting for Dems anymore...and unless some Repubs come up with a proper plan for the 95% non-wealthy, not them either. I think those R & D folks may be in for more than they bargained for...with public campaign financing still intact, some really good people may be sitting next to Dennis.
  • Cass
    Just keep telling yourselves it's because the current regime is not liberal enough. It will help speed up the correction that will be nearly complete after this November's elections. People always forget why we don't let the Democrats rule after a decade or so and vote them back in. Always, immediately the buyer's remorse sets in when they start throwing away our hard earned money faster than we can make it, destroying the economy. Then the socialist freebies start flowing to their voting blocs - further bankrupting the country and establishing a ruling elite with absolute power over us - after all, they are providing everything to us and are responsible for our very health, so why shouldn't they be able to tell us what and what not to do, eat, drink, play, believe, etc.? So go right ahead and keep telling yourselves that the problem is you're not following Marx closely enough. While you're whining and complaining at the "America Is Stupid and Evil" concert next November, the responsible adults will be at the polls cleaning up your mess. Again.
  • HopeforAmerica
    Hey Cass; NO buyers remorse here! I still back Obama and the Dems. The republicans and conservatives don't give a damn about mainstreet. The dems were side swiped by the Blue Dogs and Lieberman! Lieberman the snake, is largely responsible for striking the Anti Trust legislation which would have been good for consumers and helped the gov't save on Medicare. NO competition without a public option or anti-trust legislation for insurance companies. All other industries are barred from fixing prices... Lieberman's wife is a Insurance Co. Exec ... that's why Lieberman was against it.

    Lastly, your so called "ruling elite" is the Republicans and their Corporatism!! The Dems and Progressives are the only ones who are for Mainstreet!! And Libertarianism is a Joke... it's one step above Anarchy!
  • Cass
    You really believe that last paragraph? Who gave billions of your money to the auto and banking industry? Who is excluding unions from paying for health care? Who was in bed with Fannie and Freddie? Who are the wealthiest members of Congress - and always have been?

    What did they give YOU? Or anyone else on mainstreet for that matter? Lip service doesn't count.
  • Chris
    This is more evidence that we are a country run by Corporations both foreign and domestic, this health bill started out as a deal to help get more people insured at a affordable rate, I personnally like the COOP idea promoted by Conrad and friends, but what has happened? Money has happened, Lobbyist has happened, now its all for the big Pharma and Insurance. This is really a wake up call that something is going to have to be done to seperate special interest from government, our system seems to be geared so that our Politicians must suck up to them to stay in power and who is losing? The American citizen, thats who, just look at the Supreme court decision the other day, Corporations can spend what ever on their guy, they can out bid the citizens, even foreigner owned Corps, wil China decide our next Politician? Either this is going to be addressed or big problems are coming down the pipe, the American citizens know whats going on and it won't stand.
  • CObill
    Kucinich is not President today precisely because of what he stands for. Special interests buy elections in this country and are even more capable of doing so now after the recent Supreme Court ruling. Unless We the People truly see through the veil of fear and prejudice thrown in our faces by the aforementioned special interest groups and vote en-masse for a Kucinich type or better yet a true independent, this country is headed down the tubes...We need a viable 3rd or even 4th Party in this country to restore the checks and balances. I can't blame Obama for the situation he's in, but he needs to go after both Democrats and Republicans for their being bought and sold like cattle...
  • Ernie
    This honest concern by a politician is the reason for his early defeat during his campaign, that should have been our wake up call, "Good guy's...do finish last!"
  • fred
    can regular folks really over ride the interests of big businesses? what's really at the core of the business/political connection?
  • Garethd
    MONEY honey
  • fred
    so then:
    money=power=class
    what then if ones class interest is at odds with the monied class?
  • jay arr
    The "little giant of progressivism", Dennis Kucinich, as always , is the voice of the lower working class, the voiceless, the elderly poor, working mothers, and the under-educated,; people who need a little guy with a big heart to stand up and tell the truth. Kucinich actually believes in true democracy for all, social and economic justice for all, and the equal opportunity for all in the pursuit of happiness as set forth by our Founding Fathers. But like most "prophets" he is disdained by those who think only in terms of the moment. Wake up, America !
  • sonrisa
    dennis rocks!!
  • w_mcgriffin@yahoo.com
    why is kucinich about what is going on now, he's been office fourteen years now he decide to say something now, four years under clinton admin. saying nothing but watching the republicans kill the health bill, eight years under the bush and cheney or should i say the cheney and bush admin. sneek a health bill over the american people no discussion on the bill but instead, nobody knows anything but american people we are have better health plan but you wont know anything until we still the second election, now thats over the bill you have now is everybody whos on medicare has to find a medical company and get a preciption card and pay between $20 and $40 a month extra and medicine that was authrized with medcare isnt authrized with your precription card
  • Gareth
    I'm sorry, you must be very misinformed. You might start by reading some of the things Dennis said during all those years. The media has been very remiss with Dennis's words over the years, prefering to promote the players instead. You might benefit from more alternative media to get information and maybe read some Zinn, or even the platforms of Congressman Kucinich.
  • John Chapman NH
    That's why Kucinich should have been president, He has the balls to do what is right for America, and is willing to go toe to toe with those who ridicule his ideals, and those who hamper the progress of our nation by going the same old D.C. route. He is the one politician I would always vote for. He is the next great American hope, unfortunately he won't play by the big money rules so he has no chance in Hell. It's a shame this is the man who could make us a nation of the people again.
  • jiminnorthwestohio
    Mr. Kucinich. You are absolutely right on the money. I couldn't have said it any better. The Democratic party looks like a bunch of lilly livers that have caved into all of corporate interests. It is time for President Obama to pull his thumb out of his heiney and put the heat to the Democratic party. It looks like the Democratic party has become a party of NO. If things don't change and change fast, there is going to be a royal flush come fall.
  • gary
    you took an oath to uphold the constitution how about starting now ?
  • Art4Peace
    Right on!!! Heart & soul words from the American who should have been awarded the Nobel Peace Prize!!
    So many of the comments here, as well as what I hear about Dennis elsewhere, are saying 'I wish this guy was in charge of something', 'he should be president', he should be VP', 'would have voted for him, but...', 'wow! This guy is a politician?', etc, etc.
    So WAKE UP AMERICA!!!! If so many of you feel he should be President, or at least "in charge of something", then W-H-Y did you not go with your conscience and VOTE FOR DENNIS when we actually had the chance?????!!!!!
    This outrages me!! I have been a campaign coordinator for Dennis Kucinich for BOTH of the past presidential elections. I continually heard people say, "I really 'wish' he could be president, but he really doesn't have a chance" or "If I COULD vote for who I 'really wanted', I would vote for Dennis, but I'm told he's "not electable"". PEOPLE ... Dennis IS electable IF you VOTE FOR HIM!!!! As long as he is on the ballot as a candidate, HE IS ELECTABLE!!!!!!!!
    STOP LETTING THE MEDIA's BULLCRAP TELL YOU WHO YOU "CAN" VOTE FOR!!!!!!!!
    Let's HOPE that we can persuade Dennis to give it another shot for 2012. But we MUST get him to start campaign (or at least fundraising) NOW!!!!!!
    PLEASE, if you REALLY feel that Dennis Kucinich can save this country (as I am SURE he can), contact him in any and every way you can and tell him so, and tell EVERYONE you know to do the same!
    Dennis Kucinich CAN be elected President of the U.S., and he WILL save our country and make a huge impact on the world, IF you vote for who you REALLY want to win!!!! Straight up as that ........
  • Gareth
    BRAVO...somebody who is smarter than the fourth graders!! Thank you
  • Barb
    I do not believe we had two candidates in the last election. American people have been cheated too long by their own leaders. Taken over from within.
  • DJBALL
    Ron Paul /Dennis Kucinich - 2012 is a ticket i could get behind.
    Cynthia McKinney somewhere in there......Secretary of State.
  • Garethd
    Throw in a Trumka and a Paul and we are good to go
  • Gareth
    oops, I see you had Paul in front of Kucinich...well, ok then. Whatever. It would work, a Repub and a Dem running together.
  • theoracle
    Kucinich would have been (and still could be) a great American president.

    If he'd still been on the ballot when the Democratic Party primaries reached my state in 2008, I'd have voted for him over all the other Dems. As it happened, only Clinton and Obama were left to choose between, so I voted for Clinton, primarily because I hoped that a President Hillary Clinton, being pissed at what corrupt Republicans had done to her family in the 1990s, would use her presidential power to hold the most criminal and corrupt administration in American history, Bush and Cheney, accountable, applying the rule of law and raking the previous Republican administration over the coals of justice. Barack Obama, on the other hand, was an unknown quantity, talking up liberal ideas very well, but showing evidence of a conservative streak. Plus, I didn't get the feeling, even back in 2008, that a President Obama would hold the previous administration accountable, letting the criminals in the Bush/Cheney administration, and their conferates on Wall Street, get away with their crimes against our country and against humanity.

    Dennis Kucinich is absolutely correct in his analysis. Either Democrats provide a viable, liberal, progressive alternative to the utter corruption and greed (and some would say insanity) of the conservative Republican Party, or the Democratic Party will end up being viewed as aiding and abetting the utter corruption and greed (and reality-challenged insanity) of the party they presumably are opposing.
  • Arthur J Caputo
    Kucinich is right in everthing he says. but he's talking to the wall., The DUMB, STUPID American electorate, who believes all the lies and deceit from therepublican party are sweeing the hypocricy of the democtatic party,also.One by one the decent and real representatives of the American people are leaving congress, such as Wexler, knowing how friutless it is to stay with these corrupt politcians in congress. Selling us out in every turn. Millions of ripped off citizens need to march on Washington and scare the shit out of these shysters. Obama included.. Pelosi, Reid, you call these LEADERS? Tip ONeil would have vomited on these bastards.Now the puppets on the supreme court are giving away our democracy to the highest bidder. Have they no shame.Don't they know the consequences of what they are doing?EVIL is taking over. Right in our dumb and stupid faces. As in Germany , I blame the people who , with their dumb votes are leading us down the same path.We NEED a revolution badly! Enough is enough for these arrogant criminal scum.
  • Gareth
    You put a great big smile on my face. Thank you thank you thank you. If we don't vote Repub or Dem, insist that the good guys pick a real solid cohesive name to get behind, we could do it. We really could...and with public campaign financing no less. Rally the troops Arthur. We can blog the heck out of the next election. My motto has been for many years since facing the stupid VA system for Vietnam vets...I AM FED-UP
  • hawkny1
    If I ever get the chance to vote for Dennis Kucinich in a presidential election....
    I will vote for him........
    Twice....
  • debdellapiana
    This guy really "gets it." I voted for him in the Democratic primary, and I'd vote for him again in a minute. People say he's "unelectable," but that's just because he doesn't take big corporate bucks and has limited funds. However, I do like the comment that we need about 40 more Kucinichs in the House and Senate. Absolutely right!
  • Sharon
    I applaud Dennis Kucinich for his outspokenness! He sticks his neck out for the American people over and over again, and he needs a lot more support in the House of Representatives. I'm also proud to have supported both of his presidential runs. I wish more people had listened to what he said. It was vastly different - and vastly better - than what Barack Obama campaigned on. It's not too late to listen to Kucinich! And let's elect more REAL progressives to Congress! If we are to end the corporatocracy, end corporate personhood, and establish publicly funded elections, we will need to be very energized, very active, throw the corporate-fed bums out and vote the progressives in.
  • Mary Palomar
    A basic problem for the American people and for the Democratic Party is the conflict in interest between the individual interests of nearly all Democratic senators and congressional representatives ... and those of the coalition that forged the Democratic Party in the 1930s and 1960s. As the GOP swung right from its origins opposing slavery toward the interests of the economic elites, the Democratic Party swung left from its early role defending slavery towards uniting and supporting the interests and civil rights/liberties of labor, minorities, and women. But to get into office takes loads of money (now provided even more generously by the Supreme Court this week) and this means that only pretty wealthy people can withstand the opportunity costs of being in office and only those who are willing to sell their souls to get campaign financing can get into and stay in office, with very few exceptions. So, Democratic politicians are in no wise representative of their putative constituencies, and their interests necessarily diverge. The ideology and the political goals of the GOP actually benefit these Democratic politicians' economic interests as individuals: lower taxes (on the upper few percent, to which they belong), lower or no unearned inheritance tax ("death taxes"), fewer regulations for health and environmental considerations (they cut into the profits of their investments), and reducing or abolishing laws meant to allocate opportunities more fairly (civil rights tend to expand the pool of potential competitors for elite positions, including political positions). So, there has to be pretty severe cognitive dissonance among them, and somehow they try to placate their "base" with insipid and ineffectual "reform," while guaranteeing the preservation of the unfair structure of privileges that promote their own household wealth. Sadly, it is apparent that President Obama, too, is in the same situation, and that's why he appointed or kept on Geitner, Summers, and Bernanke, probably a deal struck long before he suddenly shot to the front of the Democratic pack. We the People need to find a way to break into this loop, and fast.
  • Nathan Bravo
    Kucinich for President, He was dead on, Our government has been Hijacked by Corporate America and no longer answers to the people, I am tired of both parties, They are both guilty of not listening to their constituents, I am tired of Good cop Bad Cop politics, I am Tired of Wall Street running Washington, and He is right, The people who created this mess are still in power, and have been promoted to positions of greater power. How is it that Wall Street does the absolute worst job possible and yet gets rewarded for its Failures, Now more than ever Washington D.C. defies logic, and is in dire need of some Major house cleaning!
  • Joy
    Dennis Kucinich needs to start a new party with true liberal values. The Democratic party has become too controlled, too corrupt, too disingenuous for my taste.

    "If it's a choice between a genuine Republican, and a Republican in Democratic clothing, the people will choose the genuine article, every time" - Harry S Truman
  • tiredofthepoliticianoftoday
    Washington has become just a warzone of Republicans vs Democrats. Instead of getting any job done that betters the American Citizen, they spend all their time in winning new members, new supporters. It is like a "gang war". You have to be on this side or that side, and nobody in the gang really knows why?? Vote em out, get rid of the Republican and Democrat parties they stand for absolutely nothing anymore.
  • Dave
    Does anyone believe it's an accident that Kucinich doesn't get more media exposure. During the debates, he and R. Paul were both frozen out-by design. Time and again, people who listen to him come to realize that he has the interests of this great country and it's citizens. We need another legitimate party to challenge the Dem/Rep, and we could really use a real political leader, like Kucinich to lead it; and fast. We are really running out of time.
  • Change...Not
    The ONLY two candidates in the Repblo-Corpo-Crats that I trusted with Dennis Kucinich and Ron Paul, one from the proud progressive left, one from the founding fathers right. Once they were eliminated I knew that only the mainstream crap was going to carry on. Those two were the only ones who can deliver "Change I can believe in".....and not be bought and sold. They are among the only 2-3% of Congress-Critters that I will inherently trust along with Bernie Sanders and a couple others.
  • Cadguy
    Raven writes:

    It's funny how the MSM never has Dennis Kucinich on to talk about any of the policy matters that happen to be the topic of that day. All we get are clowns like Lieberman, McCain, Boehner, and a sprinkling of blue dogs. Might be the powers that be are afraid that people might start thinking for themselves, and realize how much we're getting f&$!ed over. Kucinich is not alone, but one of my favorite representatives. It is nice to know that their are people on the hill that take their service to the American people seriously, and are not afraid to tell the truth.

    Spot On!
    The MSM is controlled by the Corporate elite who are really in charge of our government.
    Obama is a Corporate puppet.

    Protecting war criminals makes you on. These folks are evil.
  • Cadguy
    I voted for Kucinich in the primaries as well.

    If he wasn't a dwarf this guy could get elected.

    Americans are superficial idiots. We get what we deserve - a military industrial complex police state.
  • moonbeams
    I agree with Congressman Kucinich. I am profoundly disappointed in President Obama. I am thoroughly disgusted with the Democratic Party. But as for Massachusetts, Coakley was in favor of healthcare reform, and Brown is not. Brown will support the insurance companies and the pharmaceutical companies. Coakley would not. Maybe she ran a dumb campaign. Maybe she doesn't smile enough. But you know what? It will be a cold day in Hell before I ever again vote for a Republican. So if I lived in Massachusetts, I would have held my nose, a voted for Coakley. We can point a lot of fingers at "Washington" but we really need to remember, that we are part of this equation. Once we elected Obama, and the Democratic majority, I think too many of us thought our job was finished. But it had only just begun.
  • christoofar
    Do the "revolutionaries" in Massachusetts seriously think that Republicans will "go after" Wall St. better? Hell, that's funny. Same old, same old, no matter what side of the aisle.
    Corporate Money runs this country & always will.
    Good on you Kucinich , but it's too little too late.
  • mwl
    What this guy is trying to get people to feel sorry for him. The honest truth is Congress and the White House are a buy and sell commodity. Its all up for sale, Nebraska, Louisiana, New York mayors office, pick a scam any scam. Senators leaving their appointed place of duty without the state knowing where. Obama using his elitist position and abusing his power to talk down his nose to a candidate about his 200k mile pick up truck. The people spoke but he three stooges wont listen (Obama, Pelosi, Reid) However, the people will issue investigations and want the truth, and this corrupt Obama regime will cover, hide, dismantle the truth as best as they can. What a waste of time, energy and money the Obama regime.
    Mike
  • henry kenneth
    there is no way the current corruption in washington can be solved until reid pelosi dodd rangel and baucus and kerry are out of office
  • Dago T
    photo

    In 2008 I went to the VoteVet site and took their online presidential candidate quiz to pick the candidate who most closely represented my stands on the subjects. It came out DK three times over a 2-week period. I supported him at the Iowa Caucus until I was melded into the Edwards group. After O'Bama won Iowa, I changed my 32-year affiliation as a Dem to No Preference (Ia doesn't offer Ind). Keep up your fight Dennis.
  • shane_b1968
    An energized progressive party will do more to convince moderates to support democrats than going right. I know from blogging that it is getting harder and harder to make the argument that these people need our support. And with out us progressive liberal on board the democrats are screwed.
  • stojannenadovic
    Noncredit money is the only real money. Noncredit money is the necessary additional quantity of money in circulation (dM) as percentage (k) of existing quantity of money in circulation (M).
    dM = kM ; k = (supply - demand)/demand ;
    If noncredit money is emitted according to the cited formula, inflation cannot exist. Also, taxes are annulled for the amount of noncredit money. The consumers pay less and producers get more than today, in the order of credit money. American Monetary Act as noncredit money.
  • stojannenadovic
    Noncredit money as gift is the only real money. Noncredit money is the necessary additional quantity of money in circulation (dM) sa percentage (k) of existing quantity of money in circulation (M). dM = kM ; k = (supply - demand)/demand ;
    If noncredit money is emitted to the cited formula, inflation cannot exist. Also, taxes are annulled for the amount of noncredit money. The consumers pay less and producers get more than today, in the order of credit money. American Monetary Act as noncredit money.
  • panamarick
    Yawn...good cop, bad cop
  • Jag Pop
    This liberal has long believed that Democrats are worse than Republicans. Democrats side track progressive energy towards an illusion. Those two are wings of one party - the Corporatist Party.

    I respect Kucinich so much! But he is an exception that assists the illusion. He should leave the Democratic Party and create the For America Party.
  • John
    For those of you knocking the Alien life believers....remember water or ice has already been found by NASA on both the moon and Mars. It is likely there is alot of life and forms different from earth in the universe!!!
  • Libertarian Karaite Jew
    Party loyalties are irrelevant. The "Republicrats" & "Demopublicans" are 2 sides of the same un-American coin. Allegiance to our U.S. Law Code (i.e. our Constitution and Bill of Rights) is what matters. Like Thomas Jefferson said: "The Best government is that which governs the least". Got Liberty?
  • Lyman
    Dennis: Leave the Democratic Party behind.
    They should be sent to prison.
    The Republicans should be sent to Hell.
  • Dennis is spot on, as always. There is no clearer or sounder voice anywhere in either house.

    Unfortunately, he is not enough of a movie star to have been selected as the candidate. The electorate are cocker-spaniels, and are not operated on the basis of logic.

    RawStory should feel very flattered to be the vehicle delivering this message.

    Side note: the transcriber used the spelling "paddycake" for what is properly "patty-cake", and in fact, originally, "pat-a-cake".

    Cakes are not "padded", neither is there an Irish immigrant reference, as in "paddywagon"; but they are "patted" in the process of making.
  • Ken
    Dennis Kucinich is absolutely right, and why I gave money to his campaign.
blog comments powered by Disqus