Study: Antarctic ice melt actually slowing climate change

By Agence France-Presse
Tuesday, November 10th, 2009 -- 6:25 pm
Share on Facebook Stumble This!

artarcticice globalwarmingclimate Study: Antarctic ice melt actually slowing climate changeGlobal warming has been blamed for the alarming loss of ice shelves in Antarctica, but a new study says newly-exposed areas of sea are now soaking up some of the carbon gas that causes the problem.

Scientists led by Lloyd Peck of the British Antarctic Survey (BAS) said that atmospheric and ocean carbon is being gobbled up by microscopic marine plants called phytoplankton, which float near the surface.

After absorbing the carbon through the natural process of photosynthesis, the phytoplankton are eaten, or otherwise die and sink to the ocean floor.

The phenomenon, known as a carbon sink, has been spotted in areas of open water exposed by the recent, rapid melting of several ice shelves -- vast floating plaques of ice attached to the shore of the Antarctic peninsula.

Over the last 50 years, around 24,000 square kilometres (9,200 square miles) of new open water have been created this way, and swathes of it are now colonised by phytoplankton, Peck's team reports in a specialist journal, Global Change Biology.

Story continues below...

Their estimate, based on images of green algal blooms, is that the phytoplankton absorbs 3.5 million tonnes of carbon, equivalent to 12.8 million tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2), the principal greenhouse gas.

To put it in perspective, this is equivalent to the CO2-storing capacity of between 6,000 and 17,000 hectares (15,000 and 42,500 acres) of tropical rainforest, according to the paper.

The tally is minute compared to the quantities of greenhouse gases from fossil fuels and deforestation, which amounted to 8.7 billion tonnes of carbon in 2007.

But, said Peck, "it is nevertheless an important discovery. It shows nature's ability to thrive in the face of adversity.

"We need to factor this natural carbon absorption into our calculations and models to predict future climate change," he said in a BAS press release.

"So far, we don't know if we will see more events like this around the rest of Antarctica's coast, but it's something we'll be keeping an eye on."

The Antarctic peninsula -- the tongue of land that juts up towards South America -- has been hit by greater warming than almost any other region on Earth.

In the past 50 years, temperatures there have risen by 2.5 degrees Celsius (4.5 degrees Fahrenheit), around six times the global average.

Ice shelves are ledges of thick ice that float on the sea and are attached to the land. They are formed when ice is exuded from glaciers on the land.

In the past 20 years, Antarctica has lost seven ice shelves.

The process is marked by shrinkage and the breakaway of increasingly bigger chunks before the remainder of the shelf snaps away from the coast.

It then disintegrates into debris or into icebergs that eventually melt as they drift northwards.

The Antarctic ice shelves do not add to sea levels when they melt. Like the Arctic ice cap, they float on the sea and thus displace their own volume.

Ice that runs from land into the sea does add, though, to the ocean's volume, which is why some scientists are concerned for the future of the massive icesheets covering Antarctica and Greenland.

Share this article:
  • Print
  • email
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Story comments are below...

  • jdouglas
    I'm getting sick of this Raw Story web site. I've been reading it for eight months, and during that time its overall drift has gone farther and farther to the corporate right. The percentage of sensationalism and low-grade sensuality keeps going up and it seems that before long all I'll be reading on "Raw Story" will be straight corporate media articles. Somebody recommended this site, supposedly because it provides an alternative news slant, and lately it seems to be anything but.
  • paullohan66
    You know this will be talked about on all the Nut-Job-Radio-Network.

    If this were a righty “thing,” a right-wing publication would ignore it. Just goes to show ya who cares about the truth and we know who doesn’t. Truth is always king on the left of center side. I guess that’s why we have links to sources on are emails and blogs and they don’t.

    Wish the story was even more positive and everyone lived happily ever after. I wish global warming was not destroying the earth and our way of life.

    But I will listen to those who don’t have a horse in the race. The scientists.
  • jdouglas
    If I were interested in reading about how glorious and honorable the U.S. Marine Corps is, what Obama had to say about something or other, or whether a hurricane caused much damage I'd be watching television, not reading a web site that pretends to give me the "raw story" while simultaneously bombarding me with directly-targeted advertisements.
  • rawstorysuspect
    >directly-targeted advertisements
    >advertisements
    learn to mozilla firefox AdBlock Plus, silly.
    NO ADVERTISEMENTS.
    youre welcome.
  • jdouglas
    OK, how do I do that on a Mac?
  • peterlawrence
    Duh! you idiots... even I knew that... it's a reaction to offset the imbalance.
  • paullohan66
    My post is better then both of yours.
  • voreason3
    3.5 million tons of carbon absorbed annually by our phytoplankton friends amounts to just 0.04 % of the 8.7 billion tons released by burning fossil fuels each year.

    It's a nice bit of research but actually what it says is that homeostatic mechanisms for emissions of CO2 released by burning fossil fuels simply do not exist.

    The fact is, that what we have been doing over the past 150 years is burning a significant fraction of the carbon that has been fixed and mineralized over the past 600 million years. To imagine that there would be homeostatic mechanisms to adjust to this would be magical thinking.
  • 42,500 acres = 66.4 square miles of rainforest.

    It takes 9,200 square miles of open ocean to eat up the carbon stored by 66.4 square miles of rainforest.

    It doesn't even consider the loss of the reflective power of the lost ice, which is a significant factor in preventing global warming.

    This article is trying to give the impression that there's a serious benefit in losing 9,200 square miles of reflective ice by comparing the carbon-capture capability with that amount of carbon stored by 66.4 square miles of rainforest.

    This article is crap.
  • bob
    Yeah, and if you kill off a population, starvation numbers really start to plummet.

    Don't look now, Rawstory, your but sucking is showing.
  • texasaggie
    What in the world are you talking about?
  • putheiceback
    Thumper Alert!
  • the large kahoona
    jdouglas, Amen, looking more and more like a Zionist rats nest
  • Michael
    So the bottom line is that in 50 years we'll have no ice, but the temperature will be the same. New York will be underwater, but because it will have the same weather, it will be as if nothing bad has happened. Smart.....

    Yes, this article is crap.
  • libertate
    i once heard of this thing called the sun. apparently it's really hot. sometimes it gets hotter than other times. can anyone confirm this?
  • 7324834
    Another factor that is not currently considered (that I know of) if evaporative cooling of ice and its effects on temperatures. IOW, as the ice melts the water not only becomes liquid water in the oceans but also water vapor in the atmosphere. This acts like a giant air conditioner that will cool the planet some. This moderating of the temps will last, however, only until as long as the ice holds out. After it's all gone look out!
  • MemphisBill
    The sun is not doing this.
  • Max_1
    SALINE levels change...
    ... Plankton don't like that.

    SALINE levels change...
    ... Warm South Pacific currents don't like that.

    SALINE levels change...
    ... Water covers 70% of earth, will earth like it?
  • Everyone knows that preventing climate change, or at least the worst consequences of it, is not going to be easy. While the task required is large and difficult, there are some simple, quick, and easy fixes that can make a real difference, and perhaps even buy us more time. But they are being ignored.

    http://www.selfdestructivebastards.com/2009/11/low-hanging-fruit.html
blog comments powered by Disqus