Rumsfeld decision let Bin Laden escape: Senate report

By Agence France-Presse
Sunday, November 29th, 2009 -- 11:51 am
Share on Facebook Stumble This!

osamabinladen20090427 Rumsfeld decision let Bin Laden escape: Senate report

WASHINGTON (AFP) – Osama bin Laden was "within the grasp" of US forces in late 2001 but escaped because then-defense secretary Donald Rumsfeld rejected calls for reinforcements, a hard-hitting US Senate report says.

The report, set for release Monday, is intended to help learn the lessons of the past as President Barack Obama prepares to announce a major escalation of the conflict, now in its ninth year, with up to 35,000 more US troops.

It points the finger directly at Rumsfeld for turning down requests for reinforcements as Bin Laden was trapped in December 2001 in caves and tunnels in a mountainous area of eastern Afghanistan known as Tora Bora.

"The vast array of American military power, from sniper teams to the most mobile divisions of the marine corps and the army, was kept on the sidelines," the report says.

Story continues below...

"Instead, the US command chose to rely on airstrikes and untrained Afghan militias to attack Bin Laden and on Pakistan's loosely organized Frontier Corps to seal his escape routes."

Entitled "Tora Bora revisited: how we failed to get Bin Laden and why it matters today," the report -- commissioned by Senator John Kerry, chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee -- says Bin Laden expected to die and had even written a will.

"But the Al-Qaeda leader would live to fight another day. Fewer than 100 American commandos were on the scene with their Afghan allies and calls for reinforcements to launch an assault were rejected.

"Requests were also turned down for US troops to block the mountain paths leading to sanctuary a few miles away in Pakistan.

"The decision not to deploy American forces to go after Bin Laden or block his escape was made by Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld and his top commander, General Tommy Franks," the report says.

"On or around December 16, two days after writing his will, Bin Laden and an entourage of bodyguards walked unmolested out of Tora Bora and disappeared into Pakistan's unregulated tribal area. Most analysts say he is still there today."

Rumsfeld's argument at the time, the report says, was that deploying too many American troops could jeopardize the mission by creating an anti-US backlash among the local populace.

The report dismisses arguments at the time from Franks, Vice President Dick Cheney and others defending the decision and arguing that the intelligence was inconclusive about Bin Laden's location.

"The review of existing literature, unclassified government records and interviews with central participants underlying this report removes any lingering doubts and makes it clear that Osama bin Laden was within our grasp at Tora Bora."

The report admits that capturing or killing the Al-Qaeda leader, accused of orchestrating the September 11, 2001 attacks on the United States that killed nearly 3,000 people, would not have eliminated the worldwide extremist threat.

"But the decisions that opened the door for his escape to Pakistan allowed Bin Laden to emerge as a potent symbolic figure who continues to attract a steady flow of money and inspire fanatics worldwide," it says.

"The failure to finish the job represents a lost opportunity that forever altered the course of the conflict in Afghanistan and the future of international terrorism, leaving the American people more vulnerable to terrorism, laying the foundation for today's protracted Afghan insurgency and inflaming the internal strife now endangering Pakistan."

As Obama prepares to announce Tuesday a bold new strategy for Afghanistan, Kerry points out at the beginning of the report that when the United States went to war less than one month after the September 11 attacks, the mission was clear: to destroy Al-Qaeda and kill or capture Bin Laden.

"Today, more than eight years later, we find ourselves fighting an increasingly lethal insurgency in Afghanistan and neighboring Pakistan that is led by many of those same extremists," he says.

"Our inability to finish the job in late 2001 has contributed to a conflict today that endangers not just our troops and those of our allies, but the stability of a volatile and vital region."

Share this article:
  • Print
  • email
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Story comments are below...

  • WJM51
    They didn't WANT to kill Bin Laden. How could they keep the fear going without their boogey man? He was the way they kept doing as much damage as they could with all the sheep saying "YES, do MORE damage to our way of life". I don't think it was nearly as much incompetence as knowing just what they had there in OBL as a propaganda tool, and they needed him alive as long as possible. In fact, Benazir Bhutto said that he was dead just before they killed her. He could have been dead for 7 years, now, and the rest of world could know it and with our shitty MSM here, we will NEVER hear about it.

    Never attribute to incompetence that which can adequately be described as evil purpose. ESPECIALLY when republican scum is involved. And Rummy is just as scummy as a human being can be, right up there with Cheney and the rest of the dirt.
  • bobotheclown
    Spot on! I should have read your comment before I posted nearly the same thing :)

    OBL's been dead for years, they have to keep him alive as an excuse to keep killing & raking in the profits. I think Cheney is still pulling the puppet strings.
  • kdoug
    My comment was almost identical ... shows you should read comments before posting ...
  • terry
    It is all about the money and profit margins. Wars generate money and profit margins. Unfortunately, it is at the cost of lives and the individual (private, no contract) businesses that make the profit reap it in.

    Until we have an understand of what is the true market driver, this will continue, i.e. Blackwater
  • lordbalto
    Bin Laden was a CIA tool. They created Al Qaida to fight the Russians in Afghanistan and they used him for a false flag operation to justify their occupation of the country. By the way, check out the CIA recruitment ad at the Asia Times.
  • decora
    evidence please
  • Phil E. Drifter
    See my links above, 'Best Enemies Money Can Buy'
  • reyrey
    Exactly!!

    You beat me to it too. Bush's worst nightmare would have been capturing him. Or even worse, killing him!

    Without him to instill phony fear day after day, Bush would have been screwed.

    If he could have, he would have had him in a West Wing hidden room drinking Dom Perignon and dining on ChateauBriand.

    How many people know that fucking prick Bush is the one who DISBANDED the task force that was searching for Bin Laden!!
  • EnderW
    Oh, come on. The Republicans love bin-Laden! They want him to come fuck their daughters! bin-Laden enabled them to go against the true enemy of the Republican Party: AMERICANS!!!!
  • EnderW
    Which they did with a gusto!

    All bin-Laden did was let Republicans bring their utter hatred of Americans out in the open!
  • bruman
    While not astonishing, the report proves, beyond a doubt, the utter incompetency and foolishness of the Bush Admin. The guy everyone wanted was allowed to escape because Rumsfeld was trying to run a war like he ran Searle Pharmaceuticals as its CEO. He basically was the most despised CEO in Searle's history and ran the company into the ground. Then, as Secretary of Defense, he screwed up Afghanistan and Iraq. How Cheney can go on national TV and Radio and speak badly of Obama is beyond me. Cheney, Bush and Rummy belong in Leavenworth Prison.
  • bobotheclown
    Incompetency? I think it shows they didn't want to capture OBL. Then the questions of why not have to emerge.
  • habu99
    I think the why not is pretty self-explanatory:with the American public informed that OBL had either been captured or killed, Jabbering Junior would have had a much tougher, if not impossible, sell on his Iraq delusion.

    If people knew the actual mastermind of 9/11 was out of circulation, how much residual bloodlust would have remained to support Dipshit's dream of impressing his father, or taking over the oil for American corporations, or instituting PNAC-inspired science fiction of "democracy" growing in the sands of the Middle East?
  • rickpetes
    NOt incompetency; it's just one of the few times that the baby bush administration decided not to arrest the innocent. To this day, no charges for 911 have been filed in any court. Why? Because there is no evidence. This is a faith-based war. Have faith in what they tell you and kill who they say. Don't ask questions.
  • Phil E. Drifter
    The FBI's most wanted list doesn't have OBL on it for the 9/11 attacks. Why? Because there's no hard evidence he perpetrated/helped perpetrate 9/11.

    Before the usual (right before elections) grainy video released by OBL, his first one (amazingly this was transcribed by Faux News and is still online) explains how there is a 'government within a government' in the US and that he had nothing to do with 9/11. (OBL was once a paid mercenary for the CIA in the 80s, causing unrest in Russian-controlled areas of the Middle East.)
    (see Bush Family's Partnership w/ Killers of Americans: tinyurl.com/carlylegrp ...
    The Best Enemies Money Can Buy
    From Hitler To Saddam Hussein to Osama bin Laden - Insider Connections and the Bush Family's Partnership with Killers of Americans


    Hmm Saddam was a US ally in the 80s [Reagan sold him WMDs] before they sent him up the river after this invasion... OBL was a US ally in the 80s during the Cold War... before the US sent him up the river by blaming him for 9/11... Oh yeah, HITLER was a US ally, Prescott Bush [Dubya's grandpappy] made millions selling steel to the Nazi War Machine before the US entered WW2 and Prescott was forced to resign from board of Directors due to conflict of interest...)

    OBL Transcript of first video appearance:
    http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,40750,00.html

    Then the CIA started making fake tapes with an OBL look-alike to keep the people cringing in fear, and releasing them days/weeks before elections.

    He also describes how the real perps flying the hijacked planes had no idea it would bring down the entire buildings, they only wanted to crash the planes into prominent US landmarks; and they were dancing with joy when they heard the buildings collapsed and thought it was a sign from Allah, because they never intended to collapse the buildings.

    And google 'dancing Israelis'...ah hell I'll do it:
    http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/fivei...
    (fully cited with links to MSM articles to prove veracity)

    False flags are as old as war itself.

    (Check out wikipedia's entry for 'The Big Lie,' it explains Hitler's war strategy (curiously how the US is following it to the letter.) "Never admit defeat." etc.)
  • RickAce
    Osama bin laden = Emanuel Goldstein
  • Schmice
    George Orwell fan. Very good post.
  • decora
    OBL would have executed Orwell as a 'decadent western intellectual'. c'mon people lets use some common sense.
  • bobotheclown
    This just further proves to me that OBL was just a tool in this whole thing. And now he's been dead for years. Benazir Bhutto casually mentioned that in an interview and was assasinated soon after. Remember the shrub saying he no longer cared about OBL? He also knew OBL was dead. Why did Dead Eye Dick and the shrub fly OBL's parents out of the country after 911?
  • decora
    because the bin ladins are a massively huge family, he has several -dozens- of siblings. and they basically disowned OBL for his becoming an anti-govt zealot.

    it would be like if one of sam-waltons grandkids decided to blow up the eiffel tower, sarkozy would get all the other waltons on a plane back to arkansas real quick.
blog comments powered by Disqus