Obama says greater US trade with Asia will strengthen US jobs

By Raw Story
Saturday, November 21st, 2009 -- 10:56 am
Share on Facebook Stumble This!

barackobamaflag20090428 Obama says greater US trade with Asia will strengthen US jobsUS President Barack Obama, back from a tour of Asia, called Saturday for the United States to produce more goods to sell across the Pacific, touting trade as a way to revive the troubled US economy.

Facing rising unemployment and slipping poll numbers, Obama assured the public that creating new jobs back home was his top priority on the week-long tour that took him to Japan, Singapore, China and South Korea.

"I traveled to Asia to open a new era of American engagement," Obama said in his weekly radio address, recorded while he was in Seoul.

"Above all, I spoke with leaders in every nation I visited about what we can do to sustain this economic recovery and bring back jobs and prosperity for our people -- a task I will continue to focus on relentlessly in the weeks and months ahead," he said.

Obama, who was elected in the midst of the worst economic crisis in decades, said the lesson of the turmoil was that the world's largest economy should not fuel its growth on going into debt.

Story continues below...

"In order to keep growing, we need to spend less, save more and get our federal deficit under control," Obama said.

"We also need to place a greater emphasis on exports that we can build, produce, and sell to other nations -- exports that can help create new jobs at home and raise living standards throughout the world," he said.

If the United States increased exports to Asia-Pacific nations by five percent, "we can increase the number of American jobs supported by these exports by hundreds of thousands," Obama said.

He gave the example of the Massachusetts-based American Superconductor Corporation, which he said has added more than 100 jobs by providing wind power and smart grid systems to Asia's emerging economies.

But Obama acknowledged he could not bring back all the jobs lost in the crisis.

"Even though it will take time, I can promise you this: we are moving in the right direction," he said.

Pro-trade business groups have had mixed feelings about Obama, whose Democratic Party enjoys strong support from labor unions.

On his trip, Obama said the United States would engage in the Trans-Pacific Partnership -- a hitherto obscure pact involving Brunei, Chile, New Zealand and Singapore -- in hopes of building a vast trans-Pacific free-trade zone.

But a free-trade agreement between the United States and South Korea reached under predecessor George W. Bush remains in limbo, with Obama pressing Seoul to make more concessions for the beleaguered US auto industry.

This video was published by the White House on Nov. 21, 2009.

With AFP.

Share this article:
  • Print
  • email
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Story comments are below...

  • chabuka
    We are not as stupid as you think..President Obama....(I noticed you said trade...but what kind of trade did you mean...? FAIR trade with Asia is a lot different than whats going on now...FREE trade, ...where the American worker is supposed to compete with the overseas child labor, convict and slave labor (International Corporations, Chamber of Commerce, even some in Congress, says the American worker is paid to much, that we shouldn't fight that "developing nation" third-world, policy, would be so much easier and would make them so much more in profit, if the American worker would just accept their "fate", like the Chinese, Viet Nam, Taiwan, Indian, Mexican, African workers do in their countries...)...what happens if Americans don't want to work for or more likely CAN'T live on five dollars a day in wages..like the Chamber of Commerce says we should ......Oh thats right, can't have a well educated, livable wage paid middle class with any time on their hands...might actually pay attention to what you bastards in Government are letting the Corporations do to us, ...might protest..like the '60's, or the "WTO" summit, ...might actually change the "class" structure....throw the Corporate whores out of Congress and get the boot of Wall Street Corporations, Chamber of Commerce and a bought and paid for, Congress (the Congress of the Corporations, by the Corporations, and for the Corporations) off our necks...I know government is corrupt...but Government was not corrupted by any one other than the Corporations who have bought our government out from under us...how can government work for us, the people, when they are being bought and paid for by Corporations...("Campaign Donations") and "we" are not able to meet the "price" ...no wonder the Corporations don't want to pay us livable wages..we might be able to buy our government back from them
  • Savantster
    .
    We comprise 5% of the planet's population, and we consume 40% of it's resources. Perhaps we've become accustomed to an unsustainable lifestyle.

    now the rest of the planet wants to stop eating dirt for 2 meals a day, stop shitting in a communal pit in the center of the village, stop watching their children wither away and die from lack of food, or stop watching their babies get limbs blown off so Americans can have cheap gas for their SUVs.

    We're in a very terse spot, and I don't see how we can get out of it if everyone feels they have a right to lavish comforts. 6.5 billion people can't all own their own 3 cars per household, and can't all live in 5,000 sq. ft. McMansions, but we're telling them (through example) that they should want that.
    .
  • MrPunch
    Man the doublespeak is boggling...
  • Jhoffa_
    LOL!
  • edwards_com
    Amen, Like what. Sales clerks for Asian made superior products like BMW ( most are made in China ...you have to did for that one) How about Maytag?
  • Savantster
    "We also need to place a greater emphasis on exports that we can build, produce, and sell to other nations -- exports that can help create new jobs at home and raise living standards throughout the world,"

    The only way we can EVER "create jobs in America" is to force American companies to keep their means of production IN AMERICA. See, that's how it works.. people work in factories (when you're "making physical stuff").. and if you want "jobs" for "Americans", then the "factories" need to be in "America". This isn't rocket science.

    All this talk of "growth" is the problem. See, being "more" profitable (because being profitable isn't enough) means faster growth, but that requires finding ways to cut costs.. like building factories in some 3rd world country and paying those workers a fraction of what it costs to live in America.. and that takes jobs from Americans... who then can't afford to buy stuff (less stuff = lower standard of living these days; that is the catch-22, isn't it.. all in the name of "growth", which then only benefits the few who own all the means of production and resources).

    It boggles my mind how people just can't see some simple truths. Growth means "getting larger", and the people who get larger pocket books are those running the companies.. That's a small minority of the planet's population.. So, then, it seems that "growth", and any talk of existence in terms of growth is nothing but an exercise in helping the "few". Shouldn't we be talking about helping "everyone"? Doesn't everyone need to live? Labor as a tool for living isn't bad all by itself, but when when it becomes a tool that the few use as a disposable avenue toward their own "growth", it ends up being human lives that are disposable to those in power.

    If our goal is "constant improvement for all", we can't solve that by focusing on the few. Nor can we do that while letting the "few" control everything needed for improvement (resources and factories). If the few control everything, only the few will grow in significant ways. So all this talk of "America growing" is nonsense in the long term, for if America grows, others must not. In the short term, it means telling the "few" they have to not grow as much so the bulk of the country can grow.. and we all know what THAT means.. (the dirty S word.. socialism!).

    The world is no longer what it used to be, we can no longer function or think like we used to.. We need to change the paradigm.

    www.thevenusproject.com and www.thezeitgeistmovement.com ..
    .
  • Boson Bison
    I give kudos to Obama at times for things like this. If America can really generate jobs by producing things other countries are willing to pay for. As long as they're not paying with their lives.
  • turnip
    Savantster, you make some good points about growth being a large part of the problem. I may not agree with your adopted solution in it's execution, but do in part, in give it high merit on it's principles. The need for constant growth, which leads to most of the waste, pollution, and debt of today, is solely based on the mechanics of how 'money' itself is created, and the privatized system that supports it. To be more precise, there is little money created by fiat. The tail is not wagging the dog, money today is created endogenously through consumer and corporate credit, which is debt. There is no money in the entire system, just debt. And the debt incurred by the debt. In essence, there is a mortgage not only on the entire productive life of every citizen in the system, but a second one on the very system itself. The snake cannot survive by eating it's own tail, nor can we use debt to pay down debt. Start with THE BANK that created the system, then the 'appointed' figures that protect it, then return an honest monetary system to the people. The rest will take care of itself.
  • Savantster
    .
    An honest monetary system doesn't account for the future obsolescence of humans in the production side of the production/consumption cycle. Technology reduces/replaces the need for human labor but people keep making more babies. Humans without jobs have no money, nor means to get money. How can a system that uses money as a means for people to survive support people that can't get money?

    Have you a solution for that? If so, I'd be curious to hear it :)
    .
  • truthops2010
    Obama seems to have forgotten how we got into this mess over the last 25 years or so. Some he's not personally responsible for starting the problem, but all of them, he campaigned on the solutions but has yet to make a move to resolve them. We got into this mess by deregulating the Banking, and Financial Services industries, cutting taxes for primarily the wealthy, sending our manufacturing base overseas to service the new gods of international trade via NAFTA, GATT, WTO, etc, spending trillions of dollars to slaughter Iraqis and Afghanis who had nothing to do with 9/11, signing the largest budget for the Pentagon in our history, perpetuating the control of the FED over our currency and its fostering of companies like Goldman Sachs who are too big to fail by sucking up to the FED and taking on former executives and others from Goldman Sachs, yadda yadda yadda. But no, in Obama's storybook analysis, it is because we, meaning you and I who now have to shop at f'ng Wal Mart to survive aren't saving enough money, and spending too much. I'm still waiting for Obama to take on any of the big corporate players who have trashed our economy. Wall Street is booming, and food lines are growing. He inherited this economic mess no doubt, but he has had choices of who to bail out. Has anyone seen bailout money flow into their communities in the form of easing of credit to small business yet? Any infrastructure projects started yet? Any direct employment flowing from the huge amounts of bailout money besides the cash for clunkers programs? Huh?
  • Savantster
    .
    And we got into this mess in general because we have more people who needs jobs than there are jobs available (locally, at present.. but it will continue globally over time).

    We're in this mess because of how we look at private ownership of the planet. The few own the means and resources while everyone is born and must try to live here with those resources and means.

    Technology replaces human labor.. robots do menial labor faster and more accurately in every place it's used, and there are a lot more places it could be used as technology progresses. There will be an ever increasing proportion of the population that wants jobs (to get money to feed their family with), but an ever decreasing number of jobs for humans to do.

    Evolution (of technology) caused the problem.. now we need to evolve our understanding of private ownership (of the planet) since that is what is causing problems today.
    .
  • airjackie
    The GOP have memory lost as the Bush Administration with the corrupt appointed US Treasury Secretary and Alan Greenspan all borrowed billions of dollars from China. Now we are in a recession and have to hope China will be nice enough to allow the US to take time to pay back the loan. Now if only Bush hadn't given Iraq that free 1 Trillion dollars from US taxpayers as we could use it now. President Obama will have to do some fast talking and hope China will understand our sitution.
  • nader paul kucinich gravel
    NAFTA Nation
  • aldoraines
    Hard to believe the guy. I don't think he has kept one promise yet. Obama is a typical republican. Promise the moon until elected then into the back with the knife. Now I know what Karl Rove meant when he implied history will make us think fondly of W.
  • edwards_com
    Then please sign up for another GOP bogus war which Bankrupted this country.
  • greg789
    Obama doesn't believe that trade creates new jobs in the U.S. He believes that campaign contributions flow to advocates of free trade and cheap labor. He wrote off the people who got him elected while still in his transition and he has not looked back.

    We need a third party starting now. The only planks in the party are jobs, jobs and jobs. That subject encompasses cheap labor such as H1 Visas, Green Card Visas and illegal immigration. It includes outsourcing to countries we can never compete with until they develop labor laws, unions, Health and Safety laws for workers, environmental laws and retirement laws. We need nuclear power and a new thirties style CCC to train our half civilized youths into fields like machinist, mechanics, civil engineering and construction to rebuild our infrastructure. God what a country we would have.

    Anyone in the new party that mentions guns, abortion, gay marriage. religion or islamofacism gets kicked out.
  • Savantster
    .
    "That subject encompasses cheap labor such as H1 Visas,"

    That's funny.. since most of the team I worked with at Worldcom (software to handle your phone calls) were H1 visas, and they all made more than I did. Cheap?hardly.. And my "team lead" went on to work for HP, and he got a HUGE raise, to something like $125,000 a year to manage a team of developers, something like 20 people on the team.. he was still on his Visa. He had 4 Degrees (2 BS and 2 Masters) and was razor sharp with regard to design.

    By contrast, of the 3 (other) white Americans we had come through our team, none showed any of the skill or aptitude the Indians did. I was the only white guy on the team that did well (better than 1/2 of the Indians, and all of the white Americans we rotated through).

    What's most interesting about your proposal is that we make humans into tools for production, but you don't suggest we foster creativity and general enlightenment. Sad, that "work" is all we care about, and it's all we care about because it lets us "buy stuff".. 90% of which we don't need, 1/2 of which we don't actually ever use, but 100% of which we're convinced is the only way to "exist".

    Life is about more than "working" so you can "have stuff". Private ownership, just the idea of it (for large scale things), restricts our potential and makes us nothing more than tools for those living like gods off your labor.
    .
  • greg789
    When I retired two years ago I was making a 100,000 a year in IT and didn't manage anyone. I'd like to see all IT jobs in America staffed by Americans including your buddy's $125,000 a year job.

    I don't know what the hell you are talking about in the rest of your response. I "make humans tools of production"? Anyway you can't join the Party.
  • Savantster
    .
    "make humans tools of production"

    It is a reference to thinking the monetary system can work long term, or for the entire planet. Technology is replacing humans, period. Advocating for "good jobs", while good for the short term, doesn't address the major problem staring us in the face. You almost glamorize "work" instead of "living". Most people out there aren't working at their jobs because they like it, they work to buy food and have shelter. If you don't work, you die a slow and miserable death, and that doesn't make sense to me. If we can have a world where the machines do the work and humans just live their lives, why wouldn't we want that world? .. and your work today enriches the few, not you. You might make a decent wage, but most people don't.. and the people at the top live like gods while the masses struggle and fret about how to feed their kids.

    Labor parties would be a good short term thing compared to what we have now.. but the natural evolution of that is a world where you don't have to work. In fact, we don't have enough work for everyone on the planet who wants it, now. That is only going to keep getting worse as time progresses.
    .
  • greg789
    OK I understand what you are saying and it is valid. IF the world develops in a certain way, machines will replace all human labor. At that point, then we will need an entirely different way of placing value on humans - a new way of sharing the wealth. I have thought on that and years ago I read a book on the subject titled "End of Work". It came out a little after another book titled 'Death of the American Programmer."

    But End of Work only happens if the world develops a certain way. If we blow ourselves up, then the survivors might just be reduced to the neolithic age. If the Western Industrial countries spiral down the path of "cheapest labor", then we are "eating our seed crop" so to speak and we are doomed. The doom is not that we are living at a lower standard of living, but that the excess money that is now plowed back into research, education, etc won't be there. India and China are not going to be able to pull themselves out of their problems caused by their huge populations. They can only drag the Western countries down to their level. The technology they are playing with did not come from them but from us, made possible by the excess money we had that educated our young and paid for the research.

    I admire your social concerns. If more of us worked at coming up with solutions as you obviously have, the world would be better off.
blog comments powered by Disqus