Obama admin refuses to sign land mine treaty

By Stephen C. Webster
Tuesday, November 24th, 2009 -- 7:47 pm
Share on Facebook Stumble This!

landminevictim Obama admin refuses to sign land mine treatyAfter reviewing the Bush-era policy, the Obama White House has decided to maintain the prior administration's refusal to sign an international treaty banning land mines, according to published reports.

"More than 150 countries have agreed to the Mine Ban Treaty's provisions to end the production, use, stockpiling and trade in mines," the Associated Press noted. "Besides the United States, holdouts include: China, India, Pakistan, Myanmar and Russia."

"We made our policy review and we determined that we would not be able to meet our national defense needs, nor our security commitments to our friends and allies if we sign this convention," State Department spokesman Ian Kelly reportedly said.

Advocacy organizations like Human Rights Watch had urged administration officials to sign the treaty. The United States is the largest worldwide contributor to the recovery of undetonated mines, which still pose a severe danger to civilians in 70 countries. No land mines have been produced by the U.S. since 1997, when the Land Mine Ban Treaty took effect. The last time American forces deployed the weapon was during the 1991 invasion of Iraq.

According to the International Campaign to Ban Land Mines (ICBL), efforts undertaken in 1999 to recover mines "have saved millions of lives through the removal of more than 2.2 million emplaced antipersonnel mines, 250,000 antivehicle mines, and 17 million" explosive remnants of war.

Story continues below...

Last year land mines "killed at least 1,266 people and wounded 3,891," AP added, citing the ICBL. One third of the deaths were children, according to the group.

"In contravention of the treaty, however, the United States stockpiles some 10 million antipersonnel mines and retains the option to use them," Reuters reported.

Share this article:
  • Print
  • email
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Story comments are below...

  • MikeG
    Outrageous! Same old shit from this guy.

    I'll bet the landmine lobby in Washington was out in force. Ol' buckle under Obama.

    All future victims of landmines kindly send your severed arms and legs parcel post c/o 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, Wash DC, USA!!!!
  • douvie
    C'mon. He was just showing us how bipartisan he can be with the Rumsfeld-Cheney-Rice wing of the Republican party.
  • Guest
    Corporatist Fraud.
  • kucinich2012
    I didn't vote for him. 'nuff said....
  • trevinla
    And i will work to get a real primary in 2012!!! Bushbama's ratings are dropping not because his policies are to far left but because they are compromising too far right!!!
  • mledford27613
    Right or Left doesnt matter its bowing to the companies pulling his and the rest of our "representatives," used very loosely, strings. There is no more left or right they are all the same.
  • clareawasw
    Right, you are excused then. What kind of passive aggressive useless comment is that?!
  • moxaman
    Obama should be sent to Afghanastan to fight. Maybe then he'd learn of the real horrors of war. He, like Bush before him, are nothing but armchair general chickenhawks who never had to face and see death and those dying right before their eyes. Obama is a fraud, a puppet of the military industrial complex who are destroying our country and the entire world.
  • bobdevo
    More business as usual bullbleep from this Administration. Like we need friggin'
    land mines to protect us from Canada and Mexico?

    WTF???
  • stevelaudig
    Looking more and more like Bush every single day in matters like war and torture.
  • donofcali
    Why, why, why? Land mines are pure evil. The vast majority of victims are non-combatants. Obama loses major points once again.
  • tenorlord
    We've come up with a better landmine. Our new ones have an "expiration date". It's set when they're laid, and is a military advantage as well as providing a more humane aftermath. The US can decide to mine an area for two weeks, at the end of which the mines go inert. An enemy would have no idea when they would go inert, but our generals would and would use that area when it's thought to be unusable. All of which negates any need for the treaty.
  • David
    Ah of course, the US would never mine an area for 20 years or more, so civilians would never be in danger because... ???
  • tenorlord
    Because that wouldn't be militarily expedient. We can't know what the outside limit of these mines would be, since that be useful for an enemy to know, but I would guess that the max. time allowable would be under two years. We would want to take control of that area long before then just from a commanding officer's national pride.
  • enorceht
    STOP COMPLAINING
    This IS change ... we voted for the dems because we wanted change:
    for us - peace, freedom, and health care
    and for the government - I think when they said change they ment that what they
    were telling us during the campaign would CHANGE after they were elected
    it's all a matter of perspective
  • leblue
    Maybe he's really Jeb in black face...same old poo different day. Maybe hope and change were his stage names when he parked cars and entertained at the republican golf course. Shame on you Mr. President, we deserve better. So far NO good.
  • decora
    black face? did you wake up this morning and think to yourself 'what is the most racist, ignorant thing i can post on raw story'?
  • pastoragnostic
    That SOB. he's turning into Bush-Lite.
  • trevinla
    He has been Bushbama on most things military, judicially and corporate since day 1. He has bush advisors in the pentagon, more bush lawyers than Obama laywers in the justice dept and wall street advising him on main street economy...
  • ITDog09
    It's taking time but eventually everyone will realize, like ALWAYS, most of us voted for the lesser of two evils, and in so many years we'll all do it again.

    You want to elect someone who will chanage things? Do what they do. Start at the local level, the school board level, and work hard for some 20 years, electing one progressive after another. Start taking the money out of elections, and work to break up the media monopolies.
  • Eyeball_Kid
    Obama is escalating the conflict in Afghanistan. He's refusing to sign the land mine treaty. He's stalling on closing Gitmo. He's contaminating the terrorists' trials by predicting guilty verdicts and death sentences. He's refusing to replace corrupt Bush-appointed federal prosecutors.

    Oh, I remember those inspiring, uplifting campaign speeches. Oh, how he ushered in a new era... Weren't we excited and optimistic? I even bought an Obama tee shirt, and wore it while shopping in the supermarket.

    Change we can believe in....
blog comments powered by Disqus