Newsweek defends ignoring Obama critic’s ties to Bush

By Daniel Tencer
Tuesday, November 17th, 2009 -- 12:46 pm
Share on Facebook Stumble This!

newsweekpostamerica Newsweek defends ignoring Obama critics ties to BushReaders don't need to be informed that a Newsweek contributor who has written critical analyses of the Obama administration was a Bush administration adviser, a representative for the news weekly says.

Since the inauguration of President Obama, former Bush White House bioethics adviser Yuval Levin has written several items for Newsweek, among them an analysis published earlier this month in which Levin argued that the Democrats missed an opportunity to divide the Republican Party by not including tax cuts in the Obama administration's fiscal stimulus package.

"A moderate stimulus bill that offered a short-term boost and included a meaningful tax-cut component, for instance, might have won a very significant number of Republican votes in Congress last winter and launched a damaging internal GOP battle over the proper role of the opposition," Levin wrote.

As numerous bloggers have since pointed out, Levin's analysis overlooked the fact that the stimulus package included $280 billion in tax cuts, and still received no votes from Republican congresspeople. That oversight opened Newsweek to accusations of bias.

Now Ari Melber at The Nation writes that Newsweek doesn't believe readers need to know that Levin was a member of the Bush White House as recently as 2006.

Story continues below...

"We believe our readers are aware of Mr. Levin's background, and are able to discern a reported news article from argument, which Levin's recent piece was," spokesperson Katherina Barna said in explaining why Levin's byline states that he is "editor of National Affairs and a fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center," but doesn't mention his links to the Republican Party.

"Does anyone think most readers keep track of White House staff by name?" Melber asks. "Or that readers memorized Levin's affiliation from March? It's hard to tell if the magazine somehow believes this argument, or just doesn't care that it's not very believable."

Levin's specious claims about the stimulus package are not the first time he has been criticized for something he wrote in Newsweek. In February, Atlantic blogger Andrew Sullivan described Levin's analysis of the stimulus package as reading "as if we live on Mars."

How do you write a column about the stimulus package while barely mentioning the only reason it existed at all: the sharpest depression since the 1930s? Yuval Levin managed it. How do you write it without mentioning well over $300 billion in tax cuts from a Democratic president (far more than anything the Republican actually proposed last fall)? Levin managed that too.

In June, Levin teamed up with conservative writer and Weekly Standard founder Bill Kristol in an article declaring their opposition to health care reform, which the duo dubbed "ObamaCare."

The American public is right. ObamaCare is wrong. It should and can be defeated. ... If we do, and this fight goes well, the struggle to save the country from ObamaCare could mark the beginning of a new center-right coalition to restrain the grossly excessive ambitions of the administration and congressional Democrats, with regard not only to health care but to spending and borrowing, and to the role and reach of government more broadly.

Share this article:
  • Print
  • email
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Story comments are below...

  • Does anyone actually read Newsweek?
  • jeffersonperrin
    I've quit reading many publications since 2004 and even more since Obama was elected. Especially because of instances as with my own hometown paper(The Kansas City Star)ran a 'news' story on Page 1, above the fold, about the concern of the right wing that the president might 'indoctrinate' all of our school aged children--as if such an impossible feat could actualy be accomplished (in one hour or less). They would still hyave a subscriber if they had reported (in the true sense of the word) the real story (though hardly new news to anyone with itelligence); 'The Right Wing Fear Mongers Once Again' or 'The Right Wing Reveals Concern President Posesses Magic Powers" with the sub heading 'Obama Intent On Using Them For Evil'.
  • mledford27613
    I actually do read newsweek, It is normally a left leaning magazine although there have been a few articles that have leaned the other direction lately. Today's has Guess Fing Who on the cover. Thats right that brain dead poor excuse for a human being SP. I wouldn't even open the mag today I am so sick of hearing about this woman it is getting ridiculous. I am officially boycotting this magazine this person deserves not one second from any journalist and yet they keep putting her in the spotlight. But I guess if you hate her you are supposed to read it, I however am choosing to not purchase or watch anything else with her on or in it. I am tired of her and her earth is flat jargon. If everyone would stop giving her attention she would go away, the same with MJ the man is dead I don't care. That was rambling sorry.
  • lousgirl84
    Who the fuck is Guess Fing. Nothing comes up under google???
  • LumberJock
    I'm guessing! Should it read: Guess F'king Who?

    Leads me to Michelle Bachman.

    But then I used to be an Intell Interpretive Analyst ... before I left the republican party.
  • lousgirl84
    LOL - Thanks for the interpretation. Congratulations on leaving the thug party.
  • msvox
    Newsweek displayed their colors in the early '80s when they fired journalist Robert Parry for exposing and then digging too deeply into Iran/Contra and GHW Bush. Parry's exile was a warning to other journalists and it was remarkably effective and very destructive to our national discourse - but that's a larger discussion. Though they may have an occasional left of center voice (Eleanor Clift is no progressive, but she is at least rational) Newsweek is part of a corporate "megalopolos" and like all corporate media, they advance a corporate agenda and a necessary function of that agenda has been making unreasonable voices seem reasonable. Levin and Kristol are excellent examples, but certainly George Walker Bush is the sine qua non.
  • roooth
    I am shocked! Shocked, I tell you, to find out that Republicans are lying whores!
  • DFW
    I guess that they were so successful with inserting "Jeff Gannon" as a phony White House journalist that they think it's OK to go the strategy one step further and insert their people into formerly legitimate news sources, seeing as how Fox "news" is pretty much thoroughly discredited in the eyes of everyone but the follow-Sarah-off-the-edge-of-the-cliff crowd.

    Newsweek still has people with brains and open minds, like Eleanor Clift, but if they get crowded out by infiltrators from the extremist right, and the publication in question doesn't seem to think it's a problem, it will precede Fox into oblivion. Right-wing advertisers will ask themselves "why advertise in Newsweek, when we can reach 100% of our target audience of crazies on Fox?" Progressive or apolitical advertisers will realize that they are not reaching their target audience, and shy away from advertising in Newsweek.

    One would think the Newsweek editorial staff and their financial overlords would consider this, but maybe they see the Fox model as their last chance of success. The might be well advised to consider the reading level of the typical Fox viewer, and realize that people like that don't buy news magazines like "Newsweek," as they require (or, at least, used to require) a certain level of literacy not usually found in the Fox audience.
  • thepoliticalcat
    That's an excellent analysis of Newsweek's prospects in the marketplace. And, may I add, any product that requires a modicum of literacy or thought or the capacity therefor. The less-educated tend NOT to buy books, magazines and newspapers. And the falling circulation numbers show clearly the result of pandering to the less-educated and disgusting the more-educated with bias and, pardon me, bullshit.
  • eekeller
    You don't suppose Newsweek still wonders why their circulation is abysmal.
  • panskeptic
    Newsweek denies that ID'ing Levin as a Bush advisor is necessary, but I bet they include it in his next bout of fantasy.
  • Savantster
    .
    "We believe our readers are aware of Mr. Levin's background, and are able to discern a reported news article from argument, which Levin's recent piece was,"

    A) you always disclose as if your "readers" are learning all of the players for the first time (perhaps presuming they know who the President is would be OK).

    B) this was not an "argument" or debate, it was propaganda. A debate occurs with facts, and this "article" was missing facts and posing a hypothetical that ignored existing facts as well.

    Looks like "News"week is now "Propaganda"week.
    .
  • paullohan66
    your news magazine is now labeled a right-wing rag. I'll never buy it again.
blog comments powered by Disqus