Lieberman: Public option worse than doing nothing

By David Edwards and Daniel Tencer
Sunday, November 1st, 2009 -- 1:27 pm
Share on Facebook Stumble This!

liebermancloseup Lieberman: Public option worse than doing nothing'I feel relevant,' senator says of attention to his health care stance

Connecticut Senator Joe Lieberman says he would prefer doing nothing to passing a health care bill that includes a public option, and he is making clear that, if health care reform doesn't pass, he plans to put the blame on supporters of the public option.

"I think a public option will actually hurt the economic recovery and our long-term fiscal situation because it will end up causing the government to raise taxes, it will probably raise premiums or it will put us further into debt," Lieberman, an independent who caucuses with the Democrats, told CBS's Bob Schieffer.

Lieberman was on CBS's Face the Nation discussing his announcement last week that he plans to join the Republicans in filibustering a health care reform bill if that bill includes the public option. Lieberman further angered members of the Democratic Party when he announced he plans to campaign for some Republicans in 2010.

"I feel so strongly about the creation of another government health insurance entitlement, the government going into the health insurance business, I think it's such a mistake that I would use the power I have as a single senator to stop a final vote," Lieberman said.

Story continues below...

"Wouldn't that mean you might wind up with nothing instead of something?" Schieffer asked.

"Yeah, but I would say to the people who are all of a sudden [supporting] the public option, a government health insurance company ... they're stopping us from getting something done," Lieberman replied.

Schieffer pursued the line of questioning: "What you're also saying is nothing is better than health reform that includes a public option."

"The truth is that nothing is better than that, because we have to follow the doctor's oath here -- do no harm," Lieberman said.

The senator argued that the public option would not improve health care, pointing to a Congressional Budget Office report stating that the public option may have higher premiums than public plans.

But many critics of Lieberman's decision argue that he is motivated not by policy differences but by a desire to get attention, and by the fact that many insurance companies are headquartered in Connecticut. Schieffer noted that Lieberman has received some $400,000 from insurance companies.

Blogger Matt Corley at ThinkProgress advanced the notion yesterday that Lieberman is seeking attention, pointing to an article in the Hartford Courant in which Lieberman says of the controversy surrounding his decision: "I feel relevant."

Lieberman's relevancy to the process consists of the fact that Democrats need his vote to get the 60 votes they need to overcome a Republican filibuster of health care reform.

This video is from CBS' Face the Nation, broadcast Nov. 1, 2009.



Download video via RawReplay.com

Share this article:
  • Print
  • email
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Story comments are below...

  • johntwodogs
    Kucinich says that this bill is a bailout for the insurance companies. He says that since they stripped HR 3200 of the Kucinich amendment and the Medicare plus 5 payment, it will do next to nothing about keeping insurance companies competetive. That, and the fact that insurance will now be mandated! Just because the Republicans are against it, doesn't make it right! There has been so much backsliding and adding amendments to woo Republican votes, that the bill is basically a Republican tainted bill with no Republicans voting for it! It is set up to fail. And if the Democrats scrap it, the Republicans will also win, saying they were right all along. The ball-less Democrats should have gone with Single Payer all along. Now they are fucked; either way!
  • socialismorbust
    Actually, My Friend, I'd say WE are fucked.
  • johntwodogs
    I agree. Correction noted!
  • pjamala
    Well, it's really important for Joe to feel relevant isn't it. But being relevant has a price. If Joe votes to sustain a fillibuster, the Senate Democratic caucus must evict him and give his chairmanship to someone else. That's what happens in state legislatures to people who don't vote with their caucus on procedural votes. It should happen in the US Senate too.
  • tonybinca
    What do you bet Lieberscum is keeping his "public option," i.e., free taxpayer funded, medical care?
  • Chip
    And, we prefer nothing to Lieberman.
  • vegas409
    Is it me or is this guy a total ass
  • shrodingerscat
    Joe is the quintessential politician-on-the-take. Ever heard of the Hartford? He's either taking care of the insurance companies that are headquartered in his state or reeealy paying lip service to them. Seems like he should lose his chairmanship any time now. Think he's willing to take the chance?
  • Phil E. Drifter
    How does this asshole keep getting re-elected?
  • edwards_com
    Phil,
    I have wondered about that for years.
  • suzisunshine
    says he, who has great health insurance paid for by the taxpayer.
  • luschnig
    The last face many victims saw as they were marched into Nazi gas chambers was the face of a Jewish camp guard who had been coerced into herding has fellow Jews to their deaths. Likewise, many American's will have Joe Lieberman's vile visage burned into their retinas as they die because of the high cost, inadequate health care he is trying to foist on them.
  • socialismorbust
    Yo! Connecticut! WTF were you thinking after dumping this insensitive, arrogant, hate-monger as a Damnocrat then letting him slither back in as a (Ha-Ha-Ha!) "Independent". The only thing this jackass is independent of is THOUGHT and The Good of "We the People"!.
  • dennycrane
    Harry Reid---kick this ol' bastard in the ass, out of your party and all committees. Fuck, there's enough enemies you don't see, get rid of the ones that are standing right in front of you. Are you stupid or what? You've got mail on this bullshit, pal.
  • itsalltransparentnow
    Davis in the Washington Times:

    “It is too bad, but not surprising, that some liberal critics cannot debate Mr. Lieberman's position on the merits without attacking his motives or using scurrilous personal epithets.”

    Davis: LOL Here’s yer sign. Now get out of the kool-aid line! Libs are like hyenas, anything that doesn’t line up exactly with their agenda is lined up in the gun sight. And I mean anything. Oh, they’ll smile and sing kum bi ya but they’ll do it as they eat their own.
  • an84u
    This LIEberman's a consummate turdface shithead. I think the SOB has turned his full energy into getting attention...to the extent of being mentally unbalanced. I know I curse the day I ever voted for him on the Gore ticket. Actually, I think he caused the Dems to lose in 2000, and in turn helped the Supreme Court saddle the US w/little Shrubbutt-Lite and the flailing,old, shoot-em-in-the-face, criminal bastard Cheengangy. LIEberman certainly does not have the best interests of US citizens at heart. He's untrustworthy to the core.
  • shrapnel
    First time I ever agreed with Lieberman - but its just a coincidence. This whole process has been a sham from start to finish. Anything other than single-payer is just a bailout for the death-panels (sorry, Insurance Companies) and doesn't deserve support.
  • tarrant042
    Lieberman doesn't care whether the bill is right, wrong, good, bad or ugly. This is a very mediagenic opportunity -- he can get his name down as The One Who Killed Heathcare Reform in America. The relevancy of such a thing feels incredibly empowering, and it's Lieberman's singular motivation in this case. Lieberman, at his age, has no doubt faced the fact of his own mortality. For an individual with such a weak and damaged personality, the resultant mentality tends toward "I don't care whether they loved me or hated me, so long as they remember me."

    It's a pity that we as a nation allow people like Lieberman to remain in positions of power for such incredible lengths of time -- people like Lieberman being nothing more than common trash, of course.
  • billfromny
    Then let's give him what he apparently wants - nothing, including another electoral senate term.

    He doesn't deserve to be an entry-level manure spreader's apprentice after all the crap he's handed everyone.
  • darker
    Lieberman prefers to give us NOTHING.
    HE HAS LOTS OF PRACTICE DOING THAT!
    Someone should let him know that NOTHING
    is no longer acceptable! while he hands out
    everything to greedy corporate profiteers.
blog comments powered by Disqus