Holder disturbed by ‘interaction between Hasan and other people’

By Raw Story
Wednesday, November 18th, 2009 -- 1:45 pm
Share on Facebook Stumble This!

malikhasan2 Holder disturbed by interaction between Hasan and other peopleAttorney General Eric Holder appeared to suggest Wednesday that alleged Fort Hood shooter Nidal Malik Hasan may have had more contacts with Islamist radicals than what has been reported so far.

Speaking before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Holder said that authorities were looking into whether warnings signs were missed before the army psychiatrist allegedly went on a bloody rampage that left 13 people dead.

"I will say that on the basis of what I know so far, it is disturbing to know that there was this interaction between Hasan and other people. That is, I find, disturbing," he said.

That reference to "other people," in the plural, got the attention of some observers, such as Emptywheel blogger Marcy Wheeler, who highlighted Holder's statement on her blog.

Thus far, media reports had only confirmed that Hasan had contact with radical Yemeni cleric Anwar al-Awlaki. It was not clear whether Holder meant to suggest that Hasan had ties to other members of Islamist movements, or whether Holder had misspoken, as no follow-up questions were asked about the statement.

Story continues below...

The issue of Hasan's "contacts" gained fresh relevance this week as al-Awlaki, who had exchanged emails with Hasan, "blessed the act" and said the deadly shooting was "permissible" under Islam.

In his first interview since the November 5 rampage, al-Awlaki said the attack was allowed under Islamic law, sharia, because it was a form of jihad, or holy war, but that he had not ordered or encouraged it.

In the days following the shooting, authorities declared they believe Hasan to have acted alone. But as more information emerges on Hasan's background, a picture is emerging of an individual who sought at least the company and friendship of others who shared his views on Islam and America's foreign wars.

Last week, ABC News quoted "a senior government official" who stated that Hasan had "more unexplained connections to people being tracked by the FBI" than just al-Awlaki.

The network has also been trying to track Duane Reasoner, Jr., an 18-year-old convert to Islam who is said to have dined frequently with Hasan and who declared that he felt "no pity" for the victims of the Fort Hood shooting.

-- With Agence France-Presse

Share this article:
  • Print
  • email
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Story comments are below...

  • Terrible
    Well I'm seriously concerned about the interaction between AG Holder and other people that has led to him breaking US laws in allowing war criminals to avoid prosecution!
  • Prattvictory
    So the intelligence community who monitors these international communications never investigated, reminds me of Charlie Manson.

    The LA Sheriff thought Charlie was just about killing Black Panthers to start his race war. So they let him do it. Never arrested him for multiple parole violations because he was going to do what they wanted, murder Black troublemakers.

    Hasan was Dick Cheney's wetdream. Why should they stand in the way?
  • BAC520
    What good does it do to track, monitor, spy, surveill, watch, sneak and snoop on people and still let this happen? With all the super-eyeball spy power, they should put a guy on a no-gun buy list or something. I guess the government feels safe and secure behind the cameras. They are only protecting themselves and their own secrets. Meanwhile all the violent crime still goes on down here on land. So what if they are the "all-knowing, all seeing-eye?" Does that protect regular citizens? Or only them?
  • Savantster
    .
    The reason it seems it was "allowed" to happen is because it was not a coordinated terror act.. it was a guy pissed off that America seems to be ramping up the Crusade again. I'm sure he got tired of hearing all the white trash shit heads he was counseling talking about "camel jockeys" and "rag heads" and "sand niggers"... because if you didn't know it, that's how significant numbers of "foot soldiers" talk about this.

    They are now seemingly trying to make a case for terrorist action based on innuendo and confusing the people and facts. They are also trying to rally up support for the continued wars against "dirty arabs".

    As Jon Stewart pointed out.. Some guy who suggested that Hassan MUST be a terrorist because he "emailed al-Awlaki" had ALSO emailed al-Awlaki to ask him about Hassan.. so, if the act of emailing a "person of interest" regardless of the content of the email means you're a terrorist, then some journalists in America became terrorists just by asking around about the story. Seems silly, right? .. because it is.
    .
  • moonbeams62
    Holder said "there was this interaction between Hassan and other people..." IMO, that means the full body of communication Hassan had with people at Walter Reed, other soldiers, patients, his superiors, etc. not necessarily that he was communicating with Islamic Terrorists. I think Holder is emphasizing what a lot of people are wondering. When it was pretty well known that Hassan felt strongly enough about his beliefs that he would hire a lawyer to help him get out of the Army, and when he had disputes with superiors and with other officers, and when he was "counseling" patients and got poor evaluations, and he was on the internet posting vehement protests against the war, including exhortations to other Muslim soldiers,...it's pretty amazing he would be permitted to go to Hood and get assigned to be deployed. Not a good move on the Army's part. Quit twisting and interpreting what Holder said. You got this wrong.
  • disappointedvoter
    These goddamned religious nuts will kill us all.
  • Gorgeous George Orwell
    Two weeks after the massacre at Ft. Hood, all inconvenient and inconsistent details of the incident have been edited, scrubbed or censored, and all that remains is a well-defined frame for master debaters like Bill O'Reilly. As I watched him try to corral Ralph Nader into the "liberal" view that Major Hasan was insane, while Bill took the "conservative" view that Hasan was a terrorist, I opted to frame a related question in equally absurd simplicity: Major Hasan got off over 100 rounds, killing 13 including 5 of his co-workers and wounding 29 others. This would have required several reloadings of his FN Herstal semiautomatic pistol, yet a large roomful of freshly trained troops ready for Middle East deployment all stood around like deer caught in headlights, doing NOTHING. This begs the "O'Reilly"-type question "were they all cowards or just idiots?"

    The actual truth is most likely to be found in all those edited, scrubbed and censored details. Like, maybe the original reports of multiple shooters were accurate. Like, maybe the original report of Major Hasan's death was accurate. Maybe there's a reason so many of Major Hasan's co-workers were targeted. Maybe there's a reason Major Hasan's hairline keeps changing in published photos. Maybe there's a reason that certain eyewitnesses have been ordered not to discuss details of the incident. The final observation I have is that if Major Hasan was really this effective a marksman (despite being reprimanded for being in poor physical shape per Raw Story article), he should have been training Army sharpshooters instead of counseling them. And unless we can promptly produce legions of equally lethal marksmen, we better get the hell out of the Middle East NOW. We are just no match for them.
  • BAC520
    Orwell's media analysis is accurate, but ending the post with sarcasm is unhelpful. There are quite a few times I've had to shake my own head clean post-TV-mayhem and realize I've just been bamboozled by the tube or series of tubes. I don't want to miss a thing!!! Show the mylar balloon landing in the field again and the guy with the pitchfork!!! These machines will hack into your own mind if you're not careful. The illusion is one step ahead of you.
blog comments powered by Disqus