GOP bigwigs’ health insurance covers elective abortions: report

By Daniel Tencer
Thursday, November 12th, 2009 -- 6:39 pm
Share on Facebook Stumble This!

republicanpartyelephantlogo GOP bigwigs health insurance covers elective abortions: reportUpdate at bottom: 'Chagrined' GOP chair ends abortion insurance for employees

The health insurance plan offered to employees of the Republican National Committee includes coverage for elective abortions, a fact that could compromise the party's insistence that abortion be left out of any health care reform measure.

Since 1991, the RNC -- the group that co-ordinates Republican activities at the national level -- has been on a health insurance plan from insurer Cigna that offers elective abortion coverage, and the RNC signed up for the coverage even though it was an optional part of the package, says a report at Politico.

According to several Cigna employees, the insurer offers its customers the opportunity to opt out of abortion coverage – and the RNC did not choose to opt out.

Cigna spokesman Chris Curran declined to discuss the specifics of the RNC’s plan, saying it’s against company policy to reveal even the identities of its insured. But he said that Cigna’s products “are designed to meet the requirements of our individual employer clients. Employer clients are informed of the services covered and it is their choice to decide which benefits meet their needs.”

Story continues below...

There is no indication that any RNC employee has used the abortion coverage....

The revelation comes less than a week after the US House of Representatives passed a health reform bill that included an amendment blocking abortion from being covered under the health reform plan.

Pro-choice groups are sounding the alarm about the Stupak amendment, saying that it could restrict access to abortions even for people who are not on any public option insurance plan, because the amendment bars any insurance companies that participate in the health insurance exchange program from offering abortions, except in cases of incest or rape, or when the mother's health is in danger.

The amendment was proposed by Rep. Bart Stupak (D-MI) and House Democratic leaders determined they had to allow the amendment into the health reform bill in order to garner the votes needed from conservative Democrats to pass the bill.

The Stupak amendment has caused outrage among women's-rights groups.

"The Stupak-Pitts amendment is a giant leap in the direction of making abortion completely inaccessible to all of us," said Terry O'Neill, president of the National Organization of Women.

Some political observers have suggested that the amendment could be a deal-breaker for health reform in Congress.

"The Stupak-Pitts Amendment, barring private and public health insurance plans from offering abortions as part of basic coverage if they accept government subsidies, risks sinking the fragile health bill passed Saturday," writes Yana Kunichoff at Truthout.org. "President Obama and numerous Democrats say they will not support its passage with the amendment included."

Almost as soon as Republican spokespeople got wind of the Politico story, it appears they began to back-track and hint at changes to their health insurance plans.

“The current policy has been in effect since 1991, and we are taking steps to address the issue,” RNC spokeswoman Gail Gitcho told the news service.

The Republican Party's official policy on abortion states that life begins at conception. The party in principle supports a Constitutional amendment that would ban abortion.

But GOP Chairman Michael Steele, who is presumably covered by the Cigna health plan, has expressed views that are more centrist than the GOP's general position. While he describes himself as "pro-life," he has has said that he views abortion as an "individual choice" and has also voiced support for the funding of some types of stem-cell research.

'Chagrined' GOP chair ends abortion insurance for employees

Even though his own views towards abortion have moderated over the years, RNC chair Michael Steele didn't waste any time taking care of the latest Republican albatross.

"A chagrined GOP Chairman Michael Steele has told Republican National Committee staff to immediately stop providing RNC employees with insurance for elective abortions — an option that Republicans strongly oppose as Democrats try to pass a health care overhaul bill," the Associated Press reports.

"Money from our loyal donors should not be used for this purpose," Steele said in a statement released late Thursday. "I don't know why this policy existed in the past, but it will not exist under my administration. Consider this issue settled."

Steele faced widespread criticism earlier this year after he called abortion an "individual choice." He later "walked it back," as Politico's Ben Smith noted, by claiming that "I am pro-life, always have been, always will be."

Share this article:
  • Print
  • email
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Story comments are below...

  • dennycrane
    That's the fascist corporate capitalists way. Separate "plans" for the poor and elite. They get viagra for the penis, women have to pay for birth control pills. The capitalist pigs that have our "money" from the "bail-outs sit in their high rise offices and have "in house" Infirmaries that "dispense" the swine flu vaccines to THEM. While we have shortages caused by the pharma-phucks who sabotage Obama to make him look bad. It's "us" against "them."
  • overdoneputaforkinit
    Special treatment for Republicans, "morality" for everyone else.
  • Anais
    Do as we say, not as we do. -- RNC
  • ignatzfattis
    As I have always said -the Republican party may "officially" stand against abortion, but the Republican politicians and much of the base don't give a shit about abortion. They don't care if it's legal or illegal. If a rich guy's daughter gets knocked up by a black guy, he'll just do what they did before Roe/Wade -get the well paid family doctor to "remove an ovarian cist" or ship the daughter off to Japan.
    The Republican party is the party of the rich, and the rich can afford to get abortions even when it is illegal. The whole "anti-abortion" thing is an act to get votes that would otherwise often go uncast or to the Democrats -they did it to get the presidency for Reagan and have been pretending ever since.
  • allenallen
    So right. They just care because it's a big hammer. It gets the kooks to the polls.
  • victor
    This information could have saved us from 8 years of Bush if released prior to the 2000 election against Al Gore.
  • Heil Mary
    This hypocrisy is also practiced by Catholic clergy who insist pregnant mistresses of priests get abortions to save the priests' "calling" and to save Church money! One Philly priest actually took his THIRTEEN-year-old mistress to Planned Parenthood for her abortion! No doubt, many GOP mistresses get spa-setting abortions so they can "return to work" ASAP. Why aren't Dems demanding the criminalization of Viagra which leads to GOP abortions?? Or at least spousal and parishioner notification for all Viagra prescriptions so wives can prove their husbands' adultery and parents can thwart pedophile priests?? Steele's adulterous gold digging "Catholic" sister, Monica Turner Tyson, has probably had abortions just for her looks.
  • missskeptic
    "There is no indication that any RNC employee has used the abortion coverage"

    Well I should hope not! If I had any medical procedure, let alone an abortion, I sure as hell would sue somebody's ass if that information was plastered all over the news the next day! Geez, what a stupid comment! It's just one way the idiots at the RNC are trying to smooth over the bad news. "We had the coverage, but nobody used it!" Riiiiiiiight!!!
  • Savantster
    .
    But isn't it commendable that they have the CHOICE? Something they aren't willing to give anyone else.
    .
  • damixaustex
    They no longer have the choice. Steele made the choice for them. The procedure is disallowed.

    Steele would be really good at Government Run Health Care.
  • ignatzfattis
    "there is no indication that any RNC employee has used the abortion coverage"

    Should read

    "it is unknown if any RNC employee has used the abortion coverage"
  • damixaustex
    But...but...wouldn't you want to know if your party leaders were undergoing Hemorrhoidolysis or had endured a stapled hemorrhoidectomy procedure? Sometimes I do wonder about the GOP leadership.

    On second thought, I agree. Employers wouldn't know be privy to medical claims.

    Maybe the GOP office is making health decisions for it's staff? Sounds like Steele has no problem doing that.
  • luschnig
    In face of this and all the other enormities of the Republican capitalistic mafia which has oppressed America the only reasonable response is violence because they will never be talked out of their vices.
  • morepatience
    Save the calls for violence for sh*t hole sites like DU.

    Now how do I 'unlike' something? Got a little hasty trying to post a reply.
  • morepatience
    That's hilarious! It's not enough to get the provision from the House bill removed after the Senate is done, but it's a helluva big stick to swing.

    To play devil's advocate though, there's all kinds of things that I would opt out of if the notices that it's possible weren't buried in all kinds of small print.
  • Savantster
    .
    To punch the devil in the face, though.. you're not a lawyer charged with making sure you're not being hosed or paying for things you don't need. To kick the devil while he's down, though.. some people bother to read the fine print because it actually matters.. it's small to give lazy people a reason to not read it allowing for important things to be effectively buried.

    never sign anything that you haven't FULLY read. going to court and saying "but, it was small print! I didn't want to read that!" isn't a valid grounds for breaking a contract.
    .
  • eekeller
    Sorry....but, yes you can. Hiding things in the "fine print" is an old trick, and the courts are on to it.
  • Savantster
    .
    No, you can't. It's listed on the contract, it's binding. The courts may be on to it, but if you sign a contract, it's a contract.

    You're talking about "fine print" in "advertising", we're talking contract law here. Apples and Oranges.
  • eekeller
    Sorry, again, but "it's listed on the contract, it's binding" is naive. Too many years of practicing law have taught me that. So how long have you been practicing?
  • quizmos
    Once again, the Democrats have out-Republicaned the Republicans! Wake up America, Democracy and Freedom are Dead!
blog comments powered by Disqus