Fox News chairman says he’ll ‘block Google’

By Raw Story
Monday, November 9th, 2009 -- 10:01 am
Share on Facebook Stumble This!

11785 murdoch Fox News chairman says hell block GoogleUpdate at bottom: Murdoch defends Beck, claims Obama 'made a very racist comment'

Rupert Murdoch was hailed as an old-media pioneer when he bought MySpace for $580 million in 2005. While the new media social networking site has fallen behind its peers, its still made back more than the purchase price for Murdoch's News Corporation empire.

Now Rupert Murdoch has a new approach to the Web: Screw you.

In an interview with Australian television, the cantankerous chairman of News Corporation -- which owns Fox News, The Wall Street Journal and The New York Post -- said that he was considering blocking Google searches of his content.

Asked why the company hadn't chosen to remove its news stories from Google's index after creating a pay-for-content operation (the Journal charges for some articles), Murdoch explained, "I think we will, but that's when we start charging," he said. "We have it already with the Wall Street Journal. We have a wall, but it's not right to the ceiling. You can get, usually, the first paragraph from any story - but if you're not a paying subscriber to WSJ.com all you get is a paragraph and a subscription form."

Story continues below...

"There's a doctrine called fair use, which we believe to be challenged in the courts and would bar it altogether," he added. "But we'll take that slowly."

The company has routinely lambasted Google News for "stealing" content, by allowing excerpts of articles on its pages and including a link to the story.

"The people who simply just pick up everything and run with it – steal our stories, we say they steal our stories - they just take them," the 78-year-old Australian said. "That's Google, that's Microsoft, that's Ask.com, a whole lot of people ... they shouldn't have had it free all the time, and I think we've been asleep."

Murdoch defends Beck, claims Obama 'made a very racist comment

"Murdoch defended Glenn Beck's accusation that the president was a racist in his long interview with Sky News Australia," Business Insider's Jay Yarow notes.

As Yarow notes, Murdoch's comments on Beck and Obama occur at approximately 18 minutes into the interview.

"On the racist thing, that caused a (unintelligible--grilling?). But he (Obama) did make a very racist comment. Ahhh..about, you know, blacks and whites and so on, which he said in his campaign he would be completely above. And um, that was something which perhaps shouldn't have been said about the President, but if you actually assess what he was talking about, he was right."

RAW STORY was unable to determine exactly what Obama said on July 22 that Murdoch might consider racist, but a transcript of the president's remarks can be accessed at the White House website.

Q Thank you, Mr. President. Recently Professor Henry Louis Gates Jr. was arrested at his home in Cambridge. What does that incident say to you and what does it say about race relations in America?

THE PRESIDENT: Well, I should say at the outset that "Skip" Gates is a friend, so I may be a little biased here. I don't know all the facts. What's been reported, though, is that the guy forgot his keys, jimmied his way to get into the house, there was a report called into the police station that there might be a burglary taking place -- so far, so good, right? I mean, if I was trying to jigger into -- well, I guess this is my house now so -- (laughter) -- it probably wouldn't happen. But let's say my old house in Chicago -- (laughter) -- here I'd get shot. (Laughter.)

But so far, so good. They're reporting -- the police are doing what they should. There's a call, they go investigate what happens. My understanding is at that point Professor Gates is already in his house. The police officer comes in, I'm sure there's some exchange of words, but my understanding is, is that Professor Gates then shows his ID to show that this is his house. And at that point, he gets arrested for disorderly conduct -- charges which are later dropped.

Now, I don't know, not having been there and not seeing all the facts, what role race played in that, but I think it's fair to say, number one, any of us would be pretty angry; number two, that the Cambridge Police acted stupidly in arresting somebody when there was already proof that they were in their own home; and number three, what I think we know separate and apart from this incident is that there is a long history in this country of African Americans and Latinos being stopped by law enforcement disproportionately. That's just a fact.

As you know, Lynn, when I was in the state legislature in Illinois, we worked on a racial profiling bill because there was indisputable evidence that blacks and Hispanics were being stopped disproportionately. And that is a sign, an example of how, you know, race remains a factor in this society. That doesn't lessen the incredible progress that has been made. I am standing here as testimony to the progress that's been made.

And yet the fact of the matter is, is that this still haunts us. And even when there are honest misunderstandings, the fact that blacks and Hispanics are picked up more frequently and oftentime for no cause casts suspicion even when there is good cause. And that's why I think the more that we're working with local law enforcement to improve policing techniques so that we're eliminating potential bias, the safer everybody is going to be.

All right, thank you, everybody.

Beck said on Fox and Friends after the Gates comments, "This president, I think, has exposed himself as a guy, over and over and over again, who has a deep-seated hatred for white people or the white culture. I don't know what it is."

As the AP reported in July, "Beck's statement was challenged on the air by Fox host Brian Kilmeade, who noted that most of the people who work for the nation's first black president are white."

The AP also noted that "Bill Shine, Fox News senior vice president of programming, told the TVNewser Web site that Beck had 'expressed a personal opinion which represented his own views, not those of the Fox News Channel. And as with all commentators in the cable news arena, he is given the freedom to express his opinions.'"

However, it appears now that senior vice president of programming for Fox News isn't quite so familiar with his boss's overall feelings on the subject, and may have perhaps spoken too soon.

Share this article:
  • Print
  • email
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Story comments are below...

  • Savantster
    .
    GOOD.. block ALL your lies from google.. then only the idiots still stupid enough to buy your useless rag will see your bullshit. You'd be doing the world a favor by killing your papers as you become more obsolete to the reality-based world.

    buh bye..
  • AnonymousBosch
    HAHAHAHAHAHAAAAA!!!!!

    "If we can't figure out a business model that works with the new technologies, we'll just move to a small island in the south Pacific. We'll be fine, you'll see!! We'll do even better than the Googles."

    "And stay off our lawn!"
  • Phil E. Drifter
    lol I like the cut of your jib, good sir. *hat tip*
  • ignatzfattis
    Good -I'm glad he's going to start restricting acces to his fake news empire -won't change anything for me, and maybe if rednecks have to start PAYING for their propaganda, they'll pay attention to some REAL news outlets. Limbaugh should start charging a subscription too.

    Can you imagine the Bush years WITHOUT Fox news? Things would have been SO different.
  • morepatience
    IIRC Limbaugh does charge for at least some (maybe all) of his online content, which is what is being discussed here.
  • lorn
    Fake news? Keep going pal you are just getting started. Can you imagine if media like this place reported on how Obama is really just Bush3.

    I see over 50 comments here on this dumb useless insultingly irrelevant Palin story........and there are two or three a day here.

    Meanwhile the Democrats just took a massive step towards making abortion illegal. Surely not funding it for poor women is a 'good' start right. No commenting here on that story. The US rejecting the Goldstone report at the UN which the whole rest of the world supports (not Israel of course) no comments, no coverage of that here.

    All of the sneaky underhanded moves to get that health care bill through in the middle of the night made it look like Patriot act 2.
    Is it a stimulus bailout for insurance companies dressed up as health care?
    It would be nice to see open debate on that here, but I guess we just have to accept the prioritization of rawstory and jump up and down over the lates Palin outrage and hurl our poop at one another. Too bad, some people used to come here to talk real politics. Most of them have moved on.
  • tjfxh
    Well, we know who's going to win this one, and it ain't gonna be Rupert. See ya, bozo.
  • fhallall
    Thereby hastening your descent into irrelevancy.
  • Phil E. Drifter
    This is the first time I can recall Rupert ever saying ANYTHING about ANYTHING.

    Does anyone else suspect that he's 'getting a little hot around the collar'?
  • kiboshki
    This is awesome! Imagine a day when googling "healthcare" or "iraq" doesn't return a single FOXNews or Wall Street Journal lie.

    This would be the best thing to happen to this country in a long, long time!
  • WJM51
    Wow, PAY to get lied to? They already have that, it's called a phone sex line. Have fun trying to make money off of that, Rupie. Oh, and go back to Australia. You've done MORE than enough damage to THIS country. And take your "fair and balanced liars" network with you.
  • You mean.....she's been lying to me????

    OTH!!!
  • matticusfinch
    who the hell would pay for any content from that propaganda disinfo factory??
  • davidrvelasquez
    Excellant plan, Rupert! You filter yourself and FOX off the internet and maybe we can get RAWSTORY and other outlets to stop covering every irrelevant moronic utterance that FOX incessantly drips...and maybe you'll just disappear completely.
    Absolutely fine with me.

    Though I'd have preferred Rupert and his whole klan had all died of a bad batch of shellfish.
  • bonethug iranian
    Get 'em Rup! Faux News blocked? That's news we can all live with.
  • carlsewall
    Murdoch really is dumber than I thought. Google accounts for at least six percent of all Web traffic, probably more like ten percent, and is the dominant way for people to find information. If he thinks his reputation will sustain him in a bubble, he's an idiot.
  • starvapor
    Good riddance!!!...
    The less we're able to hear and see anything from FAUX News and its wing-nut-loon-clowns-squad and their followers, the better off our nation will be.
  • ComradeRutherford
    "There's a doctrine called fair use, which we believe to be challenged in the courts and would bar it altogether," he added.

    That is far more disturbing than blocking search engines.
  • Better yet, how about if Google simply blocks any holdings of Murdoch?

    FOX can go the way of the 404 Error for all I care.
  • Antinous
    Nobody want your stories old fart, they're nothing but lies anyway.
blog comments powered by Disqus