Whoops: CNN’s Wolf Blitzer admits to knowing the smell of marijuana

By Stephen C. Webster
Monday, November 9th, 2009 -- 9:50 pm
Share on Facebook Stumble This!

gregorybrotherswolfblitzerpalincnnautotunenews Whoops: CNNs Wolf Blitzer admits to knowing the smell of marijuanaCNN host Wolf Blitzer admitted on the air Monday that while he may not know what a marijuana plant looks like, he'd certainly be able to identify the smell.

Retorting, co-anchor Jessica Yellin jokingly asked, "How would you know what it smells like?" -- a question that drew more than a laugh from CNN pundit Lou Dobbs.

Both hosts were engaged in a discussion of Rep. Barney Frank's (D-MA) recent comment that because he is not an "outdoorsman," he would not recognize a marijuana plant if he came across one. The aside was made in response to a follow-up question by a reporter who discovered that Frank was present when his partner was arrested for possession of marijuana in 2007.

"Frank says he did not see the plants and wouldn't know what they were anyway," said Yellin during the CNN segment. "Who knew that only outdorsie types know a marijuana plant when they see it? So, Wolf, would you know a marijuana plant if you saw one?"

Blitzer seemed flustered.

Story continues below...

"I'm not sure, I, I ..." he began. "Not sure I would know. I could smell it, I think. I know what it would smell like. But I think, I'm not sure --"

"How would you know what it would smell like?" Yellin interjected.

"Let's check in with Lou Dobbs," Blitzer said. "He's got a lot more coming up on this story, I'm sure, at the top of the, er, I ... You can smell marijuana Lou, but you probably wouldn't recognize a plant. Am I right or wrong?"

Dobbs was already wearing an open-mouth smile.

"Well, you're dead wrong," he said. "I would recognize it rather readily."

Blitzer laughed. "Alright, good!" he said.

"I think we've got to give Barney Frank great credit for -- I love the fact that he said that he's not an outdoorsman," Dobbs continued. "I mean, that's funny as it can be!"

He concluded: "Well, thanks a lot. I mean, you and Jessica got out of that just in time to save both your careers."

This video was broadcast by CNN on Monday, Nov. 9, 2009.

Share this article:
  • Print
  • email
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Story comments are below...

  • reuterspiel
    Is this supposed to be schocking? Appalling ? Horrifying? Why are we supposed to care?
  • Savantster
    .
    This story has importance, but you have to read between the lines.. you have to analyze it.

    Wolf has probably smoked before, Lou almost seems a certainty. What this means is that cannabis is very very pervasive in our society, and "successful" people have smoked in the past (at a minimum)... not sure? We have a Governor out there who said they smoked it, inhaled it, did it all the time... made lots of money making movies, and now holds office. We have a President that smoked it... we have 10s of millions of people smoking it every day and the are fully functioning members of society. And we still have a prohibition on it.

    We're also seeing the "news" trying to call a Senator a "liar" based on hyperbole. I smoked for 2 or 3 years, daily.. and I've never seen a growing plant "in person". I've seen the leaf pattern all over, but I've also seen that general shaped leaf on non-cannabis plants (wondered to myself if the plant I was looking at was cannabis or not, it wasn't). I've seen growing plants on TV and the interwebs, but I've never actually seen any in the wild. What Frank was saying is that he isn't the type to have the knowledge typical of someone that "identifies plants", and he's never been shown/taught what to look for to positively identify cannabis.. so, if those plants were "hidden" in other growth, you could walk right by and never know what it was. The story (or part of it) is that the "news" is skewing those truths and trying to paint Frank as a laughable liar.. That's not news, that's tabloid.. yet, it's on CNN.. now THAT is a bit of a "news story" (that our news outlets are so compromised).

    And the deeper story is, this prohibition could ruin people's careers (if you're just a working Joe, that is.. the special ruling elite types, they can smoke pot and run the country). It's WAY past time to lift this prohibition rooted in superstition and bullshit.
    .
  • Phil E. Drifter
    Oh please, who doesn't know what it smells like. I don't care if you've never smelled it before. You smell it once, you say to yourself, "DAMN! That's GOTTA be pot!

    One-of-a-kind unique smell. Oh, and uh, the fact our ancestors have been smoking it for, what, 100,000 years, it's kinda ingrained in our DNA to recognize that pungent odor. (The human species is about 200,000 years old.)
  • From one day to the next, they left us with no job," said an out-of-work electrician, as he marched alongside some 200,000 fellow workers and their supporters in downtown Mexico City this month.
  • Savantster
    .
    Are you suggesting there might be better stories out there? ;)

    .
  • Steve
    Legalize it. Stop destroying precious lives for using a plant that has bben with us since caveman times! Tax it if need be, but for gods sake stop the madness!
  • fukum
    I'll bet Wulf knows what AIPAC's ass smells like too
  • stevelaudig
    Then maybe he is bright enough to be on Jeopardy after all. It was with no small amount of pleasure that I watched Wolf Blitzer lose badly on Celebrity Jeopardy. He managed to rack up a negative score of about $4000 on behalf of the American Cancer Society and in the process confirm to my satisfaction that he is an man ignorant of many of the basic facts of the U.S., the world and life in general. And is neither bright, nor quick. He also lacks depth. He doesn't know very much. But we knew that he didn't know. He Bushian in that sense: incurious. He lost to a "Desparate Housewife" and a Conan O'Brien fellow.
    http://www.jeopardy.com/minisites/celebrityjeop...
  • Rocky
    Do we care about this? Think not. This is not news. This is stupidity. Big surprise eh!
  • Steven
    Good ole' 5th columner, Israeli-firster, disinfo spreader, Wolf Blitzer
  • Mooftown
    Have you ever noticed how in the news nobody ever discusses if what someone is doing is right or wrong, good or bad, they merely discuss whether or not what they are doing will be effective politically, will it win elections, will it influence the public, will there be a backlash from so and so... "will so and so get the votes they need even if they rape disabled people? well find out after this break" I mean what the fuck where is the substance
  • canuckkid
    C'mon Wolf - you must have been a teenager sometime, maybe even in the Seventies... you can't tell us you've never seen the stuff before (neither can Barney Frank, for that matter...!).

    I know what it smells like, too, bud - that doesn't mean I smoke the shit.
  • Phil E. Drifter
    They can't tell us they've never seen it before because the DEA regularly runs ads on tv which has the opposite the 'intended' effect, the Annenburg School at UPenn found kids are more likely to try pot after seeing the anti-pot commercials.

    This is no surprise to me, though. They wouldn't be advertising it if there was no one to arrest. They need bodies to fuel their war machine.

    The US gov creates it's own enemies with the laws they write just so they can arrest and murder legally.
  • jdouglas
    Raw Story's web site isn't just advertising--it's personally targeted advertising. Several months ago I bought a Brooks Brothers suit at an outlet store, and within two days I was seeing Brooks Brothers ads on this Raw Story page. Five years ago I bought a pair of work boots from a catalog called Duluth Trading company, and ever now and then this Raw Story page shows a Duluth Trading company ad. I bought two dress shirts from Lands End and almost immediately, Lands End ads started appearing on the Raw Story page.
  • bygone
    at least u actually bought something, I just visited Adobe's website to check out some of their video editing software and now every day I am forced to see their ads on websites I visit - not just Rawstory but Huffington Post, Haaretz just to name the last three Ive visited, there are many others as well...Im not in the “web ad” or “data collection” business, so I don’t know for certain how it all works but it seems to me that there must be a shared database somewhere which companies buy into and when my IP address pops up and that company is a participating member, the ad shows up..i dont know how it is determined which ads go where but maybe someone has some insight and could share. I called Adobe and they treated me quite rudely, denying having any knowledge as to what I talking about which was disappointing. By the way, in addition to the fact that the Adobe product was way overpriced, the bad customer service experience and because I am being harassed by their ads, I'll look elsewhere for my video editing needs.
  • Mooftown
    That's pretty revolting... I wish I had the capacity to make a website like this that was there solely for the benefit of the country... not sensationalist bullshit, or collection of advertising revenue... say... jdouglas... wanna start a site? :-p
  • Savantster
    .
    In a world run by money, you can't blame someone for trying to pay the bills.

    However, you CAN leverage technology to shield yourself from the abuse. I run apache web server on my PCs (free) and have a modified HOSTS file that redirects malicious (and a lot of ad sites) back to my own browser. I see no ads from RAW, period. When something sneaks in, I add the site to my HOSTS file and it goes away..

    you can go to "appache org" and get the webserver, and google "mvps host" to get a starting custom hosts file (was the top link for me, to mvps dot org).
    .
  • Phil E. Drifter
    Yeah how do you plan on paying for your bandwidth, or are you and your friends just gonna write stories and investigate for free?

    You should be happy RS offers a free version.
  • Mooftown
    Stupid article... why get distracted by bullshit like this... I guess it's the way it is in america... attention spans are so short that we can find articles like this to be valid just as much as any other. I wish "raw story" could hold itself to a higher standard... but then again 60% of their website is advertising
  • Spire
    With breath-taking, ultra-titilating stories like this, it's time to quit the internet and stalk check-out counters.
  • Funny how knowing what pot smells or looks like would be a career-ender yet regularly making violent innuendo as well as helping cover for war mongers Bush/Cheney by either omission or by outright lies in their news coverage gets them promoted.

    "Greatest country in the world" my ass.
  • Mooftown
    Great post jackspace, well put!
  • Mooftown
    When confronted with the prospect of once smelling marijuana, Wolf Blitzer giggles like a little schoolgirl and blushes as if he'd been naughty. Yet when it comes to investigating whether or not the Iraq war was justified, he shucks his responsibility altogether... The news media in the United States is severely out of whack :-\
  • fukum
    Wolf probably never smelled hootch, he was too busy sniffing girls bicycle seats as a teen
  • WJM51
    Same comment as the Barney Frank Story.

    SO?
  • Nick
    I'm not sure if the story or the headline is more idiotic.
  • shablon
    What a bunch of liars! Pot plants are featured on thousands of t-shirts, decorations, placards, and this lying creep says that he does not know what pot looks like. LIAR!
blog comments powered by Disqus