Revealed: Two California airports allow passengers to fly with pot

By Stephen C. Webster
Saturday, October 17th, 2009 -- 11:15 am
Share on Facebook Stumble This!

medical marijuana bud Revealed: Two California airports allow passengers to fly with potA little noticed policy at two California airports allows properly qualified passengers to fly the friendly skies carrying up to a half pound of marijuana, news agencies revealed Friday.

RELATED: Gallup poll finds record level of support for legalizing marijuana

"The policy [at Oakland International Airport] is spelled out in a three-page document quietly enacted last year by the Alameda County Sheriff's Office," Mercury News reported. "It states that if deputies determine someone is a qualified patient or primary caregiver as defined by California law and has eight ounces or less of the drug, he or she can keep it and board the plane."

San Francisco International Airport shares the policy, CBS 5 in Oakland reported. But passengers travel with the drug "at their own risk," the agency added.

Sgt. J.D. Nelson with the Alameda County Sheriff's Office told Mercury News that officers and airport security will issue warnings to those bringing marijuana into areas where it is not legal, but do not call the passengers' destination to notify them of a traveler carrying the drug.

Story continues below...

"We're certainly within our right to, but we never have," he said. "Our notification of the passengers [legal risk] is for their own safety and well-being."

In a state that has allowed medicinal marijuana for over a decade, the policy of these two airports is hardly surprising.

Newsweek, in a recent feature, declared Oakland, California to be America's "Potopia," highlighting a nine-block area of the city as "a model for what a legalized-drug America could look like."

"Nestled among what was once a rash of vacant storefronts, [is...] a kind of urban pot utopia, where everything moves just a little bit more slowly than the outside world. Among the businesses [...] are the Blue Sky Coffeeshop, a coffeehouse and pot dispensary where getting an actual cup of Joe takes 20 minutes but picking up a sack of Purple Kush wrapped neatly in a brown lunch bag takes about five. There's Lee's Bulldog Café, a student lounge with a not-so-secret back room where the haze-induced sounds of "Dark Side of the Moon" seep through thick smoke and a glass-blowing shop where bongs are the art of choice. Around the corner is a taco stand [...] that has benefited mightily from the university's hungry students."

The local institution of higher learning, referred to as Oaksterdam University, is like a mecca for marijuana enthusiasts, the magazine reported.

"An education at Oaksterdam means learning how to grow, sell, market, and consume weed—all of which has been legal in California, for medicinal use only, since 1996," Newsweek added. "... But Oakland is unique in that it has four licensed and regulated dispensaries, each taxed directly by the city government. This past summer, Oakland voters became the first in the nation to enact a special cannabis excise tax—$18 for every $1,000 grossed—that the city believes will generate up to $1 million in the first year. Approved by 80 percent of voters, and unopposed by any organization, including law enforcement, the tax was pushed by the dispensary owners themselves, who hope the model will prove to the rest of California that a regulated marijuana industry can be both profitable and responsible."

"Oakland's airport policy was enacted in February 2008, but [Oakland attorney Robert] Raich said he didn't want to publicize it until recently lest the Bush administration change federal regulations, or lest it become an issue in Obama administration drug officials' confirmation hearings," Mercury News added.

A Field Research Corporation poll of Californians found in May that for the first time ever, a majority in the state support legalizing marijuana and taxing it similarly to alcohol.

The poll (PDF link), an “independent and non-partisan survey,” centered mostly on tax issues. Results were culled from the answers of 901 registered California voters, with a margin of error of +/- 3.4 percent.

“Three in four support increasing two so-called “sin taxes” - the state tobacco tax and the state alcohol tax. Majorities also endorse several other forms of sin taxes that are not currently taxes, including a special tax on the sale of pornography, which an overwhelming 80% support, and legalizing marijuana and taxing its proceeds, supported by 56%,” the poll found.

"Such action would also send the state into a headlong conflict with the U.S. government while raising questions about how federal law enforcement could enforce its drug laws in the face of a massive government-sanctioned pot industry," the Associated Press noted earlier this month.

President Barack Obama has said repeatedly that the legalization of marijuana is not in his vocabulary.

RELATED: Gallup poll finds record level of support for legalizing marijuana

Share this article:
  • Print
  • email
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Story comments are below...

  • undrgrndgirl
    there is nothing in oaksterdam's curriculum about consuming weed, except in the context of making cannabis foodstuffs - a legitimate way for medical users to take their medicine...i am a 2009 graduate.
  • Ryan
    Legalization is polling 56% in California!!!!!???? WOOOOHOOOOOO!!!!! 2010 baby!!!!! In case you guys dont know, the petitioners are out in force on this one already all over California. There are 3 ballot initiatives and all they need is around 450,000 signatures to make it onto the ballot in 2010. I have seen petitioners with all 3 around several of my local markets already. If its polling at 56% already for legalization, I cant see how this doesnt pass. Especially with a turnout thats likely going to be high over a repeal of prop 8. Cant wait!!!
  • Phil E. Drifter
    I hope this passes. I will be moving to CA if it does.

    I was deafened (80% deaf) from OTOTOXIC drugs given to me when I was hospitalized. Because of ALCOHOL.
  • donofcali
    "An education at Oaksterdam means learning how to grow, sell, market, and consume weed"

    I don't believe anyone is teaching selling and marketing, since both are illegal. You don't see nor will you see advertisements for cannabis like you see for prescription drugs. Pushing for profit is not part of the cannabis culture.

    And the concept of educating someone on consuming weed is quite laughable. Just another ignorant journalist from Newsweek.
  • Phil E. Drifter
    Durrrr education is not illegal. yet.
  • Phil E. Drifter
    You sir are a moron who has been brainwashed by government propaganda. From before recorded history until 1937 cannabis was a drug that was (accodring to UUtah) prescribed for over 100 common ailments.

    Do some research before you out yourself on the web for all to see what a complete moron you are.
  • Phil E. Drifter
    it's illegal BECAUSE it is the remedy for over 100 common ailments. Because Big Pharma CAN'T make money OFF A PLANT.
  • Savantster
    .
    I think the point was that they probably spend most of their time teaching growing, and probably the differences between different kinds of cannabis (body versus mind high, etc). The idea of "selling" implies "store fronts" or something, and that is illegal... you have to be a dispensary selling to patients, not just slinging on the street. Not much to market then, right?

    I don't get the idea that this person is anti-cannabis, but instead is pointing out that Newsweek is setting up Oaksterdam U for the ire of prohibitionists.. That is, if they think people are being "taught" how to be "drug dealers", they will be motivated to action to shut them down.
  • harlinredlands
    The City of Oakland is very intelligent, in both having this policy, and also in having the foresight to wait until after Obama's cabinet was formed.

    Those who oppose legalize marijuana are enemies of the Soul.
  • DownriverDem
    Mail order anyone?
  • conservatve
    Love your liberty. Our nation may once again become the land of the free.
  • Phil E. Drifter
    Stop calling it 'marijuana,' call it by it's english name: CANNABIS!
  • Well, why? Cannabis, Marijuana, Marihuana, Ganja...what does it matter what s/he calls it? Why not use the Assyrian "Qunubu" if you want a "true" word for it. That came before "Cannabis." One of the things I love about Mota is how many names there are for it!
  • Phil E. Drifter
    Anslinger used the Mexican Spanish word for it to incite 'fear of the unknown' in congress. Had they been told it was the same crop that carried this nation since before it was it's own nation, they never would have outlawed it. Using the wrod 'marijuana' brings with it the stigma Uncle Sam has spent 70+ years creating.

    We're not speaking Mexican Spanish, we're speaking English, so I'd appreciate it if people used it's English name: cannabis.

    Read tinyurl.com/1mn (20 minute read) and (much longer) tinyurl.com/potconviction (TOC to the research conducted by Profs Whitebread and Bonnie, two UVa law professors who then later published 'The Marijuana Conviction' in 1974). (I have a copy of this book, bought in 2005 after I searched for it on a whim at half.com)

    I do have a jpg somewhere, black background and hundreds of terms used to describe the plant, which together form a cannabis leaf.
  • "We're not speaking Mexican Spanish, we're speaking English,"

    Who is this "we"?

    I just think its very entertaining that you imagine it is of importance to anyone else what you prefer this plant called! That's just funny. I mean, you're serious, too, aren't you? And it's Latin, my friend, not "English." As 'Cannabis Sativa' was cooked up as part of Carl Linnaeus' Genus/Species scheme.

    Peace!
  • Savantster
    .
    The right-wing has successfully taken over this country by playing games with words and framing.

    Ask people if they think marajuana should be illegal and many will say yes.

    Ask people if cannabis should be illegal and many people won't know what you're asking them; they won't have their "framed" and "preconceived" thoughts in their head about what "it" is.

    We spend too much time in this country trying to play word games and it's destructive to the fabric of society. Words have meaning, and we should strive to be accurate in our selection of words because they matter.

    Another common framing used to emotionally charge a debate but isn't rooted in reality..? "pro-abortion" instead of "pro-choice", and the opposite of "pro-life" which is only actually "anti-choice" seeing as how pro-war, pro-death penalty, anti-feeding the poor, et. al. is not "pro-life".. It's all about the framing.

    Let's frame cannabis back to a non-offensive term so the masses can think about it without their conditioned biases. That's all he's saying. There's not much else in your life that you use some other language to describe, so why should the topic of cannabis be any different?
  • 'We're not speaking Mexican Spanish, we're speaking English, so I'd appreciate it if people used it's English name: cannabis.'

    Well, you are free to call it what you want. And appreciate whatever you want. Or not.

    And by "English," I think you mean "Latin." :) "Cannabis Sativa," was named by Carl Linnaeus as part of his Genus/Species name scheme. Latin.

    PS, who is "we"? And what is "Mexican Spanish"?

    Just calling it by a Latin or "less-Mexican" sounding name won't remove the stigma against weed. That stigma is not there because of Mexico, now. It has its very own stigma. :)
  • Savantster
    .
    the stigma is in the trigger caused by the name, not just the plant. why do you think some people took to calling it "dope"? they said it makes you dumb, another word for dope as in "you're such a dope".

    it has so many names because so many people have crusaded against it for so long that the culture has to keep shifting what it's called so they can discuss it in public without scorn. Pretty sad.

    As far as Latin goes, most of our scientific (commonly held) names are latin. It's what we use in the English language to describe something's "technical name".
  • Stigma is in the high. And the popular banter over the years. People dont need to be assuaged over their anti-Mexican tendencies/impulses! Most of the people are behind the decrim of MARIJUANA.

    And hey, I'd rather uplift and educate people past their fears. Not cater to them by divorcing myself from Mexican things. Peace.

    http://theunapologeticmexican.org/elmachete/200...
  • Phil E. Drifter
    And so what was the genesis for the early state marijuana laws in the Rocky Mountain and southwestern areas of this country? It wasn't hostility to the drug, it was hostility to the newly arrived Mexican community that used it.
blog comments powered by Disqus