Liberal filmmaker ‘took a lot of grief’ for movie that questions Afghan war policy

By Kathleen Miller
Wednesday, October 7th, 2009 -- 8:58 am
Share on Facebook Stumble This!

robert greenwald 0 Liberal filmmaker took a lot of grief for movie that questions Afghan war policy

The left-wing filmmaker behind a documentary that questions U.S. policy in Afghanistan says he "took a lot of grief" and lost progressive donors when he began making the movie "Rethink Afghanistan."

Robert Greenwald's latest effort criticizes the U.S.'s current approach to the war in Afghanistan, even if it tarnishes the image of Pres. Barack Obama by association. Greenwald says his intent with the film is to get people talking about the Afghan war and questioning U.S. policy there, which made some progressives angry in the early days of the Obama administration.

"When we started doing it, we took a lot of grief, we lost funders, people were mad at us," Greenwald said in a phone interview with Raw Story. "It was at a time when there was this notion that anything the Obama administration did you were not supposed to question."

Greenwald has a petition on the movie's website that calls on Congress to debate "civilian alternatives to a failed military-based approach to bringing peace and security to the region." He told Raw Story he was prompted to make the movie after a recent trip through Vietnam when he noticed parallels between the Afghan war and the Vietnam war.

Story continues below...

"I started thinking, literally, you could cross out Kennedy and replace it with Obama, and cross out communism and replace it with a fear of terrorism," Greenwald told Raw Story.

After the movie's D.C. premiere on Tuesday night, a freshman Democratic congresswoman quoted a "colleague" of hers as saying Obama may need to be saved "from himself" in deciding Afghan war policy.

Suburban Maryland U.S. Rep. Donna Edwards made the comments while discussing the "tough choice" ahead for members of Congress in which they will have to decide whether to approve funding more troops for the war in Afghanistan if Obama follows the recommendation of his top military commander there and asks for additional resources. General Stanley McChrystal, the top U.S. and NATO commander for the war in Afghanistan who was hand-picked by Obama, has told the president he wants to expand the U.S. presence in Afghanistan.

"As one of my colleagues--who shall remain nameless--said, 'Indeed, we may have to save this president from himself on Afghanistan,''" Edwards told the crowd, after encouraging attendees to take action in their communities by "raising questions" about the war.

"We have to be vocal and insistent on this administration and this Congress not to fall prey to the language of the good war," Edwards said, referencing how the Afghan efforts were once viewed favorably by the American public in comparison to the Iraq war.

Edwards told reporters later that her comments stemmed from concerns that Obama was being pressured to escalate the Afghan war.

"It's clear just from reading the headlines he is getting some advice and a push to escalate," Edwards said. General McChrystal has said the fate of the Afghan war will likely be decided in the next 12 months, and is expected to request as many as an additional 40,000 troops for the conflict in the near future. The U.S. currently has roughly 100,000 troops in Afghanistan. Obama told a group of bipartisan lawmakers Tuesday that he has no plans to lower troop levels in Afghanistan, the Washington Post reported.

Edwards said she doesn't support adding troops to Afghanistan, and hopes to give Obama room "to step back, make a full assessment," on the future of the war.

Share this article:
  • Print
  • email
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Story comments are below...

  • yvonneo
    Why are people not talking about Sibel Edmonds? Why are people not out in the streets enraged by what this FBI whistleblower has revealed? We're talking blackmail, bribery of our elected officials, treason, selling our nuclear technology to others including the blackmarket, foreign agents infiltrating influential positions within our govt, for god sakes!!!

    Why is the media not exposing this? We're talking crimes of not only this century, but the 20th century as well. Why are our elected officials remaining silent?

    Why did the bush administration put a gag order on Sibel Edmonds under the State Secrets Privilege?

    Educate yourselves about what Sibel Edmonds has revealed on the record and under oath.

    "Former FBI exec calls for special prosecutor...18-year counterintel/espionage manager John Cole further confirms Edmonds credibility, accuracy of charges, panic at Bureau when allegations first surfaced in 2002, and the need for prosecutions..."

    http://www.bradblog.com/

    Do not allow this to continue to be covered up people. Spread the news, loud and clear!!! Our very survival as a nation depends on it!
  • sandiegowoman
    When we were arrested outside CNN in March of 2003, we had no military experience then either, but sure as hell knew Iraq was a bad idea based on lies. There is no mission in Afghanistan. There are alqueda in Africa, should we attack there? Just in! 61/2 billion given to Pakistan over the last 8 years to "help" the military seek out terrorists. How much got to the military the last 8 years? 1/2 billion! The answer, GIVE THEM MORE BILLIONS, just announced today. Neither AFGHANISTAN OR PAKISTAN are our friends. ENOUGH! Troopsout now!
  • Satan
    "It's clear just from reading the headlines he is getting some advice and a push to escalate," - And it's been clear for quite some time that despite that 'advice' that his intention was to escalate all along, that's why he's been escalating, all along.

    The 'advice' thing is propaganda, they're going to do everything in the book to make it seem like poor Obama's hands are tied and that the mean generals and pro-war dems have him in a corner, he just can't stop the war, plus theres scary terrorists there, why by the FBI's own estimate, there were 200 Al Qaeda members left by the end of 2002. Never mind the dickhead is commander in chief.

    "Unfortunately neither Edwards nor the movie producer went to the War College and are ill-qualified to judge the military progress in Afghanistan....." - And you're unqualified to use the ellipses pal. Yes, everyone should go to a fucking war college, because ya lerns great shit there, eh? Like how to wage the longest most pointless war in U.S. history. Fucking babbling douche. There's 32 million people in Afghanistan, how do they get through their day with out the might U.S. fucking murder squad? Whadu gunna do dummy, build em a school? Lol!

    Here's a little hint for you dipshit: "WASHINGTON — The Army’s decision to bar a Stars and Stripes reporter from embedding with a unit in Iraq because he “refused to highlight” good news drew a harsh rebuke from media watchdogs, who said the action compromises the integrity of the media embed program." -http://www.stripes.com/article.asp?article=63443§ion=104

    The military only seeks to propagandize and lie to further their own goals. That's why there's so many fucking morons in the military.
  • SSpeedracer
    There are no "Progressives" associated with Obama. Only naive, myopic liberals.

    Talk + No Action = 0
  • davidrvelasquez
    If they want to extend the war then they're not "progressives". Just vegetarian businesspeople.

    Or atleast powerful liberals who draw the line at eating veal.


    END THE WAR NOW!
  • CosimodiRondo
    Mr. Greenwald, please do a follow-up on Sibel Edmonds. She has testified under oath since the December 2007 film on the Brave New Films web site.
  • rickpetes
    Afghanistan is an idiot's war. We don't even know what winning is. The 'Taliban' are not terrorists; They are religious fanatics maybe, but not terrorists. When they controlled Afghanistan, the country was at least stable. They had a harsh Sharia system of justice, but they weren't attacking anyone. They did let bin Laden hang out there, but they aren't/weren't al Queda. They even ofered to turn bin Laden over to us to prevent us from invading. We ignored that offer because this war has never been about the Taliban, except to the degree that they wanted too much money for pipeline rights. This is a war strictly for corporate profits, and just like during the Vietnam war, Wall Street is making out like gangbusters on this one. And only poor idiots are fighting in it.
  • caroldw
    "The human mind inclines toward fascism".
    These folks fear the right wing more than they fear supporting genocide.
  • tom ward
    Suppose wars are one method of population control - who would you send and where ?
    (An easy exercise: add 1-million people to a base population & grow for 100 generations.)
  • tarichar
    Advice for Obama regarding Afgan war:

    Ask Himself WWMD What would McCain do?

    Obama's clearly out of his depth on Afganistan and his failed policy he instituted 6 months ago needs to be rethought.
  • leathersmith
    because 6 months is certainly plenty of time to cure all the worlds ills huh?

    oh and by the way, we voted AGAINST whatever John McCain would do
  • malikk
    cant say say a word about the golden boy obama not even the truth, all you fucking liberals and progressives are nothing but hypocrites.
  • kimforreal
    Unfortunately neither Edwards nor the movie producer went to the War College and are ill-qualified to judge the military progress in Afghanistan.....the reporters are protected by our troops so they are not harmed....maybe they should go there alone like the person who went to get interviews with the witnesses to the fuel tanke bombing?....If Congress studies the matter thoroughly, it will take six months and a lot can happen in that time in a combat area......Those like Edwards are elected representatives without military matter experience....
  • If this guy thinks he took a lot of grief for questioning the Afghanistan invasion, think how much grief he would get if he questioned 9/11 or the Anthrax attacks. He needs to grow a pair in my opinion.

    Vice Chairman, 9/11 Commission, Lee Hamilton, Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, Homeland Security Advisory Council ~ "we got started late; we had a very short time frame...we did not have enough money...We had a lot of people strongly opposed to what we did. We had a lot of trouble getting access to documents and to people. ... So there were all kinds of reasons we thought we were set up to fail"

    http://www.thepeoplesvoice.org/TPV3/Voices.php/...
  • johnhkennedy
    Unfortunately there are warmongers in both Democrat and Republican parties. The Democrats behind the scenes, that control the party, tolerate anti-war activists as long as it helps the Dems win, but doesn't put Democratic politicians in jeopardy, but press the issue too hard and they will go after you. You learn to deal with it. It was the same when we were pushing for Impeachment.

    Our Congressional Democrats could have saved the lives of a couple of thousand US Soldiers if they had impeached but that would have risked the Democrats effort to get Total Power. Now they need to call for prosecution of the Bushies at least for Torture, notice the silence.

    The 9-11 victims died for what? Torture in their name?

    Help Prosecute the Violators of our Federal Torture Law,
    NOW, before the Statute Of Limitations expires.
    Google Our Url to see Our Work and

    SIGN the PETITION
    Calling for Prosecution Now!
    http://ANGRYVOTERS.Org

    So the 9-11 victims did not die for Torture!
    Start a weekly "prosecution" protest at your Congressman's office Now!
    .
  • nader paul kucinich gravel
    NEW RED DAWN MOVIE
    United States of Israel.
    Treasury is Bankrupt.
    American Holocaust.
    9/11 False Flag.
    James Blunt,
    No Bravery
  • Elim
    The MSM isn't talking about this because they, and all of our politicians are collectively guilty for what happened. This is the way it's been in Washington and FBI headquarters for years. They are all in on it, and profiting from it, or blackmailed to keep it quiet. Vote them all out!
  • dennycrane
    The "liberals" in this case would be the ones that Phil Ochs sang about in his song "I'm A Liberal."
  • decora
    they never used liberal to describe the funders, they said 'progressive'.
  • prochoicelib
    The strategy in Afghanistan is clear. Bumrush the natives off the land and out of the way of the oil pipline running from the caspian oil reserves.
blog comments powered by Disqus