Kucinich: Health reform legislation ‘a bailout for insurance companies’

By Stephen C. Webster
Saturday, October 31st, 2009 -- 4:01 pm
Share on Facebook Stumble This!

denniskucinich20090616b Kucinich: Health reform legislation a bailout for insurance companiesAccording to Congressman Dennis Kucinich (D-OH), the Democrats' health reform legislation is basically a sham.

Appearing on MSNBC's The Ed Show on Friday night, the House's most unabashed progressive condemned Democratic leadership for removing his amendment that would allow states to create their own single-payer systems. Then he called the entire legislative package "a bailout for insurance companies."

Under a single-payer system, like those in Canada and the United Kingdom, the government pools taxpayer funds to pay for citizens' health care and fees are not collected by health care providers. The Kucinich amendment would allow individual states an opt-in to such a system.

The amendment is missing from health reform legislation unveiled Thursday by Democratic leadership.

"Representative Kucinich was livid when he found out that his provision to allow states to create a single payer system was stripped," News Junkie Post noted. "Kucinich’s amendment passed the House Labor and Education Committee in July. 'No one gave me any rational reason,' Kucinich said. 'I can only assume the insurance company interests brought pressure to take it out. Otherwise I would have heard from someone.'"

Story continues below...

"The [committee] vote was 25 to 19, with support coming from an odd mix of liberal Democrats who support single-payer on its merits and conservative Republicans who want to preserve the rights of states to regulate themselves," The Washington Independent noted at the time.

"The removal of the Kucinich amendment constitutes yet another capitulation to the health insurance and pharmaceutical industries who are already reaping billions of dollars from the bill," reads a statement from the congressman's office on Thursday.

Under the revised public option, "Pelosi and her team have proposed a plan that would not make payments for care based on Medicare rates ..." CBS News's John Nichols noted. "Rather, under the Pelosi plan, the rates be tied to those of the big insurance companies. That's a big, big victory for the insurance industry, as it will undermine the ability of the public option to compete -- and to create pressure for reduced costs."

Speaking to liberal MSNBC anchor Ed Schultz on Friday, Kucinich continued his assault on the legislation.

"I think we need the support of the American people to say, look, you need that state single-payer amendment in the bill to make it credible," the congressman said. "I mean, what are people giving up already? They're being mandated to buy private insurance. If you read the bill, the people are going to end up paying -- the insurance companies can raise rates 25 percent right off the bat, if you read the bill."

Schultz encouraged Kucinich to repeat himself on that point.

"It's on page 22 of the bill," he replied. "Right here, it says that rates shall be set at a level that does not exceed 125 percent of the prevailing standard rate for comparable coverage in the individual market. Now ... It's very easy to understand what that means."

"It's not reform," Schultz insisted.

"It means a 25 percent increase, they'll have the ability to execute and since insurance companies have already raised rates for the last four years by double-digits, we can expect -- based on the bill -- another rate increase by the insurance companies."

Schultz called the bill a "sellout" to insurers because the bill only allows 11 million people into a limited government-run health insurance option, and includes a mandate for Americans to buy private policies.

"Maybe instead of a sellout it's a bailout," Kucinich responded. "Maybe what we're looking at here is another way that Wall Street's speculative engine can be fueled, this time with the help of the premiums of tens of millions of Americans."

On his Web site, Kucinich took his point further, calling the legislation "a bailout for insurance companies" that must be altered.

"The Kucinich [single payer] amendment has been added to H.R. 3200 in the Education and Labor Committee, the amendment would permit states to enact a single-payer health care system," the congressman's Web site claimed.

This video was broadcast by MSNBC on Friday, Oct. 30, 2009.

Share this article:
  • Print
  • email
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Story comments are below...

  • brain1
    Remember when Obama said he was going to get rid of the Lobbiest?
    I dont think we can count on him.Its Sad. He had everyone Inspired.
  • bopomunch
    It is not the health care system that needs reform. Americans have to reform their political system or these sorts of scams will keep happening. The USA is a very weak form of democracy if you consider the people's wishes are trumped by business interests time and time again.
  • kiboshki
    It is not the health care system that needs reform. Americans have to reform their political system

    Very interesting point. I'd take it one step further: many Americans desperately need to reform their attitudes about how a modern society should work.

    Society isn't inherently balanced, resources aren't limitless, inequalities are rampant, the economy is global, communication is fast, opinions aren't always equal or true, cultures are diverse, and people DO need to engage each other and civilization DOES need to incorporate everybody.

    What passes for "conservative" thought these days strives to destroy American civilization in an effort to "go back" to some mythological world epitomized by "the American way", "rugged individualism", "good Christian values", and "free" market economics. Such a world never existed, and we'll all go down with the ship if the pseudo-conservative, slave-wage, wealth-makes-right Rightwing continues pushing us that way.

    *deep breath*

    So, yeah, I'm all for Kucinich 2012 :)
  • marblex
    Stop consecutive terms of office, stop political dynasties.

    What amazes me is the cheek that Congress feels it is entitled to force Americans to buy insurance. The Commerce clause authorizes congress to exercise "plenary" authority over inTERstate commerce. Individual states regulate insurance, which is an InTRAstate enterprise, regardless of whether the insurerer is located in state or not. Insurance sold inTRA state can't be changed into inTERstate commerce.

    Congress may as well include a provision in the bill requiring JAIL TIME for people who cannot afford health insurance. That way they can put some teeth into the mandate and expose themselves for the class warriors that these sellouts really are.
  • Term limits insure that those who are popular because they work hard for their constituents are arbitrarily thrown out of office so the on and offshore financial corporate interests can pick some actor they can prime to to do their bidding instead. Sound familiar? It should.

    PT Barnum said a sucker was born every minute, and supporters of term limits prove his idea.

    It's simple. Some representatives are bought and paid for by all manner of corrupt international criminal enterprise and some give a d*mn.

    Ending a representative's tenure should be done because of any harm done by that representative, and their is plenty of harm being done.

    On the other hand I will support the same person for many terms if they continue to fight against the criminal corporate takeover of the U.S.

    Support for term limits is support for the 400,000 lobbyists who outnumber representatives by an insane bought and paid for ratio.
  • marblex
    I'm not recommending term limits. Just a prohibition on CONSECUTIVE terms. If you want to run for office every other term, fine. Just no more political dynasties.
  • kiboshki
    And at least in jail, they'd have healthcare.

    /sarc ;)
  • turnip
    At what point do YOU, the person reading this, understand that the owners of both parties have declared war on you?
  • starvapor
    Screw what anybody in congress thinks they can get away with. Cut them off at their cash flow and go directly to the heart of the problem....go after the insurance lobbyists with some RAW &EXTREME INFLUENCE, find out where they live, where they dine, what driving routes they take to see their interns and hookers, etc.,.....ya'll know what I mean?
  • yvonneo
    This is just another betrayal of the American people by Congress in favor of the greedy, sociopathic death panels known as healthcare insurance and pharmaceutical corporations.

    Just exactly what are our taxes paying for? It's certainly not for the general welfare of the American people, that's for sure. So apparently, it's solely for the purpose of enriching these corporate beasts that feed on us all without mercy and obviously will not stop until they have literally sucked the last drop of blood from our dying carcasses. Well, I think we need to substantially increase the opportunity costs of these predatory mofos. And one suggestion with regard to the healthcare issue is that the people should take the battle directly to these insurance and pharmaceutical corporations' doorsteps. Give them no peace.

    It should now be obvious that the voice of the people is being deliberately ignored by our elected representative for the sake of their corporate masters in the futherance of their own personal enrichment. The dem-controlled congress wasted alot of time doing their little song and dance for the rest of us--and for what? To trick the people into believing they worked really hard to get us healthcare? Well, the bottom line is, they failed miserably and their excuses are unacceptable. So I think in response to this particular betrayal, the people should express their displeasure by demanding that our taxes no longer be used to pay for our representatives' very generous healthcare benefits. Since they refuse to allocate our tax dollars for the general welfare of the people by providing single payer (or at the very least, a strong public option) healthcare for the country's general population, then by god why should the taxpayer be expected to pay for their healthcare?

    These corporations and their bought and paid for congress critters have basically declared war on the people (remember approx. 70% of the people wanted a strong public option--at the very least), but until we do something--SOMETHING--they will gleefully continue to deficate all over the rest of us--and laugh all the way to bank at how stupid we all are for letting them get by with it.

    Remember this: "No taxation without representation."
  • pjamala
    There's a difference between Canada (where the government acts as insurer) and Britain (where the government employs the doctors). It's the difference between Medicare (like Canada) and the V.A. (like Britain.) The MSM doesn't seem to understand the difference, but we should do better. And yes, the big companies own too many Democrats (though not all of them) for real reform to pass, whether it's health care, financial reform, cap and trade, etc.
  • shrapnel
    Hi-tech enslavement of the people disguised as healthcare. Obama will accept ANYTHING that can be described as "reform" as a victory for the White House. This is disgusting
  • socialismorbust
    Think KUCINICH 2012!
  • socialismorbust
    Damnit, Dennis! Go Socialist or Green and get out of that group of criminals and use your name, heart, and smarts to build a third (PEOPLE'S/WORKERS) party!!!
  • dennycrane
    The "Democratic Socialist Party." Where do I get my "card."
  • socialismorbust
    Right here, my friend: http://www.dsausa.org

    It's where I got mine.
    More info: http://www.dsausa.org/pdf/widemsoc.pdf
  • Having Rahm Immanuel as COS is a HUGE!!!! mistake. I'll put the responsibility for this fiasco on Obama, but I put the blame squarely with Rahm. Fire the Fuck! Remember...he's the one who went out and recruited the majority of those "conservative Democrats" now serving in Congress. You know, the one's who for some inexplicable reason are identifying themselves as Democrats but voting time and again with Republicans on everything from "support the troops" funding, to "gun rights", to one more chip in access to reproductive services! Dule Hill would do a better job as COS!!!
  • lorn
    A bailout disguised as health care? Why not?
    The American people have proven to be too dumb or too frightened to question the continuation of torture, the coverup of Bush and Cheney for war crimes by Obama, the massive increase of soldiers drones mercenaries and lies in Af-Pak, and the continued abuse of Americans by renewing and strengthening the Patriot act. Staying the Bush course in Iraq just for good measure and still Americans love their Oba-messiah.

    I can just picture Obama, Hilary and Rahm sitting with the health care vultures laughing about whether or not they could pass this one off on the American people.
    Well, even with the brave patriot Denis Kucinich telling everyone the score, this bailout for big insurance will pass, and the people will say thankyou Democrats. Thank you for trying.
    The people of North Korea have less to eat than we do, far less........but when it comes to swimming in a sea of propaganda and believing you are in tropical waters, we are all equally drenched.
  • lunaursus
    I already knew this would be the goal. Insurance companies.....again, in our lives, demanding higher and higher rates, giving less and less care, playing with peoples lives and making all the decisions about your personal health care. People should rise up and refuse ANY health bill that includes insurance companies. Pelosi, the consistant sell out of the American people, the traitor, always there for all the banks and insurance companies. She is a scourge on the nation and the democratic party, ....that is what's left of it. How do people like her evolve, anyway?
  • vaya
    Kucinich's only problem is that he does not look like George Clooney. Otherwise, he is brilliant.

    If he did look like Clooney, he'd be President, right now, and we'd be better off, I believe.
blog comments powered by Disqus