‘Wealth advisers’ upset at new IRS unit design to target super-rich

By Raw Story
Tuesday, October 27th, 2009 -- 8:06 am
Share on Facebook Stumble This!

irs Wealth advisers upset at new IRS unit design to target super richOffshore tax shelter? Check. Income hidden from tax authorities? Check. New IRS unit specifically set up to target taxpayers with tens of millions of dollars? Check.

IRS Commissioner Doug Shulman told the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Monday that the agency has set up a unit specifically to deal with rich Americans who are hiding assets.

"We will take a unified look at the entire web of business entities controlled by a high-wealth individual," Shulman said. "At least initially, we will be looking at individuals with tens of millions of dollars of assets or income."

"The high-wealth unit will focus on trusts, real estate investments, privately held companies and other business entities controlled by rich individuals. While use of sophisticated legal structures are at times legal, there are other instances where they 'mask aggressive tax strategies,' he said."

"You cannot assess compliance among the nation's wealthiest individuals by looking only at their 1040s [tax returns]," Shulman added. "Our goal is to better understand the entire economic picture of the enterprise controlled by the wealthy individual and to assess the tax compliance of that overall enterprise."

Story continues below...

The Wall Street Journal says "wealth advisers" are upset.

Wealth advisers questioned how much the new IRS approach adds, since in some cases, even under the old structure, an audit of a high-net-worth person may have looked across multiple income sources and asset classes.

However, "audits can sometimes be quite insular and silo-like," said Ronald Aucutt, a partner at the law firm of McGuire Woods. In particular, gift-tax audits and income-tax audits are usually not coordinated, he said.

The reorganization is part of a multifront IRS effort to crack down on tax evasion by wealthy Americans. The agency is now sifting through the results of a partial amnesty program that netted 7,500 disclosures by Americans who held offshore accounts.

Japan, Germany and the UK already have such units, Reuters said.

Share this article:
  • Print
  • email
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Story comments are below...

  • As long as one child goes hungry or without medical care, tax evasion by the super rich is a crime against humanity.
  • sanchosdad
    the bu$h administration was the best friend the super rich ever had. i only question why this took the better part of a year to come to fruition. i get squeezed every 2 weeks. its time for the wealthy to get theirs.
  • malikk
    the IRS nothing but a collection agency for the federal reserve bank and the reason why there are finaly cracking down on the rich is because the FED is broke,
    if you dont believe send the irs a check you will the federal reserve cashed it
  • protype
    So instead of getting squeezed every two weeks, why don't you play their game and start your own business so you can minimize taxes? I didn't say evade taxes, I said minimize taxes. There are obvious benfits to owning your own business, so instead of complaining, why doesn't everyone go into business for themselves?
  • starvapor
    "Wealth advisers" are upset? ....
    Who of you out there really gives a shit about what wealth advisers care?

    Please raise your hands if a wealth adviser has delivered you any livable "wealth" lately.
    ................One more time, please raise your hands.........................that's what I thought.
  • malikk
    i hope the IRS crawls up these rich motherfuckers asses like there been crawling up our asses for nearly 100 years please IRS make them your bitches , stick a broom handle up there asses IRS PLEASE MAKE those motherfuckers pay i have no pity for them
    if someone has a billion dollars that to much money for one person to have while other people are homeless in starving
  • protype
    Obviously if they're evading taxes it's illegal. But there's nothing wrong with minimizing taxes.

    So who's decides how much is too much money to have? Is a billion too much? $1 million? $100k? $100? Most billionaire's are giving away tens of millions a year to charities, churches, colleges, poor people, small business owner's, etc. How much are you giving away per year? And just so you know I'm not biased, I'm not financially wealthy (yet).
  • malikk
    i just love this shit the IRS going after the rich. do you people realize that all the taxes we pay goes directly to a private bank the 'FED'.this action by the IRS proves fed is broke, and there no they can't get that much money from poor working class folks anymore, tax rolls have drindle with the high unemployment so there have to look elsewhere, and tag you are it , now you filthy rich motherfuckers its your turn to bleed. this realy breaks my hearth to see rich scumbags suffer like this realy does . LOLOLOL
  • protype
    You're right about the FED...they're trying to get creative....but if you raise taxes on the rich, that's not going to take the burden off the middle class or poor. The wealthy own most of the businesses, and they will, without fail, raise prices and pass the higher taxes on to consumers.

    Tax evasion is wrong, but raising taxes and squeezing the wealthy will not solve this country's problems. REDUCING the taxes will enable companies to expand and hire more empoyees (and raise wages). It will also attract more foreign and domestic investors, which will boost the economy, which will increase tax revenue. Everyone wins with lower taxes.
  • jimbo701
    I pay my taxes. In doing so I give up certain things that I could have gotten had I not paid my taxes like a vacation or a new care etc. So it REALLY pisses me off when people who can pay their taxes without crimping their lifestyle in the least, dont. This is pure greed and selfishness. Their deposits are FDIC insured, they are protected by consumer labor laws, NOAA predicts their weather, the Defense Dept and FBI protects them, the EPA makes their water safe to drink and labor laws protect them. This things and literally thousands more are provided by taxes. If they reap the benefits, then they should be willing to pay for them. Oh wait I forgot, "only little people pay taxes".
  • protype
    "Only little people pay taxes"? I think you got that backwards: Top 5% of wage earners pay 53.25% of the income taxes. The top 50% pay 96.03%.

    Am I against tax evasion? Yes. But this attitude that rich people should pay more because they make more is the opposite of capitalism. If someone performs well in business, provides jobs, and stimulates the ecomony, they should be rewarded. Anything contrary to this is socialism.
  • dennycrane
    I'm sure this process is much like tearing apart a golf ball. There is all that "entanglement" with the outer "fringe" until you get to the center. When you get there- it makes no sense. Just send the fat cats a letter, telling them they owe a huge sum of money and they might pay it. If they lawyer up to fight it, it puts lawyers to work.
  • starvapor
    Too little, too late...
    Also, the really wealthy have enough power and money to have this effort by the IRS halted.
  • jimbo701
    I would normally agree with you. However, in this case why establish a special unit if you don't intend to use them?
  • starvapor
    The special unit might get used but the wealthy have ways of steering things to the courts and prevailing in that venue.
  • starvapor
    Special units come and go...
    Other so-called special units have been in use for more than 40 years in our nation's longest war to date, the war on drugs, still with no end in sight other than possible legalization of some drugs, mostly marijuana.

    The real test of this IRS effort will be their court tested conviction rate (all the way up to and through the Supreme Court).
  • chabuka
    yeah right...all they will have to do is "donate" some mega campaign funds to the "appropriate" politicians.....and they will walk.... "lack of evidence" will be the words of the day
  • Stephen Martin
    Why not? I've been sent packets (not a letter) but PACKETS from the IRS and I'm a financial
    peon. They waste time and money on me in comparison to what looking under the mat of the super-wealthy would reap. Let THEM share in the fun and pressure. Too much time and effort is wasted on the working poor and middle class when so much more can be gained by going after people who's wealth didn't "trickle down" but was kept for themselves.

    Let them eat cake. AND kiss my ass.
  • starvapor
    It's unfortunate, but the time spent on going after the wealthy is much more costly to the government than pursuing the weak and unprotected poor of our nation.
    The wealthy are obviously more equipped to put up a longer, more expensive and protracted fight to protect their status than the poor.
  • strategery
    Remember that sick Helmsley quote "We don't pay taxes. Only the little people pay taxes"?

    Good! The party's over! Times has run out for them to come clean, confess and disclose their hidden assets and income. Hopefully the gov will make them pay the max in back-taxes with jail time thrown in for good measure.
blog comments powered by Disqus