Is the GOP faltering in its battle against health care reform?

By Daniel Tencer
Wednesday, October 7th, 2009 -- 8:13 pm
Share on Facebook Stumble This!

healthcare Is the GOP faltering in its battle against health care reform?As news reports come in of one Republican after another suggesting that a government-run public option for health care may not be so bad after all, evidence is beginning to mount that the GOP may be conceding defeat in the health care battle -- or at least preparing itself to make major concessions.

Prominent conservative blogger Erick Erickson raised the alarm on his RedState blog on Wednesday that at least some congressional Republicans may be ready to throw in the towel, and even vote for a compromise that could include a public option.

"I am told quite reliably that in a meeting today on Capitol Hill, Republican Senators began to rapidly move toward concessions on health care because they are afraid they cannot hold their members," Erickson wrote. "Some Republicans are now thinking of supporting a government program."

Erickson urged his largely conservative readership to "go to the action center and start calling" their members of Congress.

The Washington Post reported on Wednesday that "the White House is orchestrating a series of endorsements from Republican leaders around the country.

Story continues below...

"With a key Senate panel poised to vote on a sweeping health bill, President Obama and his top aides have reached out to current and retired Republican leaders in an effort to blunt criticism that Democrats are using their congressional majorities to push through partisan legislation," the paper reported.

The Christian Science Monitor on Wednesday published a list of "Five Republicans that want the GOP to back health care reform." The list is comprised of New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, former Republican Senate majority leader Bill Frist, former Medicare chief Mark Maclellan, California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger and former health and human services secretary Tommy Thompson.

Late last week, Frist told Time magazine that if he were still in the Senate, he would "probably end up voting for" health care reform. Frist quickly backtracked, presumably under pressure from his GOP colleagues, but that wasn't enough to stem a growing tide of Republicans announcing their softened opposition to -- or even support for -- a public health option.

The Kansas City Star reported on Wednesday that Bob Dole, the former Republican presidential candidate and senator, is backing health care reform over the objections of Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell.

"This is one of the most important measures members of Congress will vote on in their lifetimes," the Star quoted Dole as saying. "If we don't do it this year, I don't know when we're going to do it."

The paper reported:

Dole and two other former Senate leaders, Republican Howard Baker and Democrat Tom Daschle, are preparing to release a statement urging Congress to move on health care.

"We're already hearing from some high-ranking Republicans that we shouldn't do that. That's helping the president," he said.

Later, he repeated that news, and elaborated on one "very prominent Republican, who happens to be the Republican leader of the Senate." That would be Sen. Mitch McConnell of Kentucky.

Dole, to his credit, is having none of it. "I want this to pass," he said. "I don't agree with everything Obama is presenting, but we've got to do something."

But perhaps the most significant sign that the tide is turning in Washington towards health care reform is the discernible change in tone towards the issue on Fox News.

As RAW STORY reported on Tuesday, Fox News host Shepard Smith -- never one of the more ideological of Fox's news crew -- challenged Wyoming Republican Sen. John Barrasso's assertion that the public option amounts to a government takeover of health care.

"Over the last ten years health care costs in America have skyrocketed," he said. "Regular folks cannot afford it. So, they tax the system by not getting preventative medicine. They go to the emergency room in the last case and we all wind up paying for it."

Share this article:
  • Print
  • email
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Story comments are below...

  • Thomas Jefferson
    it was just a matter of time. without sound bites and with their short attention span, it was inevitable that the repukes would fold.
  • edwards_com
    Republicans are no longer a political party. They are an Ideology. And a Failed one at that except to the 21% that follow Beck, Limbaugh & AM radio. Those Theatrical screaming matches at 'town halls' by paid 'concerned citizens' are coming back to haunt them already as are their Glee for the USA losing the Olympics.
  • missskeptic
    Barney Frank's comments about the GOP being in power for twelve years and doing jack-sh*t about healthcare reform are coming home to roost. There is no defense for a statement like that. Also, when Republicans hold themselves up as defenders of Medicare, it is to laugh. We WILL get single payer, if not soon, eventually, because we can't afford NOT to. Small and Big business alike will get on board because it will save them money in the long run and help them run their businesses more efficiently and profitably.
  • Olin
    That it has taken THIS long for republicans to finally come to Jesus over health care is an absolute abomination. I read that at least one republican admitted recently that they'd dropped the ball on health care reform, an idea here that dates back to, at least, Teddy Roosevelt, that they could have and should have fixed the issue they helped to create at any point over the past twelve years.

    Sadly, they'd rather play politics with folks' lives, and my own son, also a republican, has almost paid the ultimate price. He's suffering the aftermath of chemo, when his doctor allowed himself to get buffaloed by insurance companies denying the cost of a simple genetic test that would have shown an enzyme deficiency that prevents the metabolization of 5FU. My son may still lose his battle, or win without the ability to work the rest of his life, OR he may eventually pull outof this, but lose at least an entire year or more of his life getting over what his doctor and his insurance carrier have done to him.

    Can't say I have any problem with any company maximizing profit, but when profit comes at the cost of denying life-saving processes simply because of cost, it's come to the point where even my republican friends and employers (health care related company) have finally noticed that chasing profits on the backs of sick and injured people might not be all that they'd assumed.

    Then again, it's the republicans and I can't find any trust for them anywhere in my body. NOT. ONE. SINGLE. BIT!

    I can't say I hope they get sick and suffer great pain an anguish. Frankly, I hope they live long lives so they can know the pain of what they have caused to their fellow Americans. Even the most loathesome among them has eyes that can see, in their most private moments, that they've lined their coffers with lobby money to mount future campaigns against issues they don't like, i.e. anything they did not put forth in the first place.

    What I do fervently wish is that Congress should have to plod along with precisely the same insurance coverage as the rest of us.
  • DownriverDem
    Your son is a Repub?????? No offense, but why?????

    Hasn't he suffered enough from these "greed is good" Repub hypocrites?

    Again I say, no offense, but tell him if he lives, he should reconsider his political party membership.
  • nader paul kucinich gravel
    Single-payer is now on the table.

    NEW RED DAWN MOVIE
    United States of Israel.
    Treasury is Bankrupt.
    American Holocaust.
    9/11 False Flag.
    James Blunt's
    No Bravery

    RATM
  • chang
    Can you you say PROPAGANDA NONSENSE!!!
    There will be no health care socialist takeover none..erickson is a hack propagandist...like the NEA....
  • rxgary
    we afford useless wars so affordability isnt the question.
  • Jhoffa_
    Yeah, it is..

    The problem with printing money is, the more you print.. The less it is worth.
  • Savantster
    .
    Your logic, or lack of it, is astounding.

    Roll back the Bush tax cuts on the very wealthy. They won't miss the money.. stop funding the wars, bring our troops home.. cut the Defense budget, we have no credible threats around the world to justify $600 billion a year in defense, put a decent tax on capital gains, people will still gamble because 75% free money is better than no free money, and put a new dynasty tax in place, stop letting those that came before keep all their ill gotten wealth "in the family". But by dumb luck those born into dynasties keep wealth out of the hands of those who actually work for a living.. those born into dynasties don't "earn" their money, they lucked into it.. if we're all created equal, let them go out and earn their riches if they want to be rich.

    There's plenty of existing wealth to solve this problem. You don't have to print new money, you just have to take some of the wealth back from those that lie, cheat, and steal to get what they have.
    .
  • edwards_com
    NOT YET
  • Jhoffa_
    Obstructionism isn't the answer.

    Everyone wants reform.. What they apparently don't want are mandates.

    There's PLENTY that could be reformed right now.. But the political will to do so is completely absent.

    Ending the monopolies would be a good place to start. An end to new subsidies would be another.

    Frankly that's half the problem with this industry.. It's been so heavily subsidized that rates have risen faster than GDP, wages or incomes..

    Like anything else, tossing money at it only ensures that the subsidy gets absorbed.

    If allowed to operate like any other legitimate business, the medical industrial complex would have priced itself out of business years ago.

    The reason they have not is because of the subsidies.
  • Savantster
    .
    "Everyone wants reform.. What they apparently don't want are mandates. "

    Uh, "reform" is "mandates", the question is, where do those mandates fall. What people don't want is "death panels" and "government run health care" and "rationed care" and "letting old people and babies die".. none of which exists in any reality, but it's being spoken by the right-wing to derail real discussions about the topic.

    If we abolish insurance companies (or "reform" them to be non-profits with dictated pay scales for management) and have the government be the accountants (single payer), overall costs go down and everyone would be paying less, getting better care, and we could cover anyone without coverage now.

    Everything else you said here is typical nonsense.. in that it makes no sense, which is typical of "right-wing financial policies".
  • edwards_com
    TEDDY ROOSEVELT DID IT. LETS DO IT NOW.....BEST THE TRUSTS
  • rxgary
    i hope every senator that doesnt allow single payer to be added to the bill gets to take full advantage of their own health insurance. in other words may they get every disease known to mankind and some that arent.
  • Jhoffa_
    You're not going to get single payer.. We can't afford it and the people driving the debate are the ones who would be harmed.. Mainly the insurance industry.

    What you're going to get is something closer to Romney Care.. A forced subsidy.

    Delaying the bill till 2013 is a dead give away. So are Obama's backroom deals.

    It's obvious what's coming.. and it's obvious who's behind it.
  • Savantster
    .
    Actually, Single Payer ends up being cheaper in the long run.. we can't afford NOT to have it.
  • edwards_com
    NOPE
blog comments powered by Disqus