Former UN envoy to Afghanistan blows whistle on ex-boss

By Stephen C. Webster
Monday, October 12th, 2009 -- 8:25 pm
Share on Facebook Stumble This!

petergalbraith Former UN envoy to Afghanistan blows whistle on ex bossA former top United Nations official assigned to Afghanistan said Monday that his ex-boss must be fired for long denying the widespread fraud that plagued Afghanistan's last presidential election.

Speaking with CBS News anchor Katie Couric, Peter Galbraith, who was fired for claiming the United Nations helped cover-up the fraudulent votes, said that Afghan President Hamid Karzai was the primary beneficiary of the stolen election.

"I worked for the United Nations," Galbraith said. "And certainly, the United Nations could have done something to prevent the fraud before it took place. I tried to do that. But my boss, Kai Eide, stopped me."

Eide on Sunday admitted that widespread fraud took place amid the crucial vote. He had been defending himself against claims that he did not do enough to guard against fraud and had actually helped cover up instances where election workers intervened on behalf of President Karzai.

"President Karzai said Sunday that 'foreign propaganda' was holding up the process," Couric said. "What do you think he meant by that?"

Story continues below...

Galbraith replied: "Well he is continually trying to deflect the blame for the fraud that was committed on his behalf by suggesting that this is just bad news story, that it's a foreign propaganda. When I tried to intervene to preserve the integrity of the electoral process, he complained that I was engaged in foreign interference.

"This, incidentally, in an election that the international community -- and above all, the Americans, had paid $300 million to conduct and in a country where 100,000 troops are fighting on behalf of the Afghan government. So, that this has been a continuing theme on his part. And it should not be taken at all seriously. In fact one should speak firmly to him and say, 'This is unacceptable.'"

Couric asked if, after such a tainted election, Karzai would even be capable of leading the country.

"[If] he emerges from this process as the next president, he will somehow have to persuade the people who did not vote for him that he is the legitimate president," Galbraith said. "And given all the fraud, that's gonna be a tough sell."

Also Monday, Afghan Maulavi Mustafa Barakzai, who was appointed by the country's supreme court to investigate claims of fraud, resigned his post and charged that United Officials had interfered with his work.

"The election has become a major challenge for the Obama administration, which needs to convince a skeptical Congress and American public to continue waging the costly eight-year war to prevent the Taliban-led insurgency from regaining control of Afghanistan," McClatchy Newspapers reported.

If enough fraudulent votes are tossed from the tally, Karzai may be forced into a runoff election agaisnt Abdullah Abdullah, his former foreign minister. Results from an Afghan probe into the vote are expected later this week.

This video is from CBS News, broadcast Sept. 12, 2009.

Share this article:
  • Print
  • email
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Story comments are below...

  • johnhkennedy
    For what it is worth - We Tweeted this article a number of times today.
    Look for

    Corrupt US Backed #Afghan Leader-LIKE VIETNAM-Same End-Dead&Maimed USSoldiers "for nothing" http://bit.ly/3TGJVU

    Hope it helps RawStory. Keep up the great work.

    jhk
  • Harald Stephansen
    I have not seen that any non-Afghan party, including the UN and Mr. Eide, have said that the Afghan election was fair. There is however different opinions as how to go about it. Apparently Mr. Galbraith did not see any need to wait for the election results before publicizing his, possibly correct, opinion. The UN, supported by the US government, favors a different approach.
    Apparently they also do not believe a second-in-command of a not too high level UN commission should dictate the UN opinion, especially before all the facts are in.

    Mr. Galbraith himself does not appear to be a paragon virtue. A few years ago, according to reports, he was instrumental in writing the new constitution of Iraq which gave the Kurds much autonomy regarding their oil resources. He may at that time have forgotten to mention that he himself had financial interests in the Kurdistan oil industry. He is now involved in court case against a (not to reputable) small Norwegian oil company (DNO) claiming he lost $ 2-300 millions when the Kurds used the authority he had helped give them to strip his company of its previous rights.
  • johnhkennedy
    A Corrupt US Supported Leader, Just Like in VIETNAM
    with the same eventual outcome,
    Thousands of US Soldiers dead and maimed "for nothing",
    Trillions of Tax Dollars Diverted from Social Programs & Lost Forever "for nothing",
    Greater Loss of our Personal Freedom,
    Damage to Our Constitution, Rule of Law and we the Voters Are Ignored,
    All as a result of Perpetual War.

    IF WE FAIL TO CAUSE Prosecution When They Violate Our Federal Laws
    voting is meaningless. If we allow them to ignore us, voting is meaningless.

    SIGN THE PETITION
    Calling For Torture Prosecutions from the Top Down AT

    ANGRYVOTERS.ORG/nll/


    .
  • texasaggie
    What is it with the family Galbraith that they seem to be so full of people trying to do the right thing to keep our world together? Two economists and now Peter, all on the side of the angels.

    By contrast you have the family Cheney doing its damndest to destroy everything good.
  • listenUP
    What's that saying about... Absolute Power corrupts?
  • missskeptic
    Someone suggested just bribing these people to stop shooting and bombing - bribery, now that's the American Way! Actually, it's the only idea I've heard that makes sense and would probably cost a lot less in the long run.
  • dennycrane
    "...And it's one, two, three,
    What are we fighting for ?
    Don't ask me, I don't give a damn,
    Next stop is Afghanistan;
    And it's five, six, seven,
    Open up the pearly gates,
    Well there ain't no time to wonder why,
    Whoopee! we're all gonna die. " Country Joe
  • S in PA
    So our boys (and girls) are put in harms way to prop up one corrupt government (Karzi) instead of another corrupt government (Taliban). And the only thing gaining any profit, monetary or otherwise, is the military-industrial complex and the congressmen (and women) they own. Why does this remind me of Nixon???
  • JPMP
    You're close.
    Our boys (and girls) were put in harms way to INSTALL, and prop up, the corrupt (Karzi) government.
  • dennycrane
    Don't let the "cave" door hit you in the ass on our way out of this fucking Viet Nam.
  • jessehemingway
    Here are two articles that suggest that the Bush Administration and Saudi Arabia had undermined the stability in Afghanistan after the presidential election in November 2008. Once again the two main elements that were involved in the 9/11 attacks that were never thoroughly investigated after the 9/11 attacks both the Bush administration and Saudi Arabia. To believe that the United States is having a meaningful debate about our future involvement in Afghanistan with out understanding the real intentions of Saudi Arabia; is startling. What if someone pulled the veneer off of Saudi Arabia only to find it is nothing more then one rich family run by our shadow government. Then it all starts making sense.





    Saudi peace initiative for a Taliban-Karzai truce fruitless so far By Amir MirAmir Mir

    Monday 22 December 2008

    LAHORE: The Saudi-sponsored American-British initiative to broker a peace deal between the Karzai administration and the Taliban have failed so far due to trust deficit between the two sides and also because of the obstinacy of the former rulers of Afghanistan who are still determined to fight out the US-led Allied ’occupation forces’ from the war-torn country, before re-establishing their gone empire — Islamic Emirate of Taliban.

    Talks involving the Saudis and ’facilitated’ by the American and the Britons have been both denied and admitted, but the reality is that somebody, somewhere and somehow is talking to the Afghan Taliban on behalf of those who are evolving an exit strategy for Afghanistan after the Taliban furiously fought their way into a position that has made them stakeholders in the Afghan power game. They first made their presence felt in traditional strongholds such as the southwestern Afghan provinces of Kandahar, Helmand, Urozgan and Zabul. Nowadays they are able to organise attacks and maintain bases in faraway provinces such as Badghis and Faryab on the Turkmenistan border, Herat, Farah and Nimroz bordering Iran and Ghazni, Wardak, Logar, Kapisa and Parwan neighbouring Kabul. And probably all these developments have compelled the western powers to try a political surge involving parleys with all relevant groups in Afghanistan, instead of a military one, because they seem almost convinced that Taliban could be defeated militarily on their own soil.

    http://www.metransparent.com/spip.ph...e=5046&l...

    Saudi Arabia and the Future of Afghanistan
    Author: Greg Bruno, Staff Writer

    December 11, 2008

    Peace Brokers or Strategic Lobbyists?
    Despite food aid and the occasional business venture, Saudi ties to Afghanistan remained out of the public eye for much of the last decade. It is not clear what spurred Saudi involvement in the late 2008 talks with the Taliban. In October, the Saudi-owned daily Asharq Al-Awsat reported that a Taliban delegation met with Afghan officials in Mecca during Ramadan. Attendees included Taliban leader Mullah Omar's spokesman, Mullah Mohammed Tayeb Agha, a number of former Taliban government officials, and a smattering of Afghan officials, including parliamentarian Arif Noorzai. Additional talks were reportedly attended by Afghan President Hamid Karzai's brother, Qayum Karzai. The discussions were reportedly hosted by King Abdullah in the Saudi city of Mecca. Saudi officials have offered few details of the meetings, though Saudi Foreign Minister Saud al-Faisal confirmed talks were held (AFP) "at the request of Afghan President Hamid Karzai." Saud added that further Saudi involvement was conditional on Afghan parties laying down their arms and entering the political mainstream.

    http://www.cfr.org/publication/17964/






    Now put on your intelligence analysis hat. since the peace talks (wink, wink) after the 2008 presidential elections in the united states; since the peace talks between Saudi Arabia, the Bush Administration, and Afghanistan has the methods changed by the Taliban’s attacks against American forces, and do these improved methods resembled those used by the Sunnis in the Iraq cluster fuck. Does it appear that the Taliban has also found new funding sources since the peace talks (nudge, nudge)? Surprise, Surprise would somebody in the god dam media please point out, that it is Saudi Arabia that has played the central role on supporting All terrorist activity in the world!!! Saudi Arabia got the free pass after 9/11 and it is clear as day they played a major role in that horrific disaster on 9/11 and continue to support the murdering of American military personal.
  • jessehemingway
    Here are two articles that suggest that the Bush Administration and Saudi Arabia had undermined the stability in Afghanistan after the presidential election in November 2008. Once again the two main elements that were involved in the 9/11 attacks that were never thoroughly investigated after the 9/11 attacks both the Bush administration and Saudi Arabia. To believe that the United States is having a meaningful debate about our future involvement in Afghanistan with out understanding the real intentions of Saudi Arabia; is startling. What if someone pulled the veneer off of Saudi Arabia only to find it is nothing more then one rich family run by our shadow government. Then it all starts making sense.





    Saudi peace initiative for a Taliban-Karzai truce fruitless so far By Amir MirAmir Mir

    Monday 22 December 2008

    LAHORE: The Saudi-sponsored American-British initiative to broker a peace deal between the Karzai administration and the Taliban have failed so far due to trust deficit between the two sides and also because of the obstinacy of the former rulers of Afghanistan who are still determined to fight out the US-led Allied ’occupation forces’ from the war-torn country, before re-establishing their gone empire — Islamic Emirate of Taliban.

    Talks involving the Saudis and ’facilitated’ by the American and the Britons have been both denied and admitted, but the reality is that somebody, somewhere and somehow is talking to the Afghan Taliban on behalf of those who are evolving an exit strategy for Afghanistan after the Taliban furiously fought their way into a position that has made them stakeholders in the Afghan power game. They first made their presence felt in traditional strongholds such as the southwestern Afghan provinces of Kandahar, Helmand, Urozgan and Zabul. Nowadays they are able to organise attacks and maintain bases in faraway provinces such as Badghis and Faryab on the Turkmenistan border, Herat, Farah and Nimroz bordering Iran and Ghazni, Wardak, Logar, Kapisa and Parwan neighbouring Kabul. And probably all these developments have compelled the western powers to try a political surge involving parleys with all relevant groups in Afghanistan, instead of a military one, because they seem almost convinced that Taliban could be defeated militarily on their own soil.

    http://www.metransparent.com/spip.ph...e=5046&l...

    Saudi Arabia and the Future of Afghanistan
    Author: Greg Bruno, Staff Writer

    December 11, 2008

    Peace Brokers or Strategic Lobbyists?
    Despite food aid and the occasional business venture, Saudi ties to Afghanistan remained out of the public eye for much of the last decade. It is not clear what spurred Saudi involvement in the late 2008 talks with the Taliban. In October, the Saudi-owned daily Asharq Al-Awsat reported that a Taliban delegation met with Afghan officials in Mecca during Ramadan. Attendees included Taliban leader Mullah Omar's spokesman, Mullah Mohammed Tayeb Agha, a number of former Taliban government officials, and a smattering of Afghan officials, including parliamentarian Arif Noorzai. Additional talks were reportedly attended by Afghan President Hamid Karzai's brother, Qayum Karzai. The discussions were reportedly hosted by King Abdullah in the Saudi city of Mecca. Saudi officials have offered few details of the meetings, though Saudi Foreign Minister Saud al-Faisal confirmed talks were held (AFP) "at the request of Afghan President Hamid Karzai." Saud added that further Saudi involvement was conditional on Afghan parties laying down their arms and entering the political mainstream.

    http://www.cfr.org/publication/17964/






    Now put on your intelligence analysis hat. since the peace talks (wink, wink) after the 2008 presidential elections in the united states; since the peace talks between Saudi Arabia, the Bush Administration, and Afghanistan has the methods changed by the Taliban’s attacks against American forces, and do these improved methods resembled those used by the Sunnis in the Iraq cluster fuck. Does it appear that the Taliban has also found new funding sources since the peace talks (nudge, nudge)? Surprise, Surprise would somebody in the god dam media please point out, that it is Saudi Arabia that has played the central role on supporting All terrorist activity in the world!!! Saudi Arabia got the free pass after 9/11 and it is clear as day they played a major role in that horrific disaster on 9/11 and continue to support the murdering of American military personal.
blog comments powered by Disqus