Obama accuses Iran of building secret nuclear enrichment plant

By David Edwards
Friday, September 25th, 2009 -- 8:16 am
Share on Facebook Stumble This!

PITTSBURGH, Pennsylvania — US President Barack Obama accused Iran Friday of secretly building a second uranium enrichment plant inside a mountain south of Tehran.

Obama leveled the charge before the start of a G-20 summit of the world's major economies in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

The New York Times, which broke the story on its website, said the secret uranium enrichment facility was being built inside a mountain near the holy city of Qom, 100 miles (160 kilometers) south of Tehran.

Obama, British Prime Minister Gordon Brown, and French President Nicolas Sarkozy were to demand, before the start of the summit, an immediate inspection of the site by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).

In Paris the French foreign ministry, which said the statement would be made at 8:30 am (1230 GMT), called the Iranian move "a new serious violation of UN Security Council and IAEA resolutions" which "strengthens our suspicions."

Story continues below...

In Vienna, where it has its headquarters, the IAEA said Iran had informed it on September 21 that it was building "a new pilot fuel enrichment plant."

"Iran assured the agency in the letter that 'further complementary information will be provided in an appropriate and due time'," IAEA spokesman Marc Vidricaire said.

"In response, the IAEA has requested Iran to provide specific information and access to the facility as soon as possible. This will allow the agency to assess safeguards verification requirements for the facility."

Although the facility is not complete, US officials told the Times that they believe it was designed to hold about 3,000 centrifuges, which are used to enrich uranium.

They said the facility could be in operation next year.

"They have cheated three times," a senior administration official with access to the intelligence was quoted as saying of the Iranians. "And they have now been caught three times."

Revelations by an Iranian dissident group led to the discovery of the underground enrichment plant at Natanz in 2002.

Two years ago US intelligence developed evidence that Iran had secretly tried to design a nuclear weapon, but Tehran was believed to have halted it in 2003.

The Times said the United States has been tracking the secret site for years, but decided to go public after Iran learned that its existence had been discovered by Western intelligence.

It said senior officials from several countries were pulled aside at the United Nations and at the Pittsburgh summit for briefings on the intelligence and to plot strategy for talks scheduled with Iran October 1.

The five permament members of the UN Security Council -- the United States, Russia, China, France and Britain, plus Germany -- will be represented in the talks, the first direct ones between the United States and Iran in 30 years.

At the UN General Assembly this week, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad offered to let the country's nuclear experts meet with their western counterparts for the first time to allay their fears about Iran's nuclear program.

But he made no mention of the second uranium enrichment program alluded to in the September 21 letter to the IAEA.

World powers stepped up the pressure on Iran over its nuclear program with even Russia's President Dmitry Medvedev warning Tehran that sanctions may be "inevitable."

Obama urged world leaders on Wednesday to hold Iran -- as well as North Korea -- to account, warning that their nuclear programs threatened to take the world down a "dangerous slope."

Sarkozy also warned Iran against "making a tragic mistake" by assuming the international community will stand idly by while Tehran pursues what he called a military nuclear program.

Iran says its uranium enrichment program is for peaceful nuclear energy, denying charges it is seeking to build a nuclear bomb.

This video is from CNN's Newsroom, broadcast Sept. 25, 2009.



Download video via RawReplay.com

(with AFP)

Share this article:
  • Print
  • email
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Story comments are below...

  • tonybinca
    Really deceptive headline. There is a big difference in the amount of enrichment needed for nuclear power and for weapons. Plus, the "dissident group" is likely paid by the US to make accusations so Israel can goad us into another stupid war for their empire.
  • Savantster
    .
    .
    "The Times said the United States has been tracking the secret site for years, but decided to go public after Iran learned that its existence had been discovered by Western intelligence."

    There is no reason to let someone continue building a secret site that might violate international treaties unless you WANT to have a reason to have conflict later. When you see your dog lifting its leg, that's when you make it stop, you don't wait until after it has pissed all over your new couch to say something.

    I'll never be able to get my head around how politicians and the MIC works. Their main course of thinking always seems to be to find ways to allow or generate death and conflict for profit, and that is just insane. How can we ever have peace if we encourage (and profit from) war?

    (LOVE the edit feature!)
  • malikk
    what about isreali nukes let have a look at them to
  • last i remember iran signed the [NPT] israel absolutely refuses to sign.
  • libertate
    Either I just time traveled to 2002 or our overlords are really really unimaginative.
  • Savantster
    The difference would be that Iran has admitted it's building this thing.
  • libertate
    Any "just" cause for murder and pillage is good enough, huh?

    Of course you won't have to be on the front-line fighting...
  • Shahram
    No surprise, How else can a country prevent itself from being invaded by larger more powerful countries. The idea that they would use a nuke in a first strike is ridiculous. And I don't think there is a major violation here, you don't have to inform the IAEA of sites until a certain time BEFORE you introduce actual nuclear materials into it. And diversion of materials would be seen and tracked, and that has not happened. Still, what the heck does the USA want to do? Attack them, for creating a deterrent to imperial power? Impose sanctions which are an act of war and kills people? This is a never ending game of empire that the USA plays and this is the end of it. The truth is, the US is so overextened, that they can do nothing. Look at the Georgia situation, The USA did nothing, it only picks on countries it can push over, like a cowardly school bully. The USA is way overstepping it's bounds in this futile try to maintain this empire and as time passes, it just gets worse. How about trying to treat countries the same (Ahem, Israel), and trade and don't tell people what to do and remove the reasons for antagonism against the USA. I promise it will be cheaper and result in less dead American troops. Heck it might even stem and defeat terrorism eventually. But this is a dead end road. I don't understand why the US government is determined to drive the empire into the ground.
  • Macbill
    I realize the proliferation of nuclear weapons is a desired goal, but I can sort of understand why Iran wants them: Iran wants what Israel has to attain a mutually assured destruction with Israel. As it is, Israel could (not saying "would") wipe Iran off the face of the earth. I'd be a nervous neighbor, too.
  • malikk
    Overriding Western objections, a 150-nation nuclear conference on Friday passed a resolution directly criticizing Israel and its atomic program for the first time in 18 years. Iran hailed the vote as a "glorious moment."



    SLIDESHOW: Israel & Region | World The result was a setback not only for Israel but also for the United States and other backers of the Jewish state, which had lobbied for 18 years of past practice - debate on the issue without a vote. It also reflected building tensions between Israel and its backers and Islamic nations, backed by developing countries.

    Of delegations present at the International Atomic Energy Agency meeting Friday, 49 voted for the resolution. Forty-five were against and 16 abstained from endorsing or rejecting the document, which "expresses concern about the Israeli nuclear capabilities," and links it to "concern about the threat posed by the proliferation of nuclear weapons for the security and stability of the Middle East."
  • donofcali
    I agree that Iran should open this site for inspection by the IAEA. Right after Israel opens their sites for inspection by the IAEA
  • bayside
    Scott ritter says iran did disclose those plants and they are for electricity not weapons but then the UN added a added a admendment making them in violation... Who in the world is obama listening too and why doesnt he talk to both sides to get the real truth. For that matter israel has hundreds of nukes that europe is very aware of, and obama seems to be protecting..They are the ones that are unstable....................Remember last dec what they did...
blog comments powered by Disqus