Franken’s anti-rape amendment becomes law

By Stephen C. Webster
Monday, December 21st, 2009 -- 7:35 pm
Share on Facebook Stumble This!

alfranken20090630 Frankens anti rape amendment becomes lawOver the unexplained objections of 30 Republican Senators, an anti-rape amendment authored by Senator Al Franken (D-MN) became law Monday with President Obama's signature on the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2010.

The provision was sparked by the gang-rape of a 19-year-old Kellogg, Brown & Root employee by her coworkers in Iraq. After returning to the United States, Jamie Leigh Jones found she couldn't sue the company because of a clause in her employment contract.

Franken's amendment to the Defense Appropriations Act prohibits companies from using employment contracts to bar litigation over sexual assault or discrimination.

When the Senate took up Franken's measure, 30 Republicans voted against it. None cared to explain why, with some suggesting it's simply not the government's business to rewrite employment contracts.

In an especially well-publicized confrontation, a tearful Jones asking Senator David Vitter (R-LA) why he wouldn't support the amendment. He simply walked away.

Story continues below...

The group of Senators eventually become a target of a satirical Web site called "Republicans for Rape."

It was also opposed by the Obama administration and the Department of Defense, though the president declared that he supports the "intent" of the amendment.

The administration came around to supporting the amendment after two key changes were made. "The restriction will only apply to companies whose contracts with the government amounts to $1 million or more (which includes most defense contractors)," noted Talking Points Memo. "It can also be waived for national security concerns -- but the secretary of defense will have to personally explain the waiver."

Share this article:
  • Print
  • email
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Story comments are below...

  • Conservatives called Franken's amendment a craven sop to trial lawyers and another case of the federal government meddling in matters of private enterprise. There's a good explanation of their unhappiness here.
  • MakeChessNotWar
    This should be made a big issue when the rape-lovers run for re-election.
  • rexozone
    What an auspicious start with just the right issue to lay the template for upcoming battles and forthright legislation...boy, do we need it now more than ever...kudos to the klown with seriousness on his side.
  • dickerson3870
    RE: "the unexplained objections of 30 Republican Senators"
    EXPLANATION: Good old Republican 'family values'! Gays are prohibited from marrying, but corporations/businesses/contractors are free to rape, pillage and plunder.
  • wayneyoung
    Al Franken and Jessie Ventura in 2012!
  • EnderW
    Wanna see what Republicans are really about?

    http://www.republicanoffenders.com/

    Oh, and please!!!

    THE PEOPLE'S ANSWER TO THE REPUBLICAN PARTY TODAY: WE WILL NOT DIAL 911 FOR A REPUBLICAN!!! WE WILL YOUTUBE YOUR PLEAS FOR US TO DIAL 911 TO SAVE YOUR PATHETIC HATEFUL ASS THOUGH!!!!

    LET THE DYING VIDEOS BEGIN!!!!

    (follow my instructions en-masse, and we'll have a robust public option with full Republican blessing by June)
  • drunkfoulmouthfilthybeast
    Most obnoxious, ANY,ANY person that breathes air this planet provides, should be caned if thoughts like opposing rape of any woman or child would roll off any person's lip's. I'm sure if canning was a policy we wouldn't have so many prison rapes. Disgusting! Some of the warp minds these Republicans possess, it's nothing to them worry, they go around fornicating with their secretaries, campaign workers or some of the ladies of the eveniing, (of whom I have more respect for) and due to popular demand they keep their lofty positions in government, Not so, the Democrats, they are shamed blasted by the media, and the Republlicans even buying time to air ads assinating and vilifying their personality and character. And, like their logo the elephant, they never forget, except they have sudden memory loss when the finger is pointing at them. I firmly believe that the colonge they use is so powerful, that you can't smell the flesh rotting on the bone.
  • captainfrank
    I oppose the rape of children and women. However, I am all for the rape of men. Especially men who claim to be democrats.
  • rexozone
    Contain your "frank," cap'n, there's plenty of flesh for you after a hell borne sadistic life, and it comes right off the bone probly. Back to your homemade bunker until then and dream a zombie's reverie. Your republican desires are not unique and there's a lot of undead with whom you must share your spoils...Coburn, Vitter, McConnell, McCain, Palin all have blood in their remaining teeth.
  • Baconstang
    Projecting a bit? You can always claim to be Dem....
  • Therefore
    "In an especially well-publicized confrontation, a tearful Jones asking Senator David Vitter (R-LA) why he wouldn't support the amendment. He simply walked away."

    It wasn't Jones, it was a local New Orleans rape survivor.
  • good for you al ... this vote should be used every day to fight the repugs ... but the dems are dim.
  • A sharp wit and good statecraft are branches of the same limb. I am expecting great things from Franken, and creative ways of forcing the recalcitrant to "deal with it". A very serious comic.

    Next: Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert for Senate 2010 or 2012. Wadaya think, eh? Most trusted newsman in America by a wide margin, eh? Could happen . . . .
  • roy_T
    Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert should be running mates in 2012. This will be Palins and Cheny any day
  • douvie
    Then again, we could get Thompson or Jon Voigt.
  • lincolnparadox
    PP--

    I'd trust Stewart for Obama's job. If Barry O is going to rely on advisors for everything, we may as well have Jon instead.
  • Dr. Matt
    Teabagging hick/terrorist, please provide proof that President Obama relies on advisers for everything, you anti-American twit.
  • dennycrane
    Explain why those "stars" on "your" republican elephant "icon" have the stars upside down? They represent a "goats" head. I would expect it though, since you are led around by the "gangsters" from the health industry and don't even know it. You sheeple shit.
  • j
    "really?"
  • captainfrank
    Dr. Matt, I am sorry to inform you that you are a complete and utter fucking moron.
  • lincolnparadox
    Dude, I'm from NY and I have a Ph.D. Why don't you stop drinking the kool aid?

    Obama has expanded his cabinet to include an additional 3 czars over Bush. That might not sound like much, but Bush added 28 czars over Clinton. Both of the past two Presidents have divided their power amongst "smarter people."

    I'm not saying the Obama doesn't have what it takes to be President. I'm saying that either he or somebody else (maybe an advisor?) told him that dividing his power beyond the typical Cabinet posts was the way to go.

    Clinton had 7 czars. Reagan had 1. JFK had 0. FDR had 12, but he had polio.

    Your knee-jerk reaction to my comment suggests that you're more than happy to not think and just accept what the Democratic Party says. Which is good news. If you keep that up maybe you can be President someday too?
  • gron dee
    get a clue buddy. Regardless of if he uses advisors, he is completely impotent. He seems to want to be a hands off person, which is a horrible idea in this day and age with these issues. Instead of insulting someone for having an opinion.... since you are apparently so informed, why dont you fight misinformation with facts instead of continuing to be the problem.
blog comments powered by Disqus