White House reportedly warns consultant against appearing on Fox News

By Stephen C. Webster
Sunday, November 8th, 2009 -- 10:06 pm
Share on Facebook Stumble This!

foxnewslogo White House reportedly warns consultant against appearing on Fox NewsAccording to The Los Angeles Times, a Democratic political consultant was recently the recipient of a stark warning from the White House: appear on Fox News again and your clients may no longer require your services.

While the White House denied any such warning, the Sunday report by Peter Nicholas notes this particular strategist is just one of several said to have been waived away from the network by the Obama administration.

"The message [from the administration] was, 'We better not see you on again,' said the strategist, who spoke on condition of anonymity so as not to run afoul of the White House," Nicholas wrote. "An implicit suggestion, he said, was that 'clients might stop using you if you continue.'"

The Times report also cited Patrick Caddell, "a Fox News contributor and former pollster for President Carter, [who] said he had spoken to Democratic consultants who said they were told by the White House to avoid appearances on Fox. He declined to give their names."

If the claim is indeed true, it would be another advance in a media skirmish long brewing. Half-way through October, a number of administration officials went on the offensive against the network, calling it "not really a news station" and pointing out that many times it acts as a media arm of the Republican party.

Story continues below...

"Last night Fox News continued its disregard for the facts in an attempt to smear the Administration's efforts to win the Olympics for the United States," a White House blog entry states. "In the past, hosting the Olympics has been a source of pride and unity for the country, but once again Fox News' Glenn Beck program has shown that nothing is worthy of respect if it can be used as part of a partisan attack to boost ratings."

"Let's not pretend they're a news network the way CNN is," the White House's communications director said during a CNN interview in October.

Seemingly in response to reportedly being frozen out of a key interview, Fox News host Chris Wallace resorted to insults, comparing the U.S. administration to Chicago gangsters and playing a clip from the Sean Connery crime film The Untouchables.

As though to contradict the claims, "David Axelrod, senior adviser to the president, appeared on Fox News Channel last week to talk about the results of Tuesday's off-year elections," the Times noted. "Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton also appeared on the network last week."

Share this article:
  • Print this article!
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Story comments are below...
  • Hooker
    Fox news is what news would look like if Goebbells ran the network. Ailes - Goebbells, is there really a difference?
  • mparker
    Fox is a blatantly biased propaganda outlet. No Democrat should appear on their programs because it gives Fox the false appearance of legitimacy. They went to court to prove they're not news and won their case fair and square.
  • decora
    obama wtf are you wasting your energy on this shit for... get back to work and stop bitching about fox news
  • DownriverDem
    Easier said than done. A whole bunch of nuts believe them.
  • morepatience
    Do you think any fewer will with the WH wasting time on this publicly? I don't remember who, Anita Dunn maybe(?), said that they are doing it so the other networks stop picking up Fox's stories. That kind of statement either says the other networks need to be hand-fed and kept on a leash, or that they are so incompetent that they can't fact check stories by other networks (Fox) before airing them. Doesn't look good either way except for Fox's ratings. I'd love to be an investor in that network right now.
  • jrr_wired
    I think that in light of the new Nielsen ratings, Fox got nothing but the ability to charge more for air time on advertising out of making a big deal of their problems with the White House.

    Perhaps the L.A. Times reporter is shopping himself out to News Corp? Not to mention the source is "anonymous." The anonymous source smells a lot like "made up to sell a headline."
  • CaptainCrunch
    Good. Maybe when Fox cannot get anyone to appear but nut cases, they will die out as they should.
  • rickpetes
    So, why this?

    "As though to contradict the claims, "David Axelrod, senior adviser to the president, appeared on Fox News Channel last week to talk about the results of Tuesday's off-year elections," the Times noted. "Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton also appeared on the network last week.""

    Hell, they might as well appear on the Playboy channel. Though I guess the Playboy channel does have a higher level of credibility. Still, I'd just freeze FALSE News out as afar as possible and then just ignore their blatherings...
  • DownriverDem
    Too bad there wasn't some way we could have taken them on years ago, but it would have been worse with the Repubs running it all. If only Fox News told the truth and didn't suport and promote anti government rallies and protests. That makes them not a news station to me. Their hosts are full of hate and maybe they don't mean it, but it gives the crazies the message that it's okay to do violence.

    I can't believe so many folks believe everything they say.
  • jimbo701
    They are part of the GOP propaganda machine and the WH is treating them as such.
  • douvie
    It's too bad that the Obama administration can't bring the same zeal to their political program. Try shunning the likes of Snowe, Lieberman and Senator Ghastly. Why does the White House pretend that these people are in favor of advancing the interests of the American public?
  • jeffersonperrin
    "...appear on FOX and your clients may no longer require your services..."
    Sounds like something a friend would say to anyone who they've discovered visited a house of ill repute. I mean, let's face it, any decent, honest person is not going to want to associated with such an individual and the White House is just trying to do right by their friend. Naturally, integrity and loyalty (especially to one's own country) are concepts completely and utterly foreign to FOX
  • jimbo701
    I believe the WH is treating FOX "News" appropriately. They are not legitimate news and the WH is making certain people understand they don't take anything they say seriously.
  • Name
    Why would the White House want to do business with the Republican party's own media arm? Just to let them misquote, twist facts or dishonestly chop up interviews? There's no fair and balanced there and even the wing-nuts know it deep down. Why else would Fox's audience be what it is?
  • Spiffarino
    If this is true - and I'm still not convinced - then it's good news. Faux News should be marginalized. There is no reason in the world for Democrats, progressives, liberals, etc. to lend credibility to such a blatantly partisan outfit.
  • thetruthin13
    Seems to me that all the "demoncrats" are afraid of fox news because they speak the truth about the president. Obama can't let it go because he is running scared. He knows that fox news is putting the truth about him out there and people will see him for the racist and terriost that he is.
blog comments powered by Disqus