Worldwide poll: Vast majority say capitalism not working

By Raw Story
Monday, November 9th, 2009 -- 11:55 am
Share on Facebook Stumble This!

dollars cents Worldwide poll: Vast majority say capitalism not workingDissatisfaction with capitalism is widespread around the globe 20 years after the fall of the Berlin Wall that heralded the demise of European communism, a poll released Monday showed.

Only 11 percent of people surveyed across 27 countries thought free market capitalism is working well, while nearly a quarter -- 23 percent -- said the system is "fatally flawed." A bare majority, 51 percent, believed its problems can be solved with more regulation and reform, the poll said.

In only the United States (25 percent) and Pakistan (21 percent), did more than one in five people agree that capitalism works well in its current form, the poll conducted for BBC World said.

The survey of 29,033 adults comes after the worst global financial crisis since the 1930s Great Depression and amid celebrations of the anniversary of the fall of the Berlin Wall, which abruptly ended the Cold War.

And it reflects growing concerns among the public and politicians that the world's economic system has failed to live up to its promises. In Europe's post-communist eastern bloc, where residents have lived through both communism and capitalism, a poll released last week suggested capitalism is losing favor with the public.

Story continues below...

Research by the Pew Research Center showed the percentage of people approving of democracy was markedly lower in the former Soviet bloc compared to a similar 1991 poll.

Eighty-five percent of respondents in East Germany supported the change to democracy, but even this was down six percent from 1991. The figure dropped 24 percent in Bulgaria, 20 in Lithuania, 18 in Hungary and eight in Russia.

Japan's recently-elected center-left prime minister, Yukio Hatoyama, launched a broadside last month against the excesses of capitalism in his first parliamentary address since taking office.

Speaking on his vision of a kinder, gentler society guided by the spirit of "fraternity," Hatoyama said market forces were useful for a country but must be tempered in order to create a livable society.

"It is self-evident that free economic activity in markets invigorates society," said Hatoyama, 62, who swept to power in August elections, ending more than half a century of almost unbroken conservative rule.

"But it is also obvious that the idea of letting markets decide everything for the survival of the strongest, or the idea of 'economic rationalism' at the expense of people's lives, does not hold true any more."

Doug Miller, chairman of polling firm GlobeScan, which co-conducted the BBC survey, said: "It appears that the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989 may not have been the crushing victory for free-market capitalism that it seemed at the time -- particularly after the events of the last 12 months."

 46684877 world service captial 466 Worldwide poll: Vast majority say capitalism not working

--With Agence France-Presse

Share this article:
  • Print this article!
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Story comments are below...
  • Loonie
    "Tiny minority of extraordinarily obscenely wealthy people say it works just fine"
  • jaspervonspatula
    Capitalism is a great good. Unfirtunately greedy assholes using capitalism to screw everyone and ruin nations, will insure it collapses. Corrupt capitalism will kill capitalism.
  • Savantster
    .
    As with all things over time, change will happen. Capitalism (in the bastardized form we used here) served its purpose, now it is out dated and obsolete.

    We used to need human labor to gather resources, now we don't (as much, and in 20 years, won't at all). There were few people and lots of room.. now people born have no place to "just go" and live, they must become slaves to those that came before and squatted on all our resources..

    Technology has changed reality from what it had been known to be, and Capitalism came from what was.. we need a new for now. Money had a use, it represented something, now it is obsolete. If we are to survive as a species, we must rethink everything, we must adapt and change, and that includes getting rid of money and private ownership of the public planet. We all live here, we all have a right to those resources, we should not have to become slaves to ancestors just to live.

    head to thevenusproject and thezeitgeistmovement (both .com) and have a gander.. The time of money is over, the time of a Resource Based Economy is being born... let's just hope we don't destroy our only life giving planet before we wake up to that fact.
  • davidrvelasquez
    Same thing with socialism.

    Capitalism was a response and an alternative to feudalism. Socialism was a response to the excesses of capitalism.

    Neither can really function in a vacuum. A capitalist society without reasonable social policies either turns into corporate oligarchical fascism or erupts into total revolution.
    Socialism without some amount of market incentive also turns into bureaucrat dominated hell.
    The two together can function...I see it all the time in europe.
  • Savantster
    .
    "Socialism without some amount of market incentive also turns into bureaucrat dominated hell."

    Only if your aim is to profit from Production. We all have simple needs, its our learned wants and artificial scarcity of those things that cause the problem. Technology and education (more productive social memes) are the solution. Production should be done to provide for the masses, what they need, not be a vehicle for creating station and class distinction.
  • davidrvelasquez
    I know. And I should avoid such sweeping generalities.

    I was trying to point out how in europe a combination of philosophies do manage to coexist ...mitigating the effects of disastrous market driven policies rippling from the US.
    Some factory closures occured... fortunately there they didn't attach the same anti socialist phobias to gov't efforts to curtail the recession.
    Atleast in some countries people haven't lost their homes in droves because many obtained their loans through special gov't sponsored home loans. Though some of those banks participating did wind up either being sold or nationalized. ( the result not of socialist policies but of american capitalist greed)
  • Keynes always said that this kind of system, i.e., laissez-faire capitalism, had no handle on the problem of employment which might range from full employment to widespread unemployment. In other words, capitalism brings no economic stability for the huge majority. Capitalism is simply a form of economic predation whereby the moneyed prey on the working public as in take their hard earned capital by either hook or by crook.
  • Unless there are some forms of socialism sprinkled into this failed capitalist system it will be nothing more than a memory. Greed is equated with capitalism. Debt is equated with capitalism. Excessive usury is equated with capitalism. International banking cartels, and globalized corps writing the legislation on finance for a sovereign country is equated with capitalism. These are all ingredients for failure, and Fascism.
  • toolman41339
    I don't understand how anyone could call what we have now anything close to free-market capitalism. Capitalism requires capital (i.e. savings) and competition. Debt is the opposite of capital/savings. Cartels of any kind and government collusion with business are symptoms of big-goverment supported restrictions on competition.

    What you've described isn't capitalism at all; it's corporatism or fascism or collectivism or just big-goverment. Choose your favorite term. But if there's no competition and no capital, then you have the opposite of free-markets and capitalism. Describing socialism and calling it capitalism (as the above article and poll did) doesn't make it so.
  • m3t
    Let's see... you pay slave labor prices and exploit poor nations... then you extort us back home.

    And during this exploitation and extortion, you are greedy, wasteful and polluting.

    What could possibly be wrong with poorly regulated, capitalistic greed?
  • njt
    Funny how the article seems to use "capitalism" and "democracy" interchangeably. The two are by no means interchangeable and sometimes I wonder if such efforts to blur the meaning of the two isn't intentional, as if someone wants us to think "If we do away with capitalism then we won't have democracy"

    "In Europe's post-communist eastern bloc, where residents have lived through both communism and capitalism, a poll released last week suggested capitalism is losing favor with the public.

    Research by the Pew Research Center showed the percentage of people approving of democracy was markedly lower in the former Soviet bloc compared to a similar 1991 poll."
  • habu99
    You illustrate a fundamental flaw in many people's perception, the disconnect between a separate system of governance (Democracy in our case, the rights of all, the equality of all, meaningfully written down by our Founding Fathers in both the Declaration of Independence and the Preamble of the Constitution) and economics (Capitalism, which is barely mentioned in either document, which seeks to enrich the few at the expense of the many, and whose "benefits" we now fight on a daily basis in the struggle between solvency and good health). Communism is both economics and government, the citizens of a communist state are routinely screwed by their government. In a capitalist society, citizens can be screwed over by both the government AND free enterprise.
  • Savantster
    .
    I noticed that, too.. but didn't put as much weight on the intentional connection being made. However, you are correct in that many people see them as interchangeable and I'm sure that causes problems for developing nations..

    Back to education being pivotal to getting out of this mess.
    .
  • Name
    No, your are all Teweys, just mindless collectivist.
  • Savantster
    .
    You don't exist in a vacuum. You're part of a society that allows you to exist in the way you do. Without collective collaboration, none of the things you enjoy in your life would exist.. no furnace, no washing machine, no car, no movies, no cell phones, no TV.. the list goes on and on and on.

    What's mindless is not understanding how collectively, we're all here. What's mindless is being narcissistic and believing you have more of a right to life than your neighbor or some random stranger on the street. What's mindless is not understanding that all life is connected, and as thinking rational beings, we have an obligation to each other if we want to continue living comfortable lives.
  • davidrvelasquez
    Take that, Ayn Rand!
  • JadeRiver
    Um the problem with this story is that it abruptly jumps from Capitalism to Democracy as though they are synonymous. They are not.
  • kiboshki
    .
    Actually, it's kind of heartening that only a quarter of Americans think capitalism today isn't totally fupped. I was expecting much more.

    Maybe there is hope for US :)
    .
  • thomas jefferson
    personally, it's not captialism per say, that pisses me off, it's corporations gone wild with no oversite and their flagrent disobeying of the laws.

    To big to fail? To big to exist.
  • billfromny
    It certainly is apparent that after 230+ years that Capitalism is showing signs of deterioration, most of it becoming obvious within the last 8-10 years. Human nature has a way of getting in the way...like maybe, greed? Power? Complacence? Please see April 15, 1912, 2:20AM
blog comments powered by Disqus