Navy lawyer: Defending 9/11 suspects a patriotic duty

By Agence France-Presse
Sunday, November 15th, 2009 -- 8:32 pm
Share on Facebook Stumble This!

commandersuzannelacheliernavy Navy lawyer: Defending 9/11 suspects a patriotic duty"It's perfectly patriotic," said US Navy Commander Suzanne Lachelier, a military attorney appointed to represent one of the accused September 11 plotters.

She is one of only a handful of Americans who work to defend those who committed the horrific attacks in 2001 that killed nearly 3,000 people in the United States.

"Defending the US Constitution, that's what we do as prosecutors, but also as lawyers for the defense," this young dynamic woman told AFP.

"It's about presenting the rights of the accused -- it's not at all about the facts."

Lachelier was appointed to represent Ramzi Binalshibh, a Yemeni citizen -- and one-time roommate of suspected 9/11 ringleader Mohammed Atta -- whom she says suffers from severe mental problems.

Story continues below...

President Barack Obama's administration announced Friday that Binalshibh and four other alleged co-plotters of the worst ever attacks on US soil, including self-proclaimed mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, would be tried in US federal court in New York city, just steps away from the scene of their crime.

"It's historic. There are a lot of things that you don't normally deal with in a regular criminal case," said Michael Acuff, who helps Sheikh Mohammed -- known as KSM -- represent himself.

"A regular criminal case isn't affected by new laws that are changing in the middle of the case or by... political concerns at the national level like these cases are, and it is not affected by the types of things that our government has said happened to Mr Mohammed."

As military reservists, the two lawyers joined in early 2008 the defense team set up by the Pentagon to assist Guantanamo Bay detainees facing trial before military commissions -- special tribunals established by Obama's predecessor George W. Bush.

Mohammed and his co-defendants spent years in secret CIA prisons where they were subjected to other interrogation methods, such as sleep deprivation, incessant loud music, and being forced to stand for long hours in uncomfortable positions.

In announcing the administration's decision, Attorney General Eric Holder vowed the co-conspirators would stand trial "before an impartial jury" and said he expected to push for the death penalty.

The five are currently held at Guantanamo, the US naval base in southern Cuba where they have already been charged with murder under the much-criticized military commissions system.

After spending years in secret CIA prisons undergoing harsh interrogation techniques that some say amount to torture, the alleged plotters gave these uniformed lawyers a rather cool reception.

"These cases make you think about your own philosophy about justice. They make you think about your own religious beliefs," noted Acuff.

"There are things in these cases that make you evaluate yourself and your country and obviously a normal case does not often do that."

Sheikh Mohammed, a Pakistani, was waterboarded -- subjected to simulated drowning -- 183 times during his years in US custody.

The evidence US agents obtained from the accused under coercion has raised serious questions about how they could be convicted in any regular US court of law.

Acuff, a veteran lawyer in his fifties, does not hide how much his client holds him in low esteem. At their very first hearing in June 2008, Sheikh Mohammed and his fellow defendants demanded to be rid of their court-appointed American lawyers.

Two of them, including Binalshibh, were not granted their request. And military commissions rules require that all defendants be assigned a military lawyer; those who represent themselves receive a stand-by counsel.

For Adam Thurschwell, a civilian defense lawyer specializing in death penalty matters, the military commissions system "was so grotesquely unfair" that he could not resist a chance to "make a contribution to the fairness of a capital case."

"Nobody's in favor of terrorism," he stressed.

But "a good defense lawyer wants to get his client a fair trial. That's very difficult to do and harder the more infamous the defendant is."

That position remains true for these attorneys even after long hours and countless pages of legal challenges to the system as a whole, an appearance before the Supreme Court and only three completed trials.

"For a penal lawyer, the most important thing is to personalize, to humanize a client hated by everyone," Lachelier said.

Pointing to her client's legal troubles -- he has been treated with psychotropic drugs at Guantanamo -- she hopes to convince a jury of angry New Yorkers to "not exaggerate his role" in the plot that led to the September 11 attacks.

Share this article:
  • Print
  • email
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Story comments are below...

  • cameramandavid
    If she secures an acquittal (which has about as much chance as say... nil) will she have done her job perfectly? And then get forced out of the Navy like that other Commander that was quietly forced out of the Navy after being assigned to OBL's driver, and getting the case all the way up to the SCOTUS? (Where he won, by the way, and restored Habeas Corpus for the one guy...) That would be doing your job perfectly... Sounds like a setup to me... like they want her out of the Navy... no win situation for her...
  • dennycrane
    That is what we do here. Represent "all" people, with a verdict of their "peers," which means Muslims, Egyptians, etc., need to be part of the jury. If they are freed, it will be because of the "tainted" bullshit that the bush crime family did.
  • schlumgolian
    when did chris kattan become a lawyer?
  • darker
    Yes, "It's perfectly patriotic," and it's what US Navy Commander Suzanne Lachelier was
    asked to do -- her job.
  • quincunx
    "She is one ... the horrific attacks in 2001 that killed nearly 3,000 people in the United States."
    Most of the 3000 died a full 30-60 minutes after the attacks in 2001 when two of the building at the World Trade Center mysteriously lost all structural integrity.
  • Elim
    I understood that Khalid Sheik Mohammed claimed he was the mastermind of 9-11, just so he could GET a trial! Our own goverment did 9-11, along with the Israeli's and British intelligence. I'd like to see these guys acquitted, but I know it's not going to happen.
  • Eyes wide open
    It's patriotic to expose the truth. The truth is Ramzi Binalshibh didn't "mastermind" 9/11. He is merely the patsy and the scapegoat. The real perps always need a patsy. "They did it because they hate our freedoms".... is the biggest fucking joke, the biggest lie. Hmmmm...lets see, what country would want Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Iran to be bombed into the stone age?? What country is smart enough, along with "dual citizenship" U.S. government officials to dupe Americans into fighting their wars for them ?? Well, that would be Israel. Connect the God Damn Dots people .Do you really believe Ramzi Binalshibh and his rag tags could pull that off? Do you really believe these "terrorist" who could barely fly a flight simulator could maneuver 767's like top gun pilots into those towers?
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LXLmAiNYRoE&feat...
  • bdjusa
    Israel's Mossad (their intelligence organization) masterminded the 911 attacks. They often use Mulsims in their false flag attacks. Here is the proof of the Mossad 911 connection: www.takeourworldback.com/itwasntmuslims.htm
blog comments powered by Disqus