American Medical Association rethinking pot prohibition?

By Daniel Tencer
Tuesday, November 10th, 2009 -- 1:05 pm
Share on Facebook Stumble This!

marijuana American Medical Association rethinking pot prohibition?The American Medical Association on Tuesday issued a cautious but historically significant call to change America's marijuana prohibition laws, urging a "review" of the drug's status as a Schedule I drug.

At a meeting in Houston, the AMA's House of Delegates adopted a new policy that calls for "marijuana's status as a federal Schedule I controlled substance be reviewed with the goal of facilitating the conduct of clinical research and development of cannabinoid-based medicines, and alternate delivery methods."

That does not mean the AMA supports the legalization or decriminalization of marijuana.

Schedule I drugs are those considered to have no medical benefit and to be harmful when used under any circumstances. As such, marijuana is currently grouped by the federal government with drugs like heroin and LSD. By comparison, cocaine and methamphetamines are classified as Schedule II drugs, which may have some clinical benefits when used in the proper circumstances. The AMA's stance could simply result in the rescheduling of marijuana as a controlled substance that has some medical benefit.

However, Aaron Houston, director of government relations for the Marijuana Policy Project, calls the move "historic" all the same, noting that it comes from "what has historically been America's most cautious and conservative major medical organization."

Story continues below...

"Marijuana's Schedule I status is not just scientifically untenable, given the wealth of recent data showing it to be both safe and effective for chronic pain and other conditions, but it's been a major obstacle to needed research," he said in a statement.

"It's been 72 years since the AMA has officially recognized that marijuana has both already-demonstrated and future-promising medical utility," said medical student Sunil Aggarwal in a press statement from Americans for Safe Access. Aggarwal has been spearheading the effort by the AMA's youth wing to change the organization's attitude towards marijuana.

ASA government affairs director Caren Woodson pointed out that the American College of Physicians, the country's second-largest medical group, called for a review of marijuana's status last year.

"The two largest physician groups in the US have established medical marijuana as a health care issue that must be addressed," Woodson said. "Both organizations have underscored the need for change by placing patients above politics."

In its report (PDF), the AMA stated:

Results of short term controlled trials indicate that smoked cannabis reduces neuropathic pain, improves appetite and caloric intake especially in patients with reduced muscle mass, and may relieve spasticity and pain in patients with multiple sclerosis. However, the patchwork of state-based systems that have been established for .medical marijuana. is woefully inadequate in establishing even rudimentary safeguards that normally would be applied to the appropriate clinical use of psychoactive substances. The future of cannabinoid-based medicine lies in the rapidly evolving field of botanical drug substance development, as well as the design of molecules that target various aspects of the endocannabinoid system. To the extent that rescheduling marijuana out of Schedule I will benefit this effort, such a move can be supported.

The AMA's move is the latest in a series of small but significant shifts in attitudes towards the liberalization of marijuana policies.

Last month, conservative columnist George F. Will said that the US is "probably in the process" of legalizing marijuana, pointing to the Obama administration's new policy to no longer raid medical marijuana clinics that are legal under state law, so long as those state laws are being observed. (Though one California-based US attorney disputes that there has been any change in policy.)

Additionally, California is currently debating a proposal to decriminalize marijuana. Massachusetts decriminalized marijuana in a state ballot last year.

And recent polls show that support for decriminalization of marijuana has reached a record high in the United States, with some 44 percent of Americans now in favor of reducing or eliminating criminal penalties for possession of the herb.

Share this article:
  • Print this article!
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Story comments are below...

  • WJM51
    Well, it's about freaking time, seeing as how they were one of TWO industry groups who spoke out against the prohibition in 1937. They KNOW it's good for hundreds of things, they just make tons of money on the pill pushing pharma gravy train. They also know that it's NEVER killed anyone, and that the pill pushers kill 200,000 Americans every year, FAR more than all the illegal drugs combined.

    BTW, the other industry group was the bird seed manufacturers, who knew that without good nutrition, songbirds won't sing. They know that hemp seed is a complete nutrition source, and that even humans can not only live, but survive quite well on it and water. They used to use the seed for food in TB asylums, because it allows more nutrition to get to the body than any other food source and it's easy on the body.

    And they know all about he US Senate studies in '70 and 72 that found that people who smoke it tend to live LONGER than their next door neighbors who don't.

    Time to end this stupidity. Stop screwing people for doing something that never killed anyone. Especially if you are going to glorify things like going to war against countries that never threatened or attacked us. Stop seeing the American people as nothing but a bottomless pocket and fodder for your profitable prison industry. Stop screwing up people's lives. it is that simple. Stop making things worse than they would ordinarily be if you just left the situation alone.
  • Thanks for the info. on the bird seed manufacturers, did not know that. You may not be a Christian, I don't know. My point is that even in Genesis chapter 1 it says, that god made all the seed bearing plants, and trees with seed in the fruit, and it was good.
    So even religious protests I do not believe are valid. I am a Christian and I support the complete lift of the prohibition on marijuana. It is a plant that grows wild all over the world, how can that be illegal?
    The government would make a lot of money in taxes and save even more in reducing the war on drugs.
  • Phil E. Drifter
    They could make a lot of money but that's not the point of prohibition. After all, we learned the results of prohibition when we outlawed alcohol. We learned prohibition = black market crime.

    it's not about money, it's about continually suppressing the minorities.

    Alcohol is far and wide the most dangerous drug on the planet, because no other drug, legal or not, turns its user into a stumbling, belligerent moron. In fact, all the illegal drugs are safer. The only reason you hear about them ruining lives is because that particular user got caught.

    order yourself a copy of 'You Will Die: The Burden of Mondern Taboos' from suburra.com (or just read about it some on that site).
  • rickpetes
    My GOD! Don't you understand that if we legalize marijuana, we'll have to legalize the growing of hemp?! That would mean that there would be many natural products that would compete in the market with synthetics like nylon, rayon, etc. The petroleum companies would not like that, so don't get your hopes up on this.

    And possibly worse still, what would happen to our for profit prison system if they aren't allowed to destroy people's lives for the possession and distribution of the plant? NO, there are way to many business interests that would be threatened by the legalization of the demon weed.
  • Savantster
    .
    They are already going to legalize hemp.. part of why hemp was not legal is because it was "too hard" for law enforcement to tell hemp from pot (so the story goes)..

    But, hemp growing is gonna happen regardless of if they legalize the harmless smoke-able cousin.
    .
  • kenn123578
    yeah but by putting those other products out of business we save the environment and open newer jobs, think hemp will pretty much replace wood as far as paper goes, you can use it as a biodeisel, i mean is plastic really that important that we cant sacrifice some uses of it to help save our planet and to stop putting inocent people in jail for a gram of kusch, and the fact that weed also has so many possibilities to fighting cancer, yeah some people will suffer but thats what happens with change it effects people but saying products that are bad for the envirnonment will suffer is just something i think we should deal with
  • Savantster
    .
    I'm pretty sure you can use hemp oil (and various other plant oils) to make plastics, too.
  • Phil E. Drifter
    You can. It was Anslinger teaming up with Hearst and DuPont to outlaw hemp so their businesses (newspaper, of which Hearst owned thousands of acres of forestland which he used to feed his paper mills; if paper were made from hemp instead he'd have a lot of useless land; and synthetic chemicals and dirty crude DuPont needed to make plastics).
  • zelduh
    Let's stop lying about pot. It is MUCH LESS DANGEROUS than alcohol. (Have you ever seen a ward in a hospital for pot heads? You certainly see them for alcoholics!)

    Pot should simply be legalized, taxed and sold in liquor stores to people who are of the "legal age;" right next to the beer and wine.
  • zelduh
    BTW I don't smoke pot (I don't drink beer either.) I am just being honest. The time has come for society - and politicians - to be honest about it too.
  • Independentgal
    I don't smoke it, either, but I couldn't agree more with your posts. The tax revenue just might go a long way toward paying for a GOOD healthcare system.
  • bobofat
    God made weed and some asshole made Texas.
  • Satan
    Paying taxes for weed I smoke only to see half of it being spent on the U.S. war machine in a nation where so few are actively opposed to endless war is something that's not going to happen with me.

    Tax the watching of Pro Football, I'm sure it does much more damage to society in the long run, oh yeah, and fuck the troops too.
  • Savantster
    .
    There is no tax on alcohol you brew/ferment yourself, there is only a tax for selling it.. as in, you pay a tax for making the profit. If cannabis is legalized, and it should be, then there would likely not be a tax on personally grown/smoked dope.. only stuff you sell to the lazy people. nothing wrong with that.

    and if cannabis becomes legal, we'll probably have a hard time engaging in those illegal wars because soldiers will start to "wake up" and won't want to be there.

    and since Pro Football has TONS of novelties sold in association of it, it already produces a lot of tax revenue in sales taxes. Hell, i have to pay sales tax on my cable bill, so I'm already paying taxes just to watch stuff.

    And be nice to the troops.. it wasn't troops (or even ex-troops) that got us into this war.. most of these soldiers aren't really all that bright (hence being in the military) and bought the lies sold to them.. and now they are just following orders, thinking they are making us safe over here by fighting them over there. At least, most troops.. some are just douche bags, fuck those ones..
  • You better have been trying to make some stupid point when your typed "fuck the troops"!
  • This very good news for those who use marijuana, which been clinically proven to posses medicinal benefits to so many who suffer a variety of ailments. It can also be very helpful in quitting a cigarette habit. Let compassion for those it gives relief to take precedence over politics and antiquated propaganda.
  • Phil E. Drifter
    The AMA has ALWAYS supported medicinal cannabis, one of their doctors appeared in Congress to give testimony on that historic day in 1937 when 'marijuana' was outlawed.

    Directly from tinyurl.com/1mn (which is a transcript of the speech given by Dr. Whitebread in front of the CA Judges' Association before the historic 1995 vote on Prop 215):

    The other piece of medical testimony came from a man named Dr. William C. Woodward. Dr. Woodward was both a lawyer and a doctor and he was Chief Counsel to the American Medical Association. Dr. Woodward came to testify at the behest of the American Medical Association saying, and I quote, "The American Medical Association knows of no evidence that marihuana is a dangerous drug."

    What's amazing is not whether that's true or not. What's amazing is what the Congressmen then said to him. Immediately upon his saying, and I quote again, "The American Medical Association knows of no evidence that marihuana is a dangerous drug.", one of the Congressmen said, "Doctor, if you can't say something good about what we are trying to do, why don't you go home?"
  • jdouglas
    Regular marijuana use effectively kills the God Virus. Without an infected population, the Bastards would no longer have religion as a tool to manipulate the Idiots into fighting and supporting their wars. The only recognizable benefit to the Bastards, might be a population that is slightly more susceptible to subliminal commercial TV messages. So, the real question for the Bastards is this: Has the general understanding and acceptance of modern science already rendered the God Virus sufficiently impotent to warrant its abandonment as a device of social control? And, if so, can TV programming take up the slack?
  • kucinich2012
    Y'wanna pass that over here next?
  • bobofat
    If the troops smoked weed they might not all be such douche bags...Wait...I think saying f the troops isnt a brillant idea. Have you any idea how many go around shooting up places. More to come if America cant let them get stoned. That would curb PTSD in a real way...Instead they are pumped full of pfizer and bayer...The same drugs whose flashy ads say theres a risk of suicide associated with their use??? WTF? No...I think troops are our Sons, Daughters, Sisters, Brothers, Mothers, Fathers, Nieces, Uncles, Aunts,Nephews,Grandparents, friends and Nieghbors...And anything else you can think of so Im not at all surprised by the reaction people have when we disregard that fact...The reaction by the United Stupids of America is typical and we shouldnt forget who sends our loved ones to war...Gay Republicans who are too afraid to come out...bastards, and an occasional puck here or there playing the devils advocate.

    Again...PTSD+POT=REAL RESULTS.
blog comments powered by Disqus