Powell warned of ‘terror-industrial complex’ in 2007 interview

By David Edwards and Muriel Kane
Friday, October 16th, 2009 -- 10:19 am
Share on Facebook Stumble This!

powellopenhands Powell warned of terror industrial complex in 2007 interviewWhen MSNBC's Keith Olbermann welcomed three former members of Monty Python to Countdown on Wednesday, his biggest surprise was a question from Terry Gilliam, "How come that Colin Powell interview about the terror-industrial complex didn't become a bigger story?"

Olbermann was taken aback by the question, but by the next day he had uncovered Powell's September 12, 2007 interview with GQ Magazine. Powell's apology in that interview for his use of faulty intelligence prior to the Iraq War grabbed the headlines at the time, but he also delivered a far less-noticed warning against what Olbermann now calls "an entire aspect of the nexus of politics and terror."

"What is the greatest threat facing us now?" Powell asked. "People will say it’s terrorism. But are there any terrorists in the world who can change the American way of life or our political system? No. ... The only thing that can really destroy us is us. We shouldn’t do it to ourselves, and we shouldn’t use fear for political purposes—scaring people to death so they will vote for you, or scaring people to death so that we create a terror-industrial complex."

When Powell delivered a speech at the University of Oklahoma a short time later, campus reporters asked what he had meant by his remarks, and he replied, "We're spending an enormous amount of money on homeland security, and I think we should spend whatever it takes. But I think we have to be careful that we don't get so caught up in trying to throw money at the terrorist and counter-terrorist problem that we're essentially creating an industry that will only exist as long as you keep the terrorist threat pumped up. ... Let's make sure that we are spending money on the right things and not spending money just to spend money."

Although Powell's follow-up remarks focused on the potential for wasting money, the original model for his statements -- President Eisenhower's 1961 farewell address -- was primarily concerned with the threat to a free society of granting "unwarranted influence" over US policy to a "military-industrial complex" of defense contractors and national security think-tanks that might "endanger our liberties or democratic processes."

Story continues below...

Observers had been expessing concern about the rise of the homeland security industry for several years prior to Powell's remarks. Tim Shorrock's groundbreaking 2005 article, "The Spy Who Billed Me," revealed how "the government has outsourced everything from spy satellites to covert operations -- and well-connected companies are cashing in." A blog inspired by the article has continued to pursue the subject.

A March 2007 Vanity Fair article on homeland security contractor SAIC and Raw Story's May 2007 expose of a questionable anthrax vaccine maker with Bush administration connections explored other aspects of the emerging terror-industrial complex in the months immediately before the Powell interview. The subject has drawn less attention in the last few years, but the rediscovery of Powell's warning may put it back in the spotlight.

This video is from MSNBC's Countdown, broadcast Oct. 15, 2009.

Download video via RawReplay.com

Share this article:
  • Print this article!
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Story comments are below...
  • Dave
    Until we stop thinking in terms of "oh this is a conservative thing", Republican thing, Democratic thing, liberal thing, right, left etc. nothing will change. Your comment is ignorant to the fact that these are created to keep us divided and focused on the wrong issues. Shake yourself, wake yourself up, it's all of the elite and the entire government that deserves our condemnation and quite honestly a good old fashion revolt.
  • suzisunshine
    Actually , I think Pogo said it first and very well, I might add.
    "we have met the enemy and it is us"
  • socialismnow
    Pogo was right but I can see the the younger posters heading straight for Google to see who you meant. (-:)
  • suzisunshine
    I forget most of the world is a whole lot younger than me;)
  • rawstorysuspect
    lol at old dude's strange smiley?
  • rage96
    Here here!

    We've had the market on the terror and espionage arm of the corporatocracy cornered since Wilson founded the League of Nations, predating even Ike's warning to Kennedy. Why else would the world look to us for global policing?
  • Powell is probably talking about the same Terror Industrial Complex that pulled off and profited from 9/11. Who the hell knew the Anthrax story was going to turn out to be from the U.S. military labs? Hope more people can get over their emotional fear of confronting these fools. Adios. Let's do it.
  • The Terror Industrial Complex has funded many terrorists throughout history.. Hitler, Mussolini, Saddam, and even Osama Bin Laden. Those in power have a lot to gain by manipulating the public into costly wars that allow them to pass any legislation they so desire. Let's change that from so easily occurring in the future eh? Thanks.
  • libertate
    Terrorist acknowledges the terror industrial complex. Whoopdeedoo.
  • socialismnow
    The "King of Capitalism" is the war machine called the Defense Industry. As long as Fed's "made-up money" continues to be ground out like so much Monopoly money, how can there EVER be an economic recovery? Fear has been programmed in so deeply that I wonder if it can EVER be turned around....
  • NotTimothyGeithner
    Well, considering he's part of the industry, I hope Colin Powell is tried for war crimes one day.
  • Noperiod
    Stating the obvious, but the terror-industrial complex is the conservative movement / Republican
    Party. Always has been. Red menace, yellow peril, fluoride, ayatollahs, Khaddafi, Saddam, Azatlan, Acorn, FEMA, the census, and I'm sure I left a lot out -- we always got to be afraid of something.

    So, vote Republican then run home and hide under your bed.
  • namerequierd
    ITS CALLED THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT
  • Savantster
    .
    No, it's called private enterprise having government contracts to do what could be done by the government directly for a much higher price tag (need that profit in there, and corporate perks like private jets).

    The government is supposed to be accountable to the public, but letting corporations act as people allows them to use their pooled financial resources to trump the public. The very thing that allows companies to exist (pooling resources and splitting up the work load) and make profit, makes them more powerful than individual voters. It causes a slant, and one that is now completely out of control.

    The government has a job to do. We elect representatives (in theory) who will do the job society thinks needs to be done at the time.. in that we listen to their campaigns and "hire" people to do what we think needs to be done. If they don't do the job we hired them for, we fire them at the next cycle. ... but that system has broken down. The single biggest reason is that we have come to accept lies and dishonesty as normal, common, acceptable ways of doing things. We don't hold the ruling elite to the rule of law so they abuse us over and over, to the extent of putting their employees into our public domain to further policies that benefit the ruling elite, not the masses.

    Don't blame the concept for the implementation. Governments are required for societies to function without chaos. The problem isn't the idea of government or self rule, the problem is we've let lying abusers take control of the levers of power (through mass ignorance and apathy).

    Education is the single biggest threat to the ruling elite. That's why our schools don't teach kids how to actually think, they are day care centers that put facts into their brains so they can be well on their way to skilled labor, but not well rounded critical thinking creatures who analyze things around them but instead accept as fact things those in positions of authority tell them. It's part of our nature, so it's easy to exploit.. and that's what we have for "education" in America today.
  • maninwarren
    Colin Powell, paranoid conspiracy theorist. Gee, I guess he does have a brain.
  • corky44
    Nothing new. Google "Gladio"
  • Dawn
    The Daily Oklahoma makes me proud to be Okie.
  • Observer4
    The Oklahoma Daily, is the correct name, actually. Not to nitpick, of course. I used to be a columnist for the OU newspaper, and I'm proud that they were on the ball.
  • CosimodiRondo
    Leave it to Python to get journalists to do their jobs. Now if the next guest on any of these bobblehead shows will just say something like: "Well Keith, in the current health care debate ... cough cough Sibel Edmonds cough cough, the lobbyists are wielding undue ... cough Sibel Edmonds cough cough influence, ...."
  • martydidier
    There’s something everyone needs to know about Obama…. My ex-wife’s family in the early 90’s went into business with World Wide Distributing of Drugs. My ex-brother-in-law and his wife’s brother Clyde O’Connor went into business in Florida with purchasing huge jets. My ex-brother-in-law went to a known “Combine” or “Shadow Government” or “Industrial-Complex” law firm in Chicago and Obama while working as a lawyer assisted them with setting up their business. They had a lot to say about Obama first because of his name and that the Shadow Government group felt he was going places in politics for them as a TEAM MEMBER. They also mentioned that he wasn’t a US Citizen but that wouldn’t present any problems for them to cover-up.

    Meet the family:
    Mexico drug plane used for US ‘rendition’ flights: report Sep 4, 2008
    http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5j6QonBKKMo2...

    Please note the CIA link as the family often bragged about being CIA assets. They started laundering money in the later 70’s for partly for CIA operations. They were also involved in Iran/Contra while I was still married. They said that being a CIA asset means they are protected even if they commit murder and having said this, everyone will eventually learn how many there have been.

    Also don’t over look the TON’s or Cocaine in those huge bags and remember this has been going on since the early 90’s. Before this, the drugs targeted for Chicago were coming across the Texas border without being stopped. Shipments were coming in in Chiquita ships and picked up off shore in International waters and moved to either a ocean side residence or corruption protected port. Trucked across the border to then be split up and placed in a “Pepper Truck” and trucked to the Chicago area. Chicago receives a$100 million dollar shipment in Cocaine each and every week. The money is partially laundered into property using Big Banks who are part of this and other money is used for Black Ops supporting another White House Coup. This is similar to the Business Plot tried in 1933.

    Obama has been found to OWN more than 130 properties in suspicious social security numbers and names. It’s important to realize that property is used as “criminal payment” for services rendered. Obama according to the family is NOT a US Citizen and he is also a TEAM MEMBER in the Shadow Government or “Industrial-Complex”. The family talked openly in 1996 about 911 starting a series of situations including the collapse of our economy (big Banks are involved).

    Marty Didier
    Northbrook, IL
blog comments powered by Disqus