Obama slams US Chamber of Commerce for anti-reform ad

By Agence France-Presse
Friday, October 9th, 2009 -- 3:49 pm
Share on Facebook Stumble This!

us chamber of commerce Obama slams US Chamber of Commerce for anti reform adWASHINGTON — US President Barack Obama on Friday accused big business and its lobbyists of trying to kill his bid to pass a new law shielding US consumers from ruinous predatory lending practices.

The president spoke out in favor of his proposed Consumer Financial Protection Agency, part of a wider regulatory reform effort designed to rein in Wall Street abuses, which is currently being considered in Congress.

"Predictably, a lot of the banks and big financial firms don't like the idea of a consumer agency very much," Obama said at the White House, hours after he was named as this year's surprise recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize.

"In fact, the US Chamber of Commerce is spending millions on an ad campaign to kill it," Obama told an audience of members of Congress, local state officials, finance industry workers and community leaders.

Obama denied claims by critics that the proposed agency would restrict consumer choice and innovation, saying it would set ground rules so that credit card, mortgage and finance firms could not confuse customers with outrageous terms and conditions.

Story continues below...

"But all this hasn't stopped the big financial firms and their lobbyists from mobilizing against change," he said.

"They're doing what they always do -- descending on Congress and using every bit of influence they have to maintain the status quo that has maximized their profits at the expense of American consumers.

"We have already seen and lived the consequences of what happens when there is too little accountability on Wall Street and too little protection for Main Street, and I will not allow this country to go back there."

The US Chamber of Commerce rejects Obama's complaints, and warns that the proposed reforms will create an unwieldy federal agency that will make the problems worse for consumers and business.

The president wants Congress to act this year on what is billed as the most sweeping financial regulatory reform since the 1930s, despite a crush of other business.

His proposals for greater regulation would give the Federal Reserve expanded powers to oversee regulation on all finance firms or banks that pose a significant systemic risk to the wider financial infrastructure.

They would introduce new discipline and transparency into financial markets and would enable investors to better ride out the failure of one or more large financial institution.

Share this article:
  • Print this article!
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Story comments are below...
  • dennycrane
    The "chamber of klansmen" is a right wing organization that has for years "twisted" the small business owners into rebuking "liberal" business ideas.
  • Guest33
    Over the last ten years or so, the distinction between the US Chamber of Commerce and Organized Crime (i.e The Mob) has become blurred, separated by a thin thread of legal technicalities. Both engage in strong-arm tactics, extortion, racketeering, tax evasion, etc. The USCOC may not take out contract hits like the Mob, but they do no how to get rid of people they don't like.
  • suzisunshine
    anyone w/ half a brain knows the chamber of commerce doesn't give a rat's ass about america or it's people. they are corporate whores just like all republicans .
  • damixaustex
    "discipline and transparency"
    Scary stuff. No wonder they're spending millions to fight change.
  • No thanks
    "His proposals for greater regulation would give the Federal Reserve expanded powers to oversee regulation on all finance firms or banks that pose a significant systemic risk to the wider financial infrastructure."

    In short, the entity that has already failed so miserably will expand it's long record of fail into new areas of financial system. Wow, that's comforting. Has anyone looked at their record?

    There is a reason why there are constant calls here to end the Fed. If you don't understand why, please open your mind, and get your Google on. They are a large part of the cause of this crisis to begin with. They were also the causal factor in the First Great Depression. They are the reason that 95% of us will have to work until the day we die. . . that here is no safe store of wealth in this country any longer, . . . that there are no one-wage earner families, and why we devolved into a socially, culturally, and financially bankrupt country. It's by design of the debt-money system, when combined with fractional reserve banking and accompanied by mob-rule aka Democracy. There has never been any other outcome with this type of system, ever. Yes, ever. The Fed is the architect of this, and it's just the American version. . this has been going on for thousands of years. Think feudal system, but instead of land rents, we pay rent on the 'money' itself. Remember putting a quarter in the coke machine. . . now it's a buck and a half. That is why you cannot ever retire. Costs are always high, and the purchasing power of saving is stolen through inflation. That same coke, with today's more efficient and automated systems, should be less than it was 25 years ago, not 600 percent more.
  • Savantster
    .
    You're conflating several issues here.

    1) yes, the Fed needs to go. It is a huge problem and a scam on the public.. but, it isn't the only issue.. the rest are below, but conflated in your post.

    2) declining education in America means more people think less. The less you think, the less you know, the less you understand, the more likely you are to impulse buy and rack up large scale debt or live well beyond your means. Educated people are harder to "trick", and we're being tricked a _lot_. Why? (see next)

    3) we worship profits above all else in America. we were lied to about, and many people bought in to, this idea that "what is good for corporations is good for the public". Trickle Down was claimed to be about economics, what we got was pissed on by the ruling elite. This entire situation was compounded by companies being allowed to quit paying on retirements for their people, and instead, we're encouraged to use the stock market for our retirement.. how do we get money from that? let corporations have their way.. So, we were tricked/pushed into a more pro-corporate environment by having our retirements vested in that rigged game.

    4) The very understanding of the things that are important in life are missing from the American mindset. Bling isn't important.. status isn't important.. name brands aren't important.. having the "best" isn't important.. Yet, that's exactly what we see on TV every day, day in and day out. The less educated masses are literally brain washed into thinking their value as people, and their purpose in life, is to consume. To buy. To have more and upgraded shit, even for stuff the don't use. It is a mind set that is destroying many lives and bringing more pain and misery to the planet. It is not sustainable, and it is abusive.

    This is a very complicated set of issues, many many many things are all intertwined.. but the most appropriate "high level" description is basically this:

    Humans matter, not companies. Companies are tools, not something with any inherent rights, and we need to control them. The "people" behind companies want to use those companies to get ahead, so they keep trying to set up ways for "them" to have more leverage than "you".

    Two main truths are going to be very problematic in all of this. More and more people keep being born, and they all want to live their lives. And, as technology advances, less and less people will be required to produce things people would like to have to make living their lives better. These are opposing facts; people need "jobs" to pay for their lives, but we don't need people to do work any more, we have machines to do it. How do you balance that?

    www [dot] thevenusproject [dot] com

    is a good start. I'll leave you with this statement to ponder:

    We are all created equal. We all have the same right to live. To live, we all need access to resources. Why is it that those that were lucky enough to be born before and have squatted on all the natural resources and claimed them for themselves, why do all of us born now have to be beholden to them just to live? What about those that come next, and all the resources from the planet are still controlled by those that came before? How do those that come next get to live their lives without having to be slaves to those that took hostage all the natural resources?

    Private ownership of the planet made sense when we had places where people could go and stake a claim, then live off that claim. That world is gone and no one born now can claim a free stake to anything and just live. That means we need to change the way we do things; the world has changed and is still changing (new technology). If we don't change as well, we'll have nothing but more war, more death, more misery, more pain, more destruction. We are living an unsustainable paradigm; time to change the paradigm. The Venus Project seems about the best solution I've seen. Not perfect, but a hell of a lot better than what we have now.
  • Paul
    Its not that the Federal Reserve is so bad, but who is running it. Does the name Greenspan cut through the fog in your brain?

    Lets put blame where it belongs.
  • Savantster
    .
    the concept of the central banks is counter to a free society. The public must pay interest to private hands just to function? That makes no sense.
  • Name
    obama speaking out against corporate propaganda and influence is as hypocritical as him, a war monger/mass murderer being awarded the nobel peace prize.

    obama is a corporate tool. he held closed door meetings with pharma execs to write their dream bill... no negotiating prices or re-importing drugs. in exchange, big pharma is paying $150m for the ad campaigns to push thru this bushian 'reform' bill.

    farce.
  • sc_kitty
    any links to those claims of being a "war monger/mass murderer?"
  • Name
    plenty. obama has ramped up the wars in afghanistan and pakistan, drone bombing innocent civilians, and does not have a clue what to do about iraq. meanwhile, abu ghraib and gitmo are still open for bidness, and rendition and torture go on. check it out. many credible journalist document obams's war crimes... john pilger, chris hedges, greg palast, tedd rall and paul craig roberts are good starting points if you want to know the truth.
  • Savantster
    .
    No one likes hearing how Obama is still doing lots of what Bush did. They want to feel all cozy with the Health Care distraction (that doesn't kick in for 3 years..? if it even passes) and other such things.

    We will never have as a serious candidate for President, anyone that is not willing to make sure our foreign policy continues to enrich the ruling elite. Kinda sad.
  • MarxyMcLiberalson
    Actually uh, Bush wrote the pharma bill for no negotiating prescriptions for medicaid. Obmaa hasn't passed any medical bills. Not to say he hasn't met with big pharma on the healthcare bill but that is FAR from written. I'm with ya on the other stuff but lets not criticize him for stuff he hasnt done yet and PLEASE lets not us start blaming him for Bush's Policies. No matter his foreign policy its STILL 500% better than Bush's, even if he is still doing drone bombings of 100s of innocent civilians, escalating te Afghanistan war, forever "winding down" Iraq, continuing rendition, continuing torture sites, extending unconstitutional domestic spying, police, detention and even military policies, as well as aiding and abetting the Bush crimes in helping to cover them up. The Nobel prize and his brilliantly deft handling of Iran. However, admittedly, saying that you are a little better than a cocaine snorting, cowardly, execution laughing, "constitution is just a goddamned piece of paper," mass murdering, crimes against humanity, sexually depraved homosexual torturing, tree burning, oil drinking, corporate cock sucking, retarded mother fucker...isn't saying much.
  • malikk
    The biggest and most secretive gathering of ships in maritime history lies at anchor east of Singapore. Never before photographed, it is bigger than the U.S. and British navies combined but has no crew, no cargo and no destination - and is why your Christmas stocking may be on the light side this year


    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/moslive/article...
  • malikk
    The biggest and most secretive gathering of ships in maritime history lies at anchor east of Singapore. Never before photographed, it is bigger than the U.S. and British navies combined but has no crew, no cargo and no destination - and is why your Christmas stocking may be on the light side this year


    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/moslive/article...
  • icenine
    If you make it hard for them to make usurious and fraudulent loans then who will they have as patsy to blame for the next mortgage bubble that explodes? And how will they be able to reward themselves with huge bonuses without even the appearance of having made a legitimate sale? Shouldn't their paid employees in Congress at least throw them a fig leaf of cover for the accountants' sakes?
  • kevindo
    Giving the Federal Reserve any power is a mistake..... come to think of it the Federal Reserve continuing to exist is a mistake. And the CoC is just another arm for Corporate America to wield it's tyrranical agenda. The real small business owners are either brain washed and believe the propaganda (I have met a few of those) or powerless against the sheer strength of the 'entities' illegally recognized as 'individuals' by the Courts. Either way Obama does not equal change, not the good kind anyway...... yes America, we were duped again.
  • grindermonkey
    Banking as it is currently practiced in the US is probably the most indecent and horrific human activity imaginable. On a national level it cannibalizes the very clients that it was designed to assist. On an international level its corruption and unaccountability is unlike any else in history. It enslaves its customers wittingly or unwittingly into imagining that they will become financially whole at some future time and as the contract ages that time edges closer to eternity than the second coming of Christ. Whole countries are paying 30 to 40 percent of their GDP in interest to international banking institutions for loans made to long dead, corrupt dictators - institutional slavery. The dollar measures the good faith of the American people. In the hands of bankers, it measures our vanity.
  • JPMP
    We can be sure that in the RARE instances in which the Pres does something appropriate, as here, that his "majority" in Congress will act decisively against him.
  • MarxyMcLiberalson
    This is an extremist right wing radical organization! A senior member recently called for a "Scopes monkey trial of the 21st century" to evaluate evidence of global warming.

    THey are SOOOO extreme that some of the biggest names in our corporatocracy have publicly denounced them for their ridiculously obstructionist positions. GE, major stock indicator and defense darling recently quit the chamber in protest. Power power moguls PG&E, PNM & Exelon due to their "obstructionist tactics." Nike resigned from the board of directors in protest of their insane right wing influence. And Apple is the most recent mega-corporation to quit in disgust.

    Catherine Novelli, Apple's vice president of worldwide government affairs, said in a letter to Thomas Donahue, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce president and CEO. "We strongly object to the Chamber's recent comments opposing the EPA's effort to limit greenhouse gases."

    "Apple's departure is a clear signal that more and more of the chamber's members want it to download a new tune when it comes to climate change," said Peter Altman of the Natural Resources Defense Council.

    "There is a growing recognition in the business community that strong clean-energy and climate legislation is the way to strengthen our economy, reduce our oil imports and reduce pollution, but the chamber is turning a deaf ear to the trend."
blog comments powered by Disqus