Don’t fire Tasers at the chest, manufacturer warns

By Agence France-Presse
Wednesday, October 21st, 2009 -- 1:16 pm
Share on Facebook Stumble This!

taser2 Dont fire Tasers at the chest, manufacturer warnsWASHINGTON — The US manufacturer of the Taser stun gun has advised police not to aim the weapons at the chests of suspects after admitting heart risk concerns for the first time.

Taser International stressed that suffering an "adverse cardiac event" after being zapped was "extremely unlikely," but human rights groups say hundreds of people have been killed by the electroshock weapons.

In a bulletin dated October 12, the Arizona-based company issued new guidelines saying it had "lowered the recommended point of aim from center of mass to lower-center of mass for front shots."

"When possible, avoiding chest shots with ECDs (Electronic Control Devices) avoids the controversy about whether ECDs do or do not affect the human heart," it explained.

"Researchers have concluded that a close distance between the ECD dart and the heart is the primary factor in determining whether an ECD will affect the heart. The risk is judged to be extremely low in field use," it said.

Story continues below...

Tasers, which pack a 50,000-volt punch that can paralyze targets from up to 10 meters (30 feet) away, are used by several police forces around the world, including in Britain, Canada, France, Greece, Israel, and the United States.

Human rights activists have long criticized the stun guns, challenging previous claims from the manufacturer that they are a safe, non-lethal alternative to handguns.

More than 350 people died between 2001 and December last year after being stunned by the weapons, according to Amnesty International, which has been monitoring Taser-related deaths.

Share this article:
  • Print this article!
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Story comments are below...
  • Hologram5
    More than 350 people died between 2001 and December last year after being stunned by the weapons
    --------------------------------------
    Gee, and they JUST determined that there are health risks using these things? Idiots.
  • Jack D. Ripper
    And the president of this company once tried to encourage everyone to arm themselves with one of these.
  • Savantster
    .
    you know, if you abolish money and reclaim natural resources for the masses (no individual has a right to squat on a mountain or a lake and claim it for their own), we could all but exterminate all crime, and therefore have no need to taze people.

    but a better world where everyone lives their lives instead of runs the rat-race wheel for the squatters, that's not in "their plan". They can't live like gods if we kick them off our lands they have squatted on.
  • m3t
    "avoiding chest shots with ECDs (Electronic Control Devices) avoids the controversy about whether ECDs do or do not affect the human heart"

    Yes, because being electrocuted in the stomach will have zero impact on your heart.

    Did these imbeciles get their biology and physics education from the same place Bush learned to speak English?
  • kathih
    Isn't Taser International owned by Guiliani and Kerick?
  • Sporty
    And of course we know that all these officers using these tasters are expert marksmen. We can tell they never miss their target by the amount of ammunition they use in a gun battle..

    Lets face it they do not give a d... anymore about civilian damage.. and in the war ,,friendly fire..
  • starvapor
    This sudden admission by the makers of the Taser supports the fact that they have hidden this so-called new knowledge about the lethal capability of their product.

    That tasers have being falsely marketed and portrayed as a non-lethal weapon, is the root cause of the more than 400 deaths that have occurred as a result of this so-called non-lethal weapon. Every justification in defense of taser deaths quotes the false portrayals that this weapon is somehow "non-lethal".

    The so-called "excited delirium" displayed by taser victims is also being used by law enforcement agencies as the basis for defending taser deaths. However, this assertion doesn't support the body of professional opinion regarding that diagnosis. "Excited delirium is not recognized by professional medical associations, and you won't find it listed in the chief psychiatric reference book." Also that "police officials are using the diagnosis 'as a means of white-washing what may be excessive use of force and inappropriate use of control techniques by officers during an arrest." And that "The International Association of Chiefs of Police hasn't accepted the diagnosis, either, saying not enough information is known. But every year, excited delirium is showing up on more and more medical examiners' autopsy reports."
    From: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?st...

    Taser International’s central marketing claim that its device is “safe”.
    They know the track record of deaths resulting from their weapon and they are currently under litigation for many of the deaths resulting from their misrepresentation of this weapon as being “safe”. A lack of adequate testing and independent medical evidence supporting the company’s bold marketing claims have been cited by such diverse critics as Amnesty International, the American Civil Liberties Union, and a consulting electrical engineers as reasons for removing the stun guns from the market until more extensive testing is done especially with respect to how the device affects pregnant women, people on drugs, or those with heart conditions.

    Because the number of deaths resulting from tasers is publicly available knowledge, both the manufacturer of tasers and any law enforcement agency that causes a death from use of this lethal weapon are culpable for those deaths and should be held accountable.

    Congress needs to investigate and prosecute the false claims relating to this weapon as they did with false claims which resulted in deaths that were caused by the tobacco, pharmaceutical and auto industries.
  • taser_this
    These weapons were originally supposed to be an alternative to lethal force. Now 350 people have died after being tased. How many have been tased in all? The number is huge, and these devices are now being used mainly as a convenience for the authorities.
  • Max_1
    .

    There is a reason the UN called them devices of TORTURE!

    .
  • Max_1
    2007...
    U.N. Calls Tasers Torture
    http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?st...

    Taser responds...
    Taser Fires Back at U.N. Anti-Torture Committee: Analysis
    http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/mili...
  • joedee1960
    This taser thing has long been out of control:

    http://americaspeaksink.com/2009/06/police-tase...
  • no_bullshit
    duh. oh really? dont taser someone in the heart? how many stupid cops will follow this advice? probably none. why are cops allowed to taser people anyway? its obviously torture. and by the way, the UN sucks. they are a rockefeller created vehicle to subjugate the constitution and help the bilderberg scum get a world government ruled by them. how many UN child sex scandals have we heard about since they were created... disgusting
  • pacrimco
    Okay, okay, I get it. Let's do away with the tasers and just start shooting the bastards again! Unless you've been a cop in harness, and have faced a highly combative, superhumanly strong psychotic suspect, you should probably keep your two cents out of this issue. Perhaps, the real question to be positied is, "How many lives have been saved by the use of Taser weapons?" The logical followup question would then be, "How many officers have avoided death or serious injury because of the timely and effective use of Taser weapons?" Maybe you cry babies should really be pondering why the gun nuts keep promoting weapons and ammunition that will punch through five police protective ballistic vests? Get a freakin life will you. Obey the law, don't resist arrest and take your medications. Then the police can keep the Tasers holstered all the time.
  • justinus
    Tasers have now gone from self defense to "pain compliance" which sounds a lot like torture. "Do what we say or we'll inflict pain in order to make you do what we want of you," yea that's not torture at all!
  • lynhuston
    Pain compliance is not torture.
  • If made some related posts on my blog at www.Excited-Delirium.com (don't forget the dash). Not enough room to fully explore the issue here. My blog has about 1400 posts on the entire taser-death issue and related angles.
  • lynhuston
    If "civilians" obeyed the law and followed commands of officers, they wouldn't be tased. Face it, the "civilians" who are tased are idiots who are hyped up on something, or who didn't take the meds they should have taken, or are non-compliant in hopes of getting the chance to flee. Officers have a terribly dangerous job and the taser is just one method they have of protecting themselves. They use verbal commands and physical restraints far, far more often. The comments posted here make it sound like every officer is out there shooting up every civilian they come into contact with before they use any other attempts to gain compliance. Grow up, people, and act like humans instead of like animals and you won't get tased anywhere, much less in the chest.
  • lynhuston
    If "civilians" obeyed the law and followed commands of officers, they wouldn't be tased. Face it, the "civilians" who are tased are idiots who are hyped up on something, or who didn't take the meds they should have taken, or are non-compliant in hopes of getting the chance to flee. Officers have a terribly dangerous job and the taser is just one method they have of protecting themselves. They use verbal commands and physical restraints far, far more often. The comments posted here make it sound like every officer is out there shooting up every civilian they come into contact with before they use any other attempts to gain compliance. Grow up, people, and act like humans instead of like animals and you won't get tased anywhere, much less in the chest.
blog comments powered by Disqus