Senate committee approves health overhaul bill

By The Associated Press
Tuesday, October 13th, 2009 -- 7:16 am
Share on Facebook Stumble This!

baucus Senate committee approves health overhaul billUpdate: Senate Finance Committee passes health care reform bill 14-9

A pivotal Senate committee has approved a sweeping remake of the country's health care system, delivering a long-sought boost to President Barack Obama's goal of expanding coverage.

The 14-9 vote in the Senate Finance Committee sets up a historic debate on the Senate floor and moves health care overhaul closer to reality than it has been for decades.

Sen. Olympia Snowe of Maine was the only Republican to join 13 committee Democrats in voting "yes."

The 10-year, $829-billion plan approved Tuesday is aimed at extending coverage to millions more Americans, holding down costs and improving health care for all.

Story continues below...

The Finance Committee was the last of five congressional committees to act. It produced a centrist-leaning compromise bill.

Original report continues below:

WASHINGTON – President Barack Obama's plan to remake the nation's health care system is about to take its biggest step yet toward becoming reality.

The pivotal Senate Finance Committee was poised to approve sweeping legislation Tuesday requiring nearly all Americans to purchase insurance and ushering in a host of other changes to the nation's $2.5 trillion medical system.

Much work would lie ahead before a bill could arrive on Obama's desk, but action by the Finance Committee would mark a significant advance, capping numerous delays as Chairman Max Baucus, D-Mont., held marathon negotiating sessions — ultimately unsuccessful — aimed at producing a bipartisan bill.

Four other congressional committees acted before August to pass health legislation, so for months all eyes have been on the Finance Committee, the remaining one. It's also the panel whose moderate makeup most closely resembles the Senate as a whole. And the committee's centrist legislation is seen as the best building block for a compromise plan that could find favor on the Senate floor.

With Democrats holding a 13-10 majority on the committee the outcome of Tuesday's vote is not in doubt. The big question mark is whether moderate Sen. Olympia Snowe of Maine will become the first Republican to support a health overhaul bill. The legislation that passed the other House and Senate committees did so without a single Republican vote. On Monday, Snowe still wasn't saying.

With Finance Committee passage, Obama's top domestic priority will have advanced farther than former President Bill Clinton's effort ever did. The Clinton health plan never made it through all the congressional committees with jurisdiction.

The final days before Tuesday's long-anticipated vote were rocky. After playing nice for months, the health insurance industry released a report contending that the legislation would cause hefty increases in health insurance premiums.

Democrats and their allies scrambled Monday to knock it down. "Distorted and flawed," said White House spokeswoman Linda Douglass. AARP's senior policy strategist, John Rother, called it "fundamentally dishonest."

PricewaterhouseCoopers, the accounting firm that did the industry-commissioned analysis, issued a statement late Monday acknowledging it did not look at the entirety of the legislation, only the effects of four provisions that the insurance group wanted analyzed.

The drama threatened to overshadow the vote on the 10-year, $829-billion plan that Baucus has touted as the sensible solution to America's problems of high medical costs and too many uninsured.

The bill includes consumer protections such as limits on copays and deductibles and relies on federal subsidies to help lower-income families purchase coverage. Insurance companies would have to take all comers, and people could shop for insurance within new state marketplaces called exchanges.

Medicaid would be expanded, and though employers wouldn't be required to cover their workers, they'd have to pay a penalty for each employee who sought insurance with government subsidies. The bill is paid for by cuts to Medicare providers and new taxes on insurance companies and others.

Unlike the other health care bills in Congress, Baucus' would not allow the government to sell insurance in competition with private companies, a divisive element sought by liberals.

Last-minute changes made subsidies more generous and softened the penalties for those who don't comply with a proposed new mandate for everyone to buy insurance. The latter change drew the ire of the health insurance industry, which said that without a strong and enforceable requirement not enough people would get insured, and premiums would jump for everyone else.

The industry report was timed just ahead of the vote on Baucus' bill but the industry was already looking ahead to negotiations on a final package to bring to the Senate floor.

Once the Finance Committee has acted, the dealmaking can begin in earnest with Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., working with White House staff, Baucus and others to blend the Finance bill with a more liberal version passed by the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee.

A major question mark is whether Reid will include some version of a so-called public plan in the merged bill. Across the Capitol, House Democratic leaders are working to finalize their bill, which does contain a public plan, and floor action is expected in both chambers in coming weeks. If passed, the legislation would then go to a conference committee to reconcile differences.

Snowe to vote for Democratic health care bill

Republican Sen. Olympia Snowe says she will vote for a Democratic health care bill, breaking with her party on President Barack Obama's top legislative priority.

The Maine senator kept virtually all of Washington guessing how she would vote until she announced it late in the Senate Finance Committee debate Tuesday. Until then, she told reporters, she had not even let Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., in on her secret.

She told her colleagues: "When history calls, history calls," even though she had some criticism of the bill.

This video is from MSNBC's Andrea Mitchell Reports, broadcast Oct. 13, 2009.



Download video via RawReplay.com

Share this article:
  • Print this article!
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Story comments are below...
  • douvie
    This brainchild of the healthcare industry will pass. The Administration will claim a huge victory and ordinary Americans will once again get the fucking of their little lives.
  • brain1
    The Public Option is the only way this will be a Success.There are so many sick Children, and Adults that need Medical Care.
    Just keep hoping that this will become reality!!!!
  • trippin
    This is a fucking media Snowe job.

    1) One vote does not make a bi-partisan bill

    2) Trumping it up as such makes it sound like we have something to lose if we lose her support

    3) We will lose her support when the final bill has a public optiion in it

    4) No bill ever worth a shit for the common man had bi-partisan support, from Social Security to civil rights.

    We must not let the media who are in the tank for the health insurance industry sell us a bill of goods on this one. This is the same media that calls the public option a desire of the "left" to marginalize it. This is the same media that never reports that two thirds to three fourths of Americans support a public option, and never squares that against their claim it's a left-wing push.

    They're all going gaa-gaa over this non-event. Why? It's obvious. Already MSNBC is saying the final bill now probably won't have a public option in it. Why? So we don't piss off Snowe? Fuck Snowe!

    WE DEMAND A PUBLIC OPTION. Do not be distracted by nonsense. The Senate Finance Bill will look NOTHING like the bill for final passage.
  • kucinich2012
    "WE DEMAND A PUBLIC OPTION."

    How about: WE DEMAND SINGLE-PAYER!!!
  • crashmodem
    The Baucus Bill is a sham, and everyone knows it. Every special interest group has made sure that its' own constituency is covered, public be damned. This debate should have started with Single Payer, and if a compromise needed to be made, THEN go to the public option. Depublicans were going to holler and scream about socialized medicine and a government takeover of healthcare either way, so we should have given them a real takeover to start the bidding.

    Apparently Grayson was wrong- President Snowe just announced she will support the sham.
  • churchgoer
    I am an American living in Canada. It's embarassing how many "proud" Americans are trying to take advantage of the Canadian health system. It is a problem for every province across Canada. Almost 10 years ago, New Brunswick where I live had to put out new Health cards because they were catching people coming across mainly to see a General Practitioner but one fellow came for a false leg. In some cases, I'm sure the doctors looked the other way because it was a desperate situation often involving children who just needed a prescription. The way it works is the mother or whoever would often borrow the health card of a relative.
    Sadly, New Brunswick is a poor province and couldn't afford to keep paying Americans bills.
    Now I'm told that Mexico is having the same problem with people going to stay in Mexico to get health coverage.
    Isn't it about time that the US takes care of its own sick people?
  • trippin
    Oh I forgot to mention: we need to let Reid know that anyone calling themselves a Democrat who votes against cloture on a bill with a public option in it will be stipped of all their committee assignments, leadership positions, and perquisites: hookers and all. No more flying on military planes, no more cashing checks, no more nothing.

    And we need to let Obama know that if Reid won't do that, we expect him as party leader to exert pressure to REMOVE HIS FROM HIS LEADERSHIP POSITION IN THE SENATE.

    This kumbaya shit is OVER. Time to kick some right wing ass.
  • Name
    Centrist or gutless? Their bill as it stands will do little to improve the current status quo. It'll be like RomneyCare in Massachusetts where the insurance companies rule the roost and everybody pays through the nose for over-priced under-serving policies that cost more and more so the insurance companies can post profits for Wall Street and huge bonuses for their management. It'll be much the same as the Bush prescription drug bill for seniors, where the drug prices are the highest in the world but the government pays out half of the bill through our taxes. Which will have to be raised or borrowed from the Chinese- like we've done so far. But don't dare go down that single payer path which costs countries half as much as we spend and everyone gets covered because it's socialist- boo! Of course so is our interstate road system and many other great things that weren't working out well by private initiative.
  • jimbo701
    All this bill does is redirect the flow of tax dollars. Under a public option the money would go from the government to the people to the doctors. Under this "reform" the money flows from the government to the people to the private insurers to the doctors AND there is a penalty attached to no obtaining insurance. This plan simply enriches an unnecessary and useless middle man (the private insurers) at the expense of the people. May anyone who votes for this travesty go straight to hell.
  • Jhoffa_
    Heads they win, tails we lose..

    Yaaaaa! Go Health Care "Reform"
  • jimbo701
    "The bill includes consumer protections such as limits on copays and deductibles and relies on federal subsidies to help lower-income families purchase coverage"

    So instead of our tax dollars being used directly by the federal government to provide a public option they are indirectly going to private insurers via subsidy payments to people who can't wouldn't normally be able to afford private insurance. If setting up a public option is considered socialized medicine because tax dollars are paying for it, how is providing tax dollars to private insurers via subsidies to the poor any different?? What we are left with are mandatory federal payments on behalf of the poor to bloated, fat, overpriced private health insurance companies who can't survive in a genuine competitive market.The result of this will be to further entrench private ensurers in the halls of congress as the fortunes of those companies fortunes get tied closely to campaign payments to individual congressmen. How can this be considered reform?? This is a disaster.
  • miggy
    No Regulation of a God Given ( Insert Spiritual God) Inalienable Right is going to change the discourse. That is if you take the Bill of Rights and US. Constitution seriously. Which, of the last Nine years we haven’t.

    On a broader perspective, the political process is broken. Both Houses are brought and paid for with Corporate Money. It basically buys and makes our Laws nowadays. You don’t have to look any further than The Patriot Act, Military Comm. Act and John Warner Defense Act to realize that Perpetual War under a Unilateral Executive plus War Profiteering from our Tax Dollars with a out of control Fed. Reserve equals disaster.

    HealthCare, is The Globalists/Elites last bubble. The Pubic Option is their Defeat. And they know it.
  • namerequierd
    Then it must be a bad bill that hurts individuals and helps insurance companies.
  • TakeOurCountryBack
    If Snowjob likes it ........It must certainly favor the Healthcare industry machine!
  • pitbullstew
    I am 59, I dont have insurance, there are few times in my life that I ever had it, when I did and I needed it? The insurnace companies were not my friend?
    I give a rip for the insurnace companies they will price them selves out of the market place and that will be just fine with me.
  • Independentgal
    They will price themselves out of the market if -- and only if -- there is honest competition that they're forced to deal with. That's why we need the public option.
  • damixaustex
    If the insurance industry really thought rates were going to rise 18% above an expected rise, would they sound an alarm? I think not. That would be a win for them, so they'd stay quiet about it and say "we've changed our mind, we support reform."
  • donofcali
    The Baucus bill is just like Baucus: A worthless piece of shit.

    If a strong, triggerless, non-coop public option does not get added, and a bunch of other insurance industry giveaway bullshit changed, then this bill is Dead On Arrival. The ramifications of that are the dems slaughtered in the 2010 elections and Obama going down in history as a total loser and a bad memory in 2013.
  • bobgrimm
    So I see Snow White couldn't get the Seven Dwarf Repubs to Whistle While You Work.
  • miggy
    Congressional Budget Office (CBO) score's the baucus plan at $829 Billion over a 10 year period, that is paid for. The CBO also states that it will lower the deficit by $80 Billion and it would be much lower if there was a public option.

    Criminally corrupt politicians are the reason the U.S. is ranked near the bottom of every catagory when ranked next to other modern, industrialized nations. Time for publically funded elections.

    lieberman $12.6M, mcconnell $7.8M, baucus $7.7M, cornyn $6.7M, kyl $5.6M, grassley $5.4M, ensign $5.2M, conrad $5.1M, cantor $4.9M, nelson $4.9M, burr $4.8M, boehner $4.4M, hatch $4.4M, lincoln $4.1M, vitter $3.9M, carper $3.6M were paid by the Medical Industrial Complex to kill Health Care Reform. (Source: OpenSecrets.org, Aug. 09)

    Follow the Money: http://hmc-lavadogs.livejournal.com/20128.html

    Call Congress and demand, Single-Payer Health Care for All!(Toll Free # House and Senate)
    1-866-338-1015 _____ 1-866-220-0044
    1-800-473-6711 _____ 1-866-311-3405

    Sign Single-Payer Petitions: http://www.singlepayeraction.org/join.html http://www.americacantwait.com/TrueMajority

    Don’t let the Medical Industrial Complex steal your Health Care from you and your family by donating huge sums of money to Crooked Politicians in order to maintain the Status Quo. Keep up the good fight.SEMPER FI!
blog comments powered by Disqus