‘Prolonged diapering’ revealed as ‘enhanced interrogation technique’
A CIA inspector general report released Monday in a less-redacted version reveals that “prolonged diapering” was on the agency’s list of approved “enhanced” interrogation techniques. The revelation is in Appendix F, included in the IG’s report on page 149, as part of a set of guidelines for “medical and psychological support to detainee interrogations.” The document is dated Sept. 4, 2003.
According to American Civil Liberties Union staff attorney Jameel Jaffer, this is the first document released publicly which categorizes diapering as an enhanced interrogation technique. Another ACLU source told RAW STORY that while they are familiar with the use of diapers on clients being transported, this is “news to us.”
The document in Appendix F of the IG report reads: “Captured terrorists turned over to the CIA may be subjected to a wide range of legally sanctioned techniques, all of which are used on U.S. military personnel in SERE training programs. They are designed to psychologically ‘dislocate’ the detainee, maximizing his feelings of vulnerability and helplessness, and reduce or eliminate his will to resist our efforts to obtain critical intelligence.” The list, organized in “ascending degree of intensity,” says the following were approved standard measures “without physical or substantial psychological pressure”:
Shaving
Stripping
Diapering
Hooding
Isolation
White noise or loud music (at a decibel level that will not damage hearing)
Continuous light or darkness
Uncomfortably cool environment
Restricted diet, including reduced caloric intake (sufficient to maintain general health)
Water dousing
Sleep deprivation (up to 72 hours)
A second list of “enhanced” measures “with physical or psychological pressure beyond the above” reads:
Attention grasp
Facial hold
Insult (facial) slap
Abdominal slap
Prolonged diapering
Sleep deprivation (over 72 hours)
Stress positions –On knees, body slanted forward or backward –Leaning with forehead on wall
Walling
Cramped confinement
Waterboard
The appearance of diapering on the list seems to contradict an Office of Legal Counsel memo (PDF link) written by former Bush administration lawyer Steven Bradbury in 2005. Bradbury claimed diapering “is not used for the purpose of humiliating the detainee, and it is not considered to be an interrogation technique.”
However, in the appendix of the IG’s report, “prolonged diapering” was on the list of approved interrogation techniques (P. 150). While diapering is included on page 149 as a standard technique — along with shaving, stripping, hooding and isolation — it is also listed as one of a number of “enhanced measures,” with an intensity level below waterboarding, but above the “abdominal slap.”
The report does not define “prolonged” as it applies to diapering, nor does it confirm whether it was used on any prisoners. It is also unknown when exactly diapering was authorized as an EIT, and whether or not the order was rescinded before the 2005 Bradbury memo. Describing standard diapering, Bradbury wrote, “The detainee’s skin condition is monitored and diapers are changed as needed so that the detainee does not remain in a soiled diaper.”
Bradbury is one of three former Bush administration attorneys — including John Yoo and Jay Bybee — whose legal memos are being probed by the Justice Department’s Office of Professional Responsibility. U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder is reportedly in the process of appointing a special prosecutor to investigate instances of CIA detainee abuse.
Spencer Ackerman, reporting for the Washington Independent, speculates that “prolonged diapering” could be the “eleventh” EIT.
“The 2004 CIA inspector general’s report on torture says clearly that in 2002, the CIA proposed to the Justice Department the use of eleven “enhanced interrogation techniques,”’ Ackerman writes. “Ten of them got the approval of the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel in August 2002 in the infamous Jay Bybee/John Yoo memo declassified by the Obama administration in April: the attention grasp; walling; the facial hold; the facial or insult slap; cramped confinement; insects; wall standing; stress positions; sleep deprivation; the waterboard. But what happened to the eleventh?”
Quoting the memo, he writes, “The Agency eliminated one proposed technique — [REDACTED] — after learning from DoJ that this could delay the legal review.”
“But an appendix to the report written by former CIA Director George Tenet gives an indication as to what that eleventh technique was — and says that it’s permissible,” Ackerman continues. “Take a look at Appendix E, Tenet’s January 28, 2003 memorandum on guidelines for both ’standard’ and ‘enhanced’ interrogations. Tenet’s list of ‘enhanced’ techniques, you’ll notice, number eleven:
These techniques are, [sic] the attention grasp, walling, the facial hold, the facial slap (insult slap), the abdominal slap, cramped confinement, wall standing, stress positions, sleep deprivation beyond 72 hours, the use of diapers for prolonged periods, the use of harmless insects, the water board, and such techniques as may be specifically approved pursuant to paragraph 4 below.
Ackerman adds, “All the others on Tenet’s list were approved by the Office of Legal Counsel in August of 2002. But that diapering technique was never approved by the Justice Department. Tenet considered ‘the use of diapers for limited periods (generally not to exceed 72 hours)’ to be a ’standard’ technique, as I blogged earlier. But it’s at least conceivable that the Justice Department would have thought reviewing prolonged diapering would have delayed the 2002 review, since the humiliation and health issues of forcing someone to remain in their own filth for over three days raise serious legal issues.”
Ron Brynaert contributed to this report.
27 comments
| Get breaking news alerts: Email/mobile |




paging Dr. David Vitter your cell is ready
Vitter has vowed to prove that diapering is not torture.
Then they give the detainees their greek letters and have a party for them. Discuss the merits of these programs and if they should be used or not, but this kind of stuff is not “torture”. I don’t necessarily have strong feelings either way, though I would be against normalization. However I do have strong feelings against ruining the meaning of words, torture this is not, calling it torture would take away from the power of the word and the reaction it provokes.
…any act by which severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person for such purposes as obtaining from him, or a third person, information or a confession, punishing him for an act he or a third person has committed or is suspected of having committed, or intimidating or coercing him or a third person, or for any reason based on discrimination of any kind, when such pain or suffering is inflicted by or at the instigation of or with the consent or acquiescence of a public official or other person acting in an official capacity. It does not include pain or suffering arising only from, inherent in, or incidental to, lawful sanctions.
—Geneva Convention Against Torture
In what way do these “enhanced interrogation methods” not fit into this definition of torture? Sure, the word “diapering” may not sound that bad on the surface but have you ever seen a baby’s butt after just half a day in a urine soaked diaper? After three days of urine and feces, the skin would be falling off and bleeding. I can’t imagine the pain it must cause. It’s definitely torture and if you did this same thing to your child that child would be immediately removed from you and you would be sentenced to prison for years.
“In what way do these “enhanced interrogation methods” not fit into this definition of torture? ”
Well the term “severe” seems to be the gray area in the Geneva convention definition. There is also the debate as to whether these actions are covered by the Geneva convention, since they are not uniformed combatants.
Listen I don’t think we should be using most of these tactics, but from a linguistic perspective I do not like these fraternity hazing tactics to be considered torture. And frankly this whole “torture” debate is absolute garbage. This is just a case of the left covering up for Bush by only going after them for things that are covered by international law, which is vague, hard to prosecute (unless next point) and usually only reserved for losers on the battlefield. Go back to WWII, did both sides commit war crimes? Yes, but only one side was charged. It would be more important to go after the things that actually effect American citizens, like the Patriot Act, warrantless wiretapping, or the runup to war. But of course all they have to do is point you people in the wrong direction and you will be good little Obama troopers.
“There is also the debate as to whether these actions are covered by the Geneva convention, since they are not uniformed combatants.”
Yeah, the Nazi’s tried this argument. Because the Russians hadn’t signed the Hague Conventions or the Geneva Protocol they didn’t have to abide by the law when conducting war against them. Also, since Jewish prisoners weren’t uniformed, they were not prisoners of war and, therefore, not subject to international laws regarding such. It didn’t work. They were prosecuted for war crimes anyway.
“But of course all they have to do is point you people in the wrong direction and you will be good little Obama troopers.”
I didn’t vote for Obama. What, you think I don’t know a bought and paid for politician when I see one?
lets put you in a diaper for how ever long we decide. Shave your entire body, confine you to complete darkness, find out what noise makes your skin crawl and then play it one or two decibels below completely destroying your hearing and keep you in this situation for 5-7 days, all the time feeding you just enough to keep you alive. Then we will come in and tell you we just killed your entire family except your mother, sister and father. Then we tell you that we will start with your father, raping him with a broom handle, force him to commit acts that will ensure he dies a slow death. Then we will rape your mother, and her death will come after no less than 100 men have had their way with her. Of course your wife will suffer the most vile death any human ever suffered. Now tell me this isn’t torture. If you can say with an honest face that it isn’t, then it will cause we to loose complete faith in humanity. Now, all of this was legal under the Bush Reich. People that think this isn,t torture should have to endure this for at least 90 days. The American Soldiers that endure these treatments signed an agreement with our Government to not sue them if they are injured, They do this as MEN, willing to die so that ignorant, lazy people can get a check from the Government every month, and allow citizens like you and I to have an honest debate.
So? Aside from being funny I don’t see what the big deal is.
so if you were innocent of any crime, real or imagined, and the US government did this to you, we could all laugh and ask what the big deal is . . . sad really.
the big deal is that many of the people you did this to were . . . innocent, i.e. they didn’t deserve it. but then, many wrongs make right to you i’m sure.
I can only hope Cheney and the rest of these sick Bushites nursing home does the same for them.
Buncha real sick puppies. Gotta wonder what kind of person it takes to do that to someone…I keep coming back to sick, sick, sick.
When the terrorizers screwed with the land of the free and the home of the Exxon Valdez, Viacom, and Walmart, they had no idea who they were messing with.
And Abu Ghraib, Guantanamo, and the secret CIA Gulags are merely the tip of the iceberg.
The depravity of the Great Satan knows no bounds.
Into the twisted mind of Dick Cheney we go. …..
“Yeah….rrrr….lets put them in diapers…..yeah…..rrrrrr. And lets leave them on for several days, so they ….rrrrr….have to sit in their own poo…..yeah…..rrrrr!”
Sick mo fo is that Dick Cheney. America should be so ashamed not only that we elected the SOB, but also that we haven’t the balls to throw the bastard in prison where he belongs.
We *never* elected the SOB — or his trained monkey.
The ‘terrorists’ were never charged with any crime whatsoever. Never tried. NOTHING Many WERE children. Boys who looked crossed eyes at one of our ‘paid informants’ girls and the turned in as ‘terrorists’. Many were just people our paid informants turned in as ‘terrorists’ just to get another 5K.
Conservatives…The Blood is on your hands.
Republicans …You fvcked this up royal and the whole nation is paying.
Rothschild/ CIA Mk Ultra Victim,,
I don’t even know where to begin…
The CIA talked about all there torture methods,,sleep deprivation,artery,crushing skulls,and yes DIAPERING…along with rape,rape,rape and more rape,,,,,,,
The 2005 May Bradbury Memo has actually ‘hidden’ the diaper thing under the category of Sleep Deprivation.
His whole argument is like this:
1. Sleep Deprivation is OK
2. You guys at the CIA do sleep deprivation by having a guy stand, shackled, for days at a time. OK.
3. You guys at the CIA dont unshackled the guy during this time… because it wouldn’t be safe, and because it would disrupt Sleep Deprivation. OK!
4. The guy needs to take a shit, so… you are giving him a diaper, and changing it, to be all clean and stuff. so thats OK too!
tada, he has transformed the intentional ‘prolonged diapering’ of the 2002 days, into some nice sanitary thing they do for the health of the guy during sleep deprivation.
whole thing is WTF?
ie… it makes me wonder if he was trying to, like, hide something. or re-brand something. or reword it. because its ’shocking to the conscience’ to a lot of people. no radio show DJ would volunteer for that.
Also I’m wondering when people are going to start calling this Diapergate
Diapergate…. that’s just it. Downplay the lesser (if there are any) tortures… make fun of them. Or better yet, get the public to make fun of them first. Watch: Obama and Panetta will now attempt to downplay the entire panoply of tortures using “Diapergate” or something “less nasty.” Obama and Panetta at a press conference smirking and saying “Diapergate… well if this is all we have to worry about…HAHAHAHA!” While the traitorous, sycophantic “press corps” giggles and sniggers at the horrors that these criminals have and committed and continue to commit. This was thought over very carefully by the Obama and Bush administrations, one more filthy lie after another while attempting to cover their asses. The heat is on and they know it.
I wonder if Americans will keep the heat turned up on these criminals and the horrific, heinous crimes they peretrated in our names? Or will it be back to business as usual after some half-hearted attempts to address these crimes by past and present Presidents and their lackeys? Half-assed justice is no justice at all. And should we the…. wait… American Idol is on, where’s my fuckin’ remote????
Robert S. Finnegan
http://www.southeastasiaindependentmedia.com
rsfinnegan@gmail.com
Jakarta, Indonesia
A technique pioneered by J. Edger Hoover (and a special friend).
“The detainee’s skin condition is monitored and diapers are changed as needed so that the detainee does not remain in a soiled diaper.”
Right. I’ll bet.
And then he gets a sponge-bath by the Easter Bunny.
Do I have sympathy for anyone who attacks the USA? No. But the fact remains that we’re supposed to be better than they are. Remember what they said about Saddam? That he was the worst of the worst, because he tortured people?
How does that look to the world? That we’re so afraid of Osama that we acted like Saddam?
Almost as horrific as a beheading. Jesus Christ, get real! Save a life and give them a bottle of talc and tell them to get over it.
Ask David Vitter: If it’s not your idea, then being put into a diaper is not all that sexy.
WHO is the REAL tyrant? A conniving douchebag who “acts” like he’s dumb (Google or youtube Dubya’s off the cuff, NON-telepromptor speak during his gubernatorial days, you’ll be surprised. He was MEANT to make you despise him. Capice?) and arrogantly wear his murderous ways on his sleeves? Or, a smoothtalker, oBUSHma, who makes torture seem affable?
GET OFF THE Hopium. oBUSHma is a Trojan Horse for the Wall St. NWO bankster. PERIOD. TWO BILLION from Wall St. in campaign donations does NOT make someone a “grassroots.” In what moronic universe does one have to live in to delude that a presidential “just came out of nowhere?”
APPROVING $24 TRILLION THEFT of American Citizenry’s wealth in less than 7months does NOT constitute a “people’s champion.”
When will my fellow liberals wake up? WHAT, just WHAT is it gonna take?
CHANGE you can believe in?
Or, a BETRAYAL you can see?
Half a day at a fabric store would have cracked the toughest of them.
just can’t tell you how proud this makes me … or how beloved worldwide …
once again, many are missing the forest for the trees. It’s not “prolonged diapering”, idiots - it’s the prolonged sensory deprivation that went along with it. It’s the ear muffs, the hoods, the shackles, the being strapped to this or that, all while wearing a diaper so that no one has to touch you for a long, long time.