Quantcast
 


Top Republican calls Puerto Rican civil rights group ‘extremist’


By Daniel Tencer

Published: July 3, 2009
Updated 4 months ago




For weeks opponents of Sonia Sotomayor’s nomination to the Supreme Court have been looking for an angle on which to base their criticism, and it appears they have found one.

Republicans on the Hill are zeroing in on Sotomayor’s involvement with what Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL), the ranking Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee, is calling an “extreme” Puerto Rican legal advocacy group.

From 1980 to 1992, Sotomayor sat on the board of governors of the Puerto Rican Legal Defense and Education Fund (PRLDEF), a group that, according to the New York Times, “pursued lawsuits over issues like affirmative action, bilingual education, and gerrymandering election districts to increase minority voting power.”

The Times writes:

Republicans would like to tie her to those cases, while the White House would like to distance her from them. But the extent to which she was in a position to influence the group’s court filings remains murky, prompting a dispute over whether more documents exist that should be turned over and how to interpret the ones already in the Senate’s hands.

On Wednesday, for example, after the group turned over 300 pages of material to the Senate, a spokesman for the ranking Republican on the Judiciary Committee, Senator Jeff Sessions of Alabama, said the material showed she had “deeper-than-previously thought involvement in developing the legal positions of the organization.”

Senate Republicans are evidently concerned about the PRLDEF’s role in opposing then-President Ronald Reagan’s nomination of Robert Bork to the Supreme Court in 1987. CNN reports that:

During [Sotomayor's] years on the PRLDEF board, the group opposed President Reagan’s 1987 nomination of the conservative Bork — then a federal appeals judge — “because of the threat he poses to the civil rights of the Latino community,” according to the documents.

The group’s attorneys prepared press releases and “worked on numerous efforts to build coalitions against the nominee,” according to the documents. Bork was ultimately rejected by the Senate.

Senator Jeff Sessions (R-AL), the ranking Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee, has argued that the revelations of Sotomayor’s involvement with PRLDEF are further proof that Sotomayor’s confirmation hearing, scheduled to begin July 12, should be delayed. Republicans on the Hill have been complaining that they have not had enough time to go through the documents related to Sotomayor’s nomination.

The Obama administration and Democrats on the Hill are wasting little time taking control of the latest controversy over Sotomayor, highlighting the fact that Sotomayor’s position on the board did not mean that she had any direct control over the PRLDEF’s legal actions or policy positions.

“Judge Sotomayor was never an employee of PRLDEF nor did she ever supervise the work of PRLDEF staff,” White House counsel Greg Craig wrote (PDF). “As a Board member, she served on several outside committees, including at times on the Litigation Committee. Throughout her service, staff attorneys, the General Counsel, and the President directed PRLDEF’s litigation, not the Board or the Litigation Committee.”

Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT) brushed off the accusations, saying that the Republican Senate minority would find something to object to “even if the president had nominated Moses.”





10 comments

  

 
Print This Post Printer Friendly  | 
 

Get breaking news alerts: Email/mobile
Email - No spam: