Quantcast
 


As Post fires liberal columnist, Bush war architect gets ink


By John Byrne

Published: June 19, 2009
Updated 5 months ago




On Thursday, the Washington Post confirmed it had fired liberal online columnist Dan Froomkin. On Friday, they gave a guest column to Bush war architect Paul Wolfowitz.

To be fair, Wolfowitz isn’t being paid, and his column is a guest editorial. But the paper’s promotion of a man who was a key architect of President George W. Bush’s policy on Iraq — and one of its most ardent hawks — is sure to raise eyebrows among the liberals and those critical of the Post’s coverage in the run-up to the Iraq war.

Wolfowitz’s column? How Obama needs to take a harder line on Iran. It’s titled, “No Comment is Not an Option.”

“Like the rest of the world, President Obama must have been surprised by the magnitude of the protests in Iran,” Wolfowitz writes. “Iranians are protesting not just election fraud but also the growing abuses of the Iranian people by a dictatorial regime. Now is not the time for the president to dig in to a neutral posture. It is time to change course.”

The former deputy secretary of defense under Donald Rumsfeld was dispatched to lead the World Bank in 2005. He departed under a cloud after it emerged he’d had a relationship with a highly paid member of the communications staff.

Dan Froomkin, meanwhile, was a paid freelance columnist for the Post who wrote critical columns about the Bush Administration — and, more lately, about Obama Administration policies that seemed to run counter to his progressive values. In a statement Thursday, he said he was “terribly disappointed” the Post had decided to end his column.

“I was told that it had been determined that my White House Watch blog wasn’t ‘working’ anymore,” he wrote. “But from what I could tell, it was still working very well. I also thought White House Watch was a great fit with The Washington Post brand, and what its readers reasonably expect from the Post online.”

Washington Post Media Communications Director Kris Coratti said the blog wasn’t a good use of Post resources.

“I think the easiest way to put it is that our editors and research teams are constantly reviewing our columns, blogs and other content to make sure we’re giving readers the most value when they are on our site while balancing the need to make the most of our resources,” Coratti said in a statement to Politico Thursday. “Unfortunately, this means that sometimes features must be eliminated, and this time it was the blog that Dan Froomkin freelanced for washingtonpost.com.”

The departure of his blog has raised eyebrows. Salon blogger Glenn Greenwald, also a progressive, said he was vexed because Froomkin was actually an Obama critic who stuck to his values rather than expressing blind fealty to the Democratic party.

“One of the rarest commodities in the establishment media is someone who was a vehement critic of George Bush and who now, applying their principles consistently, has become a regular critic of Barack Obama — i.e., someone who criticizes Obama from what is perceived as “the Left” rather than for being a Terrorist-Loving Socialist Muslim,” Greenwald wrote. “It just got a lot rarer.”

Wolfowitz has received harsh reviews since his departure from office. In The New Yorker, veteran investigative reporter Seymour Hersh revealed that the hawkish neoconservative was instrumental in setting up an intelligence office to bypass traditional US intelligence services in an effort to tie al Qaeda to Iraq.

“Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz believed that, while the established security services had a role, they were too bureaucratic and too traditional in their thinking,” Hersh wrote. “They set up what came to be known as the ‘cabal’, a cell of eight or nine analysts in a new Office of Special Plans (OSP) based in the U.S. Defense Department… created in order to find evidence of what Wolfowitz and his boss, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, believed to be true—that Saddam Hussein had close ties to Al Qaeda, and that Iraq had an enormous arsenal of chemical, biological, and possibly even nuclear weapons that threatened the region and, potentially, the United States.”

Wolfowitz also once famously called the 9/11 attacks on New York City and the Pentagon an “opportunity.”

“9/11 really was a wake up call and that if we take proper advantage of this opportunity to prevent the future terrorist use of weapons of mass destruction that it will have been an extremely valuable wake up call,” he said.

Froomkin said in his statement that his purpose was “pursuing accountability.”

“As I’ve written elsewhere, I think that the future success of our business depends on journalists enthusiastically pursuing accountability and calling it like they see it,” he said. “That’s what I tried to do every day. Now I guess I’ll have to try to do it someplace else.”





21 comments

  

 
Print This Post Printer Friendly  | 
 

Get breaking news alerts: Email/mobile
Email - No spam: